Abstract
In this study, the risk perception level of each light pollution type was analyzed, and the effects of the variables (e.g., psychometric paradigm factor, trust in the government, etc.) on the process of the increase in the risk perception were analyzed. For the sample population (1096 persons) in Korea, the risk perception levels of each light pollution type and other environmental and health risk factors were compared, and the relative magnitude was examined. In addition, to test which variables affect the group with high-risk perception of each light pollution type, a logistic regression analysis was performed. For the group with highest risk perception of light pollution, the odds ratios (OR) of all psychometric paradigms (excluding controllability) increased compared to those of the group with low-risk perception. Additionally, the level showing the acquisition of information from the media and the recollection level of media criticism on each light pollution type showed a statistically significant increase. Especially, the risk perception of light trespass increased as trust in the government decreased. The significance of this study includes the finding that the public’s risk perception of light pollution was significantly affected by the psychometric paradigm factors. Moreover, this study analyzed the differences of the variables that affect the increase in the risk perception of each light pollution type and provided a theoretical framework that can practically reflect the strategy for the risk communication of light pollution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agha S (2003) The impact of a mass media campaign on personal risk perception, perceived self-efficacy and on other behavioural predictors. AIDS Care 15(6):749-762.
Anisimov VN, Vinogradova IA, Panchenko AV, Popovich IG, Zabezhinski MA (2012) Light-at-night-induced circadian disruption, cancer and aging. Curr Aging Sci 5(3):170–177
Baird BN (1986) Tolerance for environmental health risks: the influence of knowledge, benefits, voluntariness, and environmental attitudes. Risk Anal 6(4):425–435
Chepesiuk R (2009) Missing the dark health effects of light pollution. Environmental Health Perspectives 117(1):A20-27 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/issues/175683/ (last accessed 10 April 2014)
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K (2007) Research methods in education 6th edition. Routledge, USA and Canada
Crittenden KS (1983) Sociological aspects of attribution. Annu Rev Sociol 9:425–446
Di Giuseppe G, Abbate R, Albano L, Marinelli P, Angelillo IF (2008) A survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices towards avian influenza in an adult population of Italy. BMC Infect Dis 8:36
European Commission (2005) Eurobarometer survey, social values, science and technology. Special Eurobarometer Report 225. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb_special_240_220_en.htm (last accessed 10 April 2014)
European Commission (2011) Scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks, health effects of artificial light. http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_033.pdf (last accessed 10 April 2014)
Evans G, Durant J (1995) The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Underst Sci 4:57–74
Falchi F, Cinzano P, Elvidge CD, Keith DK, Haim A (2011) Limiting the impact of light pollution on human health, environment and stellar visibility. J Environ Manag 92(10):2714–2722
Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9:127–152
Frewer L, Salter B (2002) Public attitudes, scientific advice and the politics of regulatory policy (The case of BSE). Sci Public Policy 29(2):137–145
Gooley JJ, Chamberlain K, Smith KA, Khalsa SBS, Rajaratnam SMW, Reen EV, Zeitzer JM, Czeisler CA, Lockley SW (2011) Exposure to room light before bedtime suppresses melatonin onset and shortens melatonin duration in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(3):E463–E472
Harris CR, Jenkins M, Glaser D (2006) Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men? Judge Decis Making 1:48–63
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2010) Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans 98 Shiftwork, 563–754. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol98/mono98-8.pdf (last accessed 10 April 2014)
Jensen KK (2004) BSE in the UK: why the risk communication strategy failed. J Agric Environ Ethics 17:405–423
Kantermann T, Roenneberg T (2009) Is light-at-night a health risk factor or a health risk predictor? Chronobiol Int 26(6):1069–1074
Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S (1988) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8(2):177–187
Kim KH, Kim HJ, Song DJ, Cho YM, Choi JW (2014) Risk perception and public concerns of electromagnetic waves from cellular phones in Korea. Bioelectromagnetics 35(4):235–244
Kloog I, Haim A, Stevens RG, Barchana M, Portnov BA (2008) Light at night co-distributes with incident breast but not lung cancer in the female population of Israel. Chronobiol Int 25(1):65–81
Kretschmer V, Schmidt KH, Griefahn B (2013) Bright-light effects on cognitive performance in elderly persons working simulated night shifts: psychological well-being as a mediator? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 86(8):901–914
Kronfeld-Schor N, Einat H (2012) Circadian rhythms and depression: human psychopathology and animal models. Neuropharmacol 62(1):101–114
Lang JT, Hallman WK (2005) Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Risk Anal 25(5):1241–1252
Leikas S, Lindeman M, Roininen K, Lähteenmäki L (2007) Food risk perceptions, gender, and individual differences in avoidance and approach motivation, intuitive and analytic thinking styles, and anxiety. Appetite 48(2):232–240
Lyytimaki J, Tapio P, Assmuth T (2012) Unawareness in environmental protection: the case of light pollution from traffic. Land Use Policy 29:598–604
Miller MW (2006) Apparent effects of light pollution on singing behavior of American Robins. Condor 108(1):130–139
Millstone E, Zwanenberg PV (2002) The evolution of food safety policy-making institutions in the UK, EU and codex alimentarius. Soc Policy Adm 36:593–609
Morgan MG, Slovic P, Nair I, Geisler D, MacGregor D, Fischhoff B, Lincoln D, Florig K (1985) Powerline frequency electric and magnetic fields: a pilot study of risk perception. Risk Anal 5(2):139–149
Munch M, Kobialka S, Steiner R, Oelhafen P, Wirz-Justice A, Cajochen C (2006) Wavelength-dependent effects of evening light exposure on sleep architecture and sleep EEG power density in men. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 290:R1421–R1428
Munn T, Timmerman P, Whyte A (1999) Emerging environmental issues: a global perspective of SCOPE. Ambio 28:464–471
Petty RE. Cacioppo JT (1986) Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York
Schernhammer ES, Laden F, Speizer F, Willett EC, Hunter DJ, Kawachi I, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA (2003) Night-shift work and risk of colorectal cancer in the nurses’ health study. J Natl Cancer Inst 4:95(11):825–828
Shepherd R, Barker G, French S, Hart A, Maule J, Cassidy A (2006) Managing food chain risks: integrating technical and stakeholder perspectives on uncertainty. J Agric Econ 57(2):313–327
Siegrist M (2000) The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene Technology. Risk Anal 20(2):195–204
Sjöberg L, Drottz-Sjöberg BM (1991) Knowledge and risk perception among nuclear power plant employees. Risk Anal 11(4):607–618
Slovic P (1987) Perceptions of risk. Science 236:280–285
Snyder LB, Rouse RA (1995) The media can have more than an impersonal impact: the case of AIDS risk perceptions and behavior. Health Commun 7(2):125–145
Vandewalle G, Schmidt C, Albouy G, Sterpenich V, Darsaud A, Rauchs G, Berken PV, Balteau E, Degueldre C, Luxen A, Maquet P, Dijk DJ (2007) Brain responses to violet, blue, and green monochromatic light exposures in humans: Prominent Role of Blue Light and the Brainstem. PLoS ONE 2(11):e1247
Wahlberg AAF, Sjoberg L (2000) Risk perception and the media. J Risk Res 3:31–50
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a future environmental R&D grant funded by the Korean Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (RE201206020).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, K.H., Choi, J.W., Lee, E. et al. A study on the risk perception of light pollution and the process of social amplification of risk in Korea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 7612–7621 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4107-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4107-5