Abstract
We determined feeding rates of the hydromedusan Nemopsis bachei L. Agassiz in the mesohaline region of Chesapeake Bay, USA during the spring of 1989 and 1990 from gut contents, digestion rates and abundances of medusae and zooplankton. The medusae consumed primarily copepodites of Acartia tonsa, selecting against naupliar stages. The peak abundance of N. bachei medusae was in April to May, when densities averaged more than 10 m-3. Medusa densities were similar in both years, but were greatest (maximum of 132 medusae m-3) along a southern transect sampled only in 1990. At peak densities, N. bachei medusae consumed 30% d-1 of the copepodite standing stocks, but they consumed <1% d-1 at the lower densities typical of late May or early June. The predation effects were generally greater than those reported for other hydromedusan species. But even at peak predation, N. bachei medusae could not have controlled or reduced A. tonsa copepod populations, which had a production rate of 85% d-1 at that time. Medusa feeding rates were highest at nighttime, and were correlated with prey density in the field, but not in the laboratory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Baird, D., Ulanowicz, R. E. (1989). The seasonal dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 59: 329–364
Berggreen, U., Hansen, B., Kiorboe, T. (1988). Food size spectra, ingestion and growth of the copepod Acartia tonsa during development: implications for determination of copepod production. Mar. Biol. 99: 341–352
Burke, W. D. (1975). Pelagic Cnidaria of Mississippi Sound and adjacent waters. Gulf Res. Rep. 5: 23–38
Calder, D. R. (1971). Hydroids and hydromedusae of southern Chesapeake Bay. Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) Special Papers in Marine Science 1: 1–125
Cargo, D. G., King, D. R. (1990). Prediction of the abundance of the sea nettle Chrysaora quinquecirrha in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 13: 486–491
Clifford, H. C., Cargo, D. G. (1978). Feeding rates of the sea nettle, Chrysaora quinquecirrha, under laboratory conditions. Estuaries 1: 58–61
Daan, R. (1986). Food intake and growth of Sarsia tubulosa (Sars, 1835), with quantitative estimates of predation on copepod populations. Neth. J. Sea Res. 20: 67–74
Daan, R. (1989). Factors controlling the summer development of copepod populations in the Southern Bight of the North Sea. Neth. J. Sea Res. 23: 305–322
Feigenbaum, D., Kelly, M. (1984). Changes in the lower Chesapeake Bay food chain in presence of the sea nettle Chrysaora quinquecirrha (Scyphomedusa). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 19: 39–47
Fulton III, R. S., Wear, R. G. (1985). Predatory feeding of the hydromedusae Obelia geniculata and Phialella quadrata. Mar. Biol. 87: 47–54
Heinle, D. R. (1966). Production of a calanoid copepod, Acartia tonsa in the Patuxent River Estuary. Chesapeake Sci. 7: 59–74
Larson, R. J. (1987). Daily ration and predation by medusae and ctenophores in Saanich Inlet, B.C., Canada. Neth. J. Sea Res. 21: 35–44
Matsakis, S., Conover, R. J. (1991). Abundance and feeding of medusae and their potential impact as predators on other zooplankton in Bedford Basin (Nova Scotia, Canada) during spring. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sciences 48: 1419–1430
Matsakis, S., Nival, P. (1989). Elemental composition and food intake of Phialidium hydromedusae in the laboratory. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 130: 277–290
Moore, D. R. (1962). The occurrence and distribution of Nemopsis bachei Agassiz (Hydrozoa) in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb. 12: 399–402
Olson, M. M. (1987). Zooplankton. In: K. L. Heck, Jr. (ed.) Ecological studies in the middle reach of Chesapeake Bay. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 38–81
Pearre, Jr., S. (1982). Estimating prey preference by predators: use of various indices, and the proposal of another based on 311-1. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sciences 39: 914–923
Phillips, P. J., Burke, W. D., Keener, E. J. (1969). Observations on the trophic significance of jellyfishes in Mississippi Sound with quantitative data on the associative behavior of small fishes with medusae. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 98: 703–712
Purcell, J. E. (1982). Feeding and growth of the siphonophore Muggiaea atlantica (Cunningham 1893). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 62: 39–54
Purcell, J. E., Kremer, P. (1983). Feeding and metabolism of the siphonophore Sphaeronectes gracilis. J. Plankton Res. 5: 95–106
Purcell, J. E., Roman, M. R., White, J. R. (1988). Effects of ctenophore and scyphomedusa predation on herbivores in Chesapeake Bay. EOS Trans. Am. geophys. Un. 69: 1096
Reeve, M. R., Walter, M. A., Ikeda, T. (1978). Laboratory studies of ingestion and food utilization in lobate and tentaculate ctenophores. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 740–751
Roman, M. R., White, J. R., Gauzens, A. L. (1988). Temporal and spatial variations in zooplankton of the mesohaline portion of Chesapeake Bay. Chesapeake Research Consortium Publ. 129: 91
Stearns, D. E. (1986). Copepod grazing behavior in simulated natural light and its relation to nocturnal feeding. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 30: 65–76
Sullivan, B. K., Reeve, M. R. (1982). Comparison of estimates of the predatory impact of ctenophores by two independent techniques. Mar. Biol. 68: 61–65
White, J. R. (1991). Seasonal study of zooplankton dynamics in the mesohaline Chesapeake Bay. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
White, J. R., Roman, M. R. (1988). Grazing and egg production by Chesapeake Bay zooplankton in spring and summer. Chesapeake Research Consortium Publ. 129: 78
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by J. Grassle, New Brunswick
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Purcell, J.E., Nemazie, D.A. Quantitative feeding ecology of the hydromedusan Nemopsis bachei in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Biology 113, 305–311 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347285
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347285