Abstract
In this paper, we define comparative advantage and disadvantage within the framework of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). We develop models that address the measurement of comparative advantage and disadvantage entirely in terms of proportional changes in levels of output and input activities. The models allow inclusion of explicit limits on admissible tradeoffs across both types of activities. The assessment of comparative advantage and disadvantage establishes a framework for competitor analysis and the feasibility and desirability of strategic alliances.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A.I. Ali, C. Lerme and L. Seiford, Components of efficiency evaluation in Data Envelopment Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research (1995).
A.I. Ali and L. Seiford, The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis, in: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt, eds., Oxford, New York, pp. 120–159.
P. Andersen and N.C. Petersen, A procedure for ranking efficient units in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science 39(1993)1261–1264.
R.D. Banker, A. Charnes and W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science 30(1984)1078–1092.
A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, Z.M. Huang and D.B. Sun, Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks, Journal of Econometrics 46(1990)73–91.
A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford and J. Stutz, Foundations of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions, Journal of Econometrics 30(1985)91–107.
W.D. Cook, A. Kazakov and Y. Roll, On the measurement and monitoring of relative efficiency of highway maintenance patrols, in: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A. Lewin and L. Seiford, eds., Kluwer, Norwell, MA, pp. 195–210.
D.L. Day, A.Y. Lewin and H. Li, Strategic leaders or strategic groups: A longitudinal Data Envelopment Analysis of the U.S. brewing industry, European Journal of Operational Research 80(1995) 619–638.
R. Färe and D. Primont, Measuring the efficiency of multiunit banking: An activity analysis approach, Journal of Banking and Finance 17(1993)539–544.
K.R. Harrigan, Managing joint ventures, Part I, Management Review (February 1987) 24–42.
K.R. Harrigan, Managing joint ventures, Part II, Management Review (March 1987) 52–55.
P. Lorange and G.J.B. Probst, Joint ventures as self-organizing systems: A key to successful joint venture design and implementation, Columbia Journal of World Business (Summer 1987) 71–77.
R. Moss Kanter, When Giants Learn to Dance: Mastering the Challenge of Strategy, Management and Careers in the 1990s, Simon and Schuster, 1989.
M.E. Porter, From competitive advantage to corporate strategy, Harvard Business Review (May–June 1987) 43–59.
Y. Roll, W.D. Cook and B. Golany, Controlling factor weights in Data Envelopment Analysis, IIE Transactions 23(1991)2–9.
M.J. Shniederjans and J. Hoffman, Multinational acquisition analysis: A zero–one goal programming model, European Journal of Operational Research 62(1992)175–185.
R.G. Thompson, F.D. Singleton, R.M. Thrall and B.A. Smith, Comparative sites evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas, Interfaces 16(1986)35–49.
Y.H.B. Wong and J.E. Beasley, Restricting weight flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society 41(1990)829–835.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iqbal Ali, A., Lerme, C.S. Comparative advantage and disadvantage in DEA. Annals of Operations Research 73, 215–232 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018929228294
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018929228294