Volatile-Mediated Effects Predominate in Paraburkholderia phytofirmans Growth Promotion and Salt Stress Tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana

Abiotic stress has a growing impact on plant growth and agricultural activity worldwide. Specific plant growth promoting rhizobacteria have been reported to stimulate growth and tolerance to abiotic stress in plants, and molecular mechanisms like phytohormone synthesis and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deamination are usual candidates proposed to mediate these bacterial effects. Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN is able to promote growth of several plant hosts, and improve their tolerance to chilling, drought and salinity. This work investigated bacterial determinants involved in PsJN stimulation of growth and salinity tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana, showing bacteria enable plants to survive long-term salinity treatment, accumulating less sodium within leaf tissues relative to non-inoculated controls. Inactivation of specific bacterial genes encoding ACC deaminase, auxin catabolism, N-acyl-homoserine-lactone production, and flagellin synthesis showed these functions have little influence on bacterial induction of salinity tolerance. Volatile organic compound emission from strain PsJN was shown to reproduce the effects of direct bacterial inoculation of roots, increasing plant growth rate and tolerance to salinity evaluated both in vitro and in soil. Furthermore, early exposure to VOCs from P. phytofirmans was sufficient to stimulate long-term effects observed in Arabidopsis growth in the presence and absence of salinity. Organic compounds were analyzed in the headspace of PsJN cultures, showing production of 2-undecanone, 7-hexanol, 3-methylbutanol and dimethyl disulfide. Exposure of A. thaliana to different quantities of these molecules showed that they are able to influence growth in a wide range of added amounts. Exposure to a blend of the first three compounds was found to mimic the effects of PsJN on both general growth promotion and salinity tolerance. To our knowledge, this is the first report on volatile compound-mediated induction of plant abiotic stress tolerance by a Paraburkholderia species.

Introduction

Plants have evolved diverse mechanisms to cope with and survive environmental abiotic stresses such as salinity, including an early response to the short-term impact of high sodium concentrations, which is characterized by a rapid growth arrest by inhibition of cell growth and division (Munns and Tester, 2008), and the adjustment of osmotic potential by the cellular accumulation of compatible solutes (Ismail et al., 2014). Although there is a great variety in the extent of salinity tolerance among diverse land plants, there is substantial evidence on the activation of additional cell protection mechanisms, like ROS detoxification (Gill and Tuteja, 2010), sodium exclusion (Roy et al., 2014) and its storage within vacuoles (Fan et al., 2014), to achieve tolerance to saline stress in glycophyte plants (Munns and Tester, 2008). This includes most food crops, as well as the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana (Hauser and Horie, 2010; Zhang and Shi, 2013). Remarkably, it has been shown that a tolerance response can be improved in A. thaliana by external stimuli, improving the efficacy of osmotic adjustment and ion detoxification mechanisms (Jakab et al., 2005). These induced systemic tolerance (IST) events are probably mediated by the interplay of hormone signaling pathways within the plants, including salicylic acid (SA), ethylene and jasmonic acid-pathways (Cho et al., 2008). Currently, the environmental signals underlying induction of IST responses are not well understood. However, they represent attractive targets for enhancing productivity and growth of crop plants under field conditions (Farag et al., 2013).

Microorganisms play a key role providing conditions necessary for plant growth and development in a variety of environments (Lugtenberg and Kamilova, 2009; Vacheron et al., 2013; Liu and Zhang, 2015). Interestingly, it has been found that colonization of plants by certain specific plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can lead to enhanced resistance to abiotic challenges, such as water deficit (Naveed et al., 2014), salinity (Sziderics et al., 2007), adaptation to transplantation (Nowak and Shulaev, 2003), and chilling (Ait Barka et al., 2006). Over the last few years, several studies have reported the ability of isolated microorganisms to induce plant tolerance to salinity once they have been inoculated to seeds or young plantlets (reviewed in Yang et al., 2009; Dodd and Pérez-Alfocea, 2012; Shrivastava and Kumar, 2015), including a variety of hosts, like wheat (Nadeem et al., 2013; Singh et al., 2015), maize (Hamdia et al., 2004; Nadeem et al., 2009), cotton (Liu et al., 2013; Egamberdieva et al., 2015), tomato (Mayak et al., 2004; Ali et al., 2014), lettuce (Barassi et al., 2006; Kohler et al., 2009), sunflower (Shilev et al., 2010; Tewari and Arora, 2014) and Arabidopsis (Zhang et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2014; Sukweenadhi et al., 2015). Among the PGPR that have been demonstrated to play a role in salt stress tolerance induction, a wide diversity of bacteria is included, encompassing several members of the γ-proteobacteria class, specially within the genus Pseudomonas (Ahmad et al., 2013; Nadeem et al., 2013; Chang et al., 2014; Han et al., 2015), α-proteobacteria belonging to the Azospirillum genus (del Amor and Cuadra-Crespo, 2011; Nia et al., 2012; Sahoo et al., 2014), and β-proteobacteria like Achromobacter (Mayak et al., 2004) or Paraburkholderia (Talbi et al., 2013; Pinedo et al., 2015). Several examples have also been described for the phylum Firmicutes, with special emphasis on the genus Bacillus (Zhang et al., 2008; Kohler et al., 2009; Karlidag et al., 2013; Ramadoss et al., 2013; Han et al., 2015), and also some examples have been described within the Actinobacteria phylum (Sadeghi et al., 2012; Palaniyandi et al., 2014; Gond et al., 2015). Despite these numerous reports on induction of plant tolerance to salinity, relatively few studies have been able to identify microbial mechanisms involved in the induction of salt tolerance in their hosts. For many beneficial plant bacteria interactions in saline conditions, a role has been proposed for the deamination of the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC), to produce ammonia and α-ketobutyrate (Glick et al., 2007), as a bacterial modulator of growth and tolerance to saline stress in the host, which is supported by reports involving mainly Pseudomonas and Enterobacter species isolated for their ability to metabolize ACC (Mayak et al., 2004; Nadeem et al., 2007; Saravanakumar and Samiyappan, 2007; Ahmad et al., 2013; Chang et al., 2014). Other phytohormone-related bacterial functions, like the ability to modulate indoleacetic acid (IAA) levels, have also been proposed to play a role in plant salt stress tolerance induction (Shilev et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2012; Egamberdieva et al., 2015). However, it is not easy to rule out the contribution of additional putative growth promotion functions, like the production of siderophore compounds, which is frequently observed in bacterial isolates effective in amelioration of abiotic stress (Barriuso et al., 2008; Shilev et al., 2010; Tiwari et al., 2011; Ramadoss et al., 2013; Liu and Zhang, 2015; Singh et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2016). These may act as stimulating compounds by themselves, activating a tolerance response within the plant (Aznar and Dellagi, 2015). Additionally, production of bacterial exopolysaccharide (EPS) might be able to trigger an analogous response and even physically protect roots from osmotic stress by adhering to root surface and reducing ion absorption (Sandhya et al., 2009; Tewari and Arora, 2014). Finally, the emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has been shown to be widespread in soil and rhizosphere bacteria, taking part in several types of biotic interactions (Effmert et al., 2012; Lemfack et al., 2014). Abiotic stress tolerance induction by VOC emission has been demonstrated for certain Bacillus species, like Bacillus subtilis GB03 (Zhang et al., 2008), a mechanism that may be shared by other PGPR bacteria, belonging to different phyla (Blom et al., 2011), including the γ-Proteobacterium Pseudomonas simiae AU (Vaishnav et al., 2015, 2016). So far, studies focused on characterization of phytostimulating VOCs have demonstrated that active emissions are usually produced as complex mixtures of different compounds, and these components vary greatly among tested PGPR strains, even when these are close phylogenetic relatives (Farag et al., 2006; Blom et al., 2011). In general terms, although reports of plant growth stimulation and concomitant stress tolerance induction by rhizosphere bacteria are abundant in literature, there are comparatively few instances where the specific contribution of bacterial determinants has been studied by inactivation of relevant genes, and detailed analysis of plant growth stimulation to reveal the actual functional significance of each candidate mechanism.

Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN is a widely studied plant growth promoter, with outstanding abilities for colonization of different plant hosts, including tomato (Sharma and Nowak, 1998), potato (Frommel et al., 1991; Kurepin et al., 2015), grape (Compant et al., 2005; Trdá et al., 2014), ryegrass (Afzal et al., 2013) switchgrass (Kim et al., 2012), lupin (Kost et al., 2014), maize (Naveed et al., 2015), and Arabidopsis (Poupin et al., 2013). A versatile and effective model for PGPR-mediated plant stimulation, strain PsJN has been demonstrated to promote plant growth and improve the host tolerance to several biotic and abiotic stress conditions (Sessitsch et al., 2005). In Vitis vinifera L. cv Chardonnay, PsJN colonizes roots, stem and leaves tissue (Compant et al., 2005), and induces systemic protection of the host plant against pathogen attack (Compant et al., 2005, 2008), an effect that can also be observed in A. thaliana (Timmermann et al., unpublished). Additionally, P. phytofirmans PsJN colonization is also able to enhance the tolerance of inoculated plants to water deficiency and drought-derived damage (Naveed et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2016), to protect from transplantation (Nowak and Shulaev, 2003), osmotic and chilling stress (Ait Barka et al., 2006; Fernandez et al., 2012), and from freezing temperatures in Arabidopsis (Su et al., 2015). The strain has a functional ACC deaminase (Sun et al., 2009; Zúñiga et al., 2013), as well as the ability to synthesize and degrade IAA (Compant et al., 2005; Donoso et al., 2016), and AHL mediated quorum sensing has been shown to regulate plant tissue colonization (Trognitz et al., 2008; Zúñiga et al., 2013). On the other hand, the ability to emit VOCs has been collectively reported for several Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia species, including P. phytofirmans (Blom et al., 2011; Weisskopf and Bailly, 2013), but the specific contribution of this potential mechanism to the overall growth promotion effects of the individual bacteria, and a possible role in stress tolerance induction, has not been explored so far.

