Citation Amnesia: The Case of the Overlooked Research
The New Scientist's study of citation behavior reveals 85% of respondents feel under-citing scientific work is a significant problem. When asked if their own work had been ignored in citations, 72% said yes. The New Scientist's news blog entry didn't reveal how many of them feel that they themselves under-cite their colleagues work, but one imagines the practice goes both ways.
In an interview about the results, Geoffrey Bilder acknowledges the problem and suggests that simplifying citiation formats to include just basic metadata and an article identifier like the CrossRef DOI or even PubMed ID could make room for more comprehensive citation lists.
For more, see the complete article.
What does it mean to be "indexed?" Content from 27,000 journal titles, conference proceedings, and books are now available in the CrossCheck database. A CrossCheck user who submits a manuscript for duplicate detection will be comparing the submission to 20 million items from other scholarly publishers as well as to content from the open web.
Chuck Koscher, CrossRef's Director of Technology, begins his term as Chair of the National Information Standards Organization. Here's an exerpt from NISO's press release: 