Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A study on the risk perception of light pollution and the process of social amplification of risk in Korea

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the risk perception level of each light pollution type was analyzed, and the effects of the variables (e.g., psychometric paradigm factor, trust in the government, etc.) on the process of the increase in the risk perception were analyzed. For the sample population (1096 persons) in Korea, the risk perception levels of each light pollution type and other environmental and health risk factors were compared, and the relative magnitude was examined. In addition, to test which variables affect the group with high-risk perception of each light pollution type, a logistic regression analysis was performed. For the group with highest risk perception of light pollution, the odds ratios (OR) of all psychometric paradigms (excluding controllability) increased compared to those of the group with low-risk perception. Additionally, the level showing the acquisition of information from the media and the recollection level of media criticism on each light pollution type showed a statistically significant increase. Especially, the risk perception of light trespass increased as trust in the government decreased. The significance of this study includes the finding that the public’s risk perception of light pollution was significantly affected by the psychometric paradigm factors. Moreover, this study analyzed the differences of the variables that affect the increase in the risk perception of each light pollution type and provided a theoretical framework that can practically reflect the strategy for the risk communication of light pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agha S (2003) The impact of a mass media campaign on personal risk perception, perceived self-efficacy and on other behavioural predictors. AIDS Care 15(6):749-762.

  • Anisimov VN, Vinogradova IA, Panchenko AV, Popovich IG, Zabezhinski MA (2012) Light-at-night-induced circadian disruption, cancer and aging. Curr Aging Sci 5(3):170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird BN (1986) Tolerance for environmental health risks: the influence of knowledge, benefits, voluntariness, and environmental attitudes. Risk Anal 6(4):425–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chepesiuk R (2009) Missing the dark health effects of light pollution. Environmental Health Perspectives 117(1):A20-27 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/issues/175683/ (last accessed 10 April 2014)

  • Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K (2007) Research methods in education 6th edition. Routledge, USA and Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden KS (1983) Sociological aspects of attribution. Annu Rev Sociol 9:425–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Giuseppe G, Abbate R, Albano L, Marinelli P, Angelillo IF (2008) A survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices towards avian influenza in an adult population of Italy. BMC Infect Dis 8:36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005) Eurobarometer survey, social values, science and technology. Special Eurobarometer Report 225. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb_special_240_220_en.htm (last accessed 10 April 2014)

  • European Commission (2011) Scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks, health effects of artificial light. http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_033.pdf (last accessed 10 April 2014)

  • Evans G, Durant J (1995) The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Underst Sci 4:57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falchi F, Cinzano P, Elvidge CD, Keith DK, Haim A (2011) Limiting the impact of light pollution on human health, environment and stellar visibility. J Environ Manag 92(10):2714–2722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9:127–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer L, Salter B (2002) Public attitudes, scientific advice and the politics of regulatory policy (The case of BSE). Sci Public Policy 29(2):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooley JJ, Chamberlain K, Smith KA, Khalsa SBS, Rajaratnam SMW, Reen EV, Zeitzer JM, Czeisler CA, Lockley SW (2011) Exposure to room light before bedtime suppresses melatonin onset and shortens melatonin duration in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(3):E463–E472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris CR, Jenkins M, Glaser D (2006) Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men? Judge Decis Making 1:48–63

    Google Scholar 

  • International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2010) Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans 98 Shiftwork, 563–754. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol98/mono98-8.pdf (last accessed 10 April 2014)

  • Jensen KK (2004) BSE in the UK: why the risk communication strategy failed. J Agric Environ Ethics 17:405–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantermann T, Roenneberg T (2009) Is light-at-night a health risk factor or a health risk predictor? Chronobiol Int 26(6):1069–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S (1988) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8(2):177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Kim HJ, Song DJ, Cho YM, Choi JW (2014) Risk perception and public concerns of electromagnetic waves from cellular phones in Korea. Bioelectromagnetics 35(4):235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloog I, Haim A, Stevens RG, Barchana M, Portnov BA (2008) Light at night co-distributes with incident breast but not lung cancer in the female population of Israel. Chronobiol Int 25(1):65–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer V, Schmidt KH, Griefahn B (2013) Bright-light effects on cognitive performance in elderly persons working simulated night shifts: psychological well-being as a mediator? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 86(8):901–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronfeld-Schor N, Einat H (2012) Circadian rhythms and depression: human psychopathology and animal models. Neuropharmacol 62(1):101–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang JT, Hallman WK (2005) Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Risk Anal 25(5):1241–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikas S, Lindeman M, Roininen K, Lähteenmäki L (2007) Food risk perceptions, gender, and individual differences in avoidance and approach motivation, intuitive and analytic thinking styles, and anxiety. Appetite 48(2):232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytimaki J, Tapio P, Assmuth T (2012) Unawareness in environmental protection: the case of light pollution from traffic. Land Use Policy 29:598–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MW (2006) Apparent effects of light pollution on singing behavior of American Robins. Condor 108(1):130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millstone E, Zwanenberg PV (2002) The evolution of food safety policy-making institutions in the UK, EU and codex alimentarius. Soc Policy Adm 36:593–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MG, Slovic P, Nair I, Geisler D, MacGregor D, Fischhoff B, Lincoln D, Florig K (1985) Powerline frequency electric and magnetic fields: a pilot study of risk perception. Risk Anal 5(2):139–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munch M, Kobialka S, Steiner R, Oelhafen P, Wirz-Justice A, Cajochen C (2006) Wavelength-dependent effects of evening light exposure on sleep architecture and sleep EEG power density in men. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 290:R1421–R1428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munn T, Timmerman P, Whyte A (1999) Emerging environmental issues: a global perspective of SCOPE. Ambio 28:464–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty RE. Cacioppo JT (1986) Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York

  • Schernhammer ES, Laden F, Speizer F, Willett EC, Hunter DJ, Kawachi I, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA (2003) Night-shift work and risk of colorectal cancer in the nurses’ health study. J Natl Cancer Inst 4:95(11):825–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd R, Barker G, French S, Hart A, Maule J, Cassidy A (2006) Managing food chain risks: integrating technical and stakeholder perspectives on uncertainty. J Agric Econ 57(2):313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist M (2000) The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene Technology. Risk Anal 20(2):195–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg L, Drottz-Sjöberg BM (1991) Knowledge and risk perception among nuclear power plant employees. Risk Anal 11(4):607–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1987) Perceptions of risk. Science 236:280–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder LB, Rouse RA (1995) The media can have more than an impersonal impact: the case of AIDS risk perceptions and behavior. Health Commun 7(2):125–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewalle G, Schmidt C, Albouy G, Sterpenich V, Darsaud A, Rauchs G, Berken PV, Balteau E, Degueldre C, Luxen A, Maquet P, Dijk DJ (2007) Brain responses to violet, blue, and green monochromatic light exposures in humans: Prominent Role of Blue Light and the Brainstem. PLoS ONE 2(11):e1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg AAF, Sjoberg L (2000) Risk perception and the media. J Risk Res 3:31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a future environmental R&D grant funded by the Korean Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (RE201206020).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Wook Choi.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, K.H., Choi, J.W., Lee, E. et al. A study on the risk perception of light pollution and the process of social amplification of risk in Korea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 7612–7621 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4107-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4107-5

Keywords

Navigation