Abstract
A hot relativistic fluid is viewed as a collection of quantum objects that represent interacting elementary particles. We present a conceptual framework for deriving nonlinear equations of motion obeyed by these hypothesized objects. A uniform phenomenological prescription, to affect the quantum transition from a corresponding classical system, is invoked to derive the nonlinear Schrödinger, Klein–Gordon, and Pauli–Schrödinger and Feynman-GellMaan equations. It is expected that the emergent hypothetical nonlinear quantum mechanics would advance, in a fundamental way, both the conceptual understanding and computational abilities, particularly, in the field of extremely high energy-density physics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bialynicki-Birula, I., Mycielski, J.: Ann. Phys. 100, 62 (1976)
Mielnik, B.: Commun. Math. Phys. 37, 221 (1974)
Mielnik, B.: Commun. Math. Phys. 101, 323 (1985)
Mielnik, B.: Phys. Lett. A 289, 1 (2001)
Kibble, T.W.B.: Commun. Math. Phys. 65, 189 (1979)
Kibble, T.W., Daemi, R.: J. Phys. A 13, 141 (1980)
Weinberg, S.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 485 (1989)
Weinberg, S.: Ann. Phys. 194, 336 (1989)
Gisin, N.: Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 363 (1989)
Gisin, N.: Phys. Lett. A 143, 1 (1990)
Simon, C., Buzek, V., Gisin, N.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 17 (2001)
Polchinski, J.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 397 (1991)
Haag, R., Bannier, U.: Commun. Math. Phys. 60, 1 (1978)
Waniewski, J.: J. Math. Phys. 27, 1796 (1986)
Peres, A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1114 (1989)
Brody, D.C., Gustavsson, A.C.T., Hughston, L.P.: J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43, 082003 (2010)
Jordan, T.F.: Phys. Rev. A 73, 022101 (2006)
Madelung, E.: Z. Phys. 40, 322 (1927)
Bohm, D.: Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952)
Takabayasi, T.: Phys. Rev. 102, 297 (1956)
Takabayasi, T.: Nuovo Cimento 3, 233 (1956)
Takabayasi, T.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 14, 283 (1955)
Takabayasi, T.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 12, 810 (1954)
Takabayasi, T.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 13, 222 (1955)
Takabayasi, T.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 70, 1 (1983)
Takabayasi, T.: Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 4, 2 (1957)
Cufaro Petroni, N., Gueret, Ph., Vigier, J.-P.: Nuovo Cimento 81, 243 (1984)
Aron, J.: Compt. Rend. 251, 921 (1960)
Lin, C.-K., Wu, K.-C.: J. Math. Pures Appl. 98, 328 (2012)
Spiegel, E.A.: Physica D 1, 236 (1980)
Ercolani, N., Montgomery, R.: Phys. Lett. A 180, 402 (1993)
Nassar, A.B.: J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18, L509 (1985)
Nonnenmacher, T.F., Dukek, G., Baumann, G.: Lett. Nuovo Cim. 36, 453 (1983)
Kuz’menkov, L.S., Maksimov, S.G.: Theor. Math. Phys. 118, 227 (1999)
Manfredi, G., Haas, F.: Phys. Rev. B 64, 075316 (2001)
Shukla, P.K., Eliasson, B.: Phys. Rev. Lett 96, 245001 (2006)
Eliasson, B., Shukla, P.K.: Plasma Fusion Res. 4, 032 (2009)
Hong, W.-P., Jung, Y.-D.: Phys. Lett. A 374, 4599 (2010)
Andreev, P.A., Kuz’menkov, L.S.: Phys. Rev. A 78, 053624 (2008)
Andreev, P.A., Kuz’menkov, L.S., Trukhanova, M.I.: Phys. Rev. B 84, 245401 (2011)
Haas, F., Eliasson, B., Shukla, P.K.: Phys. Rev. E 85, 056411 (2012)
Fröhlich, H.: Physica A 37, 215 (1967)
Haas, F.: Quantum plasmas: An Hydrodynamic Approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2011)
Marklund, M., Brodin, G.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 025001 (2007)
Brodin, G., Marklund, M.: New J. Phys. 9, 277 (2007)
Mahajan, S.M., Asenjo, F.A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 195003 (2011)
