Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The dynamics of social agreement according to Conceptual Agreement Theory

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many social phenomena can be viewed as processes in which individuals in social groups develop agreement (e.g., public opinion, the spreading of rumor, the formation of social and linguistic conventions). Conceptual Agreement Theory (CAT) models social agreement as a simplified communicational event in which an Observer \((O)\) and Actor \((A)\) exchange ideas about a concept \(C\), and where \(O\) uses that information to infer whether \(A\)’s conceptual state is the same as its own (i.e., to infer agreement). Agreement may be true (when \(O\) infers that \(A\) is thinking \(C\) and this is in fact the case, event \(a1\)) or illusory (when \(O\) infers that \(A\) is thinking \(C\) and this is not the case, event \(a2\)). In CAT, concepts that afford \(a1\) or \(a2\) become more salient in the minds of members of social groups. Results from an agent-based model (ABM) and probabilistic model that implement CAT show that, as our conceptual analyses suggested would be the case, the simulated social system selects concepts according to their usefulness to agents in promoting agreement among them (Experiment 1). Furthermore, the ABM exhibits more complex dynamics where similar minded agents cluster and are able to retain useful concepts even when a different group of agents discards them (Experiment 2). We discuss the relevance of CAT and the current findings for analyzing different social communication events, and suggest ways in which CAT could be put to empirical test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Article 22 July 2014

Jeffrey Sanford Russell, John Hawthorne & Lara Buchak

References

  • Aaker, D.A.: Building Strong Brands. The Free Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M.: Knowledge Work and Knowledge-Intensive Firms. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell, A.: Party change in Chile in comparative perspective. Rev. Cienc. Política 23(2), 88–108 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, H., McGrath, J.E., Berdahl, J.L.: Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation. Sage, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R.: Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., Terna, P. (eds.) Simulating Social Phenomena, pp. 21–41. Springer, Berlin (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, P.: The physical modelling of human social systems. Complexus 1, 190–206 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.W.: The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts. In: Neisser, U. (ed.) Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, pp. 101–140. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.W.: Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In: Collins, A.C., Gathercole, S.E., Conway, M.A. (eds.) Theories of Memory, pp. 29–101. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthon, P., Leyland, F.P., Campbell, C.: Does brand meaning exist in similarity or singularity? J. Bus. Res. 62(3), 356–361 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M.B.: A dual process model of impression formation. In: Srull, T.K., Wyer Jr, R.S. (eds.) Advances in Social Cognition, pp. 1–36. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.P., Kozinets, R.V., Sherry Jr, J.F.: Teaching old brands new tricks: retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. J. Mark. 67(3), 19–33 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canessa, E., Riolo, R.: An agent-based model of the impact of computer-mediated communication on organizational culture and performance: an example of the application of complex systems analysis tools to the study of CIS. J. Inf. Technol. 21, 272–283 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canessa, E., Chaigneau, S.E., Quezada, A.: An ABM of the development of shared meaning in a social group. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, Rome, Italy, 28–30 January, pp. 5–14 (2011)

  • Canessa, E., Chaigneau, S.E., Quezada, A.: The life of concepts: an ABM of conceptual drift in social groups. In: Filipe, J., Fred, A. (eds.) Agents and Artificial Intelligence. Communications in Computer and Information Science Series, vol. 271, pp. 271–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(2), 591–646 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaigneau, S.E., Canessa, E.: The power of collective action: how agents get rid of useless concepts without even noticing their futility. Actas Jornadas Chilenas de Computación, Curicó, Chile 7–11 November pp. 1–8 (2011)

  • Chaigneau, S.E., Canessa, E., Gaete, J.: Conceptual agreement theory. New Ideas Psychol. 30(2), 179–189 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P.E.: The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: Apter, D.E. (ed.) Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–261. The Free Press, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., Pace, S.: Brand community of convenience products: new forms of customer empowerment—the case “My Nutella the community”. Eur. J. Mark. 40(9/10), 1087–2005 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Lauro, C., Tanaka, J.W., Curran, T.: The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15, 623–629 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky, M.: Species and the Linnaean hierarchy. In: Wilson, R.A. (ed.) Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, pp. 285–306. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.: Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 255–278 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S.: Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. J. Consum. Res. 24(4), 343–373 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: On sense and reference. In: Geach, P., Black, M. (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Blackwell, Oxford (1893/1952)

