« Citation Typing Ontology | Main | What do people want from an author identifier? »

Introductory Signals

So while doing some background reading today I realized that legal citations already widely support a form of "citation typing" in the form of "Introductory Signals". The 10 introductory signals break down as follows...

In support of an argument:
   1) [no signal]. (NB that, apparently, this is increasingly deprecated.)
   2) accord;
   3) see;
   4) see also;
   5) cf.;

For Comparisons:
   6) compare ... with ...;

For contradiction:
   7) but see;
   8) but cf.;

For background:
   9) see generally;

And for examples:
   10) e.g.

Clever lawyers.

Comments

Cool that these are formalized in lawyers' citation styles! I spent a little time tracking down some references so I'll share them here:

http://www.law.suffolk.edu/library/research/Bluebook/signals.cfm

http://www.law.cornell.edu/citation/6-300.htm

The other question: has anybody done a citation or argumentation analysis on a legal corpus, relying on this data?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)