Asenjo, F.A., Muñoz, V., Valdivia, J.A., Mahajan, S.M.: Phys. Plasmas 18, 012107 (2011)
Kuz’menkov, L.S., Maksimov, S.G., Fedoseev, V.V.: Theor. Math. Phys. 126, 110 (2001)
Kuz’menkov, L.S., Maksimov, S.G., Fedoseev, V.V.: Theor. Math. Phys. 126, 212 (2001)
Andreev, P.A., Kuz’menkov, L.S.: Russian Phys. J. 50, 1251 (2007)
Koide, T.: Phys. Rev. C 87, 034902 (2013)
Kaniadakis, G.: Physica A 307, 172 (2002)
Pesci, A.I., Goldstein, R.E.: Nonlinearity 18, 211 (2005)
Pesci, A.I., Goldstein, R.E., Uys, H.: Nonlinearity 18, 227 (2005)
Feynman, R.P., Gell-Mann, M.: Phys. Rev. 109, 193 (1958)
Pesci, A.I., Goldstein, R.E., Uys, H.: Nonlinearity 18, 1295 (2005)
Carbonaro, P.: EPL 100, 65001 (2012)
Weinberg, S.: Gravitation and Cosmology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (1972)
Mahajan, S.M.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 035001 (2003)
Ginzburg, V.L., Landau, L.D.: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950). English translation in: Landau, L.D.: Collected papers, pp. 546. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1965)
It is impossible to adequately refer to the immense literature on the NSE. A comprehensive reference list is given in: Ablowitz, M., Prinari, B.: Scholarpedia 3, 5561 (2008). Other classic works are Chiao, R.Y., Garmire, E., Townes, C.H.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 479 (1964); Zakharov, V.E.: J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 9, 190 (1968); Hasimoto, H.: J. Fluid Mech. 51, 477 (1972); Zakharov, V.E., Shabat, A.B.: Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 62 (1972); Novikov, S.P., Manakov, S.V., Pitaevskii, L.B., Zakharov, V.E.: Theory of Solitons-The Inverse Scattering Method. Plenum Press, New York (1984); Sulem, C., Sulem, P.-L.: The Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation. Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse. Springer-Verlag, New York (1999). Authors recent work on two physical systems that lead to generalized NSEs include: Berezhiani, V.I.,Mahajan, S.M.: Phys. Rev. E 52, 2 (1995); Mahajan, S.M., Shatashvili, N.L., Berezhiani, V.I.: Phys. Rev. E 80, 066404 (2009)
Takabayasi, T.: Prog. Theo. Phys. 14, 283 (1955)
Holland, P.R.: The Quantum Theory of Motion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)
Asenjo, F.A., Muñoz, V., Valdivia, J.A.: Phys. Rev. E 81, 056405 (2010)
Andreev, P.A., Kuz’menkov, L.S.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 26, 1250186 (2012)
Berezhiani, V.I., Mahajan, S.M.: Phys. Rev. E 52, 2 (1995)
Acknowledgments
Illuminating discussions with Profs. George Sudarshan and Cecile Dewitt are gratefully acknowledged. SMM’s work was supported by the US-DOE grants DE-FG02-04ER54742. FAA thanks to CONICyT-Chile for Funding N o 79130002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
To accommodate spin (an internal degree of freedom) in a relativistic theory, we must take the following essential steps:
-
1) Modify the classical energy momentum tensor to include a new, relativistically correct, internal (spin generated) stress term
$$ \mathcal{T}^{\mu\nu}= g P^{\mu} P^{\nu}+{\Pi}\eta^{\mu\nu}+ g\frac{\hbar^{2}}{8}\partial^{\mu} M_{\alpha\beta}\partial^{\nu} M^{*\alpha\beta}, $$(53)which will transforms to the “quantum” energy momentum tensor
$$ \mathcal{T}_{q}^{\mu\nu}= g\left(P^{\mu} P^{\nu}+\frac{\hbar}{2i}\partial^{\mu} \frac{\hbar}{2i}\partial^{\nu}\ln g\right)+{\Pi}\eta^{\mu\nu}+ g\frac{\hbar^{2}}{8}\partial^{\mu} M_{\alpha\beta}\partial^{\nu} M^{*\alpha\beta} $$(54)when subjected to the prescription (8). The stress is expressed in terms of the fully spin antisymmetric tensor
$$ M_{\alpha\beta}=\frac{{\Psi}^{\dag}\sigma_{\alpha\beta} {\Psi}}{{\Psi}^{\dag}{\Psi}} , $$(55)where σ α β =i γ α γ β , and γ α are the Dirac matrices.
