Skip to main content

When Is a Confidence Measure Good Enough?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Computer Vision Systems (ICVS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7963))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Confidence estimation has recently become a hot topic in image processing and computer vision. Yet, several definitions exist of the term ”confidence” which are sometimes used interchangeably. This is a position paper, in which we aim to give an overview on existing definitions, thereby clarifying the meaning of the used terms to facilitate further research in this field. Based on these clarifications, we develop a theory to compare confidence measures with respect to their quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, S., Scharstein, D., Lewis, J.P., et al.: A database and evaluation methodology for optical flow. IJCV 92(1), 1–31 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barron, J.L., Fleet, D.J., Beauchemin, S.: Performance of optical flow techniques. IJCV 12(1), 43–77 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bainbridge-Smith, R.G., Lane, A.: Measuring confidence in optical flow estimation. IET Electronics Letters 32(10), 882–884 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kondermann, D., et al.: On performance analysis of optical flow algorithms. In: Dellaert, F., Frahm, J.-M., Pollefeys, M., Leal-Taixé, L., Rosenhahn, B. (eds.) Real-World Scene Analysis 2011. LNCS, vol. 7474, pp. 329–355. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Uras, S., Girosi, F., Verri, A., Torre, V.: A computational approach to motion perception. Biol. Cybern. 60, 79–97 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh, A.: An estimation-theoretic framework for image-flow computation. In: ICCV, pp. 168–177 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kondermann, C., Kondermann, D., Garbe, C.S.: Postprocessing of optical flows via surface measures and motion inpainting. In: Rigoll, G. (ed.) DAGM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5096, pp. 355–364. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Simoncelli, E., Adelson, E., Heeger, D.: Probability distributions of optical flow. In: CVPR, pp. 310–315 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lucas, B., Kanade, T.: An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In: DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, pp. 121–130 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bruhn, A., Weickert, J.: A confidence measure for variational optic flow methods. In: GPID, pp. 283–298 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Márquez-Valle, P., Gil, D., Hernández-Sabaté, A.: A complete confidence framework for optical flow. In: ECCV Workshops, pp. 124–133 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kondermann, C., Mester, R., Garbe, C.S.: A statistical confidence measure for optical flows. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P., Zisserman, A. (eds.) ECCV 2008, Part III. LNCS, vol. 5304, pp. 290–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kybic, J., Nieuwenhuis, C.: Bootstrap optical flow confidence and uncertainty measure. In: CVIU, pp. 1449–1462 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mac Aodha, O., Humayun, A., Pollefeys, M., Brostow, G.J.: Learning a confidence measure for optical flow. IEEE PAMI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Evans, L.C.: Partial Differential Equations. American Mathematical Society (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horn, B., Schunck, B.: Determining optical flow. AI 17, 185–203 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Burden, R., Douglas Faires, J.: Numerical Analysis. Thompson (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shi, J., Tomasi, C.: Good features to track. In: CVPR, pp. 593–600 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Butler, D.J., Wulff, J., Stanley, G.B., Black, M.J.: A naturalistic open source movie for optical flow evaluation. In: Fitzgibbon, A., Lazebnik, S., Perona, P., Sato, Y., Schmid, C. (eds.) ECCV 2012, Part VI. LNCS, vol. 7577, pp. 611–625. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, C.: Beyond pixels: exploring new representations and applications for motion analysis. Ph.D. thesis (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Márquez-Valle, P., Gil, D., Hernàndez-Sabaté, A., Kondermann, D. (2013). When Is a Confidence Measure Good Enough?. In: Chen, M., Leibe, B., Neumann, B. (eds) Computer Vision Systems. ICVS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7963. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39402-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39402-7_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39401-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39402-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics