Skip to main content
Log in

Potential Applicability of Persuasive Communication to Light-Glow Reduction Efforts: A Case Study of Marine Turtle Conservation

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial lighting along coastlines poses a significant threat to marine turtles due to the importance of light for their natural orientation at the nesting beach. Effective lighting management requires widespread support and participation, yet engaging the public with light reduction initiatives is difficult because benefits associated with artificial lighting are deeply entrenched within modern society. We present a case study from Queensland, Australia, where an active light-glow reduction campaign has been in place since 2008 to protect nesting turtles. Semi-structured questionnaires explored community beliefs about reducing light and evaluated the potential for using persuasive communication techniques based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to increase engagement with light reduction. Respondents (n = 352) had moderate to strong intentions to reduce light. TPB variables explained a significant proportion of variance in intention (multiple regression: R 2 = 0.54–0.69, P < 0.001), but adding a personal norm variable improved the model (R 2 = 0.73–0.79, P < 0.001). Significant differences in belief strength between campaign compliers and non-compliers suggest that targeting the beliefs reducing light leads to “increased protection of local turtles” (P < 0.01) and/or “benefits to the local economy” (P < 0.05), in combination with an appeal to personal norms, would produce the strongest persuasion potential for future communications. Selective legislation and commitment strategies may be further useful strategies to increase community light reduction. As artificial light continues to gain attention as a pollutant, our methods and findings will be of interest to anyone needing to manage public artificial lighting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (2001) Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu Rev Psychol 52(1):27–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (2002) Constructing a TpB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. http://chuang.epage.au.edu.tw/ezfiles/168/1168/attach/20/pta_41176_7688352_57138.pdf. Accessed August 2012

  • Armitage CJ, Conner M (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 40(4):471–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage CJ, Norman P, Conner M (2002) Can the theory of planned behaviour mediate the effects of age, gender and multidimensional health locus of control? Br J Health Psychol 7(3):299–316. doi:10.1348/135910702760213698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2007) 2006 Census QuickStats. http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2006/quickstat/UCL303600. Accessed 12 April 2012

  • Australian Government (2013) Home energy saver scheme. http://www.dss.gov.au/our-responsibilities/communities-and-vulnerable-people/programs-services/financial-management-program/home-energy-saver-scheme/home-energy-saver-scheme. Accessed 5 June 2014

  • Bamberg S, Schmidt P (2003) Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environ Behav 35(2):264–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg S, Ajzen I, Schmidt P (2003) Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: the roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 25(3):175–187. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2503_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barschel N, Bruce R, Haggitt D, Lichter B, McCray J (2013) Sea turtle friendly lighting: a model ordinance for local governments & model guidelines for incorporation into governing documents of planned communities: condominiums, cooperatives and homeowners’ associations. The Conservation Clinic, University of Florida Levin College of Law, on behalf of the Sea Turtle Conservancy, Florida

  • Bator R, Cialdini R (2000) The application of persuasion theory to the development of effective proenvironmental public service announcements. J Soc Issues 56(3):527–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry M, Booth DT, Limpus CJ (2013) Artificial lighting and disrupted sea-finding behaviour in hatchling loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on the Woongarra coast, south-east Queensland, Australia. Aust J Zool 61(2):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake J (1999) Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environ 4(3):257–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown TJ, Ham SH, Hughes M (2010) Picking up litter: an application of theory-based communication to influence tourist behaviour in protected areas. J Sustain Tour 18(7):879–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A (2004) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler KR (1997) Coastal protection of sea turtles in Florida. J Land Use Environ Law 13:399

    Google Scholar 

  • Chepesiuk R (2009) Missing the dark: health effects of light pollution. Environ Health Perspect 117(1):A20–A27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini R (1993) Influence: science and practice. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinzano P, Falchi F, Elvidge CD (2001) The first World Atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. MNRAS 328(3):689–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark BAJ (2005) Is artificial light at night too much of a good thing? Clin Exp Optom 88(4):197–199. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2005.tb06697.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett JB (2005) Altruism, self-interest, and the reasonable person model of environmentally responsible behavior. Sci Commun 26(4):368–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEEDI (2011) Queensland energy management plan. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Queensland State Government. Available online at http://rti.cabinet.qld.gov.au/documents/2011/may/qld%20energy%20management%20plan/Attachments/Qld%20Energy%20Mgt%20Plan.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2014

  • Eckert K (1999) Designing a conservation program. In: Eckert K, Bjorndal K, Abreu-Grobois AF, Donnelly M (eds) Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles. IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No. 4, Washington, DC, pp 6–8

