Abstract
Inclusive wealth (IW) measures the wealth of all the assets from which human wellbeing is derived, including produced, human and natural capital. This metric represents a region’s capacity to create and maintain human wellbeing over time and reflects how human, manufactured, natural and environmental factors interact and contribute to sustainability. However, IW is mostly measured at national levels and thus is difficult to deploy in more fine-grained applications of regional sustainability. To fill this gap, we aimed to develop a hybrid geospatial method to measure IW at a finer resolution using multisource data and geographical technology and to understand how different capital types are distributed and interact at a regional scale. Taking China and Japan as examples, this paper mapped the distribution of IW and its three constituent forms of capital at an approximately 1 km resolution in both countries in 2017. Some patterns that cannot be observed in country-level studies are revealed. First, the IW density of Japan is approximately 6 times that of China, and Tokyo has over three times the IW as that of Beijing. This finding underscores the greater overall sustainability of Japan. Second, the results show clear regional variation and an urban-rural divide of wealth in both countries. There is a northeast-southwest demarcation line that divides China into two parts with different levels of wealth, and the IW of Japan is concentrated along the Taiheiyo Belt. Furthermore, contrasts exist between the distribution of natural and human capital. Natural capital always accounts for very little of the wealth in developed regions with high IW and, in particular, high human capital.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For data details, see https://www.worldpop.org/geodata/listing?id=29.
For data details, see https://eogdata.mines.edu/download_dnb_composites.html.
For data details, see http://data.ess.tsinghua.edu.cn.
See the 3D surface map via: http://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/aw3d30/l_map_en_v1804.htm.
References
Ahmad N, Derrible S, Managi S (2018) A network-based frequency analysis of inclusive wealth to track sustainable development in world countries. J Environ Manag 218:348–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.070
Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Goulder L, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Heal G, Levin S, Maler K, Schneider S, Starrett D, Walker B (2004) Are we consuming too much? J Econ Perspect 18(3):147–172. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330042162377
Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Goulder LH, Mumford KJ, Oleson K (2012) Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environ Dev Econ 17(03):317–353. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x12000137
Bird F (2014) The practice of mining and inclusive wealth development in developing countries. J Bus Ethics 135(4):631–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2378-2
Cai B, Wang J, He J, Geng Y (2016) Evaluating CO2 emission performance in China’s cement industry: an enterprise perspective. Appl Energy 66:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.006
Chin G (2016) Measuring consumption and wealth remotely. Science 353(6301):786–788. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.353.6301.786-j
Collins R, Selin NE, de Weck OL, Clark WC (2017) Using inclusive wealth for policy evaluation: application to electricity infrastructure planning in oil-exporting countries. Ecol Econ 133(2017):23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.013
Dai S, Ren D, Chou CL, Finkelman RB, Seredin VV, Zhou Y (2012) Geochemistry of trace elements in Chinese coals: a review of abundances, genetic types, impacts on human health, and industrial utilization. Int J Coal Geol 94:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2011.02.003
Dasgupta P (2009) The welfare economic theory of green national accounts. Environ Resour Econ 42(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9223-y
Dasgupta P, Duraiappah A, Managi S, Barbier E, Collins R, Fraumeni B, Gundimeda H, Liu G, Mumford K (2015) How to measure sustainable progress. Science 350(6262):748–748. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.350.6262.748
de Groot R, Brander L, van der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, Christie M, Crossman N, Ghermandi A, Hein L, Hussain S, Kumar P, McVittie A, Portela R, Rodriguez LC, ten Brink P, van Beukering P (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services 1(1):50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005
Easterlin RA (2003) Explaining happiness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(19):11176–11183. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633144100
Fenichel EP, Abbott JK, Bayham J, Boone W, Haacker EM, Pfeiffer L (2016) Measuring the value of groundwater and other forms of natural capital. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(9):2382–2387. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513779113
Fujii H, Managi S (2016) An evaluation of inclusive capital stock for urban planning. Ecosyst Health Sust 2(10):1–11. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400636-2
Hayashi T (2015) Measuring rural–urban disparity with the Genuine Progress Indicator: a case study in Japan. Ecol Econ 120:260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.006
Henderson JV, Storeygard A, Weil DN (2012) Measuring economic growth from outer space. Am Econ Rev 102(2):994–1028. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.2.994
Henderson JV, Squires T, Storeygard A, Weil D (2018) The global distribution of economic activity: nature, history, and the role of trade. Q J Econ 133(1):357–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx030
Ikeda S, Tamaki T, Nakamura H, Managi S (2017) Inclusive wealth of regions: the case of Japan. Sustain Sci 12(6):991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0450-4