We have recently described the ability of P. phytofirmans PsJN to enhance salt tolerance of A. thaliana, focusing on metabolic and transcriptional changes in the plant, related to stress-perception and stress-responsive pathways (Pinedo et al., 2015). That study showed that PsJN inoculation increased tolerance to salt treatment in short and long-term exposure, suggesting a priming (IST) effect mediated by bacterial inoculation, which involves modulation of the transcriptional response of the plant in the presence of stress. However, the bacterial effectors involved in these effects are yet unclear, and it is currently uncertain whether a stable colonization of the host is required throughout the plant life cycle to achieve an effective phytostimulation. In this work, we have aimed to further characterize the extent of PsJN-mediated tolerance in A. thaliana, by exploring if protection against the lethal effects of salinity, and a better sodium management, can be induced by the bacterium. We have especially endeavored to identify the key molecular mechanisms of P. phytofirmans involved in plant growth stimulation and salt-stress tolerance. For this, we have evaluated plant development under salt-stress using bacterial mutants in key growth promotion functions, which enabled us to analyze the relevance of direct phytohormone modulation and colonization on tolerance induction, and we studied the contribution of bacterial VOC emissions to the stimulant effects of strain PsJN. Our observations highlight the importance of this last phytostimulation mechanism over other possible PGPR functions, not only for induction of salinity tolerance in the host plant, but for general plant growth stimulation by beneficial Paraburkholderia strains.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Growth Conditions, and Plant Inoculation

Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN was originally obtained from the laboratory of Dr. A. Sessitsch (AIT, Austria). Azospirillum brasilense Sp7 was acquired from DSMZ. Wild type Sp7, PsJN, and four PsJN mutants were routinely grown at 30°C in Dorn mineral salts medium (Dorn et al., 1974) containing 10 mM fructose, and supplemented with kanamycin (Km, 50 μg ml^-1), whenever required (see below). Bacterial inocula were grown in a rotary shaker (150 rpm) up to mid-exponential phase (O. D. 600 = 0.6). Cell suspensions were collected, adjusted to approximately 10⁸ colony forming units (CFU ml^-1) and diluted in agar media, just prior to solidification, at specific bacterial concentrations for plant inoculation in gnotobiotic systems. To assess the effect of heat-inactivated bacteria, an inoculum suspension was heated at 95°C for 20 min prior to the final dilution in agar medium (HK-PsJN inoculum). Mortality was routinely confirmed by plate counting.

PsJN-acdS, PsJN-iacC, and PsJN-bpI.1 mutants were constructed as described previously (Zúñiga et al., 2013). Briefly, each open reading frame (loci Bphyt_5397; Bphyt_2156; Bphyt_0126, respectively), was disrupted by insertional recombination using a suicidal kanamycin resistance plasmid containing a cloned internal segment of the target gene reading frame, to get one homologous recombination event and thus generate two truncated copies of the selected gene, obtaining P. phytofirmans PsJN respective mutants, which were selected on LB agar containing 50 μg ml^-1 Km. Changes in the acyl homoserine lactone profile of mutant bpI.1 were verified (Zúñiga et al., unpublished results), together with the loss of the ability to catabolize IAA (Donoso et al., 2016) in PsJN-iacC, and the ACC deaminase function in the PsJN-acdS mutant, respectively. This last strain completely lost activity, measured as the production of α-ketobutyrate from ACC [58 nmol α-ketobutyrate (mg protein)^-1 min^-1 in the wild type strain] (Penrose and Glick, 2003), as well as the ability to use ACC as a sole nitrogen source (data not shown). The fliA gene mutant, was obtained by using primer pairs fliAmutFW (5′- GCACAAGGTGGAGCAGAATC -3′), and fliAmutRV (5′- TACAGCGACATCAGCAGCTT -3′). The PCR gene product was cloned using the pCR2.1-TOPO system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA. USA), to generate suicidal plasmid pCR2.1fliA. This plasmid was then introduced into P. phytofirmans PsJN by electroporation, to get one recombination event disruption of the fliA gene, and potential recombinants were selected in Luria Bertani (LB) agar medium containing kanamycin. Correct insertion within the fliA ORF was confirmed by PCR and sequencing. Swimming motility in Dorn 0.3% agar medium supplemented with 10 mM fructose was completely abolished in the mutant strain (data not shown).

Arabidopsis thaliana Growth and Exposure to Salinity In soil

Arabidopsis thaliana seeds were obtained from the ABRC. These were surface sterilized with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (a 1:1 mixture of commercial laundry bleach with water) containing 0.1% Tween 20, rinsed three times with sterile water, and maintained at 4°C for 7 days to synchronize germination. Square Petri dishes were prepared with half-strength Murashige-Skoog medium (MS¹/₂) (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) in 0.8% agar and inoculated or not with PsJN or its mutants, and surface sterilized seeds were sown to allow germination. For irrigation experiments with saline solutions in soil, germinated seeds were incubated under a 16:8 (long day) light:dark cycle at 20–22°C, and transferred to 1:1 peat:vermiculite substrate 11 days after sowing (DAS). Both inoculated and non-inoculated plants were irrigated every 48 h with sterile water. One day a week, plants received irrigation with a sterile solution of NaCl/CaCl₂ 100 mM/10 mM, 200 mM/20 mM, 300 mM/30 mM, or with sterile water (untreated controls). Soil salinity was expected to increase through time in this experimental system, due to the cumulative effect of successive NaCl/CaCl₂ irrigations, which was confirmed by soil conductivity measurements, indicating that saline irrigation increased soil conductivity from 0.4 ± 0.05 dS/m at the day of transplant, to 3.3 ± 0.11 dS/m, 8 ± 0.16 dS/m, and 12.3 ± 0.21 dS/m, for 100 mM/10 mM, 200 mM/20 mM, and 300 mM/30 mM NaCl/CaCl₂, respectively, at day 36. Rosette growth was registered photographically at 5–6 days intervals and total rosette area was estimated every week using Adobe Photoshop Cs3 software (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, USA), and fresh (FW) and dry weight (DW) quantified at the end of the experiment with an analytical balance (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan).

Arabidopsis thaliana Growth and Exposure to Salinity In vitro

To measure the sort-term effect of saline shock in PsJN inoculated and non-inoculated A. thaliana, plants were transferred at 11 DAS to MS¹/₂ supplemented with salt concentrations ranging from 0 mM NaCl/0 mM CaCl₂ to 250 mM NaCl/25 mM CaCl₂. Different growth parameters (root length and rosette diameter) and leaf senescence signs were evaluated during 14 days after transfer. For experiments involving in vitro exposure to salt, plants were maintained in their original square Petri dishes for 21 DAS, at different NaCl/CaCl₂ concentrations, and final FW and DW were determined, as well as growth parameters. Leaf/rosette area measurements of plants in soil or in vitro experiments were calculated using Adobe Photoshop as stated above. Statistical analyses of plant growth parameters and leaf senescence were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey’s honestly significant difference (P < 0.05) test was used to make comparisons among different treatments. Homogeneity of variances and normality tests were performed using the MiniTab Statistical Software (MiniTab Incorporated, State College, PA, USA).

Sodium Concentrations in Plant Tissues

Inoculated and non-inoculated salt-stressed plants were harvested at different times from soil or in vitro experiments for sodium extraction and quantification, which was performed as in Zhang et al. (2008). For soil experiments, plant rosettes were collected, weighed, and treated separately. For in vitro grown plants, roots and rosettes of five plants (one plate), within each experimental group were collected and pooled. Roots and rosettes were weighed separately and rinsed with deionized water. Plant tissue was dried at 60°C for 2 days, and dry weight was registered for each pool of separated tissue. All material was subsequently extracted with 3 ml of 100% HNO₃ overnight, followed by incubation at 90 to 100°C for 1 h. Aqueous Na⁺ in this final solution was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Model 3110; PerkinElmer Instruments, Norwalk, CT, USA), and normalized relative to dry weight.

Growth Stimulation by Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds from Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN

Arabidopsis thaliana seeds ecotype Col-0 were sterilized and sown on MS¹/₂ medium with 0.8% agar in one half of the plate. On the other half with Dorn mineral salts medium containing 10 mM fructose as the sole carbon and energy source and 1.5% agar, 1 × 10⁶ CFU of each strain (HK-PsJN, PsJN, and GB03) were inoculated over a membrane (pore size of 0,22 μm) and the plates were sealed with parafilm. Twenty days after inoculation FW and chlorophyll content measurements were performed, as described by Porra et al. (1989). Total chlorophyll was extracted from leaves of A. thaliana using N,N-9-dimethylformamide for 24 h at 4°C in the dark, and chlorophyll a and b concentrations were measured simultaneously by spectrophotometry. To test for significant differences in response variables, one-way ANOVA were performed, using Shapiro–Wilk test for normality, and Bartlett tests for homogeneity of variances. Statistical analyses were carried out using R software. When differences in the means were significant, a Tukey’s HSD test was performed.

