Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Artificial light at night as a driver of urban colonization by an avian predator

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Urbanization and artificial light at night (ALAN) are major drivers of local biodiversity losses causing community alterations, disruption of predator-prey interactions, and ultimately, promotion of cascading effects. However, some species can colonize urban environments.

Objectives

We explore the role of ALAN as a driver of the colonization of urban environments by a nocturnal avian predator, the burrowing owl Athene cunicularia.

Methods

We studied in a suburban locality in La Pampa, Argentina: (1) prey availability with pitfall traps under streetlights and control sites; (2) diet by analyzing pellets; (3) space use by deploying GPS data-loggers to breeding owls; (4) nesting habitat selection by comparing environmental variables at nest and random locations; and (5) productivity by correlating environmental variables with the number of fledglings.

Results

First, streetlights altered the invertebrate availability, attracting them to illuminated areas. Second, the owl diet was more similar to the invertebrate taxa trapped at pitfall traps under streetlights than that in control traps. Third, owl space use was determined by streetlights. Owls spent more time around light sources, particularly during the nighttime. Fourth, the most important habitat feature influencing the nesting habitat selection was the distance to streetlight. Owls selected areas close to streetlights for nesting. Finally, productivity was not explained by any of our habitat variables.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that ALAN alters the availability of invertebrates and plays a role in the diet, space use, and occupation of urban burrowing owls. Streetlights increase foraging efficiency for owls due to the clumping of prey attracted to lights. This predator-prey relationship might be only supported in suburban environments where low urbanization levels let burrowing owls nest in bare ground areas, and invertebrates are attracted to ALAN from surrounding wilder areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Data availability

All data analysed during this study are included in the article, its supplementary information files, and the Digital.CSIC repository (Rodríguez et al. 2020).

References

  • Almpanidou V, Tsapalou V, Tsavdaridou AI, Mazaris AD (2020) The dark side of raptors’ distribution ranges under climate change. Landsc Ecol 35:1435–1443

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayalon I, Barros Marangoni LF, Benichou JIC et al (2019) Red sea corals under artificial light pollution at night (ALAN) undergo oxidative stress and photosynthetic impairment. Glob Change Biol 25:4194–4207

    Google Scholar 

  • Baladrón AV, Cavalli M, Isacch JP, Bó MS (2020) Burrowing owl nest distribution and density in relation to urban development. Ethol Ecol Evol 32:237–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Baladrón AV, Isacch JP, Cavalli M, Bó MS (2016) Habitat selection by burrowing owls Athene cunicularia in the pampas of Argentina: a multiple-scale assessment. Acta Ornithol 51:137–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennie J, Davies TW, Cruse D et al (2015) Cascading effects of artificial light at night: resource-mediated control of herbivores in a grassland ecosystem. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 370:20140131

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2019) Species factsheet: Athene cunicularia. In: IUCN Red List birds. http://www.birdlife.org/. Accessed 25 Oct 2019

  • Bolton D, Mayer-Pinto M, Clark GF et al (2017) Coastal urban lighting has ecological consequences for multiple trophic levels under the sea. Sci Total Environ 576:1–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buij R, Gschweng M (2017) Nocturnal hunting by eleonora’s falcons Falco eleonorae on their breeding and non-breeding grounds. Acta Ornithol 52:35–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP (2011) AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Canário F, Hespanhol Leitão A, Tomé R (2012) Predation attempts by short-eared and long-eared owls on migrating songbirds attracted to artificial lights. J Raptor Res 46:232–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrete M, Tella JL (2010) Individual consistency in flight initiation distances in burrowing owls: a new hypothesis on disturbance induced habitat selection. Biol Lett 6:167–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli M, Baladrón AV, Isacch JP et al (2014) Prey selection and food habits of breeding burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) in natural and modified habitats of Argentine pampas. Emu 114:184–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli M, Baladrón AV, Isacch JP et al (2016) Differential risk perception of rural and urban burrowing owls exposed to humans and dogs. Behav Processes 124:60–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke JA (1983) Moonlight’s influence on predator/prey interactions between short-eared owls (Asio flammeus) and deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:205–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies TW, Bennie J, Gaston KJ (2012) Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities. Biol Lett 8:764–767