Galvani AP, Bauch CT, Anand M, Singer BH, Levin SA (2016) Human-environment interactions in population and ecosystem health. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(51):14502–14506. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618138113
King RG, Levine R (1994) Capital fundamentalism, economic development, and economic growth. Carn-Roch Conf Ser Public Policy 40(1994):259–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(94)90011-6
Kurniawan R, Managi S (2018a) Measuring long-term sustainability with shared socioeconomic pathways using an inclusive wealth framework. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1722
Kurniawan R, Managi S (2018b) Linking wealth and productivity of natural capital for 140 countries between 1990 and 2014. Soc Indic Res 141(1):443–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1833-8
Li G, Fang C, Wang S (2016) Exploring spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem-service values and hotspots in China. Sci Total Environ 545-546:609–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.067
Li X, Xu H, Chen X, Li C (2013) Potential of NPP-VIIRS nighttime light imagery for modeling the regional economy of China. Remote Sens 5(6):3057–3081. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5063057
Li X, Zhou W (2018) Dasymetric mapping of urban population in China based on radiance corrected DMSP-OLS nighttime light and land cover data. Sci Total Environ 643:1248–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.244
Managi S (2015) The Routledge handbook of environmental economics in Asia. Routledge, London and New York
Managi S, Kumar P (2018) Inclusive wealth report 2018: measuring progress towards sustainability. Routledge
Metzger MJ, Lindner M, Pedroli B (2018) Towards a roadmap for sustainable land use in Europe. Reg Environ Chang 18(3):707–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1285-y
Minami R, Ma X (2010) The Lewis turning point of Chinese economy: comparison with Japanese experience. China Econ J 3(2):163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2010.511912
Nordhaus WD (2006) Geography and macroeconomics: new data and new findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(10):3510–3517. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509842103
Pearson LJ, Biggs R, Harris M, Walker B (2013) Measuring sustainable development: the promise and difficulties of implementing inclusive wealth in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia. Sustainability: Sci Pract Policy 9(1):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2013.11908104
Porfirio LL, Steffen W, Barrett DJ, Berry SL (2009) The net ecosystem carbon exchange of human-modified environments in the Australian Capital Region. Reg Environ Chang 10(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0081-5
Song XP (2018) Global estimates of ecosystem service value and change: taking into account uncertainties in satellite-based land cover data. Ecol Econ 143:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.019
Uehara T, Niu J, Chen X, Ota T, Nakagami K (2016) A sustainability assessment framework for regional-scale Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) incorporating Inclusive Wealth, Satoumi, and ecosystem services science. Sustain Sci 11(5):801–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0373-5
UNDP (2017) Human development report 2016: human development for everyone. UN, New York https://doi.org/10.18356/b6186701-en
UNU-IHDP, UNEP (2012) Inclusive wealth report 2012: measuring process toward sustainability. Cambridge University Press, London
UNU-IHDP, UNEP (2014) Inclusive wealth report 2014: measuring process toward sustainability. Cambridge University Press, London
van den Bergh JCJM (2001) Ecological economics: themes, approaches, and differences with environmental economics. Reg Environ Chang 2(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101130000020
Wu R, Yang D, Dong J, Zhang L, Xia F (2018) Regional inequality in China based on NPP-VIIRS night-time light imagery. Remote Sens 10(2):240. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020240
Yamaguchi R, Sato M, Ueta K (2015) Measuring regional wealth and assessing sustainable development: an application to a disaster-torn region in Japan. Soc Indic Res 129(1):365–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1106-3
Yoshida Y, Matsuda H, Fukushi K, Ikeda S, Managi S, Takeuchi K (2018) Assessing local-scale inclusive wealth: a case study of Sado Island, Japan. Sustain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0540-y
Yun SD, Hutniczak B, Abbott JK, Fenichel EP (2017) Ecosystem-based management and the wealth of ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(25):6539–6544. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617666114
Zhang J, Sun W (2018) Measurement of the ocean wealth of nations in China: an inclusive wealth approach. Mar Policy 89:85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.12.012
Zhao N, Liu Y, Cao G, Samson EL, Zhang J (2017) Forecasting China’s GDP at the pixel level using nighttime lights time series and population images. GISci Remote Sens 54(3):407–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2016.1276
Funding
This research is supported by the following Grant in Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan (MEXT): Grant in Aid (20H00648), Ministry of Environment, Japan (1-2001). Bingqi Zhang was financially supported by the China Scholarship Council (CSC). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agencies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mitigation and adaptation strategies under uncertainties in East Asia
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 3.00 mb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, B., Nozawa, W. & Managi, S. Sustainability measurements in China and Japan: an application of the inclusive wealth concept from a geographical perspective. Reg Environ Change 20, 65 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01658-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01658-x