To further evaluate the effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant growth, quantifying root growth, seeds were exposed to bacteria using a sealed dual agar plate system, where P. phytofirmans PsJN, a mutant strain, or a heat killed inoculum, was homogenously inoculated in MS¹/₂ 0.8% agar medium in one square Petri dish, and A. thaliana seeds were sown in a separate MS¹/₂ plate. Both plates were then placed in front of each other, and held together using parafilm. Non-exposed plantlets were incubated in front of sterile MS¹/₂ agar medium. To assess the contribution of CO₂ accumulation due to parafilm sealing, control experiments were performed to measure plant growth parameters in both sealed and non-sealed dual plate systems. To evaluate long term effects of volatile exposure, volatile treated and non-treated plants were transferred to soil after 11 DAS, and plant growth was monitored until day 40. Alternatively, plantlets were transferred to fresh MS¹/₂ agar supplemented or not with 150 mM NaCl/15 mM CaCl₂, to test for the effects of early exposition to volatiles on the development of A. thaliana to salt tolerance. Plant growth parameters and leaf senescence were measured as described above. To evaluate the effect of individual volatile compounds on plant growth and salinity tolerance, the dual plate system described above was modified by introducing an open sterile 0.6 ml eppendorf tube, attached to the center of the plate in front of A. thaliana seeds, in the absence of bacterial inoculums. Different amounts, ranging from 100 ng to 1 mg of each of the selected volatile compounds 2-UN, 3-MB, 1-HEP, or DMDS, were placed into the attached tube prior to sealing the plates together. As volatilization of the compounds was visually confirmed, addition of the indicated amounts was repeated periodically (once every 5 days) for the rest of the stimulation period (until 14 DAS) to avoid eventual loss of the respective volatiles throughout incubation time. This was done by opening the system and re-sealing after application. After the stimulation period, plantlets were transferred to fresh medium in the presence or absence of salt, and growth parameters were determined at the times indicated above.

Detection of Volatiles Emitted by Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN

For detection of bacterial volatiles, strain PsJN was placed in 20 ml headspace tubes, homogenously inoculated in MS¹/₂ at a density of 10⁶ CFU ml^-1, prior to airtight sealing. Alternatively, bacteria were placed on the surface of 10 ml of solid 0.8% agar supplemented with MS¹/₂ or Kings B medium. After 72 h incubation at 30°C to allow for bacterial growth, 100 μl samples were taken through the septum of each tube using a GC syringe, and directly loaded into a Hewlett Packard Gas Chromatographer (injection temperature set at 160°C), equipped with an HP-5 column 30 m × 320 μm × 0.25 μm, Agilent Technologies (5%- phenyl, 95%-methylpolysiloxane), and a flame ionization detector (FID) detection system (detector temperature 200°C). Runs were performed in a splitless mode, with N₂ as make-up (20 ml min^-1) and carrier gas (2.3 ml min^-1). A temperature ramp was applied to detect as many volatile signals as possible, starting at 70°C for 2 min, then programmed at a rate of 6°C min^-1 to 71°C for 2 min, and finally ramped at a rate of 120°C min^-1 to 155°C for 2 min. Headspace volumes of tight sealed control tubes with MS¹/₂ of Kings B medium in the absence of bacteria, were injected as negative controls. Under these conditions, four clear signals could be detected from PsJN-inoculated Kings B medium, and three of these appeared also in MS¹/₂ inoculated tubes. To confirm the identity of the volatile compounds detected, the headspace compounds of PsJN-inoculated tubes were concentrated using a solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) (50/30 μm divinylbenzen/carboxenTM/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)) 2 cm stableflex/ss fiber exposed to volatile emission within headspace tubes for 30 min at 30°C, and run in a Shimadzu GC equipment coupled to MS, under the following conditions: Injector: 270°C; detector: 210°C; and column oven 40°C for 2 min, then programmed at a rate of 5°C min^-1 to 110°C, and finally ramped at a rate of 10°C min^-1 to 280°C. Separation was achieved using a 60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm (5%-diphenyl-95% polymethylsiloxane) DB-5MS column (Agilent Technologies), and carrier gas was He, set to a flow velocity of 1 ml min^-1. Obtained profiles unequivocally identified the detected signals as 2-UN; 3-MB; 1-HEP; and DMDS by comparison with the NIST library. This was further confirmed in both the GC-MS and GC-FID systems by comparison with analytical standards of each separate compound, obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA).

Results

Bacterial Features Favoring Host Colonization and Alteration of Phytohormone Levels Do Not Influence Stimulation of A. thaliana Salinity Tolerance by P. phytofirmans PsJN

Previous results from our group suggest that early PsJN inoculation is sufficient to enhance tolerance to salinity in A. thaliana, rather than just increasing growth rate regardless of saline stress (Pinedo et al., 2015). However, an estimation of salinity-induced mortality, senescence and tissue damage is necessary to ascertain if sodium exclusion or tissue tolerance mechanisms are being activated in the plants (Roy et al., 2014), and to determine if salt toxicity is effectively reduced by bacterial inoculation. Supplementary Figure S1 summarizes the most relevant differences in rosette growth among PsJN inoculated and N. I. A. thaliana plants growing under different saline stress conditions in soil, showing that inoculated plants do not only survive, but continue to grow in the presence of salt, in contrast with N. I. controls, and that they can retain over 60% of water content when grown under saline irrigation, while plants without inoculum retained only 40% under the same conditions (Supplementary Table S1). The salinity tolerance index (DW_salt/DW_control), measured for inoculated plants was 0.74, compared to 0.51 for N. I. plants, and sodium concentrations within leaves reached 32 ± 8.9 mg Na⁺/g of dry tissue in N. I. controls irrigated with 200/20 mM of NaCl/CaCl₂, while PsJN-inoculated plants reached only 19.7 ± 5.2 mg Na⁺/g of dry tissue. This is consistent with a reduced sodium accumulation in rosette tissues when PsJN-inoculated plants are exposed to salinity in vitro, relative to accumulation within N. I. controls (Supplementary Table S2), while several other growth parameters are modified by bacterial inoculation under the same salinity conditions (Supplementary Figures S2 and S3).

To explore the role of bacterial functions putatively involved in both plant growth promotion and induction of plant stress tolerance, the effects of P. phytofirmans PsJN mutants were compared to the wild type, regarding stimulation of A. thaliana tolerance and growth under salt stress in vitro, as described in the previous section. Two of the selected mutants carried a recombinational insertion in genes related to bacterial modulation of phytohormone levels: Mutant strain PsJN-AcdS underwent inactivation of the ACC deaminase gene (acdS) which only has one chromosomal copy in P. phytofirmans PsJN. This inactivation completely abolished ACC deaminase activity, and also the ability of the strain to use ACC as a sole nitrogen source for growth (Supplementary Figure S4). On the other hand, mutant strain PsJN-IacC, carried an insertion in a specific aromatic ring hydroxylating dioxygenase gene (iacC), which is involved in the catabolism of the auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) by P. phytofirmans. A. thaliana seeds were germinated in vitro in the presence of each of these mutants, the wild type P. phytofirmans, HK-PsJN, or N. I. controls. Then, 11 DAS, plants were transferred to fresh MS¹/₂ medium supplemented with 0 (control) or 150/15 mM NaCl/CaCl₂, and incubated for 2 weeks prior to evaluation of plant growth parameters.

As seen in Figure 1, inactivation of either acdS or iaaC did not result in a significant reduction of the ability of strain PsJN to stimulate A. thaliana salt stress tolerance, although certain significant differences could be detected with the wild type for growth stimulation of non-stressed plants (Figure 1A). Consequently, mutant strains of P. phytofirmans in colonization related functions were also included in the analysis, in order to test their influence on PsJN-mediated salinity tolerance in A. thaliana. When PsJN-BpI.1 inoculated plants were challenged with 150/15 mM NaCl/CaCl₂, a concentration producing the highest differences among wild type PsJN inoculated and N. I. salt stressed plants (Pinedo et al., 2015), the effect of the mutant displayed no significant differences to that of the wild type strain (Figure 1B). Finally, a mutant was produced with an inactivated version of gene FliA, which encodes for a main regulator protein controlling flagellar assembly, to investigate if flagella can work out as bacterial elicitors of IST in A. thaliana. PsJN-FliA proved unable to perform swimming motility toward fructose in soft agar (Supplementary Figure S5). As shown in Figure 1B, this last mutant strain showed identical growth promotion effects to those of the wild type PsJN, both in control and saline conditions. These results suggest that microbe-associated molecular patterns, colonization and/or modulation of phytohormone levels do not play a fundamental role in salt tolerance induction in A. thaliana.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Effect of Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN-derived mutants on growth stimulation of Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Root growth, rosette area and fresh weight of A. thaliana col-0 grown in gnotobiotic in vitro cultures using half strength MS agar medium inoculated with 1 × 10⁴ CFU/ml of P. phytofirmans (PsJN), a heat-killed PsJN inoculum (HK-PsJN), the PsJN-derived mutants (acdS, iacC, bpI.1, or fliA), or non-inoculated medium (N. I.). Plants were transferred at 11 days after sowing (DAS) to fresh MS¹/₂ agar with no added NaCl or CaCl₂ (untreated controls) (A), or MS¹/₂ agar with 150/15 mM NaCl/CaCl₂ (B). Growth parameters were registered at 21 DAS. Bars show mean percentage values relative to N. I. plants, and the error bars indicate standard deviations from experiments with 30 plants analyzed for each bacterium and salt treatment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among bacterial treatments within each salt concentration for each measured parameter (One way ANOVA Tukey’s HSD tests; p < 0.05).

Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN Promotes Growth of A. thaliana and Induces Saline Stress Tolerance by Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds

Since production of VOCs has been shown to induce plant growth promotion in several members of the phylum Firmicutes, and important members of the phylum Proteobacteria (Liu and Zhang, 2015), preliminary assays were performed using P. phytofirmans PsJN to assess growth promotion of A. thaliana without direct contact with the host. Standard divided plate assays were carried out to explore plant growth stimulation by strain PsJN added to sterile cellulose filters and placed on MS¹/₂ agar directly opposite to Arabidopsis seeds. Fresh weight and chlorophyll content of volatile-treated plants in the absence of salt were measured. Figure 2 shows the effects of strain PsJN incubated separately from the host, compared to the effects of the well-characterized volatile compound producer B. subtilis GB03, confirming the ability of P. phytofirmans to stimulate growth of A. thaliana through this mechanism. Inoculum density effects on seedling exposure to volatile emissions from strain PsJN (Supplementary Figure S6), were explored using a dual plate assay approach, that allows quantitative monitoring of root growth. This was achieved by sowing A. thaliana seeds in square Petri dishes and coupling these front-to-front with MS¹/₂ agar square dishes homogenously inoculated with strain PsJN. Under these conditions, inoculated bacteria were able to maintain their abundance and viability for at least 2 weeks (an initial inoculum of 1 × 10⁶ CFU ml^-1 allowed an average recovery of 5.8 × 10⁵ ± 3.2 × 10⁵ CFU ml^-1 after 2 weeks), but did not show substantial growth due to the lack of an abundant carbon source in MS¹/₂ medium. Different bacterial inoculum concentrations were assayed in this system to explore the optimal microbial abundance for volatile-mediated promotion of A. thaliana growth. These experiments suggested no growth promotion, and even a mildly inhibitory effect, was produced when bacteria reached 1 × 10⁸ CFU/ml of agar medium, which is consistent with previous data using direct inoculation of roots with this number of bacteria (Poupin et al., 2013). However, inoculum concentrations of 1 × 10⁴ and 1 × 10⁶ were both able to promote plant growth in a similar fashion (Supplementary Figure S6). As a general rule, further experiments to analyze the effects of PsJN volatile emission on A. thaliana were performed using this dual plate system, and an inoculum concentration of 1 × 10⁶ CFU/ml of agar in front of the plants. The contact-independent effects of strain PsJN contrasted with those of the PGPR A. brasilense (Figure 2). This species was selected because it has been shown to increase the growth of different plant hosts, including A. thaliana (Dubrovsky et al., 1998; Fibach-Paldi et al., 2012), but it does so by a mechanism involving bacterial production of IAA, and direct contact between bacteria and plant roots (Dobbelaere et al., 1999; Spaepen et al., 2014). Here, direct inoculation of plant roots with Sp7 produced the expected increase in plant weight, and general modification of the root system architecture (shorter primary roots, but abundant lateral roots). However, when bacteria and plants were inoculated separately in our dual plate system (Sp7 VOCs), no significant increase in plant growth relative to non-inoculated control systems was observed (Figure 2C). In order to explore if the observed effects could arise from specific VOC-mediated stimulation of plant growth, or merely by accumulation of CO₂ due to the use of a sealed system (Kai et al., 2016), control experiments were performed to compare the effects obtained in our sealed setting with a non-sealed dual plate system, which showed similar stimulation effects (Supplementary Figure S7).

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. Bacterial stimulation of A. thaliana growth mediated by volatile organic compounds (VOC) from P. phytofirmans PsJN. The effects of bacterial emission of volatile compounds was tested using divided petri dishes with A. thaliana col-0 plants sown in half strength MS medium agar on one side, and minimal medium for bacterial growth on the other. 1 × 10⁶ CFU of the corresponding bacterial inoculum (N. I.; PsJN; HK-PsJN; or Bacillus sp. strain GB03) was added on top of a 0.022 μm filter. Total fresh weight and chlorophyll content per mg of fresh tissue were measured at 21 DAS. Columns show mean values, while error bars indicate standard deviations for 30 plants (fresh weight) or 6 plants (chlorophyll content) (A, left and center panels). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among bacterial treatments (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). Representative photographs of plates are presented for each bacteria treatment (B). Root growth, rosette diameter and fresh weight of A. thaliana (C) directly inoculated with 1 × 10⁴ CFU/ml of strain PsJN (PsJN), 1 × 10⁴ CFU/ml of A. brasilense strain Sp7 (Sp7), or co-incubated separately with each of these strains in dual plate systems (PsJN VOCs or Sp7 VOCs, respectively). Growth parameters were registered at 21 DAS. Bars show mean percentage values relative to N. I. plants, and the error bars indicate standard deviations from experiments with 24 plants analyzed for each bacterium and salt treatment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among bacterial treatments within each salt concentration for each measured parameter (One way ANOVA Tukey’s HSD tests; p < 0.05).

Long-term effects of volatile treatment during the 1st days of Arabidopsis growth were studied by transplanting 11 days old plantlets to peat:vermiculite soil substrate, and measuring growth parameters under standard culture and irrigation conditions. As can be seen in Figure 3A, early stimulation through volatile compound treatment (plants without contact with strain PsJN) allowed plants to grow at a similar rate than those directly inoculated with strain PsJN, showing that volatile treatment alone is able to reproduce an essential phytostimulation property of P. phytofirmans, and that exposure to these emissions during the first 11 days of plant development is sufficient to accelerate growth throughout the entire plant life-cycle. Furthermore, when plants exposed to PsJN volatile emissions were transferred to soil and irrigated with 200/20 mM NaCl/CaCl₂, following the same regime described in Supplementary Figure S1, they exhibited similar tolerance levels to those directly in contact with the strain (Figure 3B), suggesting that volatile emissions by P. phytofirmans may be also sufficient to explain stress tolerance induction in A. thaliana, even though salinity stress was applied at a much later developmental stage than volatile treatment. Representative images of plants undergoing different inoculum and salinity conditions highlight the similarities among PsJN-inoculated and volatile-treated plants. To assess the effects of PsJN when a saline shock was applied in vitro, the effects of an 11 day co-incubation of Arabidopsis seeds with strain PsJN at 1 × 10⁶ CFU/ml were registered for plants that were subsequently transferred to fresh MS¹/₂ medium in the presence or absence of 150/15 mM NaCl/CaCl₂ (Figure 4), and compared to the effect of direct inoculation of the plants with PsJN. These results showed that exposure to P. phytofirmans VOCs during the first 11 DAS was enough to stimulate plant growth to the same levels of directly inoculated plants, while the response of A. thaliana to saline treatment was not different among the two types of bacterial treatment. The volatile-mediated effect of strain PsJN could not be reproduced by inoculation of heat-killed bacteria to agar in front of A. thaliana seeds at a concentration equivalent to 1 × 10⁶ CFU/ml, showing that volatiles must be emitted by metabolically active bacteria (Figures 4A,B).

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. Long-term effects of exposure to volatile emission from P. phytofirmans. Arabidopsis seeds were exposed to PsJN volatiles (PsJN-VOCs), directly inoculated with the bacterium (PsJN), or non-inoculated (N. I.) in the dual plate system for 11 DAS, and plantlets were transferred to soil. Transferred plants were irrigated three times a week. Untreated controls received only standard irrigation water (A), while treated plants received 2 irrigations with standard water and a third containing 200 mM of NaCl and 20 mM of CaCl₂ (B). Images of 10 representative plants taken at different times, and rosette area was measured for each treatment. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences among PsJN and N. I: plants within each measured time point, which were explored using One-Way ANOVA Tukey’s HSD tests; p < 0.05. Images of representative plants are shown below each treatment, representing time points (DAS) with the highest differences in rosette area for untreated controls and salt irrigated plants (highlighted by white arrows).

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. Volatile organic compounds-mediated stimulation of A. thaliana tolerance to salinity. Root growth, rosette diameter and fresh weight were measured for A. thaliana col-0 plants inoculated with P. phytofirmans (PsJN), non-inoculated (N.I), or exposed to volatile emissions from live PsJN (PsJN-VOCs) or a heat-killed inoculum (HK-PsJN-VOCs) (see Materials and Methods). Plants were transferred at 11 DAS to fresh MS¹/₂ agar with no added NaCl or CaCl₂ (0 NaCl/0 CaCl₂) as untreated controls (A, upper row; B left panel), or MS¹/₂ agar with 150/15 mM NaCl/CaCl₂ (A, lower row; B right panel). Growth parameters were registered at 21 DAS. Bars show mean percentage values relative to N. I. plants, and the error bars indicate standard deviations from experiments with 30 plants analyzed for each bacterium and salt treatment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among bacterial treatments within each salt concentration for each measured parameter (One way ANOVA Tukey’s HSD tests; p < 0.05).