-
2) In addition to the contribution to the energy momentum tensor, we have to include the effect of spin-electromagnetic field interaction (through the associated magnetic moment). The complete equation of motion
then, expands to
where the last three terms on the r.h.s are all spin dependent. Here the constant \(κ=-q\hbar /4c\). In spite of the immensely exaggerated complication of (57) vis a vis (11), the passage to the spin Fluidon quantum equation is quite straightforward, though highly tedious. These are the main steps and the final results:
-
a) Following the derivation of the KG Fluidon, we, first find the spin generalized momentum that is a perfect four gradient (vorticity free). Such a combination is found to be
$$ P^{\mu} + qA^{\mu}-\varsigma\partial^{\mu} \omega=\partial^{\mu} S $$(58)where ς and ω are functions of spin to be explicitly displayed later. The four curl of the effective momentum P μ yields
$$ \partial^{\mu} P^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu} P^{\mu}=-q F^{\mu\nu}-\hbar{\Omega}^{\mu\nu} $$(59)where
$$ {\Omega}^{\mu\nu}=-\partial^{\mu}\varsigma\partial^{\nu} \omega+\partial^{\nu}\varsigma\partial^{\mu} \omega $$(60)is a kind of spin specific vorticity or curvature, which (with a weight \(\hbar \)) accentuates the electromagnetic curvature F μν (with a weight q).
-
b) then we introduce the following definitions: The wave function [56]
$$ {\Psi}=\left( \begin{array}{c} \psi \\ -\psi \end{array} \right) $$(61)is a four component spinor with
$$ \psi=\sqrt{g} e^{i S/\hbar}\varphi $$(62)thus the relativistic nature of the spin is represented through a spinor field. Here S is the eikonal defined by (58), g=n/f, as in the KG case, is the thermally modified number density, and
$$ \varphi=\left( \begin{array}{c} \cos(\theta/2) e^{i\omega/2} \\ i \sin(\theta/2) e^{-i\omega/2} \end{array} \right) $$(63)is a two-component spinor leading to the normalizations
$$ \psi^{\dag}\psi=g ,\qquad {\Psi}^{\dag}{\Psi}=2g $$(64)
The field 𝜃 is a parametric replacement of ς,
Using (61)-(65), we identify various intermediate variables in terms of the spinor φ
and
With the somewhat elaborate machinery, contained in (61)-(69), (57), and the accompanying continuity equation
can be manipulated to, finally, derive the nonlinear Feynman-Gell-mann equation
where
is the standard gauge derivative, and where the constant of integration was identified with the fermion mass square m 2. The nonlinear term \(\lambda \bar {\Pi }({\Psi }^{\dag }{\Psi })\), as before, is fluid specific. The spinor Fluidons, obeying the nonlinear (71), are, then, the quantum objects that embody many body interactions of a thermal fermion assembly. It is totally remarkable that their dynamics is relatively simple- almost like that of an elementary particle.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahajan, S.M., Asenjo, F.A. Hot Fluids and Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics. Int J Theor Phys 54, 1435–1449 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-014-2341-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-014-2341-0