  • Gladwin, T.N., Kennelly, J.J., Krause, T.S.: Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(4), 874–907 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, H.J.: Concepts: where subjectivism goes wrong. Philosophy 84(1), 5–29 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J.A.: Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 18, 441–461 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L.: Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J. Mark. 57, 1–22 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L.: Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassar, W., Mittal, B., Sharma, A.: Measuring customer-based brand equity. J. Consum. Mark. 12(4), 11–9 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, A.P., Blair, I.V., Hastie, R.: Illusions of gender: stereotypes evoke false memories. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37(1), 3–14 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: Languages and language. In: Gunderson, K. (ed.) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VII, pp. 3–35. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D.: Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. Wiley, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D.: The choice axiom after twenty years. J. Math. Psychol. 15(3), 215–233 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchione, E., Salgado, M., Gilbert, N.: ‘What did you say?’ Emergent communication in a multi-agent spatial configuration. Adv. Complex Syst. 13(4), 469–482 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayden, R.L.: A hierarchy of species concepts: the denoument in the saga of the species problem. In: Claridge, M.F., Dawah, H.A., Wilson, M.R. (eds.) Species: The Units of Diversity, pp. 381–423. Chapman and Hall, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G.: Culture and consumption: a theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. J. Consum. Res. 13, 71–84 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae, K., Cree, G.S., Seidenberg, M.S., McNorgan, C.: Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behav. Res. Methods 37, 547–559 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G.: Language: A Biological Model. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B.: Getting rid of species? In: Wilson, R.A. (ed.) Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, pp. 307–315. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G.L., Brownell, H.H.: Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 11(1), 70–84 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, A., Griffin, C., Wicks, P.G.: Children’s use of brand symbolism: a consumer culture theory approach. Eur. J. Mark. 42(5/6), 627–640 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patalano, A.L., Chin-Parker, S., Ross, B.H.: The importance of being coherent: category coherence, cross-classification, and reasoning. J. Mem. Lang. 54(3), 407–424 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleijel, F., Rouse, G.W.: A new taxon, capricornia (Hesionidae, Polychaeta), illustrating the LITU (‘least-inclusive taxonomic unit’) concept. Zool. Scr. 29, 157–168 (2000a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleijel, F., Rouse, G.W.: Least-inclusive taxonomic unit: a new taxonomic concept for biology. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 627–630 (2000b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.: Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol. Econ. 48(4), 369–384 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, T.T., Patterson, K.: Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136(3), 451–469 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B.: Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cogn. Psychol. 7, 573–605 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., Boyes-Braem, P.: Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 8, 382–439 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L.A., Phelan, J.E.: Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Res. Organ Behav. 28, 61–79 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.E.: Theories of semantic memory. In: Estes, W.K. (ed.) Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes, vol. 6, pp. 1–56. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Overschelde, J.P., Rawson, K.A., Dunlosky, J.: Category norms: an updated and expanded version of the norms. J. Mem. Lang. 50(3), 289–335 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, P., Coumans, H.: Investigating social interaction strategies for bootstrapping lexicon development. J. Artif. Soc. Simul. 6(1) (2003). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/1/4.html

  • Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford (1953)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by FONDECYT (Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia of the Chilean Government) grant Nr. 1130052 to the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Av. P. Hurtado 750, Viña del Mar, Chile

    Enrique Canessa

  2. Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Av. Diagonal Las Torres 2640, Santiago, Chile

    Sergio Chaigneau

Authors
  1. Enrique Canessa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sergio Chaigneau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique Canessa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canessa, E., Chaigneau, S. The dynamics of social agreement according to Conceptual Agreement Theory. Qual Quant 48, 3289–3309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9957-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9957-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation