Powder neutron-diffraction profile analysis of zero-dimensional H-bonded crystal HCrO2

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(99)00189-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Powder neutron-diffraction profile analysis of α-HCrO2 has been done at five temperatures, 295, 210, 140, 70 and 10 K, to confirm the space group and the hydrogen-bond distance. The data were analyzed for three models: (1) space group R3̄m with off-centered disordered hydrogen; (2) R3̄m with centered hydrogen; and (3) R3m. The space group R3̄m with off-centered disordered hydrogen gave the most reasonable results in the range of 70–295 K, consistent with earlier results. The hydrogen bond distance 2.471(3) Å at 295 K agrees with one of the earlier studies. The space group at 10 K is less conclusive.

Introduction

α-HCrO2 and α-HCoO2 are isomorphous, with trigonal symmetry and NaHF2 structure (Fig. 1). These are extremely simple systems with only one HMO2 and hydrogen bond in the asymmetric unit [1]. This greatly simplifies the interpretation of spectroscopic data. HCrO2 has attracted much interest spectroscopically because of the anomalous deuteration effect on the vibrational spectra. An infrared study of HCrO2 and DCrO2 [2] revealed some unexpected effects: (1) whereas the O–H stretching band occurs at 1640 cm−1, the O–D stretching band appears at 1750 cm−1 (ν(O–H)/ν(O–D)=0.94); (2) the O–H stretching band occurs as a singlet, but the O–D band as a doublet; (3) the frequency ratio of the OHO bending mode to the ODO bending mode at room temperature is 1.441, larger than other hydrogen-bonded systems; and (4) there are two bands in the lattice mode region in HCrO2, but six bands in DCrO2. These differences were ascribed to a difference in the potential energy curve between O–H–O and O–D–O bonds. On the basis of the potential with Ax2+Bx4 type, Snyder and Ibers [2] concluded that the potential energy curve of the O–H–O bond is of an effectively single-minimum type and that of the O–D–O bond is of double-minimum type. The infrared spectra were also analyzed using a model potential consisting of two back-to-back Morse function and the well parameters were determined [3], [4]. Extensive infrared and inelastic neutron scattering measurements of these systems have been made [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. The system HCoO2–DCoO2 behaves in a completely analogous manner [11].

Hamilton and Ibers [1], [12] analyzed the structure of HCrO2 and DCrO2 by neutron powder diffraction and the results were compatible with the interpretation of the infrared spectra. They drew the conclusion that (1) both HCrO2 and DCrO2 have the common space group of R3̄m and that the deuterium atoms are off-centered and disordered in DCrO2, but no conclusion could be reached concerning centering or off-centering of hydrogen atoms in HCrO2, (2) the O–D–O bond distance (2.55(2) Å) is 0.06 Å longer than the O–H–O bond distance (2.49(2) Å). More recently Christensen et al. [13] did neutron powder profile refinement of both HCrO2 and DCrO2 and concluded: (1) that the space group of HCrO2 is R3̄m, consistent with Hamilton and Ibers, and with the hydrogen atoms off-centered and disordered, but that the space group of DCrO2 is R3m and deuterium atoms are off-centered and ordered; (2) that the expansion of the O⋯O distance is 0.10 Å with an O–H–O bond distance of 2.47(1) Å and an O–D–O bond distance of 2.57(2) Å.

As described in the textbook of Hamilton and Ibers [1], the questions of interest in the HCrO2 and DCrO2 systems are

  • 1.

    The type of potential curve: Is O–H–O (O–D–O) bond of single-minimum or double-minimum type?

  • 2.

    An extraordinarily large expansion of the hydrogen bond on deuteration (geometric isotope effect [14]): Is this true and, if so, how can it be explained?

