Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Habitat-Dependent Species Recognition in Hybridizing Newts

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many species breed in heterogeneous environments where conditions affecting signaling fidelity may vary. Species recognition may be impaired under particular environmental conditions enhancing the hybridization risk. We investigated the influence of habitat on species recognition efficiency in two hybridizing newts, Lissotriton vulgaris and L. helveticus. The former is considered to be an open habitat species where the two species are in sympatry, whereas the latter also breeds in forest ponds where dissolved humic acids attenuate wavelength transmission, especially in the UV range. Because UV sexual signalling occurs in L. vulgaris, we predicted that species recognition would be reduced in water stained by humic acids. We conducted two-choice preference tests in males and females in stained and clear water. Females of both species preferred the conspecific male in clear water but not in stained water. Males did not show species recognition in either treatment. In both newts, visual species recognition is likely to depend upon habitat. Resorting to chemical communication may offset the loss of visual information but the same environmental factors that affect the transmission of visual signal can also affect the transmission of chemical signals. This environmental disruption of species recognition may account for the general avoidance of forest ponds by L. vulgaris in sympatry with L. helveticus. Stochastic variations of visual conditions in ponds may also explain the ongoing hybridization between two long diverged species that exhibit many and well differentiated sexual ornaments, and more generally between taxa naturally experiencing strong variations of their sensory environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen, J. W., de Wijer, P., Jehle, R., & Smit, J. (1998). Rare hybridization and introgression in smooth and palmate newts (Salamandridae: Triturus vulgaris and T. helveticus). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 36(3), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen, J. W., & Wallis, G. P. (1991). Restricted gene flow in a moving hybrid zone of the newts Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus in western France. Evolution, 45(4), 805–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babik, W. (2003). Nuclear markers, mitochondrial DNA and male secondary sexual traits variation in a newt hybrid zone (Triturus vulgaris × T. montandoni). Molecular Ecology, 12(7), 1913–1930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N. H., & Hewitt, G. M. (1985). Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 113–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughman, J. W. (2001). Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature, 411(6840), 943–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughman, J. W. (2002). How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(12), 571–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bro-Jorgensen, J. (2010). Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: Animal communication in a world in flux. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(5), 292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, C. N. (2004). Multimodel inference understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research, 33(2), 261–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candolin, U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews, 78(4), 575–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Candolin, U., Salesto, T., & Evers, M. (2007). Changed environmental conditions weaken sexual selection in sticklebacks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20(9), 233–239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chunco, A. J., McKinnon, J. S., & Servedio, M. R. (2007). Microhabitat variation and sexual selection can maintain male color polymorphisms. Evolution, 61(11), 2504–2515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. A., & Luddem, S. T. (2002). Degree of male ornamentation affects female preference for conspecific versus heterospecific males. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 269(1487), 111–117.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuau, J., Rat, M., Schmeller, D., & Loyau, A. (2012). Multiple signals in the palmate newt: Ornaments help when courting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66(7), 1045–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crump, D., Lean, D., Berrill, M., Coulson, D., & Toy, L. (1999). Spectral irradiance in pond water: Influence of water chemistry. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 70(6), 893–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J. A. (1980). Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution, 34(1), 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J. A. (1992). Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. The American Naturalist, 139(Suppl), S125–S153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J. A., & Basolo, A. L. (1998). Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13(10), 415–420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, N. J., Albright, L. B., Gerlach, G., Fisher, H. S., & Rosenthal, G. G. (2007). Humic acid interferes with species recognition in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33(11), 2090–2096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. S., Wong, B. B. M., & Rosenthal, G. G. (2006). Alteration of the chemical environment disrupts communication in a freshwater fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 273(1591), 1187–1193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gabor, C. R., & Halliday, T. R. (1996). Sequential mate choice by multiply mating smooth newt: Females become more choosy. Behavioral Ecology, 8(2), 162–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, S., Lindholm, A. K., Endler, J. A., & Brooks, R. (2003). Environmental variation and the maintenance of polymorphism: The effect of ambient light spectrum on mating behaviour and sexual selection in guppies. Ecology Letters, 6(5), 463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez D. (2006). AVICOL, a program to analyse spectrometric data. Free executable available at http://sites.google.com/site/avicolprogram/orfromtheauthoratdodogomez@yahoo.