Identification of VOCs Emitted by P. phytofirmans and Their Effect on A. thaliana Growth and Tolerance to Saline Stress

To identify VOC putatively responsible for the beneficial effects of strain PsJN, the headspace of P. phytofirmans cultures grown in MS¹/₂ (containing 10 mM fructose) and Kings B media in hermetically sealed tubes were analyzed by gas chromatography with a FID, to discriminate relevant signals. Specific selected samples were run through a gas chromatographer coupled to a mass spectrometer detector to allow identification of eluted peaks. Then, candidate compounds were compared with commercial standards. This strategy allowed identification of four major compounds in the headspace of strain PsJN: 2-undecanone (2-UN); 1-heptanol (1-HL); 3-methyl-butanol (3-MB); and dimethyl disuphide (DMDS) (Supplementary Figure S8). Each of the identified compounds was found to be emitted by PsJN at concentrations in the range of 0.05–10 μg per ml of air within headspace tubes, depending on the growth medium. Concentrations in tubes containing MS¹/₂ were approximately 0.1, 0.08, and 0.05 μg per ml for 3-MB, 1-HP, and 2-UN, respectively, compared to 8.0, 7.0, and 4.5 μg per ml in Kings B. The DMDS signal, on the other hand, was consistently absent from all MS¹/₂ samples (data not shown), and could only be observed when bacteria grew in Kings B medium, rising up to 10 μg per ml of air.

Using the in vitro dual plate stimulation method, described above, A. thaliana seeds were placed in MS¹/₂ in front of sterile medium (N. I. controls), PsJN-inoculated medium, or plates supplemented by addition of 2-UN, 1-HL, 3-MB, or DMDS at different amounts, ranging from 100 ng to 1 mg of the added compound per 100 ml of headspace volume (1 ng–10 μg per ml), contained in the assay system. These additions were repeated every 5 days of incubation, to compensate for the loss of volatiles throughout incubation time, and plants were harvested at 21 DAS, to test for growth promotion induced by each amount of supplemented bacterial volatile. Consistently with reported amounts found in the headspace of PsJN cultures, growth promoting amounts of individual volatiles range from 100 ng to 100 μg per plate, while higher values did not result in significant growth promotion effects in the plants (Figure 5). Finally, three volatile compounds, 2-UN, 1-HL, and 3-MB, were selected to test for stimulation of saline stress tolerance in plants. As previous experiments had determined production of these three compounds to be in the 0.1–0.05 μg per ml range in MS¹/₂, added amounts for this experiment should not exceed 5–2.5 μg in total for a 50 ml plate, in order to avoid testing concentrations higher than those that can be produced by bacteria under the experimental conditions. Thus, a low amount of 100 ng of each volatile was added periodically to separate plates of Arabidopsis seedlings in the dual plate system. Alternatively, a 1:1:1 blend of the three compounds was also added to plants during the first 14 DAS. Then, these were transferred to fresh medium in the presence or absence of 150/15 mM of NaCl/CaCl₂, without further volatile-mediated stimulation, and incubated until 21 DAS. As shown in Figure 6, each of the identified volatiles is able to induce a partial level of plant growth promotion in A. thaliana, when added separately, or in the tripartite blend, in the absence of salt. This was especially significant in the case of rosette growth and total fresh weight stimulation, while the observed increases in root growth were lower than those produced by the actual volatile emissions of strain PsJN (PsJN VOCs) (Figure 6A). Regarding growth in the presence of salt, addition of separate compounds produced intermediate effects compared to those of PsJN emissions. However, some of these proved significantly different to non-stimulated control plants, as in the case of addition of 3-MB and 2-UN for stimulation of rosette growth, and the effect of these two compounds and the volatile blend on root growth and increase in total fresh weight under salinity stress conditions (Figure 6B). Altogether, these results show that PsJN-mediated effects on plant growth stimulation and induction of salinity tolerance can be reproduced, to different extents, by specific stimulation with P. phytofirmans-derived VOC, partially mimicking the effect of direct inoculation of the live bacterium to A. thaliana plants.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. Arabidopsis thaliana growth stimulation by different amounts of individual volatile compounds emitted by P. phytofirmans PsJN. Root growth (A) and fresh weight (B) were determined for A. thaliana col-0 grown in vitro MS¹/₂ agar medium without bacterial inoculum, and in the presence of different amounts of volatile compounds added per plate. Tested compounds were 2-undecanone (2-UN); 1-heptanol (1-HP); 3-methyl-butanol (3-MB); or dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) at the indicated amounts. Growth parameters were registered at 21 DAS. Columns show mean values, and the error bars indicate standard deviations from experiments with 24 plants analyzed for each compound concentration. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from the control (N. I.) treatment within each compound (One way ANOVA Tukey’s HSD tests; p < 0.05).

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. Stimulation of A. thaliana growth and salt tolerance by individual volatile compounds and a volatile blend emitted by P. phytofirmans PsJN. Root growth, rosette area and fresh weight were determined for A. thaliana col-0 grown in vitro on MS¹/₂ agar medium without bacterial inoculum, placed in front of an independent MS¹/₂ agar plate inoculated with 1 × 10⁶ CFU/ml of P. phytofirmans (PsJN-VOCs), non-inoculated MS¹/₂ agar (N. I.), or in the presence of different amounts of volatile compounds added per plate. Tested compounds were 100 ng of 2-undecanone (2-UN); 1-heptanol (1-HP); 3-methyl-butanol (3-MB); or a 1:1:1 blend of the three compounds (BLEND). Plants were transferred at 14 DAS to fresh MS¹/₂ agar with no added NaCl or CaCl₂ (untreated controls) (A), or MS¹/₂ agar with 150/15 mM NaCl/CaCl₂ (B). Growth parameters were registered at 21 DAS. Columns show mean values relative to N. I. controls, and the error bars indicate standard deviations from experiments with 24 plants analyzed for each compound treatment. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from the control (N. I.) treatment within each compound (One way ANOVA Tukey’s HSD tests; p < 0.05).

Discussion

Bacterial determinants of growth promotion and salinity tolerance in A. thaliana in response to PsJN inoculation have been studied in this work, based on previous results showing that short- and long-term changes in the response of inoculated plants are able to enhance their growth in the presence of salt (Pinedo et al., 2015). Here, we have explored the onset of salinity tolerance conferred by P. phytofirmans, and the extent of long-term induction of plant growth and stress-survival by inoculation of strain PsJN, quantifying germination, growth parameters, sodium accumulation and water management in inoculated A. thaliana plants exposed to increasing concentrations of salt in irrigation water, and comparing these to N. I. control plants. The salinity tolerance index of inoculated plants under saline conditions was found to be similar to that of higher salt-tolerant ecotypes of A. thaliana, like Ws and Ler (Jha et al., 2010). Moreover, sodium levels measured in whole rosettes of stressed plants in soil showed a 40% lower amount of Na⁺ per gram of dry weight in PsJN-inoculated plants relative to N. I. controls, suggesting an increase of sodium exclusion capacity. This could be enough to explain relevant phenotype differences among the experimental groups, in terms of ion toxicity during long-term exposure to stress (Shi et al., 2002; Tester and Davenport, 2003). As PsJN was shown to influence A. thaliana tolerance to both long and short-term saline stress conditions, we used this simpler short-term model to study the role of specific bacterial functions on plant tolerance induction.

