Abstract
Many social phenomena can be viewed as processes in which individuals in social groups develop agreement (e.g., public opinion, the spreading of rumor, the formation of social and linguistic conventions). Conceptual Agreement Theory (CAT) models social agreement as a simplified communicational event in which an Observer \((O)\) and Actor \((A)\) exchange ideas about a concept \(C\), and where \(O\) uses that information to infer whether \(A\)’s conceptual state is the same as its own (i.e., to infer agreement). Agreement may be true (when \(O\) infers that \(A\) is thinking \(C\) and this is in fact the case, event \(a1\)) or illusory (when \(O\) infers that \(A\) is thinking \(C\) and this is not the case, event \(a2\)). In CAT, concepts that afford \(a1\) or \(a2\) become more salient in the minds of members of social groups. Results from an agent-based model (ABM) and probabilistic model that implement CAT show that, as our conceptual analyses suggested would be the case, the simulated social system selects concepts according to their usefulness to agents in promoting agreement among them (Experiment 1). Furthermore, the ABM exhibits more complex dynamics where similar minded agents cluster and are able to retain useful concepts even when a different group of agents discards them (Experiment 2). We discuss the relevance of CAT and the current findings for analyzing different social communication events, and suggest ways in which CAT could be put to empirical test.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaker, D.A.: Building Strong Brands. The Free Press, New York (1996)
Alvesson, M.: Knowledge Work and Knowledge-Intensive Firms. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)
Angell, A.: Party change in Chile in comparative perspective. Rev. Cienc. Política 23(2), 88–108 (2003)
Arrow, H., McGrath, J.E., Berdahl, J.L.: Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation. Sage, London (2000)
Axelrod, R.: Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., Terna, P. (eds.) Simulating Social Phenomena, pp. 21–41. Springer, Berlin (1997)
Ball, P.: The physical modelling of human social systems. Complexus 1, 190–206 (2003)
Barsalou, L.W.: The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts. In: Neisser, U. (ed.) Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, pp. 101–140. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Barsalou, L.W.: Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In: Collins, A.C., Gathercole, S.E., Conway, M.A. (eds.) Theories of Memory, pp. 29–101. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (1993)
Berthon, P., Leyland, F.P., Campbell, C.: Does brand meaning exist in similarity or singularity? J. Bus. Res. 62(3), 356–361 (2009)
Brewer, M.B.: A dual process model of impression formation. In: Srull, T.K., Wyer Jr, R.S. (eds.) Advances in Social Cognition, pp. 1–36. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1988)
Brown, S.P., Kozinets, R.V., Sherry Jr, J.F.: Teaching old brands new tricks: retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. J. Mark. 67(3), 19–33 (2003)
Canessa, E., Riolo, R.: An agent-based model of the impact of computer-mediated communication on organizational culture and performance: an example of the application of complex systems analysis tools to the study of CIS. J. Inf. Technol. 21, 272–283 (2006)
Canessa, E., Chaigneau, S.E., Quezada, A.: An ABM of the development of shared meaning in a social group. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, Rome, Italy, 28–30 January, pp. 5–14 (2011)
Canessa, E., Chaigneau, S.E., Quezada, A.: The life of concepts: an ABM of conceptual drift in social groups. In: Filipe, J., Fred, A. (eds.) Agents and Artificial Intelligence. Communications in Computer and Information Science Series, vol. 271, pp. 271–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(2), 591–646 (2009)
Chaigneau, S.E., Canessa, E.: The power of collective action: how agents get rid of useless concepts without even noticing their futility. Actas Jornadas Chilenas de Computación, Curicó, Chile 7–11 November pp. 1–8 (2011)
Chaigneau, S.E., Canessa, E., Gaete, J.: Conceptual agreement theory. New Ideas Psychol. 30(2), 179–189 (2012)
Converse, P.E.: The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: Apter, D.E. (ed.) Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–261. The Free Press, New York (1964)
Cova, B., Pace, S.: Brand community of convenience products: new forms of customer empowerment—the case “My Nutella the community”. Eur. J. Mark. 40(9/10), 1087–2005 (2006)
D’Lauro, C., Tanaka, J.W., Curran, T.: The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15, 623–629 (2008)
Ereshefsky, M.: Species and the Linnaean hierarchy. In: Wilson, R.A. (ed.) Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, pp. 285–306. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Evans, J.: Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 255–278 (2008)