  • Gordon, S. D., & Uetz, G. W. (2011). Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: Evidence for behavioural plasticity. Animal Behaviour, 81(2), 367–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. A. (1996). The newts and salamanders of Europe. London: T & AD Poyser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. A., & Mylotte, V. J. (1988). Observation on the development of the secondary sexual characters of male newts, Triturus vulgaris and T. helveticus. Journal of Herpetology, 22(4), 480–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haerty, W., Gentilhomme, E., & Secondi, J. (2007). Female preference for a male sexual trait uncorrelated with male body size in the palmate newt (Triturus helveticus). Behaviour, 144(7), 797–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T. R. (1977). The courtship of European newts: An evolutionary perspective. In D. H. Taylors & S. I. Guttman (Eds.), The reproductive biology of amphibians (pp. 185–232). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hankison, S. J., & Morris, M. R. (2003). Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: Female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues. Behavioral Ecology, 14(2), 282–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets, E. A., & Papaj, D. R. (2005). Complex signal function: Developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57(3), 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heubel, K. U., & Sclupp, I. (2006). Turbidity affects association behaviour in male Poecilia latipinna. Journal of Fish Biology, 68(2), 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuschele, J., Mannerla, M., Gienapp, P., & Candolin, U. (2009). Environment-dependent use of mate choice cues in sticklebacks. Behavioral Ecology, 20(6), 1223–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, P. C., Barata, E. N., & Canario, V. M. (2002). Possible disruption of pheromonal communication by humic acid in the goldfish, Carassius auratus. Aquatic Toxicology, 60(3–4), 169–183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huovinen, P. S., Penttilä, H., & Soimasuo, M. R. (2003). Spectral attenuation of solar ultraviolet radiation in humic lakes in Central Finland. Chemosphere, 51(3), 205–214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johanet, A., Secondi, J., & Lemaire, C. (2011). Widespread introgression does not leak into allotopy in a broad sympatric zone. Heredity, 106(6), 962–972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johanet, A., Secondi, J., Pays, O., Pagano, A., Lodé, T., & Lemaire, C. (2009). A case of reproductive character displacement in female palmate newts (Lissotriton helveticus) compte rendus. Biologies, 332(6), 548–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuyama, S., Yamamoto, K., Takeo, I., & Toyoda, F. (2002). Peptide and protein pheromones in amphibians. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B, 132(1), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak, H. L., Cirino, L. A., & Ptacek, M. B. (2008). Female mating preferences for male morphological traits used in species and mate recognition in the Mexican sailfin mollies, Poecilia velifera and Poecilia petenensis. Behavioral Ecology, 19(3), 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larmuseau, M. H. D., Raeymaekers, J. A. M., Ruddick, K. G., van Houdt, J. K. J., & Volckaert, F. A. M. (2009). To see in different seas: Spatial variation in the rhodopsin gene of the sand goby (Potamoschistus minutus). Molecular Ecology, 18(20), 4227–4239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lythgoe, J. N. (1979). Ecology of vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maletzky, A., Mikulicek, P., Franzen, M., Goldschmid, A., Gruber, H.-J., Horak, A., et al. (2008). Hybridization and introgression between two species of crested newts (Triturus cristatus and T. carnifex) along contact zones in Germany and Austria: Morphological and molecular data. Herpetological Journal, 18(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. P., Zagarese, H., Williamson, C. E., Balseiro, E. G., Hargreaves, B. R., Modenatti, B., et al. (1995). The attenuation of solar UV radiation in lakes and the role of dissolved organic carbon. Limnology and Oceanography, 40(8), 1381–1391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, N. E., & Blumstein, D. T. (2012). Multisensory perception in uncertain environments. Behavioral Ecology, 23(3), 457–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadachowska, K., & Babik, W. (2009). Divergence in the Face of Gene Flow: The case of two newts (Amphibia: Salamandridae). Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26(4), 829–841.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nadachowska-Brzyska, K., Zielinski, P., Radwan, J., & Babik, W. (2012). Interspecific hybridization increases MHC class II diversity in two sister species of newts. Molecular Ecology, 21(4), 887–906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nöllert, A., & Nöllert, C. (2003). Le guide des amphibiens d’Europe. Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partan, S., & Marler, P. (1999). Communication goes multimodal. Science, 283(5406), 1272–1273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partan, S. R., & Marler, P. (2005). Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals. The American Naturalist, 166(2), 231–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. J., & McNaughton, P. A. (1991). Response properties of cones from the retina of the tiger salamander. Journal of Physiology, 433, 561–587.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke, S. R., & Andersson, S. (2008). Female preferences for long tails constrained by species recognition in short-tailed red bishops. Behavioral Ecology, 19(6), 1116–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranåker, L., Nilsson, P. A., & Brönmark, C. (2012). Effects of degraded optical conditions on behavioural responses to alarm cues in a freshwater fish. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e38411.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Randler, C. (2002). Avian hybridization, mixed pairing and female choice. Animal Behaviour, 63(1), 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L. H., Archer, M. A., & Wayne, R. K. (1999). Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity, 83(4), 363–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Secondi, J., Aumjaud, A., Pays, O., Boyer, S., Montembault, D., & Violleau, D. (2007). Water turbidity affects the development of sexual morphology in the palmate newt. Ethology, 113(7), 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secondi, J., Johanet, A., Pays, P., Cazimajou, F., Djalout, Z., & Lemaire, C. (2010). Olfactory and visual species recognition in newts and their role in hybridization. Behaviour, 147(13–14), 1693–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secondi, J., Lepetz, V., & Théry, M. (2012). Male attractiveness is influenced by UV wavelengths in a newt species but not in its close relative. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e30391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seehausen, O., Takimoto, G., Roy, D., & Jokela, J. (2008). Speciation reversal and biodiversity dynamics with hybridization in changing environments. Molecular Ecology, 17(1), 30–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seehausen, O., Van Alphen, J. J. M., & Witte, F. (1997). Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science, 277(5333), 1808–1811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn, H., & Peet, M. (2003). Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature, 424(6946), 267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spurway, H., & Callan, H. G. (1960). The vigour and male sterility of hybrids between the species Triturus vulgaris and T. helveticus. Journal of Genetics, 57(1), 84–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. (1959). The role of hybridization in evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 103(2), 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelkens, R., & Seehausen, O. (2009). Genetic distances between species predict novel trait expression in their hybrids. Evolution, 63(4), 884–897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, M. K., & Parris, M. J. (2009). When do the costs of spermatogenesis constrain sperm expenditure? Remarks on the pattern of the spermatogenic cycle. Ethology, 115(1), 96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Themudo, G. E., & Arntzen, J. W. (2007). Newts under siege: Range expansion of Triturus pygmaeus isolates populations of its sister species. Diversity and Distributions, 13(5), 580–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of Man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–207). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utne, A. C. W. (1997). The effect of turbidity and illumination on the reaction distance and search time of the marine planktivore Gobiusculus flavescens. Journal of Fish Biology, 50(5), 926–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uy, J. A. C., & Stein, A. C. (2007). Variable visual habitats may influence the spread of colourful plumage across an avian hybrid zone. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20(5), 1847–1858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Sluijs, I., Gray, S. M., Amorim, M. C. P., Barber, I., Candolin, U., Hendry, A., et al. (2011). Communication in troubled waters: Responses of fish communication systems to changing environments. Evolutionary Ecology, 25(3), 623–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verrell, P. A. (1986). Male discrimination of larger, more fecund females in the smooth newt (Triturus vulgaris). Journal of Herpetology, 20(3), 416–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verrell, P. A., Halliday, T. R., & Griffiths, M. L. (1986). The annual reproductive cycle of the smooth newt (Triturus vulgaris) in England. Journal of Zoology, 210(1), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R. H. (1991). Association of song properties with habitat for territorial oscines birds of eastern North America. The American Naturalist, 138(4), 973–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilgers, D. J., & Hebets, E. A. (2011). Complex courtship displays facilitate male reproductive success and plasticity in signaling across variable environments. Current zoology, 57(2), 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B. B. M., Candolin, U., & Lindström, K. (2007). Environmental deterioration compromises socially enforced signals of male quality in three-spined sticklebacks. The American Naturalist, 170(2), 184–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. H., Norman, M. A., Newton, S. Q., Miller, D. M., Teppen, B. J., & Schäfer, L. (2000). Molecular dynamics simulations of the adsorption of proteins on clay mineral surfaces. Journal of Molecular Structure, 556(1–3), 95–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted with the approval of Préfecture de Maine-et-Loire (permit 04/2012) and in accordance with the current laws in France. It was funded by ANR-2011-BSV7-001 project SENSHYBLE. We are thankful to Christian Jousseaume for helping setting the new husbandry facility and Pierre-André Crochet and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

Ethical standard

The experiment complies with the current laws of the country in which it was performed. Individuals were captured and released after test completion as stated in the Permit No 04/2012 delivered by Préfecture du Maine-et-Loire.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GECCO (Groupe Ecologie et Conservation des vertébrés), LUNAM Université, Université d’Angers, 2 boulevard Lavoisier, 49045, Angers, France

    Jean Secondi, Mireille Okassa & Stéphane Sourice

  2. UMR 7179, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 1 Avenue du Petit Château, 91800, Brunoy, France

    Marc Théry

Authors
  1. Jean Secondi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mireille Okassa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stéphane Sourice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marc Théry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Secondi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Secondi, J., Okassa, M., Sourice, S. et al. Habitat-Dependent Species Recognition in Hybridizing Newts. Evol Biol 41, 71–80 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-013-9248-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-013-9248-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation