ReviewHealth consequences of electric lighting practices in the modern world: A report on the National Toxicology Program's workshop on shift work at night, artificial light at night, and circadian disruption
Graphical abstract
Introduction
The widespread adoption of electric light, only about 130 years ago, has facilitated a 24-hour/7-day society in which people work, sleep, eat, play, and expect goods and services at any time during the day or night. In this situation, people are exposed to electric light through lifestyle choices (e.g., use of electronic devices at night), the locations of their residences (e.g., urban light pollution), and employment during the night shift or as a shift worker (i.e., a worker whose schedule switches among morning, day, evening, and night). The United Nations proclaimed 2015 the International Year of Light and Light-Based Technologies in recognition of how light “has revolutionized medicine, opened up international communication via the Internet, and continues to be central to linking cultural, economic, and political aspects of the global economy” (http://www.light2015.org/Home/About.html). Although electric light has clearly benefited humankind, exposures to ill-timed, unnatural electric light, such as light at night (LAN) or differences in the quantity and spectrum of electric light from that provided by daylight exposures, may disrupt sleep and biological processes controlled by endogenous circadian clocks, potentially resulting in adverse health outcomes.
Because of these potential health concerns, LAN was nominated to the National Toxicology Program (NTP) to be the subject of literature-based health-hazard assessments on cancer and non-cancer outcomes. The NTP's Office of the Report on Carcinogens (ORoC) is assessing cancer outcomes for potential listing in the RoC, a U.S. congressionally mandated, science-based document that identifies cancer hazards. The Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) was asked to consider evaluating non-cancer (e.g., cardiovascular, metabolic, reproductive, gastrointestinal, immunological, neurological, and psychiatric) outcomes. Both ORoC and OHAT evaluations typically integrate evidence from human, experimental animal, and mechanistic studies. One of the rationales for nominating LAN to the RoC was the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) working group 2007 conclusion that “shift work involving circadian disruption is probably carcinogenic to humans” (IARC, 2010). Therefore, the NTP defined the nomination to include circadian disruption and shift work at night, in addition to LAN. Those nominating this topic emphasized that they were interested in a broader scope than shift work, because of concerns about effects from exposure to LAN in the sleeping area (from indoor and outdoor lights) and outfitting of institutions with light sources rich in short-wavelength content, such as some types of light-emitting diodes, and based on the opinion that carcinogenic effects observed among shift workers were potentially due to LAN.
Because of the complexity and breadth of the topic, the NTP convened a public workshop and webcast entitled “Shift Work at Night, Artificial Light at Night, and Circadian Disruption” on March 10–11, 2016, to help obtain input on the approach for the NTP literature-analysis activities and to identify data gaps and research needs in the field. (The Panel suggested changing the terminology used by the NTP to describe the exposure to light from “artificial light at night” [ALAN] to “electric lighting practices.”)
This workshop report captures the major discussion points of the Panel. The first part introduces the concepts of electric light as effector and enabler and of shift work as a complex exposure scenario, and it provides background information on circadian disruption and links to potential adverse health effects. The second part discusses key issues related to advancing the science, which will help inform NTP literature-based evaluations and identify data gaps and research needs. This section is followed by a brief discussion of interventions to protect public health. Finally, post-workshop activities and meeting outcomes are discussed. It is important to note that the workshop did not require expert consensus and is not intended to provide formal recommendations or guidelines.
Section snippets
Methods: workshop format
To meet the workshop goals, a cross-disciplinary workshop panel was selected by the NTP with experts in (1) the key exposures, such as light, shift work, and sleep, (2) health outcomes, such as cancer and reproductive, neurological, and behavioral outcomes, and (3) other pertinent disciplines, such as circadian biology, exposure assessment, epidemiology, clinical research, toxicology, and mechanisms of disease.
The workshop was organized into six sessions, which reflected a progression of
Light as effector and enabler
One of the key suggestions from the Panel was to describe light both as a direct effector on circadian rhythms and as an enabler of additional activities that may lead to circadian disruption, including night-shift work and other atypical and inconsistent sleep-wake patterns that can lead to social jet lag. It is important to note that the NTP workshop focused on effects of light and shift work on the circadian domain of the biological time structure. Circadian disruption was defined by the
Conclusions
An important outcome of the workshop was to increase the visibility of these pervasive and often unavoidable exposures and their associations with potential adverse health effects. Same-day attendees, either in person or via the webinar, exceeded 150 people from diverse organizations, including government, industry, academia, and non-profits, along with other concerned citizens. Videos of the workshop and summary materials remain available on the NTP website (//ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/workshop_ALAN
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Disclaimer
The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Toxicology Program or the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Gloria Jahnke, Dr. Katie Pelch, Dr. Kyla Taylor, Ms. Whitney Mitchell, and Ms. Courtney Skuce for their support at the workshop or for preparation of background materials for the workshop.