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davies TW, Smyth T (2018) Why artificial light at night should be a focus for global change research in the 21st century. Glob Change Biol 24:872–882

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCandido R, Allen D (2006) Nocturnal hunting by peregrine falcons at the empire state building, New York City. Wilson J Ornithol 118:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominoni DM, Halfwerk W, Baird E et al (2020) Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology. Nat Ecol Evol 4:502–511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dominoni DM, Nelson RJ (2018) Artificial light at night as an environmental pollutant: an integrative approach across taxa, biological functions, and scientific disciplines. J Exp Zool Part A 329:387–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Donners M, van Grunsven RHA, Groenendijk D et al (2018) Colors of attraction: modeling insect flight to light behavior. J Exp Zool Part A 329:434–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.2188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer RG, Bearhop S, Campbell HA, Bryant DM (2013) Shedding light on light: benefits of anthropogenic illumination to a nocturnally foraging shorebird. J Anim Ecol 82:478–485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falchi F, Cinzano P, Duriscoe D et al (2016) The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness. Sci Adv 2:e1600377

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fenoglio MS, Rossetti MR, Videla M (2020) Negative effects of urbanization on terrestrial arthropod communities: a meta-analysis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 29:1412–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming PA, Bateman PW (2018) Novel predation opportunities in anthropogenic landscapes. Anim Behav 138:145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich A, Ciach M (2019) Nocturnal noise and habitat homogeneity limit species richness of owls in an urban environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:17284–17291

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Davies TW, Bennie J, Hopkins J (2012) Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments. J Appl Ecol 49:1256–1266

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Davies TW, Nedelec SL, Holt LA (2017) Impacts of artificial light at night on biological timings. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 48:49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin E, Desmond M, VanLeeuwen D (2018) Juvenile burrowing owl nighttime space-use in Southern New Mexico. J Raptor Res 52:158–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE et al (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grubisic M, van Grunsven RHA, Kyba CCM et al (2018) Insect declines and agroecosystems: does light pollution matter? Ann Appl Biol 173:180–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Guetté A, Godet L, Juigner M, Robin M (2018) Worldwide increase in artificial light at night around protected areas and within biodiversity hotspots. Biol Conserv 223:97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson C (2018) Impact of urbanization on birds. In: Tietze DT (ed) Bird Species: how they arise, modify and vanish. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 235–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettel EF, Gentle LK, Quinn JL, Yarnell RW (2018) The breeding performance of raptors in urban landscapes: a review and meta-analysis. J Ornithol 159:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Knop E, Zoller L, Ryser R et al (2017) Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination. Nature 548:206–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn AJ, Riggs AC (1982) Sample size dependence in measures of proportional similarity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Komine H, Koike S, Schwarzkopf L (2020) Impacts of artificial light on food intake in invasive toads. Sci Rep 10:6527

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kyba CCM, Hänel A, Hölker F (2014) Redefining efficiency for outdoor lighting. Energy Environ Sci 7:1806

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyba CCM, Kuester T, Sánchez de Miguel A et al (2017) Artificially lit surface of earth at night increasing in radiance and extent. Sci Adv 3:e1701528

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lebbin DJ, Harvey MG, Lenz TC et al (2007) Nocturnal migrants foraging at night by artificial light. Wilson J Ornithol 119:506–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Levey DJ, Duncan RS, Levins CF (2004) Use of dung as a tool by burrowing owls. Nature 430:39

    Google Scholar 

  • Longcore T, Rich C (2004) Ecological light pollution. Front Ecol Environ 2:191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Longcore T, Rodríguez A, Witherington B et al (2018) Rapid assessment of lamp spectrum to quantify ecological effects of light at night. J Exp Zool Part A 329:511–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín-Gómez OH, García-Arroyo M, Sánchez-Sarria CE et al (2020) Nightlife in the city: drivers of the occurrence and vocal activity of a tropical owl. Avian Res 11:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez G, Baladrón AV, Cavalli M et al (2017) Microscale nest-site selection by the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) in the pampas of Argentina. Wilson J Ornithol 129:62–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller JC, Carrete M, Boerno S et al (2020) Genes acting in synapses and neuron projections are early targets of selection during urban colonization. Mol Ecol 29:3403–3412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller JC, Kuhl H, Boerno S et al (2018) Evolution of genomic variation in the burrowing owl in response to recent colonization of urban areas. Proc R Soc B 285:20180206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Negro JJ, Bustamante J, Melguizo C et al (2000) Nocturnal activity of lesser kestrels under artificial lighting conditions in Seville, Spain. J Raptor Res 34:327–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens ACS, Cochard P, Durrant J et al (2020) Light pollution is a driver of insect declines. Biol Conserv 241:108259

