Elsevier

Applied Soil Ecology

Volume 122, Part 2, January 2018, Pages 181-199
Applied Soil Ecology

Review
Humusica 2, article 13: Para humus systems and forms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.09.043Get rights and content

Highlights

  • First attempt of classification of atypical humipedons called Para humus systems.

  • Diagnostic features and horizons are presented with the help of photographs.

  • Examples of classification of Para systems included in larger ecosystems.

  • Cosmopedon, Aeropedon, Humi-Co-and Lithopedon, Hydropedon, Geopedon and Symbiopedon.

Abstract

Planet Earth is covered by very common Terrestrial (not submersed), Histic (peats) and Aqueous (tidal) humipedons. Beside these typical topsoils there are other more discrete humipedons, generated by the interaction of mineral matter with microorganisms, fungi and small plants (algae, lichens and mosses). In some cases roots and their symbionts can be a driving force of litter biotransformation, in other cases a large amount of decaying wood accommodates particular organisms which interfere and change the normal process of litter decomposition. Particular microorganisms inhabit submerged sediments or extreme environments and can generate specialised humipedons with grey-black or even astonishingly flashing colours. We describe all these common but still unknown humipedons, defining diagnostic horizons and proposing a first morpho-functional classification, which still has to be improved. At the end of the article, the hypothesis of evolving and interconnected Cosmo, Aero, Hydro, Humi, Co, Litho and Geopedons (related to the microbiota) is formulated as a speculative curiosity.

Section snippets

Introduction to Para humus systems

Beside Terrestrial and Histic humus systems and intergrades, it is possible to notice other humus systems in natural or artificial environments. Their ecological determinants are different from those of the main systems and are strongly related to specific habitats and/or plant covers. Labelled “Para” (from the ancient Greek παρά, aside), these novel humus systems and their main characters are reported in Table 1. We know that we are not in the mainstream of soil science, by extending the

Field assessment of Para humus systems

Specific diagnostic horizons allow the identification of each Para humus system. As listed below, Para systems are presented together with their associated prefixes. The adopted classification principle is to use the name alone (Crusto, Bryo, Rhizo, Ligno, Anaero, Archaeo) when the absence of more evolved horizons does not allow assigning them to the main classical Terrestrial or Histic humus systems or forms. Unless arrested in their development by erosion or climatic constraints, they

Crusto humus systems

Crusto humus systems are strongly controlled by the presence of bacteria, cyanobacteria, algae, lichens, bryophytes, and microfungi living in extremophile, aerated or periodically watered habitats (Evans and Johansen, 1999; Elbert et al., 2012). These organisms may form monospecific (microbial communities with a visible dominant member and many invisible associated members) or plurispecific (microbial communities with numerous invisible microscopic members) covers, from micrometric biofilms to

Bryo humus systems

Bryo are humus systems strongly influenced by dominant mosses or arbuscular lichens (mosses and lichens are often associated) or small stonecrop plants (Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9). These organisms may form mono- or multi-specific covers. Aeration is a mandatory prerequisite even if they prefer wet environments where they may form peatland (sphagnum bogs). These plants may grow on remains of a previous stem and when looking through a Bryo humipedon profile, old and new

Rhizo humus systems

Rhizo humus systems occur when roots are the driving factor of humus system development (Fig. 10, Fig. 11, Fig. 12, Fig. 13, Fig. 14, Fig. 15, Fig. 16). This humus system is not easy to detect because root-built aggregates are similar to other soil aggregates and, in addition, roots may penetrate and modify earthworm aggregates (Pouvelle et al., 2008). The humipedon is systematically assigned to a Rhizo system where more than 70% of the volume of the cumulated humus horizons is made of roots or

Ligno humus systems

Ligno are humus systems made of dominant wood under transformation by wood-feeding animals and/or wood-rotting fungi.

Anaero humus systems

Here the concept of humus system is extended to environments where water is the matrix. This should be considered as an innovation, which is proposed to the scientific community as a possible extension of names and concepts coined for terrestrial environments to aquatic environments. Although undergone by specialists of different disciplines, using different methodologies and different vocabularies, soil and sediment studies show that both environments ensure similar functions, such as for

Archaeo humus systems

Archaeo humus systems are under the influence of archaea or anaerobic bacteria living in extremophile submerged and emerged habitats without plants: highly saline, acidic or alkaline waters, hot springs among many others. These micro-ecosystems are formed by phototroph, lithotroph and/or organotroph microorganisms living in extremophile habitats (Fig. 28).

Can a column of plankton have humus inside? Is there humus even in the intergalactic space?

If we admit that the main components of a humus form are its specialized colonies of biodegrading and organic matter transforming microorganisms, we can say that there is humus in a column of plankton and even in the air. Soil microorganisms disperse out of the soil. Like pollen they are transported everywhere through the air in a kind of “microscopic dusty-misty-soil” represented by mineral and organic and/or organic-mineral particles, water, air and microorganisms.

