« March 2011 | Main | May 2011 »

April 26, 2011

Catch CrossRef Staff at Upcoming Spring Meetings

This snuck up on us, but CrossRef's Director of Technology Chuck Koscher is at the annual spring meeting of the International Association of Science, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) in Washington DC even as we speak.

I'll be heading down to Baltimore for the Council of Science Editors Meeting in Baltimore later this week.

Director of Strategic Initiatives Geoffrey Bilder will be speaking at the Medical Libraries Association (MLA) annual meeting in Minneapolis in mid May. Executive Director Ed Pentz heads down to Florianopolis, Brazil for a seminar on CrossRef DOIs at the end of the month.

Further on the horizon, many CrossRef staff members will be attending the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) meeting in June where Geoffrey Bilder and I will be speaking. I'll be heading back to Baltimore to the American Association of University Presses (AAUP) meeting immediately thereafter.

We're also happy to be presenting at the Library Science Symposium of the AAAS Pacific Division annual meeting in San Diego in mid June, and at the Cambridge, Massachusetts Editorial Managers User Group (EMUG) meeting in June to talk about our CrossMark and CrossCheck projects.

Please send an email to info@crossref.org if you'd like to schedule a time to talk.

Whew! Happy spring travel season.

April 20, 2011

CrossRef and International DOI Foundation Collaborate on Linked-Data-Friendly DOIs

20 April 2011, Lynnfield, MA USA-CrossRef and the International DOI Foundation (IDF) have announced that all 46 million CrossRef Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are now enabled for use in linked data applications, effective immediately.

The term "linked data" describes a set of best practices for exposing data in machine-readable form using the standard HTTP web protocol. These best practices support the development of tools to link and make use of data from multiple web sources without the need to deal with many different proprietary and incompatible application programming interfaces (APIs).

"We are delighted with this collaboration," says Geoffrey Bilder, Director of Strategic Initiatives at CrossRef. "By making sure that CrossRef DOIs can be used according to linked data principles, we hope to encourage linked data applications to make use of CrossRef DOIs as the basis for standard, persistent citations to the content our members publish on the web. We look forward to other DOI Registration Agencies (RAs) enabling similar functionality so that their members' content also be persistently linked to by linked data tools."

Norman Paskin of the IDF commented, "We feel that a significant advantage of applying Linked Data principles and technologies to DOI-registered material is that it is 'data worth linking to': it is curated, value-added, data, which is managed, corrected, updated and consistently maintained by Registration Agencies. It is also persistent, so avoiding 'bit-rot'. This significant announcement by CrossRef is part of improvements the International DOI Foundation is continuing to make to facilitate more sophisticated uses of a DOI."

How It Works
The Corporation for National Research Initiatives (CNRI), the IDF, and CrossRef have enabled the DOI web proxy (which is located at http://dx.doi.org) to support content negotiation for DOIs. In the early days of the web, human beings were following most URLs, and it made sense that the DOI web proxy only resolved CrossRef DOIs to human-readable web pages. Now, however, a program is just as likely to follow a URL as a person is. The program may have to scrape the HTML landing page that was designed for humans for data that it needs. This aproach is suboptimal and error-prone. The solution for this problem until now has been that CrossRef and other RAs have provided a variety of APIs that allow programs to query for DOIs and receive machine-readable content in return. Some examples of these APIs include OpenURL and piped queries.

The problem with these APIs is that they require programmers to familiarize themselves with sometimes extensive API documentation that varies from one data provider to the next. This approach is not scalable when dealing with many sources of information. Content negotiation helps because it is a standard part of the HTTP protocol that underlies the web. A program can now resolve a DOI through the standard web proxy and specify that the data should be returned in a machine-readable format, and the programmer can use the same methods they use for querying for data on any linked-data-enabled site.

Current users will notice no difference in the behavior of the DOI resolver system unless they explicitly start using content negotiation, thus ensuring backwards compatibility.

An important feature of the implementation is that either the RA responsible for the DOI or the organization to whom the content identified by the DOI belongs can respond to any content negotiation request. Initially, programs requesting machine-readable data from CrossRef DOIs using content negotiation will receive the metadata that the CrossRef member publisher has registered at CrossRef. As publishers start to implement content negotiation on their own sites, they may want to return richer and more complete representations of their content, at which point CrossRef can direct content-negotiated requests directly to the publishers' sites.

