Skip to main content
Log in

A decision support system for preventive conservation: From measurements towards decision making

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

We present a decision-support system that guides heritage guardians in selecting mitigation actions to improve the indoor air quality and thus the preservation conditions of indoor collections in heritage buildings. This contribution shows that it is feasible to build a decision support system dedicated to preventive conservation when the following barriers are overcome: 1) simultaneous measurement of a wide range of environmental parameters in order to detect a larger number of undesired situations; 2) development of an algorithm to perform reproducible indoor air quality assessments; and 3) transformation of the air quality assessment into a graph that can be read intuitively without causing a wide variation of interpretations among stakeholders. An important aspect of the decision support system is that it reduces several sources of uncertainty that hamper reliable indoor air quality assessments. The possibilities of such a system are illustrated with a measurement campaign in a church where a heating system has been installed and used for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.W. Fleming, Vision Res. 94, 62 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Henderson, R. Waller, Stud. Conserv. 61, 308 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, Econometrica 47, 263 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2011)

  5. S. Michalski, M. Rossi-Doria, ICOM Committee for Conservation, 16th Triennial Meeting (Lisbon, Portugal, 2011) p. 1

  6. T. Strang, Preservation of electronic records: new knowledge and decision-making (Ottawa, 2003) p. 1

  7. N.P. Rougier, M. Droetboom, P.E. Bourne, PLOS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003833 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. H.W.J. Rittel, M.M. Webber, Policy Sci. 4, 155 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ICOMOS (2014) International Charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites (The Venice Charter, 1965) https://doi.org/www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf (accessed 25 June 2018)

  10. O. Schalm et al., IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 364, 012056 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ISO Guide 73:2009, Risk management -- vocabulary

  12. W. Briggs, Uncertainty: The Soul of Modeling, Probability & Statistics (Springer, New York, 2016)

  13. C.M. Grzywacz, Monitoring for Gaseous Pollutants in Museum Environments (Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, 2006)

  14. H.A. Ankersmit, N.H. Tennent, S.F. Watts, Atmos. Environ. 39, 695 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Leyva Pernia et al., IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 364, 012045 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Ashley-Smith, A. Burmester, M. Eibl (Editors), Climate for Collections. Standards and Uncertainties (Doerner Institute, Munich, 2013)

  17. P. Storme, O. Schalm, R. Wiesinger, Herit. Sci. 3, 25 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ’t Hart L. et al., Appl. Phys. A 122, 923 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Madon et al., Science 318, 1728 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Olswang, P.A. Prelock, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 58, S1818 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E.C. McNie, Environ. Sci. Pol. 10, 17 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Dillon et al., Herit. Sci. 2, 11 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Weichselgartner, R. Kasperson, Global Environ. Chang. 20, 266 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, P. Slovic (Editors), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982)

  25. D. Arnott, G. Pervan, J. Inf. Technol. 20, 67 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D. Arnott G. Pervan, Decision Support Syst. 44, 657 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Geng, H.J. Hamilton, ACM Comput. Surv. 38, 9 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ISO14971:2007, Medical devices -- Application of risk management to medical devices

  29. ISO 31000:2009, Risk management -- Principles and guidelines on implementation

  30. J.L. Perdersoli, C. Antomarchi, S. Michalski, A Guide to Risk Management of Cultural Heritage (ICCROM, 2016)

  31. B. Ankersmit, M. Stappers, Managing Indoor Climate Risks in Museums (Springer, Amsterdam, 2017)

  32. L. Bratasz et al., Strain 51, 78 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Jakiela, L. Bratasz, R. Kozlowski, Wood Sci. Technol. 42, 268 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. T. Prosek et al., Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 43, 129 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Dubus et al., Stud. Conserv. 55, 121 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Dubus, T. Prosek, e-Preserv. Sci. 9, 67 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Austin, PLOS ONE 10, e0137789 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Marchetti et al., Build. Environ. 126, 132 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. P. Di Justo, E. Gertz, Atmospheric Monitoring with Arduino: Building Simple Devices to Collect Data about the Environment (O’Reilly, Beijing, 2013)

  40. D. Leyva, New approach to indoors air quality assessment for cultural heritage conservation, Indoor air (Ghent, 2016) paper 784

  41. W. Anaf, D. Leyva Pernia, O. Schalm, Geosci. J. 8, 276 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. K. Pravossoudovitch et al., Ergonomics 57, 503 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. E.C. McNie, Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 17 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Schalm.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schalm, O., Cabal, A., Anaf, W. et al. A decision support system for preventive conservation: From measurements towards decision making. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12441-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12441-5

Navigation