Several works have attempted to identify the main bacterial mechanisms involved in plant growth promotion and phytostimulation in P. phytofirmans, suggesting an involvement of IAA production (Naveed et al., 2015), acyl-homoserine lactone signaling (Trognitz et al., 2008; Zúñiga et al., 2013), ACC-deamination (Sun et al., 2009), and/or nicotinic acid mononucleotide metabolism (Wang et al., 2006). However, though phytohormone signaling is influenced by P. phytofirmans inoculation of different plant hosts, like potato (Kurepin et al., 2015), grapevine (Bordiec et al., 2011) and Arabidopsis (Poupin et al., 2013), it has not been successfully established if such changes are directly produced by bacterial synthesis/degradation of plant hormones, if they are induced by the plant in response to PsJN colonization, or even if they are indirect regulatory consequences of bacteria-triggered physiological changes, activated through different mechanisms. In terms of phytohormone signaling, strain PsJN has been reported to produce IAA from tryptophan (Mitter et al., 2013), which is further degraded by an aromatic cleavage catabolism pathway encoded by the iac/cat genes (Donoso et al., 2016). Additionally, P. phytofirmans ACC deaminase has been reported to enhance elongation of canola roots in the gnotobiotic pouch assay (Sun et al., 2009), while an acdS mutant that only differed from the wild type P. phytofirmans in ACC-deaminase displayed a significant reduction in root elongation of A. thaliana (Zúñiga et al., 2013). However, although the results of this work cannot fully exclude a role for bacterial IAA metabolism and ACC deamination in salinity tolerance-induction, they strongly suggest that these functions have a minor influence in the response of Arabidopsis under salt stress. This is not necessarily contradictory to the reported evidences mentioned above since, in the case of IAA metabolism, bacterial modulation of IAA levels would be expected to alter the response of the plants as long as the relevant bacterial pathways are induced and sufficiently active in planta, with sufficient numbers of colonizing bacteria to ensure an effect, and properly tuned to plant metabolism under the selected experimental conditions (Spaepen et al., 2007). When such requirements are not adequately met, null or undesirable effects in plant growth have been observed in other systems (Xie et al., 1996; Persello-Cartieaux et al., 2003). On the other hand, a case for the involvement of ACC deamination as the main bacterial modulator of growth and tolerance to saline stress in plants is supported by examples involving AcdS mutants of Pseudomonas species (Cheng et al., 2012; Ali et al., 2014; Han et al., 2015) but, for the most part of the reports in literature, the actual extent of the contribution of this bacterial enzyme to salinity tolerance induction in the host is not explored in detail, and has been mostly inferred from the existence of a functional AcdS in active bacterial isolates (Onofre-Lemus et al., 2009; Ahmad et al., 2013; Chang et al., 2014; Singh et al., 2015). However, it is worth noting that, in several cases, high ACC deaminase activity levels in isolates do not correlate with a better performance in salinity tolerance induction (Zheng et al., 2008; Tank and Saraf, 2010; Tiwari et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2013; Mapelli et al., 2013; Ramadoss et al., 2013), or even growth promotion activity in general (Dey et al., 2004; Long et al., 2008; Bruto et al., 2014). Furthermore, it has been observed that, in order to be effective, ACC deamination within plant tissues must deal with feedback regulation of ethylene biosynthesis (Yang and Hoffman, 1984), that will stimulate ethylene production when ACC levels are low (Vacheron et al., 2013). In the case of P. phytofirmans-mediated stimulation of A. thaliana, our results show that the influence of ACC deamination is restricted to root growth elongation and architecture changes in unstressed plants.

For P. phytofirmans-mediated phytostimulation, tissue colonization numbers appear to modulate the plant responses to bacterial inoculation, resulting in growth promotion or growth inhibition, depending on bacterial concentrations in rhizosphere and within plant tissues (Poupin et al., 2013; Zúñiga et al., 2013), which suggests that an unbalanced amount of bacteria entering in contact with the roots can be stressful to the plants. Accordingly, a purified flagellin fragment (flg22 peptide) from PsJN has been observed to reduce A. thaliana growth, when added exogenously (Trdá et al., 2014), while treatment with heat killed-bacteria does not benefit plant growth and stress tolerance (Pinedo et al., 2015 and this work), but induces stress pathways, that are not activated by live PsJN (Poupin et al., 2013). In the present study, a reduction of growth promotion and salt stress tolerance induction was observed for the bpI.1 acyl-homoserine lactone signaling mutant of strain PsJN (Figure 1), which may be explained by its regulatory influence on a relevant growth promotion trait, or simply by its capacity to modulate plant colonization, derived from its role in rhizosphere competence, swimming motility and adherence to root tissues (Zúñiga et al., 2013). On the other hand, the PsJN-fliA strain, defective in the flagellum synthesis regulator FliA, induced salinity tolerance of A. thaliana just like the wild type PsJN, which suggests that colonization alone is not enough to induce salt tolerance and growth promotion and may be rather an additional source of biotic stress for the plants when not restricted below certain specific levels. In the context of PsJN-induced salinity tolerance in A. thaliana, colonization may be only required to achieve sufficient bacterial numbers in the proximity of the plant, since no evidence was found of a direct dependence of plant-bacteria contact on stimulation of growth and salinity tolerance. This does not imply that other promotion mechanisms may not be active and relevant in the absence of salt stress, while contact-independent growth promotion traits, such as volatile-mediated phytostimulation, may be less active in different environmental contexts as well.

As an intriguing alternative to contact-dependent plant growth promotion mechanisms, organic volatile compound production by PGPRs has been shown to be responsible for growth stimulation and stress tolerance induction in a variety of plant hosts (Liu and Zhang, 2015). It was first described for Bacillus stimulation of ISR in Arabidopsis (Ryu et al., 2003), and has since been shown to be relevant for the growth promotion of several plants (Farag et al., 2013), and to induce different physiological changes in the host, to modify gene expression patterns, and phytohormone levels, including cytokinin, IAA and abscisic acid, and even induce catabolism of certain bacterial volatiles (Oikawa and Lerdau, 2013). Paenibacillus polymyxa and B. subtilis have been thoroughly described to induce a stress tolerance response and priming in A. thaliana, providing protection against abiotic stress (Yang et al., 2009) and pathogen infection (Farag et al., 2006). It has been conclusively demonstrated that P. polymyxa exerts its protective actions through volatile emission of the C-13 compound tridecane (Lee et al., 2012), while Bacillus produces a complex mixture of compounds (Farag et al., 2006), that are able to activate diverse signaling pathways in the plant host (Zhang et al., 2008).

So far, phytostimulation by VOC production has been thoroughly studied mainly in Firmicutes and certain specific Proteobacteria, like Pseudomonas chlororaphis, but only a few molecules being unequivocally identified as plant growth modulators (Chung et al., 2016). However, the ability to produce volatile compounds currently appears to be widely distributed among rhizosphere bacteria, and is probably present in most plant associated species (Blom et al., 2011; Kanchiswamy et al., 2015). Though by far less understood, increasing evidence has been found for their involvement in many plant-bacteria interactions, including rhizosphere colonizers of the Pseudomonas, Serratia and Burkholderia genera, that produce a whole set of novel volatile compounds, different from those identified in Bacilli (Schulz and Dickschat, 2007). Descriptive studies have confirmed that volatile compounds in microbial emissions occur as a complex mixture of low-molecular weight lipophilic compounds, including alkanes, long chain alcohols, ketones, and sulfur compounds derived from different biosynthetic pathways (Schulz and Dickschat, 2007; Kanchiswamy et al., 2015). Despite the fact that several members of the Burkholderia (now Paraburkholderia) genus have been found to display plant growth promoting abilities (Compant et al., 2008; Suárez-Moreno et al., 2012), there are only a few detailed studies of the effects produced by volatiles emitted by members of the genus, and most are specially focused on antagonistic effects by B. tropica and B. ambifaria (Groenhagen et al., 2013; Tenorio-Salgado et al., 2013; Weisskopf and Bailly, 2013). Blom et al. (2011) showed the production of a wide variety of VOCs from different Proteobacteria strains, encompassing several species within the order Burkholderiales, including P. phytofirmans. However, volatile mixtures were shown to depend strongly on growth medium, and even vary considerably among closely related species. Moreover, no correlation could be observed among those volatile compounds and plants beneficial effects mediated by the bacteria included in their study and/or their reported type of interaction with plants, except for the case of B. pyrrocinia (Blom et al., 2011). We have analyzed VOCs production in P. phytofirmans PsJN by co-incubation of A. thaliana with bacteria homogenously inoculated in MS¹/₂ agar in sealed dual plate systems, showing that the resulting effects on plant growth are different from those of PGP bacteria that do not stimulate growth through volatile emission, like A. brasilense, which could not induce significant changes in plant size or weight when separately co-incubated with A. thaliana. In order to further explore the potential influence of CO₂ in our sealed plates (Kai et al., 2016), we have assessed the effects of PsJN on plant growth in non-sealed systems, as recommended by Piechulla and Schnitzler (2016). The results of those experiments (Supplementary Figure S7) support the idea that PsJN-induced changes are not produced by CO₂ accumulation.

We have also shown specific accumulation of the compounds 2-UN, 3-MB, 1-HL, and DMDS, in the headspace of cultures grown in MS¹/₂ medium, under conditions analogous to plant growth experiments, and we have confirmed their presence by comparison of retention times (Supplementary Figure S8) and MS profiles with those of analytical standards. We have explored the biological function of each compound added separately to A. thaliana cultures in different amounts (Figure 5). This suggests that most of them can produce an effect in a wide range of added quantities, with detectable influence on plant growth even at the lowest tested amounts (100 ng), which is roughly 50–100 times less that the amounts that could be detected in stationary phase PsJN cultures in sealed headspace tubes. On the other hand, some specific effects, like the increase in root length, were less pronounced when much higher amounts (1 mg) were tested. A similar observation was made by Blom et al. (2011) regarding addition of indole to A. thaliana, which promotes growth when tested in different amounts (1 ng–10 μg), but inhibits growth at 1 mg, while the study of the effects of different concentrations of volatile compounds of Paenibacillus on the elicitation of ISR, have shown that sometimes lower doses are required for a beneficial response (Lee et al., 2012). Our results support the potential of 2-UN, 3-MB, and 1-HL for direct growth promotion stimulation on A. thaliana (Figure 6), and suggest the involvement of one or more of these compounds in plant growth promotion and stress tolerance induction by P. phytofirmans. Furthermore, this study suggests that volatile-mediated effects on plant growth by strain PsJN are triggered at an early stage of plant growth, and are then able to influence the complete life cycle of the host, which is consistent with the onset of an IST response, as has been shown for B. subtilis stimulated tolerance (Zhang et al., 2008). Intriguingly, the volatile emissions from P. phytofirmans seem to be much less complex in terms of the diversity of its constituent compounds than that of B. subtilis strain GB03, as we could only detect the four indicated compounds, compared to more than 30 that have been found in Bacillus emissions (Farag et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2012) using a similar method, which could explain some of the differences in their growth promotion effects. However, it is noteworthy that PsJN volatile-mediated effects are able to influence plant growth in the long-term even though exposition takes place only during the first 11 days of growth, reaching similar tolerance levels to those of inoculated plants (Figure 3), an interesting feature which demands further study.

