Permian-Triassic Tethyan realm reorganization: Implications for the outward Pangea margin
Introduction
From Early Permian to Late Triassic, the Earth surface recorded drastic modifications including: (1) final amalgamation of the Pangean supercontinent, (2) Tethyan realm reorganization marked by the subduction of the Paleotethys ridge under the Laurussia and Asian margins (310-280 Ma), the onset of the Neotethys opening at 280-260 Ma (Stampfli and Borel, 2002), and the northward drifting of Cimmerian blocks synchronous with the subduction of the Paleotethys until ∼225 Ma (Pullen et al., 2008), (3) mantle activity expressed by the outpouring of Large Igneous Provinces (LPs) (Golonka and Bocharova, 2000), and (4) early rifting of Pangea coeval with the Cantabrian orogen in western Europe (Gutiérrez-Alonso et al., 2008) (Fig. 1).
Based on compilation of worldwide geological data, Gutiérrez-Alonso et al. (2008) proposed that between 310 and 280 Ma, the subduction of the Paleotethys mid-ocean ridge under Laurussia triggered a redistribution of the stress-strain regime throughout the Pangea supercontinent during rigid-body rotation. This plate-scale model, based on the Paleotethys slab pull, accounts for the widespread radial rifting systems recorded all around the core of the Cantabrian orogen in Early Permian times (including the Neothethys, Madagascar, Oslo, North Sea and Siberian rifts). Following this event, the Neotethys opened at ca. 280-260 Ma and inner Pangean deformation and magmatism abruptly ended.
Here, we explore the evolution of the outward Pangea margin facing the Panthalassa subduction. For this, we use a compilation of available geochronological, geochemical, geological and paleogeographic data along the outward Pangean margin, from Laurussia to eastern Gondwana. Along this outward Pangean margin. We distinguish three main segments on the basis of their self-consistent evolution: western Laurentia, western Gondwana and eastern Gondwana (Fig. 1). These segments show synchronous but distinct changes in their magmatic and tectonic setting at 280–265, 265–230 and 230-220 Ma. These changes coincide with subduction of the Paleotethys ridge, opening of the Neotethys ocean and closure of the Paleotethys ocean, respectively, and with overall changes in apparent pole wandering path of Pangea. As no other investigated model can explain such plate-scale and synchronous events, we hypothesize that the Permian-Triassic counterclockwise rotation of Pangea shown by paleomagnetic and paleoenvironment studies (Marcano et al., 1999, Golonka, 2007, Torsvik et al., 2012), likely caused by opening of the Neotethys, triggered the major changes in tectonic and magmatic setting recorded all along the margin. Considering the position of the studied segments with respect to the position of the Permian-Triassic Euler pole of rotation of Pangea, the conceptual model presented here fairly explains the observed tectono-magmatic changes along the whole outward Pangea margin, i.e. on more than 30 000 km long.
Section snippets
Permian Triassic evolution of the outward Pangea margin
We compiled the salient available data of the Late Paleozoic to early Mesozoic evolution of the Panthalassa margin from northwestern Canada to east Australia (Fig. 2 and supplementary data). We describe this large-scale geodynamic system by studying the main three representative segments of the margin: western Laurentia, western Gondwana and eastern Gondwana. We do not integrate the evolution of north Laurussia as very few data are available. The Permian-Triassic evolution of the Asian
Main Permian-Triassic geodynamic events along the outward Pangea margin
From Late Paleozoic to Early Mesozoic, the geodynamic evolution of the Panthalassa margin is marked by strikingly synchronous changes in tectonic and magmatic setting and by the development of orogenic phases that occurred all along the margin.
Three main periods can be distinguished: (1) Early Permian times (280-260 Ma), (2) Late Permian to Middle Triassic times (260-230 Ma) and (3) Late Triassic times (230-200 Ma) (Fig. 2). (1) In Early Permian (275-260 Ma), the subduction flipped from east to
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the SEDIT program in Paris (INSU, 2008 and 2009), the Labex OSUG@2020 in Grenoble, and the French Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD). We thank Suzanne Kay, Veronica Oliveros and one anonymous reviewer for their helpful and constructive comments which help to greatly improve this manuscript.
References (71)
- et al.
Grenvillian remnants in the northern Andes: rodinian and phanerozoic paleogeographic perspectives
J. S. Am. Earth Sci.
(2010) - et al.
Distinguishing between in-situ and accretionary growth of continents along active margins
Lithos
(2014) - et al.
Resolving the paradigm of the late paleozoic–triassic chilean magmatism: isotopic approach
Gondwana Res.
(2016) - et al.
Late Triassic–Early Jurassic continental extension in southwestern Gondwana: tectonic segmentation and pre-break-up rifting
J. S. Am. Earth Sci.
(2001) - et al.
Hot spot activity and the break-up of Pangea
- et al.
Early permian to late triassic batholiths of the chilean frontal cordillera (28°–31°S): SHRIMP U–Pb zircon ages and Lu–Hf and O isotope systematics
Lithos
(2014) - et al.
Cretaceous to early Paleogene tectonic evolution of the northern Central Andes ( 0-18's) and its relations to geodynamics
(1996) - et al.
The Choiyoi volcanic province at 34-36S (San Rafael, Mendoza, Argentina): implications for the late Palaeozoic evolution of the southwestern margin of Gondwana
Tectonophysics
(2009) Permian plate margin volcanism and tuffs in adjacent basins of west Gondwana: age constraints and common characteristics
J. S. Am. Earth Sci.
(2006)- et al.
True polar wander during the Permo-Triassic
J. Geodyn.
(1999)