For further detail and examples please visit
http://www.crossref.org/CrossTech/2011/04/content_negotiation_for_crossr.html
About CrossRef
CrossRef (http://www.crossref.org) is a not-for-profit membership association of publishers. Since its founding in 1999, CrossRef has provided reference linking services for more than 46 million content items, including journal articles, conference proceedings, books, book chapters, reference entries, technical reports, standards, and data sets. CrossRef's goal is to be a trusted collaborative organization with broad community connections; authoritative and innovative in support of a persistant, sustainable infrastructure for scholarly communication.

CONTACT: Carol Anne Meyer, info@crossref.org, +1 781-295-0072 x23, Fax: +1 781-295-0077, www.crossref.org, twitter: @CrossRefNews

April 14, 2011

The discussion on retractions and corrections heats up

Phil Davis, over at the Scholarly Kitchen, has people thinking about retractions. His blog post "When Bad Science Persists on the Internet" focuses on just one aspect that CrossRef's upcoming CrossMark service is meant to help with: the dire case when an article must be retracted.

As I noted in the Learned Publishing article that started Phil thinking about this, retractions are the most extreme form of corrections and updates that CrossMark is designed to help with.

And Geoff Bilder, the brains behind CrossMark, notes that CrossMark has other interesting applications. BioMed Central has reported on some early experiments in using CrossMark to thread related content together.

Coincidentally, the Journal of Medical Ethics just published an analysis of the growth and causes of retractions in the biomedical literature by Liz Wager from the Committee on Publication Ethics, which shows that retractions are up about tenfold from the 80s to the period from 2006-2009.

Another source for keeping an eye on retractions is watchdog blog Retraction Watch.

So what's the deal with CrossMark now? We are currently in a pilot phase with a few publishers who will be adding CrossMark logos and status information to a few test journals. We are recruiting additional CrossRef members to participate in the next phase of the pilot. If you are interested in participating, please contact us at info@crossref.org. We will plan a webinar soon to provide a demo of the service. I'll also be describing CrossMark at the Society for Scholarly Publishing's (SSP) Annual Meeting and the AAAS Pacific Meeting LIbrary Science Symposium, both in June.

To make sure you are in the loop as CrossMark develops, make sure to sign up for our mailing list

April 11, 2011

CrossRef Indicators

Updated April 11, 2011

Total no. participating publishers & societies 3403
% of non-profit publishers 57%
Total no. participating libraries 1,703
No. journals covered 24,116
No. DOIs registered to date 46,254,389
No. DOIs deposited in previous month 385,375
No. DOIs retrieved (matched references) in previous month 18,914,426
DOI resolutions (end-user clicks) in previous month n/a

New CrossRef Members

Updated April 11, 2011

Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina
American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM)
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Associated Professional Sleep Societies (APSS)
Institut d'Educacio Fisica de Catalunya (INEFC)
Institute for Social Research Zagreb
Medical Faculty, University in Nis
The Oceanography Society
University Nove de Julho
University of Illinois Press

Last updated April 04, 2011

American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance
Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zagreb
Journal of Orofacial and Health Sciences
Nottingham University Press
Peeramed
Proteomass
Southern Med Review
University of Oslo Library

April 8, 2011

CrossMark and UKSG Transfer Project in the news

Carol Meyer discusses CrossMark in a recently published Learned Publishing article (http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20110202 and Ed Pentz's article in the February 2011 issue of Against the Grain reflects on the UKSG Transfer Project.

April 4, 2011

CrossRef Indicators

Updated April 04, 2011

Total no. participating publishers & societies 3390
% of non-profit publishers 57%
Total no. participating libraries 1,697
No. journals covered 23,971
No. DOIs registered to date 46,087,800
No. DOIs deposited in previous month 385,375
No. DOIs retrieved (matched references) in previous month 18,914,426
DOI resolutions (end-user clicks) in previous month n/a

New CrossRef Members

Updated April 04, 2011

American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance
Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zagreb
Journal of Orofacial and Health Sciences
Nottingham University Press
Peeramed
Proteomass
Southern Med Review
University of Oslo Library

Last update March 28, 2011

Aboriginal Policy Studies
Insciences Organization
Maralte, B.V.
Polish Society for Magnesium Research
Revista ACTA Geografica