  • Elvidge C, Sutton P, Baugh K, Ziskin D, Ghosh T, Anderson S (2011) National trends in satellite observed lighting: 1992-2009. Remote Sens 3:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Action (2013) Comparison of energy efficiency schemes in Australia. http://www.energyaction.com.au/comparison-of-ees. Accessed 5 June 2014

  • Festinger L (1962) Cognitive dissonance. Sci Am 207(4):93–107. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1062-93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding KS, McDonald R, Louis WR (2008) Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. J Environ Psychol 28(4):318–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003

  • Fischer A, Young JC (2007) Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biol Conserv 136(2):271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2010) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy R, Francis JJ, Johnston M, Eccles M, Lecouturier J, Bamford C, Grimshaw J (2007) The development of a theory-based intervention to promote appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia. BMC Health Serv Res 7(1):207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Walker A, Grimshaw J, Foy R, Kaner EF, Smith L, Bonetti D (2004) Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour. A manual for health services researchers. Centre for Health Services Research, Newcastle Upon Tyne, pp 2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS (1999) Economics as a science of human behaviour: towards a new social science paradigm. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18(1):59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham S (2007) Can interpretation really make a difference? Answers to four questions from cognitive and behavioral psychology. In: Proceedings of the interpreting world heritage conference, 2007. National Association for Interpretation Fort Collins, CO, pp 25–29

  • Ham SH, Weiler B, Hughes M, Brown T, Curtis J, Poll M (2008) Asking visitors to help: research to guide strategic communication for protected area management. Sustainable Tourism CRC, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland P, Staats H, Wilke HA (1999) Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 29(12):2505–2528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath Y, Gifford R (2002) Extending the theory of planned behavior: predicting the use of public transportation. J Appl Soc Psychol 32(10):2154–2189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamrowski RL, Sutton SG, Tobin RC, Hamann M (in press) Balancing artificial light at night with turtle conservation? Coastal community engagement with light-glow reduction. Environ Conserv

  • Knussen C, Yule F (2008) “I’m Not in the Habit of Recycling”: the role of habitual behavior in the disposal of household waste. Environ Behav 40(5):683–702. doi:10.1177/0013916507307527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Edu Res 8(3):239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lackey BK, Ham S (2003) Contextual analysis of interpretation focused on human-black bear conflicts in Yosemite National Park. Appl Environ Edu Commun 2(1):11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limpus CJ, Kamrowski RL (2013) Ocean-finding in marine turtles: the importance of low horizon elevation as an orientation cue. Behaviour 150:863–893. doi:10.1163/1568539X-00003083

    Google Scholar 

  • Limpus C, Limpus DJ (2003) Loggerhead turtles in the equatorial and southern Pacific Ocean: a species in decline. In: Bolten A, Witherington B (eds) Loggerhead sea turtles. Smithsonian Books, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobb AE, Mazzocchi M, Traill WB (2007) Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behaviour. Food Qual Preference 18(2):384–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.04.004

  • Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environ Change 17(3–4):445–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004

  • Lucas RJ, Peirson SN, Berson DM, Brown TM, Cooper HM, Czeisler CA, Figueiro MG, Gamlin PD, Lockley SW, O’Hagan JB, Price LLA, Provencio I, Skene DJ, Brainard GC (2014) Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age. Trends Neurosci 37(1):1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytimäki J (2013) Nature’s nocturnal services: light pollution as a non-recognised challenge for ecosystem services research and management. Ecosyst Serv 3:e44–e48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytimäki J, Rinne J (2013) Voices for the darkness: online survey on public perceptions on light pollution as an environmental problem. JIES 10(2):127–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytimäki J, Tapio P, Assmuth T (2012) Unawareness in environmental protection: the case of light pollution from traffic. Land Use Policy 29(3):598–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald EA (2011) The application of persuasive communication theory to promote visitor conservation behaviour at Wellington zoo. PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

  • McKenzie-Mohr D (1994) Social marketing for sustainability: the case of residential energy conservation. Futures 26(2):224–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(94)90111-2

  • McKenzie-Mohr D (2000a) Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. Am Psychol 55(5):531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie-Mohr D (2000b) New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior. Promoting sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. J Soc Issues 56(3):543–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie-Mohr D, Smith W (1999) Fostering sustainable development. An introduction to community-based social marketing. Academy for Educational Development and Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, New Society Publishers, Washington, DC