A new more realistic concept

Advertisement to the reader

As for other articles of Humusica 2, the reader must be informed that some knowledge of Humusica 1 (especially articles 1 and 7) is necessary for knowing what we mean by “humus form”, “humus system”, “humipedon”, “diagnostic horizon”, etc., and the same for the use of qualifiers, mosaic references, and most basic principles of our classification.

We must admit that Section 9 is largely speculative, and needs more developments in a paper specifically devoted to this topic. However, we think that

Authors’ contributions

Zanella A. and Ponge J.-F.: coordination of authors, structure of the article, redaction of the first draft of text, tables and figures, re-elaboration, final presentation; Zanella A.: non-cited author of photographs.

Others Authors: collaboration to the redaction of the article in specific domains and punctual corrections in other parts. Introduction and Field assessment: Matteodo M., Fritz I., Pietrasiak N.; Crusto: Pietrasiak N., Fritz I.; Bryo: Matteodo M.; Rhizo: Juilleret J., Matteodo M.;

References (57)

  • J. Zhi et al.

    Predicting mattic epipedons in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau using Random Forest

    Geoderma Regional

    (2017)
  • J.A. Aitkenhead-Peterson et al.

    Sources, production, and regulation of allochthonous dissolved organic matter inputs to surface waters

  • H.P. Bais et al.

    The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms

    Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.

    (2006)
  • J.W. Ball et al.

    Water-Chemistry Data for Selected Springs, Geysers, and Streams in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, 2006-2008

    (2010)
  • F. Baudin et al.

    Géologie de la matière organique, Collection

    (2007)
  • J. Belnap et al.

    Biological Soil Crusts: Ecology and Management

    (2001)
  • J. Belnap et al.

    Influence of biological soil crusts on soil environments and vascular plants

  • S. Bertilsson et al.

    Supply of dissolved organic matter to aquatic ecosystems: autochthonous sources

  • M.A. Bowker

    Biological soil crust rehabilitation in theory and practice: an underexploited opportunity

    Restor. Ecol.

    (2007)
  • B. Büdel

    Ecology and diversity of rock-inhabiting cyanobacteria in tropical regions

    Eur. J. Phycol.

    (1999)
  • E.P. Burford et al.

    Fungal involvement in bioweathering and biotransformation of rocks and minerals

    Miner. Mag.

    (2003)
  • J.P. Cagampan et al.

    Net ecosystem CO2 exchange of a cutover peatland rehabilitated with a transplanted acrotelm

    Écoscience

    (2008)
  • D.N. Cole

    Trampling disturbance and recovery of cryptogamic soil crusts in Grand Canyon National Park

    Great Basin Natur.

    (1990)
  • C.A. Crispim et al.

    Algal and cyanobacterial biofilms on calcareous historic buildings

    Curr. Microbiol.

    (2003)
  • R.L. Crocker et al.

    Soil development in relation to vegetation and surface age at Glacier Bay

    Alaska. J. Ecol.

    (1955)
  • W. Elbert et al.

    Contribution of cryptogamic covers to the global cycles of carbon and nitrogen

    Nature Geosci.

    (2012)
  • R.D. Evans et al.

    Microbiotic crusts and ecosystem processes

    Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.

    (1999)
  • K. Gagnon et al.

    Seabird guano fertilizes Baltic Sea littoral food webs

    PLoS ONE

    (2013)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Non-typical degraded and regraded humus forms in metal-contaminated areas, or there and back again

      2021, Geoderma
      Citation Excerpt :

      The humus forms are most comprehensively represented for forests on automorphic soils (Zanella et al., 2018g; Zanella et al., 2018h). In the latest version of the Classification, considerable attention is paid to temporary wet soils (Zanella et al., 2018i), permanently waterlogged soils (Zanella et al., 2018c; Zanella et al., 2018d), and Para systems (Zanella et al., 2018f). The Classification presents man-induced humus forms in much less detail and includes only artificially constructed substrates, urban soils, and agricultural soils (Zanella et al., 2018b; Zanella et al., 2018k; Zanella et al., 2018l).

    • Techno-moder: A proposal for a new morpho-functional humus form developing on Technosols revealed by micromorphology

      2020, Geoderma
      Citation Excerpt :

      Forms such as “Para” and “Anthropogenic” have recently been added (Zanella et al., 2017c). Para-humus systems are driven by specific ecological determinants such as bryophytes, roots or even biological crusts (Zanella et al., 2018a), while Anthropogenic, or “techno” humus system result from human activities (Zanella et al., 2018b). One way to characterize the humus form developing on the soil surface is the use of thin-section micromorphology.

    • Soil, Humipedon, Forest Life and Management

      2023, International Journal of Plant Biology
    • Humus Forms and Organic Matter Decomposition in the Swiss Alps

      2023, International Journal of Plant Biology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text