Elsevier

Chemical Geology

Volume 419, 25 December 2015, Pages 149-157
Chemical Geology

Trace element analysis of olivine: High precision analytical method for JEOL JXA-8230 electron probe microanalyser

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.10.042Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Electron probe microanalysis of Ni, Mn, Ca, Al, Cr, Co, Ti, Zn, P, Na in olivine by WDS, precision better than 10 ppm (2 σ).

  • Simultaneous with trace elements, analysis of Fe, Mg and Si in olivine by EDS, precision for Fo better than 300 ppm (2 σ).

  • Analytical volume is a half-sphere with a diameter of approximately 7 μm for most elements.

Abstract

Olivine compositions provide critical information on the composition and origin of primary mantle-derived melts and their sources. The minor and trace elements (Ni, Mn, Ca, Al, Cr, Co, Ti, Zn, P, Na), which are present at concentrations over 10 ppm, are especially informative and can be determined by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). Here we report a new analytical method to analyse these elements with unprecedented precision for an electron microprobe.

The method was developed using the new JEOL JXA 8230 EPMA at ISTerre, UJF, Grenoble, France. The facility has a tungsten source gun and is equipped with five wavelength-dispersive spectrometers (WDS) and one silicon drift detector energy-dispersive spectrometer (SDD, EDS). It is placed in an environment with closely controlled temperature (+/− 0.5 °C) and humidity (+/− 4%).

The analytical conditions are as follows: acceleration voltage 25 kV, 900 nA beam current; WDS detection for trace elements (Ni, Mn, Ca, Al, Cr, Co, Ti, Zn, P, Na) and EDS detection for Si, Mg and Fe; total counting time 12 min; ZAF correction. The analysed volume is a half-sphere with a diameter of approximately 7 μm for most elements or a cylinder with a diameter of 7 μm and depth of approximately 2 μm for Al and Na. Instrumental drift during analytical sessions was monitored by repeated measurements of olivine standards. For trace elements, the method yields detection limits from 4 to 10 ppm and similar precision of individual analyses (2 standard errors). The detectable amount of an element is down to 2  10 15 g and the precision for Fo in olivine is 200–300 ppm (2 standard errors).

Comparison of data obtained using the EPMA with laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) for a large range of olivine compositions confirms the accuracy of the EPMA which is similar to the precision noted above.

Introduction

Olivine comprises more than 50% of the upper mantle of the Earth and is the most common mineral in many ultramafic and basaltic volcanic rocks, mantle peridotites and inclusions in diamond. Recent studies have shown that olivine is one of the principal sources of petrological and geochemical information on magma formation and mantle geodynamics (e.g. Sobolev et al., 2005, Sobolev et al., 2007, De Hoog et al., 2010). Especially informative are the concentrations of minor and trace elements in olivine such as Ni, Mn, Ca, Al, Cr, Co, Ti, Zn, P and Na. The range in concentrations of these elements usually varies from 10 to several thousand ppm. Laser ablation inductively coupled mass spectroscopy (LA-ICP-MS) and secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) are widely applied to the analysis of trace elements in olivine but the spatial resolution of these methods (20–100 μm) is not sufficient to resolve the fine zoning that is commonly observed in olivine phenocrysts from volcanic rocks (Fig. 1). Only the electron microprobe can provide high-precision analysis of trace elements in olivine with a spatial resolution of 1–5 μm. The high-precision EPMA method developed earlier by Sobolev et al. (2007) allowed the analysis of a range of elements – Ni, Mn, Ca, Al, Cr, and Co – in olivine with a precision of 15–30 ppm (2 standard errors). However, elements such as Na, P, Zn and Ti could not be analysed precisely using this method. The purpose of this contribution is to describe an analytical method for high-precision trace-element analyses in olivine, using the new JEOL JXA-8230 electron probe microanalyser at the Institute des Sciences de la Terre (ISTerre), University Grenoble-Alpes, France, which produces analyses of all the elements mentioned above with a precision better than 10 ppm (2 standard errors). The method has been developed and tested by analysing the well-certified San Carlos olivine standard USNM 111312/444 (Jarosewich et al., 1980, De Hoog et al., 2010; Hauri et al., personal communication), an internal laboratory olivine standard (XEN), and a large set of olivines with a wide range of trace element contents from different types of basalts that have been analysed by LA-ICP-MS at the Max-Planck Institute in Mainz, Germany.

Section snippets

Hardware of the electron probe microanalyser in ISTerre

The JEOL JXA-8230 EPMA was installed at ISTerre in 2012. It employs a tungsten (W) filament that provides a very stable beam current (0.05%/h and 0.3%/12 h) even at high (1 microampere) currents. A stable beam current is an essential requirement for precise trace element analyses because of the long counting time needed for signal accumulation on peak and background positions. The central column (40° X-Ray take-off angle) is surrounded by five wavelength-dispersive spectrometers (WDS) and a

Detection limit and counting statistics

EPMA is widely used to measure trace elements in monazite (e.g. Jercinovic and Williams, 2005, Jercinovic et al., 2008, Jercinovic et al., 2012), quartz (e.g. Rusk et al., 2006, Wark and Watson, 2006, Donovan et al., 2011), olivine (e.g. Sobolev et al., 2005, Sobolev et al., 2007, Sobolev et al., 2009 ) and sulphides (e.g. Gervilla et al., 2004). The current challenge when making such measurements is to decrease the detection limit (minimum detectable concentration) and to improve analytical

Analytical precision and accuracy of microprobe analysis of olivine: comparison with LA-ICP-MS.

Routine EPMA procedure includes monitoring of instrumental drift. To do this we run the San Carlos olivine standard as an unknown, three times for every 30–40 measurement points. All measurements of major and trace elements are corrected for deviation from San Carlos olivine reference values (Table 2) if the deviation is higher than 2 sigma errors.

The analytical precision (reproducibility) of olivine analyses, established by repeated measurement of olivine standards, is 200–300 ppm (2 standard

Advantages and precautions during the use of the high-current olivine method

The reported analytical method significantly increases the precision of in-situ analysis of olivine for elements such as Ni, Ca, Al, Cr, Mn, Co, P, and Ti; for the first time trace elements such as Zn and Na by EPMA can be analysed. This opens new perspectives in the study of geochemical and petrological processes involving olivine, including the development of tracers of mantle source composition and particularly the presence of olivine-free mantle lithologies produced by recycled crust. In

Conclusions

A new analytical method for high-precision measurements of 10 trace elements in olivine, together with major elements, was developed on the JEOL JXA-8230 EPMA. The analytical conditions of analysis are: accelerating voltage 25 kV, probe beam current 900 nA, 12  minutes total measurement time for a single analysis. All elements are analysed simultaneously, trace elements by WDS and major elements (Si, Mg, Fe) by EDS. Linear background interpolation methods with background position measurements on

Acknowledgements

Installation and running of JEOL JXA-8230 in ISTerre was supported by the Chair of Excellence grant of Agence nationale de la recherche, France, (ANR-09-CEXC-003-01) and partly by CNRS and Labex OSUG2020 to AVS. The study was partly supported by grants from Russian Science Foundation 14-17-00491 to AVS and VB and Russian Foundation for Basic Research grants 13-05-00640 to VB and 13-05-12110 to AVS.

We acknowledge K.-P. Jochum, B. Stoll and U. Weis for their help with the LA-ICP-MS and K.

References (39)

  • J.J. Donovan et al.

    Improved electron probe microanalysis of trace elements in quartz

    Am. Miner.

    (2011)
  • D.A. Gedcke

    How counting statistics controls detection limits and peak precision, AN59: http://www.ortec-online.com

    (2001)
  • F. Gervilla et al.

    Platinum-group element distribution in some ore deposits: results of EPMA and Micro-PIXE analyses

    Microchim. Acta

    (2004)
  • J. Goldstein et al.

    Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis

    (2007)
  • C. Herzberg

    Petrology and thermal structure of the Hawaiian plume from Mauna Kea volcano

    Nature

    (2006)
  • E.J. Jarosewich et al.

    Reference samples for electron microprobe analysis

    Geostand. Newslett.

    (1980)
  • R. Jenkins et al.

    Practical X-ray Spectrometry

    (1982)
  • M.J. Jercinovic et al.

    Analytical perils (and progress) in electron microprobe trace element analysis applied to geochronology: background acquisition, interferences, and beam irradiation effects

    Am. Miner.

    (2005)
  • M.J. Jercinovic et al.

    Trace analysis in EPMA: Emas 2011: 12th European Workshop on modern developments in microbeam

    Analysis

    (2012)
  • Cited by (103)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text