In summary, we have found that P. phytofirmans PsJN is able to promote growth and induce tolerance to salinity in A. thaliana mainly through the emission of volatile compounds, and that the contribution of bacterial phytohormone synthesis pathways is only minor. This is especially significant since, even though growth promotion by Paraburkholderia volatile emission has been reported before (Blom et al., 2011; Weisskopf and Bailly, 2013), relevant literature has failed to consider it as a possible mechanism underlying in the multiple plant growth promotion effects produced by P. phytofirmans PsJN, one of the most studied PGPR belonging to the β-proteobacteria (Suárez-Moreno et al., 2012; Mitter et al., 2013; Hardoim et al., 2015). The results of this work highlight the importance of the use of bacterial mutants in simple, well characterized, plant model systems to assess the actual specific contributions of potential growth promotion traits, in order to challenge traditional views on the mechanisms of plant tolerance stimulation. A simple mixture of four volatile metabolites was produced from PsJN, which was capable of mimicking the main effects of bacterial inoculation relative to growth stimulation and tolerance to salinity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first functional study comparing the effects of volatile compounds produced by P. phytofirmans PsJN to other possible growth promotion mechanisms, and reporting their role in plant tolerance to abiotic stress.

Author Contributions

TL conceived and coordinated the study, performed preliminary experiments and revised the manuscript. SR performed most of the plant inoculation experiments, and contributed to their design and analysis. TT and IP designed and performed specific experiments, related to VOC production and evaluation of PsJN mutants, respectively. MP contributed to the design and analysis of various experiments, supervised part of the work and critically reviewed the manuscript. TG performed analytical detection of salts within tissues and volatile compounds, contributing to the design of related experiments, while PR provided analytical insight on GC-MS experiments, advised on their performance and proper execution, and helped in the interpretation of results. JT and RD performed long term-growth analyses and produced PsJN mutant strains, respectively. All authors contributed to the writing of specific sections of the manuscript and have read and approved its final version.

Funding

This work was funded by Fondecyt grants 11121515, 11121306, and 3140033, the Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES FB-0002-2014), the Millennium Nucleus for Plant Systems and Synthetic Biology (NC130030), and Internal Individual Research Project DII16006 from Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, funded this research. TT is a CONICYT PhD fellow.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Bernardo Gonzalez for his unconditional support and valuable scientific contributions regarding our work, Betsabet Sepúlveda for her assistance and technical advice on the use of the GC-MS equipment at Universidad de Chile, and Dr. Ana Zúñiga for providing P. phytofirmans mutant strain PsJN-bpI.1.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01838/full#supplementary-material

References

Afzal, M., Khan, S., Iqbal, S., Mirza, M. S., and Khan, Q. M. (2013). Inoculation method affects colonization and activity of Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN during phytoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 85, 331e336. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.08.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ahmad, M., Zahir, Z. A., Nazli, F., Akram, F., Arshad, M., and Khalid, M. (2013). Effectiveness of halotolerant, auxin producing pseudomonas and Rhizobium strains to improve osmotic stress tolerance in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Braz. J. Microbiol. 44, 1341–1348. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822013000400045

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ait Barka, E., Nowak, J., and Clément, C. (2006). Enhancement chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72,7246–7252. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01047-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ali, S., Charles, T. C., and Glick, B. R. (2014). Amelioration of high salinity stress damage by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes that contain ACC deaminase. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 80, 160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aznar, A., and Dellagi, A. (2015). New insights into the role of siderophores as triggers of plant immunity: what can we learn from animals? J. Exp. Bot. 66, 3001–3010. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv155

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barassi, C. A., Ayrault, G., Creus, C. M., Sueldo, R. J., and Sobero, M. T. (2006). Seed inoculation with Azospirillum mitigates NaCl effects on lettuce. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam) 109, 8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.02.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barriuso, J., Solano, B. R., and Gutiérrez Mañero, F. J. (2008). Protection against pathogen and salt stress by four plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from Pinus sp. on Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytopathology 98, 666–672. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-6-0666

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blom, D., Fabbri, C., Connor, E. C., Schiestl, F. P., Klauser, D. R., Boller, T., et al. (2011). Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 13, 3047–3058. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02582.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bordiec, S., Paquis, S., Lacroix, H., Dhondt, S., Ait Barka, E., Kauffmann, S., et al. (2011). Comparative analysis of defence responses induced by the endophytic plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN and the non-host bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi in grapevine cell suspensions. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 595–603. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bruto, M., Prigent-Combaret, C., Muller, D., and Moënne-Loccoz, Y. (2014). Analysis of genes contributing to plant-beneficial functions in plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria and related Proteobacteria. Sci. Rep. 4, 6261. doi: 10.1038/srep06261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, P., Gerhardt, K. E., Huang, X.-D., Yu, X.-M., Glick, B. R., Gerwing, P. D., et al. (2014). Plant growth promoting bacteria facilitate the growth of barley and oats in salt impacted soil: implications for phytoremediation of saline soils. Int. J. Phytorem 16, 1133–1147. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2013.821447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, Z., Woody, O. Z., McConkey, B. J., and Glick, B. R. (2012). Combined effects of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas putida UW4 and salinity stress on the Brassica napus proteome. Appl. Soil Ecol. 61, 255–263. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.10.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cho, S. M., Kang, B. R., Han, S. H., Anderson, A. J., Park, J. Y., Lee, Y. H., et al. (2008). 2R, 3R-butanediol, a bacterial volatile produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6, is involved in induction of systemic tolerance to drought in Arabdopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21, 1067–1075. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-8-1067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chung, J. H., Song, G. C., and Ryu, C. M. (2016). Sweet scents from good bacteria: case studies on bacterial volatile compounds for plant growth and immunity. Plant Mol. Biol. 90, 677–687. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0344-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Compant, S., Nowak, J., Coenye, T., Clément, C., and Ait Barka, E. (2008). Diversity and occurrence of Burkholderia spp. in the natural environment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32, 607–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00113.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Compant, S., Reiter, B., Sessitsch, A., Nowak, J., Clement, C., and Ait Barka, E. (2005). Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by a plant growth-promoting bacterium, Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 1685–1693. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1685-1693.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

del Amor, F. M., and Cuadra-Crespo, P. (2011). Plant growth-promoting bacteria as a tool to improve salinity tolerance in sweet pepper. Funct. Plant Biol. 32, 82–90.

Google Scholar

Dey, R., Pal, K. K., Bhatt, D. M., and Chauhan, S. M. (2004). Growth promotion and yield enhancement of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol. Res. 159, 371–394. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2004.08.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dobbelaere, S., Croonenborghs, A., Thys, A., Van de Broek, A., and Vanderleyden, J. (1999). Phytostimulatory effect of Azospirillum brasilense wild type and mutant strains altered in IAA production on wheat. Plant Soil 212, 153–162. doi: 10.1023/A:1004658000815

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dodd, I. C., and Pérez-Alfocea, F. (2012). Microbial amelioration of crop salinity stress. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 3415–3428. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Donoso, R., Leiva-Novoa, P., Zúñiga, A., Timmermann, T., Recabarren-Gajardo, G., and González, B. (2016). Biochemical and genetic basis of índole-3-acetic acid (auxin phytohormone) degradation by the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01991-16 [Epub ahead of print],

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dorn, E., Hellwig, M., Reineke, W., and Knackmus, H. J. (1974). Isolation and characterization of a 3-chlorobenzoate degrading pseudomonad. Arch. Microbiol. 99, 61–70. doi: 10.1007/BF00696222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dubrovsky, J. G., Puente, M. E., and Bashan, Y. (1998). Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system for the study of the effect of inoculation by Azospirillum brasilense Sp-245 on root hair growth. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 1657–1664. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90318-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Effmert, U., Kalderas, J. J., Warnke, R., and Piechulla, B. (2012). Volatile mediated interactions between bacteria and fungi in the soil. J. Chem. Ecol. 36, 665–703. doi: 10.1007/s10886-012-0135-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Egamberdieva, D., Jabborova, D., and Hashem, A. (2015). Pseudomonas induces salinity tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and resistance to Fusarium root rot through the modulation of indole-3-acetic acid. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 22, 773–779. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.04.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, W., Deng, G., Wang, H., Zhang, H., and Zhang, P. (2014). Elevated compartmentalization of Na into vacuoles improves salt and cold stress tolerance in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Physiol. Plant. 154, 560–571. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Farag, M. A., Ryu, C. M., Sumner, L. W., and Paré, P. W. (2006). GC-MS SPME profiling of rhizobacterial volatiles reveals prospective inducers of growth promotion and induced systemic resistance in plants. Phytochemistry 67,2262–2268. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.07.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farag, M. A., Zhang, H., and Ryu, C. M. (2013). Dynamic chemical communication between plants and bacteria through airborne signals: induced resistance by bacterial volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 39, 1007–1018. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0317-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernandez, O., Theocaris, A., Bordiec, S., Feil, R., Jacquens, L., Clément, C., et al. (2012). Burholderia phytofirmans PsJN acclimates grapevine to cold by modulating carbohydrate metabolism. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 25,496–504. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-09-11-0245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fibach-Paldi, S., Burdman, S., and Okon, Y. (2012). Key physiological properties contributing to rhizosphere adaptation and plant growth promotion abilities of Azospirillum brasilense. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 326, 99–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02407.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frommel, M. I., Nowak, J., and Lazarovits, G. (1991). Growth enhancement and developmental modifications of in vitro grown potato (Solanum tuberosum ssp. tuberosum) as affected by a nonfluorescent Pseudomonas sp. Plant Physiol. 96, 928–936. doi: 10.1104/pp.96.3.928

