Skip to main content
Log in

Hypothesis: ubiquitous circadian disruption can cause cancer

  • ESSAY
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Circadian disruption (CD) was implicated in chains of cancer causation when the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified shift-work involving circadian disruption as probably carcinogenic in 2007. In the following decade, epidemiological studies into causal concepts associated with circadian disruption were inconclusive. Unappreciated complexity with an exclusive focus on shift-work, light-at-night, sleep, and melatonin in regard to circadian disruption may be accountable. With compelling non-epidemiological evidence, we posit that ubiquitous circadian disruption causes cancer and, moreover, that this is unexplored epidemiologically. This hypothesis offers a novel explanation why numerous studies in shift-workers evince inconsistent results: If circadian disruption is a ubiquitous causal phenomenon, confining assessments to the workplace, ignoring circadian disruption at play, and potential misclassification of ‘who’ is ‘when’ and ‘how much’ exposed to circadian disruption may disallow detecting the existence and magnitude of cancer risks. The rationale herein provides plausible explanations for previous observations and makes falsifiable predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lewis P, Foster RG, Erren TC. Ticking time bomb? High time for chronobiological research. EMBO Rep. 2018;19(5):e46073. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201846073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. IARC. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 98. Painting, Firefighting and Shiftwork. Lyon, France. 2010.

  3. Erren TC, Lewis P. Can yesterday’s smoking research inform today’s shiftwork research? Epistemological consequences for exposures and doses due to circadian disruption at and off work. J Occup Med Toxicol Lond Engl. 2017;12:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-017-0175-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Erren TC, Reiter RJ, Peickarski C. Light, timing of biological rhythms, and chronodisruption in man. Naturwissenschaften. 2003;90(11):485–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wittmann M, Dinich J, Merrow M, Roenneberg T. Social jetlag: misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(1–2):497–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520500545979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Czeisler CA. Perspective: casting light on sleep deficiency. Nature. 2013;497(7450):S13. https://doi.org/10.1038/497S13a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. James P, Bertrand KA, Hart JE, Schernhammer ES, Tamimi RM, Laden F. Outdoor light at night and breast cancer incidence in the Nurses’ Health Study II. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(8):087010. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP935.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Figueiro MG. Disruption of circadian rhythms by light during day and night. Curr Sleep Med Rep. 2017;3(2):76–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40675-017-0069-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Stevens RG. Electric power use and breast cancer: a hypothesis. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;125(4):556–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kantermann T, Burgess HJ. Average mid-sleep time as a proxy for circadian phase. PsyCh J. 2017;6(4):290–1. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kantermann T, Sung H, Burgess HJ. Comparing the morningness–eveningness questionnaire and Munich chronotype questionnaire to the dim light melatonin onset. J Biol Rhythm. 2015;30(5):449–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730415597520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erren TC, Morfeld P, Foster RG, Reiter RJ, Gross JV, Westermann IK. Sleep and cancer: synthesis of experimental data and meta-analyses of cancer incidence among some 1,500,000 study individuals in 13 countries. Chronobiol Int. 2016;33(4):325–50. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2016.1149486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Erren TC, Morfeld P, Lewis P. Computing circadian misalignment: Why not combine sleep timing and duration to assess accumulated sleep deficiency? Chronobiol Int. 2017;34(10):1321–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2017.1371729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Erren TC, Morfeld P. Computing chronodisruption: how to avoid potential chronobiological errors in epidemiological studies of shift work and cancer. Chronobiol Int. 2014;31(4):589–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Srour B, Plancoulaine S, Andreeva VA, et al. Circadian nutritional behaviours and cancer risk: new insights from the NutriNet-sante prospective cohort study: disclaimers. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(10):2369–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31584.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kogevinas M, Espinosa A, Castello A, et al. Effect of mistimed eating patterns on breast and prostate cancer risk (MCC-Spain Study). Int J Cancer. 2018;143(10):2380–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31649.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis P, Korf HW, Kuffer L, Gross JV, Erren TC. Exercise time cues (zeitgebers) for human circadian systems can foster health and improve performance—a systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018;4:e000443. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000443.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. German National Cohort C. The German National Cohort: aims, study design and organization. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(5):371–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9890-7.

  19. Van Dycke KC, Rodenburg W, van Oostrom CT, et al. Chronically alternating light cycles increase breast cancer risk in mice. Curr Biol. 2015;25(14):1932–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Lewis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erren, T.C., Lewis, P. Hypothesis: ubiquitous circadian disruption can cause cancer. Eur J Epidemiol 34, 1–4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0469-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0469-6

Keywords

Navigation