Skip to main content
Log in

CogState computerized memory tests in patients with brain metastases: secondary endpoint results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0933

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is associated with memory dysfunction. As part of NRG Oncology RTOG 0933, a phase II study of WBRT for brain metastases that conformally avoided the hippocampal stem cell compartment (HA-WBRT), memory was assessed pre- and post-HA-WBRT using both traditional and computerized memory tests. We examined whether the computerized tests yielded similar findings and might serve as possible alternatives for assessment of memory in multi-institution clinical trials. Adult patients with brain metastases received HA-WBRT to 30 Gy in ten fractions and completed Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), CogState International Shopping List Test (ISLT) and One Card Learning Test (OCLT), at baseline, 2 and 4 months. Tests’ completion rates were 52–53 % at 2 months and 34–42 % at 4 months. All baseline correlations between HVLT-R and CogState tests were significant (p ≤ 0.003). At baseline, both CogState tests and one component of HVLT-R differentiated those who were alive at 6 months and those who had died (p ≤ 0.01). At 4 months, mean relative decline was 7.0 % for HVLT-R Delayed Recall and 18.0 % for ISLT Delayed Recall. OCLT showed an 8.0 % increase. A reliable change index found no significant changes from baseline to 2 and 4 months for ISLT Delayed Recall (z = −0.40, p = 0.34; z = −0.68, p = 0.25) or OCLT (z = 0.15, p = 0.56; z = 0.41, p = 0.66). Study findings support the possibility that hippocampal avoidance may be associated with preservation of memory test performance, and that these computerized tests also may be useful and valid memory assessments in multi-institution adult brain tumor trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schagen SB, Vardy J, Steering Committee of the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (2007) Cognitive dysfunction in people with cancer. Lancet Oncol 8(10):852–853. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70287-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Preusser M, Winker F, Collette L et al (2012) Trial design on prophylaxis and treatment of brain metastases: lessons learned from the EORTC Brain Metastases Strategic Meeting 2012. Eur J Cancer 48(18):3439–3447. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caine C, Mehta MP, Laack NN, Gondi V (2012) Cognitive function testing in adult brain tumor trials: lessons from a comprehensive review. Exp Rev Anticancer Ther 12(5):655–667. doi:10.1586/era.12.34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li J, Bentzen SM, Li JL et al (2008) Relationship between neurocognitive function and quality of life after whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastasis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71(1):64–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Correa DD, Maron L, Harder H et al (2007) Cognitive functions in primary central nervous system lymphoma: literature review and assessment guidelines. Ann Oncol 18(7):1145–1151. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Welzel G, Fleckenstein K, Schaefer J et al (2008) Memory function before and after whole brain radiotherapy in patients with and without brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(5):1311–1318. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Resch JE, McCrea MA, Cullum CM (2013) Computerized neurocognitive testing in the management of sport-related concussion: an update. Neuropsychol Rev 23(4):335–349. doi:10.1007/s11065-013-9242-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wesnes K, Edgar C, Andreasen N et al (2010) Computerized cognition assessment during acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand 122(4):270–277. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01309.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fliessbach K, Rogowski S, Hoppe C et al (2010) Computer-based assessment of cognitive functions in brain tumor patients. J Neurooncol 100(3):427–437. doi:10.1007/s11060-010-0194-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters K, Woodring S, Affronti ML et al (2013) Neurocognitive dysfunction in newly diagnosed high-grade glioma patients: Utilization of standardized computerized neurocognitive testing. Neuro Oncol 15(suppl.):iii96

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conklin HM, Ashford JM, DiPinto M et al (2013) Computerized assessment of cognitive late effects among adolescent brain tumor survivors. J Neurooncol 113(2):333–340. doi:10.1007/s11060-013-1123-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tomé WA et al (2014) Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase 2 multi-institutional trial. J Clin Oncol 32(34):3810–3816. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2909

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Brandt J, Benedict RHB (2001) Hopkins verbal learning test—revised. Psychol Assess Resour, Lutz

