Rationale: Virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) guidance to peripheral pulmonary lesions is often limited by insufficient segmentation of the peripheral airways. Objectives: To test the effect of applying positive airway pressure (PAP) during CT acquisition to improve segmentation, particularly at end-expiration. Methods: CT acquisitions in inspiration and expiration with 4 PAP protocols were recorded prospectively and compared to baseline inspiratory acquisitions in 20 patients. The 4 protocols explored differences between devices (flow vs. turbine), exposures (within seconds vs. 15-min) and pressure levels (10 vs. 14 cmH2O). Segmentation quality was evaluated with the number of airways and number of endpoints reached. A generalized mixed-effects model explored the estimated effect of each protocol. Measurements and Main Results: Patient characteristics and lung function did not significantly differ between protocols. Compared to baseline inspiratory acquisitions, expiratory acquisitions after 15 min of 14 cmH2O PAP segmented 1.63-fold more airways (95% CI 1.07–2.48; p = 0.018) and reached 1.34-fold more endpoints (95% CI 1.08–1.66; p = 0.004). Inspiratory acquisitions performed immediately under 10 cmH2O PAP reached 1.20-fold (95% CI 1.09–1.33; p < 0.001) more endpoints; after 15 min the increase was 1.14-fold (95% CI 1.05–1.24; p < 0.001). Conclusions: CT acquisitions with PAP segment more airways and reach more endpoints than baseline inspiratory acquisitions. The improvement is particularly evident at end-expiration after 15 min of 14 cmH2O PAP. Further studies must confirm that the improvement increases diagnostic yield when using VBN to evaluate peripheral pulmonary lesions.

1.
Leiten EO, Martinsen EM, Bakke PS, Eagan TML, Grønseth R: Complications and discomfort of bronchoscopy: a systematic review. Eur Clin Respir J 2016: 3: 33324.
2.
Heerink WJ, de Bock GH, de Jonge GJ, Groen HJM, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M: Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2017: 27: 138–148.
3.
Baaklini WA, Reinoso MA, Gorin AB, Sharafkaneh A, Manian P: Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 2000; 117: 1049–1054.
4.
Wang Memoli JS, Nietert PJ, Silvestri GA: Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule. Chest 2012: 142: 385–393.
5.
Eberhardt R, Kahn N, Gompelmann D, Schumann M, Heussel CP, Herth FJ: Lungpoint-a new approach to peripheral lesions. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5: 1559–1563.
6.
Diez-Ferrer M, Cubero N, López-Lisbona R, Minchole E, Dorca J, Rosell A: Relation between the bronchus sign and segmented airways in virtual bronchoscopic navigation. Impact on bronchoscopic diagnostic yield: 4th European Congress for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (ECBIP). Belgrade, Serbia, 2017.
7.
van ‘t Westeinde SC, Horeweg N, Vernhout RM, Groen HJ, Lammers JW, Weenink C, Nackaerts K, Oudkerk M, Mali W, Thunnissen FB, de Koning HJ, van Klaveren RJ: The role of conventional bronchoscopy in the workup of suspicious ct scan screen-detected pulmonary nodules. Chest 2012; 142: 377–384.
8.
Pu J, Gu S, Liu S, Zhu S, Wilson D, Siegfried JM, Gur D: Ct based computerized identification and analysis of human airways: a review. Med Phys 2012; 39: 2603–2616.
9.
Bankier AA, O’Donnell CR, Boiselle PM: Quality initiatives respiratory instructions for Ct examinations of the lungs: a hands-on guide. Radiographics 2008; 28: 919–931.
10.
Diez-Ferrer M, Gil D, Carreño E, Padrones S, Aso S, Vicens V, Noelia C, Lopez Lisbona R, Sanchez C, Borras A, Rosell A: Positive airway pressure-enhanced Ct to improve virtual bronchoscopic navigation. Chest 2016; 150: 1003A–1003A.
11.
R core team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2017.
12.
Vieira SR, Puybasset L, Richecoeur J, Lu QIN, Cluzel P, Gusman PB, Coriat P, Rouby JJ: A lung computed tomographic assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure – induced lung overdistension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1571–1577.
13.
Holanda MA, Fortaleza SC, Alves-de-Almeida M, Winkeler GF, Reis RC, Felix JH, Lima JW, Pereira ED: Continuous positive airway pressure effects on regional lung aeration in patients with copd: a high-resolution ct scan study. Chest 2010; 138: 305–314.