References (67)
- et al.
Artificial light at night alters delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in response to acute stress in Siberian hamsters
Brain Behav. Immun.
(2013) - et al.
Can light make us bright? Effects of light on cognition and sleep
Prog. Brain Res.
(2011) - et al.
The impact of daytime light exposures on sleep and mood in office workers
Sleep Health
(2017) - et al.
Disruption of circadian coordination accelerates malignant growth in mice
Pathol. Biol.
(2003) - et al.
Shift work and cancer risk: potential mechanistic roles of circadian disruption, light at night, and sleep deprivation
Sleep Med. Rev.
(2013) - et al.
Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age
Trends Neurosci.
(2014) - et al.
The effects of spectral tuning of evening ambient light on melatonin suppression, alertness and sleep
Physiol. Behav.
(2017) - et al.
A model of phototransduction by the human circadian system
Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.
(2005) - et al.
The circadian clock and human health
Curr. Biol.
(2016) - et al.
Social jetlag and obesity
Curr. Biol.
(2012)
Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting
Lancet Oncol.
Increased melatonin signaling is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes
Cell Metab.
Aligning work and circadian time in shift workers improves sleep and reduces circadian disruption
Curr. Biol.
French agency for food, environmental and occupational health & safety
Dim light at night interferes with the development of the short-day phenotype and impairs cell-mediated immunity in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus)
J. Exp. Zool. A Ecol. Genet. Physiol.
Dim light at night increases body mass of female mice
Chronobiol. Int.
Chronic exposure to dim light at night suppresses immune responses in Siberian hamsters
Biol. Lett.
Nocturnal light exposure impairs affective responses in a wavelength-dependent manner
J. Neurosci.
Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures
Am. J. Ind. Med.
Melatonin-depleted blood from premenopausal women exposed to light at night stimulates growth of human breast cancer xenografts in nude rats
Cancer Res.
Circadian stage-dependent inhibition of human breast cancer metabolism and growth by the nocturnal melatonin signal: consequences of its disruption by light at night in rats and women
Integr. Cancer Ther.
Circadian regulation of molecular, dietary, and metabolic signaling mechanisms of human breast cancer growth by the nocturnal melatonin signal and the consequences of its disruption by light at night
J. Pineal Res.
Light exposure at night disrupts host/cancer circadian regulatory dynamics: impact on the Warburg effect, lipid signaling and tumor growth prevention
PLoS One
Impact of windows and daylight exposure on overall health and sleep quality of office workers: a case-control pilot study
J. Clin. Sleep Med.
Action spectrum for melatonin regulation in humans: evidence for a novel circadian photoreceptor
J. Neurosci.
The human circadian system adapts to prior photic history
J. Physiol.
Modifications to weekend recovery sleep delay circadian phase in older adolescents
Chronobiol. Int.
Circadian and melatonin disruption by exposure to light at night drives intrinsic resistance to tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer
Cancer Res.
Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews
PLoS One
Progressive decrease of melatonin production over consecutive days of simulated night work
Chronobiol. Int.
The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness
Sci. Adv.
Self-luminous devices and melatonin suppression in adolescents
Light. Res. Technol.
Dim nighttime light impairs cognition and provokes depressive-like responses in a diurnal rodent
J. Biol. Rhythm.
Cited by (268)
Effects of dim light at night in C57BL/6 J mice on recovery after spinal cord injury
2024, Experimental NeurologyChitosan revokes controlled-cortical impact generated neurological aberrations in circadian disrupted mice via TLR4-NLRP3 axis
2024, European Journal of PharmacologyThe association between blue light exposure and incidence of type 2 diabetes: A prospective study of UK biobank
2024, Environmental ResearchCerebral, systemic physiological and behavioral responses to colored light exposure during a cognitive task: A SPA-fNIRS study
2024, Behavioural Brain ResearchOutdoor artificial light at night and incident cardiovascular disease in adults: A national cohort study across China
2024, Science of the Total Environment