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta MP, Rodrigus P, Terhaard CH et al (2003) Survival and neurologic outcomes in a randomized trial of motexafin gadolinium and whole-brain radiation therapy in brain metastases. J Clin Oncol 21(13):2529–2536. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.12.122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR et al (2009) Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10(11):1037–1044. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70263-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown PD, Asher AL, Ballman KV, et al. (2015) NCCTG N0574 (Alliance): a phase III randomized trial of whole-brain radiation therapy in addition to radiosurgery in patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, May 18, 2015: LBA4

  17. Soffietti R, Kocher M, Abacioglu UM et al (2013) A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial of adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation in patients with one to three brain metastases from solid tumors after surgical resection or radiosurgery: quality-of-life results. J Clin Oncol 31(1):65–72. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gondi V, Tolakanahalli R, Mehta MP et al (2010) Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: a “how-to” technique using helical tomotherapy and linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78(4):1244–1252. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.039

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Bjork-Eriksson T et al (1998) Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med 4(11):1313–1317. doi:10.1038/3305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun A, Bae K, Gore EM et al (2011) Phase III trial of prophylactic cranial irradiation compared with observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: neurocognitive and quality-of-life analysis. J Clin Oncol 29(3):279–286. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.29.6053

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolfson AH, Bae K, Komaki R et al (2011) Primary analysis of a phase II randomized trial Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0212: impact of different total doses and schedules of prophylactic cranial irradiation on chronic neurotoxicity and quality of life for patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81(1):77–84. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lim YY, Prang KH, Cysique L, Pietrzak RH, Snyder PJ, Maruff P (2009) A method for cross-cultural adaptation of a verbal memory assessment. Behav Res Methods 41(4):1190–1200. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lim YY, Pietrzak RH, Snyder PJ, Darby D, Maruff P (2012) Preliminary data on the effect of culture on the assessment of Alzheimer’s disease-related verbal memory impairment with the international shopping list test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 27(2):136–147. doi:10.1093/arclin/acr102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson TAC, Wilson PH, Snyder PJ et al (2011) Sensitivity and test-retest reliability of the international shopping list test in assessing verbal learning and memory in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 26(5):412–424. doi:10.1093/arclin/acr039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rahimi-Golkhandan S, Maruff P, Darby D, Wilson P (2012) Barriers to repeated assessment of verbal learning and memory: a comparison of international shopping list task and rey auditory verbal learning test on build-up of proactive interference. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 27(7):790–795. doi:10.1093/arclin/acs074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Collie A, Darekar A, Weissgerber G et al (2007) Cognitive testing in early-phase clinical trials: development of a rapid computerized test battery and application in a simulated phase I study. Contemp Clin Trials 28(4):391–400. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2006.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Maruff P, Thomas E, Cysique L et al (2009) Validity of the CogState brief battery: relationship to standardized tests and sensitivity to cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and AIDS dementia complex. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 24(2):165–178. doi:10.1093/arclin/acp010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fredrickson J, Maruff P, Woodward M et al (2010) Evaluation of the usability of a brief computerized cognitive screen test in older people for epidemiological studies. Neuroepidemiology 34(2):65–75. doi:10.1159/000264823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Darby D, Pietrzak RH, Fredrickson J et al (2012) Intraindividual cognitive decline using a brief computerized cognitive screening test. Alzheimers Dement 8(2):95–104. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2010.12.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lacy JW, Yassa MA, Stark SM, Muftuler LT, Stark CEL (2011) Distinct pattern separation related transfer functions in human CA3/dentate and CA1 revealed using high-resolution fMRI and variable mnemonic similarity. Learn Mem 18(1):15–18. doi:10.1101/lm.1971111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lim YY, Jaeger J, Harrington K et al (2013) Three-month stability of the CogState brief battery in healthy older adults, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease: results from the Australian imaging, biomarkers, and lifestyle-rate of change substudy (AIBL-ROCS). Arch Clin Neuropsychol 28(4):320–330. doi:10.1093/arclin/act021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yassa MA, Stark CEL (2011) Pattern separation in the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci 34(10):515–525. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.06.006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bakker A, Kirwan CB, Miller NI, Stark CEL (2008) Pattern separation in the human hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus. Science 319(5870):1640–1642. doi:10.1126/science.1152882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lewis MS, Maruff P, Silbert BS, Evered LA, Scott DA (2007) The influence of different error estimates in the detection of postoperative cognitive dysfunction using reliable change indices with correction for practice effects. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 22(2):249–257. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Caine C, Anderson SK, Harel BT, Brown P, Cerhan JH (2013) Validation data for software-based neurocognitive tests for primary brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 15(suppl):iii97

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brandt J (1991) The Hopkins verbal learning test: development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms. Clin Neuropsychiatr 5:125–142. doi:10.1080/13854049108403297

    Google Scholar 

  37. Barani IJ, Larson DA, Berger MS (2013) Future directions in treatment of brain metastases. Surg Neurol Int 4(suppl. 4):S220–S230. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.111299

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Li J, Bentzen SM, Renschler M, Mehta MP (2007) Regression after whole-brain radiation therapy for brain metastases correlates with survival and improved neurocognitive function. J Clin Oncol 25(10):1260–1266. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Meyers CA, Hess KR, Yung WK, Levin VA (2000) Cognitive function as a predictor of survival in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 18(3):646–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Meyers CA, Smith JA, Bezjak A et al (2004) Neurocognitive function and progression in patients with brain metastases treated with whole-brain radiation and motexafin gadolinium: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 22(1):157–165. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.05.128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Delis DC, Freeland J, Kramer JH, Kaplan E (1988) Integrating clinical assessment with cognitive neuroscience: construct validation of the California Verbal Learning Test. J Consult Clin Psychol 56(1):123–130. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.56.1.123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Delis DC, Massman PJ, Butters N et al (1991) Profiles of demented and amnestic patients on the California Verbal Learning Test: implications for the assessment of memory disorders. Psychol Assess 3(1):19–26. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.3.1.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA (2000) California verbal learning test-second edition (adult version). The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  44. Davidson PS, McFarland CP, Glisky EL (2006) Effects of emotion on item and source memory in young and older adults. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 6(4):306–322. doi:10.3758/CABN.6.4.306

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Noll RB, Patel SK, Embry L et al (2013) Children’s Oncology Group’s 2013 blueprint for research: behavioral science. Pediatr Blood Can 60(6):1048–1054. doi:10.1002/pbc.24421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Collerton J, Collerton D, Arai Y et al (2007) A comparison of computerized and pencil-and-paper tasks in assessing cognitive function in community-dwelling older people in the Newcastle 85+ pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc 55(10):1630–1635. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01379.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Uysal S, Mazzeffi M, Lin HM et al (2011) Internet-based assessment of postoperative neurocognitive function in cardiac and thoracic aortic surgery patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141(3):777–781. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Younes M, Hill J, Quinless J et al (2007) Internet-based cognitive testing in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 13(8):1011–1019. doi:10.1177/1352458507077626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Schatz P, Sandel N (2013) Sensitivity and specificity of the online version of ImPACT in high school and collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med 41(2):321–326. doi:10.1177/0363546512466038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB et al (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17(3):998–1007

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was presented in abstract form at the 2014 meeting (ESTRO 33) of The European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology.

Funding

The study was approved by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and supported by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grant U10 CA21661, NRG Oncology Operations 1U10CA180868-01, NRG Oncology SDMC 1U10CA180822-01, Community Clinical Oncology Program Network grant U10 CA37422 and Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core 1U24CA180803-01 from the NCI. This manuscript’s contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chip Caine.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Wolfgang A. Tomé serves on the scientific advisory board of View Ray Inc.; holds patents through Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF); and has received research funding from NIH, Philips Medical System and Accuray. Minesh Mehta has served as a consultant for Abbott, BMS, Celldex, Elekta, Novelos, Novocure, Phillips and Roche; holds stock options in Pharmacyclics; has served as a speaker for Defined Health, IME and Serono; and has research funding from Novocure. Wenyin Shi performed consulting work for Elekta and Varian. None of these activities is related to this protocol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caine, C., Deshmukh, S., Gondi, V. et al. CogState computerized memory tests in patients with brain metastases: secondary endpoint results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0933. J Neurooncol 126, 327–336 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1971-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1971-2

Keywords

Navigation