  • Middlestadt SE, Bhattacharyya K, Rosenbaum J, Fishbein M, Shepherd M (1996) The use of theory based semistructured elicitation questionnaires: formative research for CDC’s Prevention Marketing Initiative. Public Health Rep 111(Suppl 1):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris D (2002) Light as environment: medicine, health, and values. J Med Humanit 23(1):7–29. doi:10.1023/a:1013085302589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris MG, Venkatesh V, Ackerman PL (2005) Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory of planned behavior. Eng Manag IEEE Trans 52(1):69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) “Fear won’t do it” promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30(3):355–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette JA, Wood W (1998) Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychol Bull 124(1):54–74. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens S (2000) ‘Engaging the public’: information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environ Plan A 32(7):1141–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer C, Swanson A, Ikanda D, Kushnir H (2011) Fear of darkness, the full moon and the nocturnal ecology of African lions. PLoS ONE 6(7):e22285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pallak MS, Cook DA, Sullivan JJ (1980) Commitment and energy conservation. Policy Stud Rev Ann 4:352

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker D, Manstead ASR, Stradling SG (1995) Extending the theory of planned behaviour: the role of personal norm. Br J Soc Psychol 34(2):127–138. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01053.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestalozzi N, Cauwels P, Sornette D (2013) Dynamics and spatial distribution of global nighttime lights. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 13-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2237410 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2237410

  • Petty R, Cacioppo J (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Communication and Persuasion. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, pp 1–24. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1

  • Powell RB, Ham SH (2008) Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to pro-conservation knowledge, attitudes and behaviour? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands. JOST 16(4):467–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Pudmenzky C (2013) In Queensland, what legislative changes or modifications need to be implemented in relation to light pollution problems for nesting sea turtles and hatchlings? Queensland parliamentary internship research report. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia

  • Rich C, Longcore T (2006) Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross A, Dovers S (2008) Making the harder yards: environmental policy integration in Australia. Aust J Public Admin 67(3):245–260. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00585.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon M (2003) Artificial night lighting and sea turtles. Biologist 50(4):163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon M, Wyneken J (1994) Orientation by hatchling sea turtles: mechanisms and implications. Herpetol Nat Hist 2:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 10:221–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (2000) Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. Am Psychol 55(5):523–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Dietz T (1994) The value basis of environmental concern. J Soc Issues 50(3):65–84. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens RG (2009) Light-at-night, circadian disruption and breast cancer: assessment of existing evidence. Int J Epidemiol 38(4):963–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann S (2001) Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: a model explaining opposition to protected areas. J Environ Psychol 21(4):369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton SG, Tobin RC (2011) Constraints on community engagement with Great Barrier Reef climate change reduction and mitigation. Global Environ Change 21(3):894–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen J, Ölander F (2006) The dynamic interaction of personal norms and environment-friendly buying behavior: a panel study. J Appl Soc Psychol 36(7):1758–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell C, Wilson C (2005) Does Tourism contribute to sea turtle conservation? Is the flagship status of turtles advantageous? MAST 3(2):145–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Read AD (2004) Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Resour Conserv Recy 41(3):191–214. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.11.001

  • Van Vliet B, Chappells H, Shove E (2005) Infrastructures of consumption: environmental innovation in the utility industries. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermette L, Godin G (1996) Nurses’ intentions to provide home care: the impact of AIDS and homosexuality. AIDS Care 8(4):479–488. doi:10.1080/09540129650125669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S (2010) Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. J Environ Psychol 30(3):305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S, Lorenzoni I (2011) Engaging the public with climate change: behaviour change and communication. Earthscan Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherington B, Martin RE (2000) Understanding, assessing, and resolving light-pollution problems on sea turtle nesting beaches, 2nd edn, rev. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Marine Research Institute, Technical Report TR-2, St. Petersburg, FL

  • Zint M, Wolske KS (2014) From information provision to participatory deliberation: engaging residents in the transition toward sustainable cities. In: Mazmanian D, Blanco H (eds) The Elgar companion to sustainable cities: strategies, methods and outlook. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the residents of Bargara for making this research possible, Amy Smith and Sam Ham for advice on TPB usage and communication theory, Chad Kirby for his assistance with data collection, and QPWS rangers for support and consultation. We acknowledge the assistance of the Bargara Buzz in publicizing the survey. Advice from three reviewers greatly improved the manuscript. This research was funded by a grant from James Cook University’s Graduate Research Scheme, and this manuscript forms part of RLK’s PhD research at James Cook University. RLK is supported by the Northcote Trust Graduate Scholarship. MH is supported by the Australian Government’s NERP. This work complies with James Cook University human ethics permit No. H4079.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth L. Kamrowski.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamrowski, R.L., Sutton, S.G., Tobin, R.C. et al. Potential Applicability of Persuasive Communication to Light-Glow Reduction Efforts: A Case Study of Marine Turtle Conservation. Environmental Management 54, 583–595 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0308-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0308-9

Keywords

Navigation