14.
Gattinoni L, Mascheroni D, Torresin A, Marcolin R, Fumagalli R, Vesconi S, Rossi GP, Rossi F, Baglioni S, Bassi F, Nastri G, Pesenti A: Morphological response to positive end expiratory pressure in acute respiratory failure. Computerized tomography study. Intensive Care Med 1986; 12: 137–142.
15.
Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Avalli L, Rossi F, Bombino M: Pressure-volume curve of total respiratory system in acute respiratory failure: computed tomographic scan study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136: 730–736.
16.
Vieira SR, Puybasset L, Lu Q, Richecoeur J, Cluzel P, Coriat P, Rouby JJ: A scanographic assessment of pulmonary morphology in acute lung injury. Significance of the lower inflection point detected on the lung pressure-volume curve. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 1612–1623.
17.
Gattinoni L, D’Andrea L, Pelosi P, Vitale G, Pesenti A, Fumagalli R: Regional effects and mechanism of positive end-expiratory pressure in early adult respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 1993; 269: 2122–2127.
18.
Gattinoni L, Pelosi P, Crotti S, Valenza F: Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on regional distribution of tidal volume and recruitment in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151: 1807–1814.
19.
Dambrosio M, Roupie E, Mollet JJ, Anglade MC, Vasile N, Lemaire F, Brochard L: Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and different tidal volumes on alveolar recruitment and hyperinflation. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 495–503.
20.
Puybasset L, Cluzel P, Chao N, Slutsky AS, Coriat P, Rouby JJ: A computed tomography scan assessment of regional lung volume in acute lung injury. The CT scan ards study group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1644–1655.
21.
Malbouisson L, Muller JC, Constantin J-M, Lu QI, Puybasset L, Rouby JJ: Computed tomography assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced alveolar recruitment in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163: 1444–1450.
22.
Lo P, van Ginneken B, Reinhardt JM, Yavarna T, de Jong PA, Irving B, Fetita C, Ortner M, Pinho R, Sijbers J, Feuerstein M, Fabijanska A, Bauer C, Beichel R, Mendoza CS, Wiemker R, Lee J, Reeves AP, Born S, Weinheimer O, van Rikxoort EM, Tschirren J, Mori K, Odry B, Naidich DP, Hartmann I, Hoffman EA, Prokop M, Pedersen JH, de Bruijne M: Extraction of airways from Ct (exact’09). IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012; 31: 2093–2107.
23.
Haralick RM, Shapiro LG: Computer and robot vision. Boston, MA, USA, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1991, vol. 1, p 608.
24.
Layon J, Banner MJ, Jaeger MJ, Peterson CV, Gallagher TJ, Modell JH: Continuous positive airway pressure and expiratory positive airway pressure increase functional residual capacity equivalently. Chest 1986; 89: 517–521.
25.
Duncan AW, Oh TE, Hillman DR: Peep and CPAP. Anaesth Intensive Care 1986; 14: 236–250.
26.
Chiumello D, Coppola S, Froio S, Mietto C, Brazzi L, Carlesso E, Gattinoni L: Time to reach a new steady state after changes of positive end expiratory pressure. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 1377–1385.
27.
O’Donoghue FJ, Catcheside PG, Jordan AS, Bersten AD, McEvoy RD: Effect of CPAP on intrinsic PEEP, inspiratory effort, and lung volume in severe stable COPD. Thorax 2002; 57: 533–539.
28.
De Troyer A, Wilson TA: Effect of acute inflation on the mechanics of the inspiratory muscles. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2009; 107: 315–323.
29.
Rosenblum LJ, Mauceri RA, Wellenstein DE, Thomas FD, Bassano DA, Raasch BN, Chamberlain CC, Heitzman ER: Density patterns in the normal lung as determined by computed tomography. Radiology 1980; 137: 409–416.
30.
Stoel BC, Putter H, Bakker ME, Dirksen A, Stockley RA, Piitulainen E, Russi EW, Parr D, Shaker SB, Reiber JHC, Stolk J: Volume correction in computed tomography densitometry for follow-up studies on pulmonary emphysema. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5: 919–924.
31.
Herth FJF, Kirby M, Sieren J, Herth J, Schirm J, Wood S, Schuhmann M: The modern art of reading computed tomography images of the lungs: quantitative CT. Respiration 2018; 95: 8–17.
32.
Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA: The ASA’s statement on p values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat 2016; 70: 129–133.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.