Interactive Logo Helps Researchers Decide which Scholarly Content to Trust. Elsevier Editor's Update, Issue 37, 30 October 2012.
The Secret Life of Retracted Articles, The Scholarly Kitchen Blog, August 10, 2012.
The persistence of error: a study of retracted articles on the Internet and in personal libraries Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2012 July; 100(3): 184–189.
On Your [Cross]Mark: New Update Identification System Launches. InterActivity The iFactory Blog. Friday, May 11th, 2012. Publishing. Tom Beyer.
Retractions of scientific papers-and the lack of retractions-draw international media attention. physicstoday, Science and the Media, May 4, 2012.
CrossMark: Keeping Readers Up to Date Editors' Bulletin. Volume 7, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 24-25. Available online: 23 Apr 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17521742.2011.622108
Seven days: 27 April–3 May 2012, Nature Seven Days. 485, 10–11 (03 May 2012) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/485010a
Has this research paper been updated? Click here to find out. Nature News Blog 27 Apr 2012 | 17:17 BST | Posted by Richard Van Noorden | Category: Lab life, Science communication
Science publishing: The paper is not sacred. Nature Comment. 480, 449–450, 22 December 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/480449a
Stop fetishizing the scientific paper: Our invited Comment in Nature. Retraction Watch, December 21, 2011.
CrossMark Version Identiﬁcation Service Nears Launch, PSP Bulletin, Volume 10, No. 4, Fall 2011.
CrossMark：文献の更新状況の確認手段, USACO News, No. 220, August 2011 (in Japanese).
Distinguishing published scholarly content with CrossMark. Learned Publishing, Volume 24, Number 2, April 2011 , pp. 87-93(7)1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20110202