Fournier, S.: Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. J. Consum. Res. 24(4), 343–373 (1998)
Frege, G.: On sense and reference. In: Geach, P., Black, M. (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Blackwell, Oxford (1893/1952)
Gladwin, T.N., Kennelly, J.J., Krause, T.S.: Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(4), 874–907 (1995)
Glock, H.J.: Concepts: where subjectivism goes wrong. Philosophy 84(1), 5–29 (2009)
Hampton, J.A.: Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 18, 441–461 (1979)
Keller, K.L.: Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J. Mark. 57, 1–22 (1993)
Keller, K.L.: Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2003)
Lassar, W., Mittal, B., Sharma, A.: Measuring customer-based brand equity. J. Consum. Mark. 12(4), 11–9 (1995)
Lenton, A.P., Blair, I.V., Hastie, R.: Illusions of gender: stereotypes evoke false memories. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37(1), 3–14 (2001)
Lewis, D.: Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1969)
Lewis, D.: Languages and language. In: Gunderson, K. (ed.) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VII, pp. 3–35. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1975)
Luce, R.D.: Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. Wiley, New York (1959)
Luce, R.D.: The choice axiom after twenty years. J. Math. Psychol. 15(3), 215–233 (1977)
Marchione, E., Salgado, M., Gilbert, N.: ‘What did you say?’ Emergent communication in a multi-agent spatial configuration. Adv. Complex Syst. 13(4), 469–482 (2010)
Mayden, R.L.: A hierarchy of species concepts: the denoument in the saga of the species problem. In: Claridge, M.F., Dawah, H.A., Wilson, M.R. (eds.) Species: The Units of Diversity, pp. 381–423. Chapman and Hall, London (1997)
McCracken, G.: Culture and consumption: a theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. J. Consum. Res. 13, 71–84 (1986)
McRae, K., Cree, G.S., Seidenberg, M.S., McNorgan, C.: Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behav. Res. Methods 37, 547–559 (2005)
Millikan, R.G.: Language: A Biological Model. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
Mishler, B.: Getting rid of species? In: Wilson, R.A. (ed.) Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, pp. 307–315. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Murphy, G.L., Brownell, H.H.: Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 11(1), 70–84 (1985)
Nairn, A., Griffin, C., Wicks, P.G.: Children’s use of brand symbolism: a consumer culture theory approach. Eur. J. Mark. 42(5/6), 627–640 (2008)
Patalano, A.L., Chin-Parker, S., Ross, B.H.: The importance of being coherent: category coherence, cross-classification, and reasoning. J. Mem. Lang. 54(3), 407–424 (2006)
Pleijel, F., Rouse, G.W.: A new taxon, capricornia (Hesionidae, Polychaeta), illustrating the LITU (‘least-inclusive taxonomic unit’) concept. Zool. Scr. 29, 157–168 (2000a)
Pleijel, F., Rouse, G.W.: Least-inclusive taxonomic unit: a new taxonomic concept for biology. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 627–630 (2000b)
Robinson, J.: Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol. Econ. 48(4), 369–384 (2004)
Rogers, T.T., Patterson, K.: Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136(3), 451–469 (2007)
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B.: Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cogn. Psychol. 7, 573–605 (1975)
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., Boyes-Braem, P.: Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 8, 382–439 (1976)
Rudman, L.A., Phelan, J.E.: Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Res. Organ Behav. 28, 61–79 (2008)
Smith, E.E.: Theories of semantic memory. In: Estes, W.K. (ed.) Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes, vol. 6, pp. 1–56. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1978)
van Overschelde, J.P., Rawson, K.A., Dunlosky, J.: Category norms: an updated and expanded version of the norms. J. Mem. Lang. 50(3), 289–335 (2004)
Vogt, P., Coumans, H.: Investigating social interaction strategies for bootstrapping lexicon development. J. Artif. Soc. Simul. 6(1) (2003). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/1/4.html
Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford (1953)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by FONDECYT (Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia of the Chilean Government) grant Nr. 1130052 to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Canessa, E., Chaigneau, S. The dynamics of social agreement according to Conceptual Agreement Theory. Qual Quant 48, 3289–3309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9957-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9957-7