If the reported isotope effect is really true, the question is: why are HCrO2 and HCoO2 so exceptional? We notice some characteristic structural features in these systems. Firstly, the hydrogen-bond unit OHO along the c-axis is located in a layer perpendicular to the c-axis and sandwiched by a Cr atom layer. In H-bonded crystals the observed expansion of the O⋯O distance is in general a result of a compromise with other effects in the environment surrounding the OHO system (like cation coordination polyhedra). The geometric isotope effect is thus smeared out or suppressed due to such a situation in the crystals. The separated layer structure of the HCrO2 system seems to allow the hydrogen bond to expand without competing with other factors. Secondly, considering the hydrogen-bond network, the HCrO2 system is one of the simplest compounds with 0-dimensional hydrogen-bond network (isolated H-bond system) [15], [16], [17]. Thus we may say that HCrO2 is a “ultimate” 0-D system.

The magnitude of the geometric isotope effect in the HCrO2 system is, therefore, in the range of 0.06(3)–0.10(2) Å, depending on the combination of the space group and the literature data adopted [12], [13]. This would mean that the geometric isotope effect is 2–3 times larger than the largest geometric isotope effect observed in other H-bonded systems [14], [18]. However, judging from the combined standard deviations, it seems difficult to draw a definite conclusion. In view of these interesting questions, we have started a systematic study on the HCrO2 and DCrO2 systems. In this article the results of neutron powder-diffraction of HCrO2 is reported.

Section snippets

Experimental

Green-grey powder of HCrO2 was prepared from reagent material (Cica) of Cr(OH)3·nH2O by adding 0.5 N NaOH and application of hydrothermal synthesis technique (360°C, 44 MPa, 10 days). The synthesized powder was dried at 100°C after washing with distilled water. Diffraction data were taken on the neutron powder diffractometer at the Studsvik Neutron Research Laboratory, Sweden. The diffractometer is equipped with a bank of 35 detectors and an Air Products closed-cycle helium refrigerator system. A

Results and discussion

All the data were analyzed for three different models, namely (1) space group R3̄m with off-centered, disordered hydrogen atoms, (2) space group R3̄m with centered hydrogens and (3) space group R3m with off-centered, ordered hydrogens. Comparison between the three models are given for the 295 and 10 K data in Table 1. Observed, calculated and difference diffraction patterns of HCrO2 at 295 and 10 K are shown in Fig. 2 for the R3̄m model with off-centered, disordered hydrogen atoms. As far as the

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Håkan Rundlöf for skilful assistance in the data collection of the neutron diffraction data.

References (22)

  • A.S. Gilbert et al.

    Spectrochim. Acta

    (1976)
  • A.N. Christensen et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (1977)
  • M. Ichikawa et al.

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (1994)
  • M. Ichikawa et al.

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (1996)
  • J. Rodriguez-Carvajal

    Physica B

    (1993)
  • M. Ichikawa

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1981)
  • W.C. Hamilton et al.

    Hydrogen bonding in solids

  • R.G. Snyder et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1962)
  • M.C. Lawrence et al.

    Ferroelectrics

    (1980)
  • M.C. Lawrence et al.

    Mol. Phys.

    (1981)
  • J.J. Rush et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1966)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Binding and transport of Cr(III) by clay minerals during the Great Oxidation Event

      2022, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Cr-Cr path (path 2-2 in Table 1, Fig. 2B&C) at 2.79-2.97 Å, with a coordination number of approximately 1, corresponds to a bidentate mononuclear complex (edge sharing between Cr-octahedra). Such edge sharing of Cr octahedra has been observed in Cr(III) precipitates (Table S1, see references in Supplementary Material) and represents a typical structure for bonding individual Cr-octahedra within a larger structure consisting of chained Cr-octahedra (Ichikawa et al., 1999). The Cr-Al path (path 2-1 in Table 1, Fig. 2B&C), with an interatomic distance of 2.81-2.85 Å for all the three clay minerals, indicates Cr-octahedra edge-sharing with Al-octahedra on the surfaces of clay minerals.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text