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry G, Buchanan BW, Salmon M, Wise SE (2008) Effects of night lighting on urban reptiles and amphibians. In: Mitchell JC, Jung Brown RE, Bartholomew B (eds) Urban herpetology. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Salt Lake City, pp 239–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebolo-Ifrán N, Tella JL, Carrete M (2017) Urban conservation hotspots: predation release allows the grassland-specialist burrowing owl to perform better in the city. Sci Rep 7:3527

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez A, Holmes ND, Ryan PG et al (2017) Seabird mortality induced by land-based artificial lights. Conserv Biol 31:986–1001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez A, Orozco-Valor PM, Sarasola JH (2020) GPS tracks of burrowing owls in La Pampa, Argentina [Dataset]. In: Digital.CSIC. https://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/12634

  • Russ A, Lučeničová T, Klenke R (2017) Altered breeding biology of the European blackbird under artificial light at night. J Avian Biol 48:1114–1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz C (2006) Home range size, habitat use, activity patterns and hunting behaviour of urban-breeding Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis. Ardea 94:185–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez KB, Malizia AI, Bó MS (2008) Trophic ecology of the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) in urban environments of Mar Chiquita biosphere reserve (Buenos Aires province, Argentina). Ornitol Neotrop 19:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayol F, Sol D, Pigot AL (2020) Brain size and life history interact to predict urban tolerance in birds. Front Ecol Evol 8:58

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobie C, Bayne E, Wellicome T (2014) Influence of anthropogenic features and traffic disturbance on burrowing owl diurnal roosting behavior. Endanger Species Res 24:73–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobie CA, Bayne EM, Wellicome TI (2016) Influence of human footprint and sensory disturbances on night-time space use of an owl. Endanger Species Res 31:75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:16083–16088

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solaro C, Santillán MA, Costán AS, Reyes MM (2012) Ecología trófica de Athene cunicularia and Tyto alba en el Cerro Curru-Mahuida, ecotono Monte-Espinal, La Pampa, Argentina. Hornero 27:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone EL, Harris S, Jones G (2015) Impacts of artificial lighting on bats: a review of challenges and solutions. Mamm Biol 80:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdez-Gómez HE, Holroyd GL, Trefry HE, Contreras-Balderas AJ (2018) Home Ranges, habitats, and roosts of wintering burrowing owls in agricultural landscapes in Central Mexico. J Raptor Res 52:178–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Zozaya SM, Alford RA, Schwarzkopf L (2015) Invasive house geckos are more willing to use artificial lights than are native geckos. Austral Ecol 40:982–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker N et al (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are in debt with landowners who allowed us to enter their properties to study owls. We thank our many friends and all Global Training fellows from University of the Basque Country for helping us during fieldwork. We also thank Mónica Pia for labwork and staff from the Museo Provincial de Historia Natural of La Pampa for invertebrate identification. Cami Sarasola and Jaime Potti improved the English grammar. Two anonymous reviewers provided useful comments. AR was supported by a Juan de la Cierva (Incorporación) contract, Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (IJCI-2015-23913). This research was supported by the project ‘Impacto de la contaminación lumínica en el comportamiento de un predador nocturno (Project ID: BS2017CSICS2017C00088903)’ and funded by the program Becas Iberoamérica-Santander Investigación (Fundación Banco de Santander).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AR, PMO-V, and JHS designed the study. PMO-V, JHS, and AR collected field data. JHS, AR, and PMO-V provided materials. AR analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Airam Rodríguez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures in this study were approved by Dirección de Recursos Naturales from Government of La Pampa province, Argentina. All procedures undertaken in this study were in accordance with approved guidelines.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (PDF 1392 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez, A., Orozco-Valor, P.M. & Sarasola, J.H. Artificial light at night as a driver of urban colonization by an avian predator. Landscape Ecol 36, 17–27 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01132-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01132-3

Keywords

Navigation