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gill, S. S., and Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48, 909–930. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glick, B. R., Cheng, Z., Czarny, J., and Duan, J. (2007). Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 119, 329–339. doi: 10.1007/s10658-007-9162-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gond, S. K., Torres, M. S., Bergen, M. S., Helsel, Z., and White, J. F. Jr. (2015). Induction of salt tolerance and up-regulation of aquaporin genes in tropical corn by rhizobacterium Pantoea agglomerans. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 60,392–399. doi: 10.1111/lam.12385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Groenhagen, U., Baumgartner, R., Bailly, A., Gardiner, A., Eberl, L., Schulz, S., et al. (2013). Production of bioactive volatiles by different Burkholderia ambifaria strains. J. Chem. Ecol. 39, 892–906. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0315-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamdia, M. A., Shaddad, M. A. K., and Doaa, M. M. (2004). Mechanism of salt tolerance and interactive effect of Azospirillum bransilense inoculation on maize cultivars grown under salt stress conditions. Plant Growth Regul. 44, 165–174. doi: 10.1023/B:GROW.0000049414.03099.9b

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, Y., Wang, R., Yang, Z., Zhan, Y., Ma, Y., Ping, S., et al. (2015). 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase from Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501 facilitates the growth of rice in the presence of salt or heavy metals. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25, 1119–1128. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1412.12053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., et al. (2015). The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 293–320. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00050-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hauser, F., and Horie, T. (2010). A conserved primary salt tolerance mechanism mediated by HKT transporters: a mechanism for sodium exclusion and maintenance of high K+/Na+ ratio in leaves during salinity stress. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 552–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02056.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ismail, A., Takeda, S., and Nick, P. (2014). Life and death under salt stress: same players, different timing? J. Exp. Bot. 65, 2963–2979. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jakab, G., Ton, J., Flors, V., Zimmerli, L., Métraux, J. P., and Mauch-Mani, B. (2005). Enhancing Arabidopsis salt and drought stress tolerance by chemical priming for its abscisic acid responses. Plant Physiol. 139, 267–274. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.065698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jha, D., Shirley, N., Tester, M., and Roy, S. J. (2010). Variation in salinity tolerance and shoot sodium accumulation in Arabidopsis ecotypes linked to differences in the natural expression levels of transporters involved in sodium transport. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 793–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02105.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kai, M., Effmert, U., and Piechulla, B. (2016). Bacterial-plant-interactions: approaches to unravel the biological function of bacterial volatiles in the rhizosphere. Front. Microbiol. 7:108. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanchiswamy, C. N., Malnoy, M., and Maffei, M. E. (2015). Chemical diversity of microbial volatiles and their potential for plant growth and productivity. Front. Plant Sci. 6:151. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karlidag, H., Yildirim, E., Turan, M., Pehluvan, M., and Donmez, F. (2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria mitigate deleterious effects of salt stress on strawberry plants (Fragaria ananassa). Hortic. Sci. 48, 563–567.

Google Scholar

Kim, K., Jang, Y. J., Lee, S. M., Oh, B. T., Chae, J. C., and Lee, K. J. (2014). Alleviation of salt stress by Enterobacter sp. EJ01 in tomato and Arabidopsis is accompanied by up-regulation of conserved salinity responsive factors in plants. Mol. Cells 37, 109–117. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2014.2239

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, S., Lowman, S., Hou, G., Nowak, J., Flinn, B., and Mei, C. (2012). Growth promotion and colonization of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) cv. Alamo by bacterial endophyte Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN. Biotechnol. Biofuels 30, 37. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-37

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kohler, J., Hernandez, J. A., Caravaca, F., and Roldan, A. (2009). Induction of antioxidant enzymes is involved in the greater effectiveness of a PGPR versus AM fungi with respect to increasing the tolerance of lettuce to severe salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 65, 245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.09.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kost, T., Stopnisek, N., Agnoli, K., Eberl, L., and Weisskopf, L. (2014). Oxalotrophy, a widespread trait of plant-associated Burkholderia species, is involved in successful root colonization of lupin and maize by Burkholderia phytofirmans. Front. Microbiol. 4:421. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kurepin, L. V., Park, J. M., Lazarovits, G., and Bernards, M. A. (2015). Burkholderia phytofirmans-induced shoot and root growth promotion is associated with endogenous changes in plant growth hormone levels. Plant Growth Regul. 75, 199–207. doi: 10.1007/s10725-014-9944-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, B., Farag, M. A., Park, H. B., Kloepper, J. W., Lee, S. H., and Ryu, C. M. (2012). Induced resistance by a long-chain bacterial volatile: elicitation of plant systemic defense by a C13 volatile produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa. PLoS ONE 7:e48744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048744

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, G. W., Lee, K. J., and Chae, J. C. (2016). Herbaspirillum sp. strain GW103 alleviates salt stress in Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis. Protoplasma 253,655–661. doi: 10.1007/s00709-015-0872-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lemfack, M. C., Nickel, J., Dunkel, M., Preissner, R., and Piechulla, B. (2014). mVOC: a database of microbial volatiles. Nucleic Acid Res 42, D744–D748. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X.-M., and Zhang, H. (2015). The effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant abiotic stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 6:774. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00774

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Shi, Z., Yao, L., Yue, H., Li, H., and Li, C. (2013). Effect of IAA produced by Klebsiella oxytoca Rs-5 on cotton growth under salt stress. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 59, 59–65. doi: 10.2323/jgam.59.59

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Long, H. H., Schmidt, D. D., and Baldwin, I. T. (2008). Native bacterial endophytes promote host growth in a species-specific manner; phytohormone manipulations do not result in common growth responses. PLoS ONE 3:e2702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lugtenberg, B., and Kamilova, F. (2009). Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 541–556. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mapelli, F., Marasco, R., Rolli, E., Barbato, M., Cherif, H., Guesmi, A., et al. (2013). Potential for plant growth promotion of rhizobacteria associated with Salicornia growing in Tunisian hypersaline soils. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 248078. doi: 10.1155/2013/248078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mayak, S., Tirosh, T., and Glick, B. R. (2004). Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 42, 565–572. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mitter, B., Petric, A., Shin, M. W., Chain, P. S., Hauberg-Lotte, L., Reinhold-Hurek, B., et al. (2013). Comparative genome analysis of Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN reveals a wide spectrum of endophytic lifestyles based on interaction strategies with host plants. Front. Plant Sci. 4:120. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Munns, R., and Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murashige, T., and Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nadeem, S. M., Zaheer, Z. A., Naveed, M., and Nawaz, S. (2013). Mitigation of salinity-induced negative impact on the growth and yield of wheat by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in naturally saline conditions. Ann. Microbiol. 63, 225–232. doi: 10.1007/s13213-012-0465-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nadeem, S. M., Zahir, Z. A., Naveed, M., and Arshad, M. (2007). Preliminary investigation on inducing salt tolerance in maize through inoculation with rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase activity. Can. J. Microbiol. 53,1141–1149. doi: 10.1139/W07-081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nadeem, S. M., Zahir, Z. A., Naveed, M., and Arshad, M. (2009). Rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase confer salt tolerance in maize grown on salt-affected fields. Can. J. Microbiol. 55, 1302–1309. doi: 10.1139/w09-092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naveed, M., Hussain, M. B., Zahir, Z., Mitter, B., and Sessitsch, A. (2014). Drought stress amelioration in wheat through inoculation with Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN. Plant Growth Regul. 73, 121–131. doi: 10.1007/s10725-013-9874-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naveed, M., Qureshi, M. A., Zahir, Z. A., Hussain, M. B., Sessitsch, A., and Mitter, B. (2015). L-Tryptophan-dependent biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) improves plant growth and colonization of maize by Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN. Ann. Microbiol. 65, 1381–1389. doi: 10.1007/s13213-014-0976-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nia, S. H., Zarea, M. J., Rejali, F., and Varma, A. (2012). Yield and yield components of wheat as affected by salinity and inoculation with Azospirillum strains from saline or non-saline soil. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 11, 113–121.

Google Scholar

Nowak, J., and Shulaev, V. (2003). Priming for transplant stress resistance in in vitro propagation. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 39, 107–124. doi: 10.1079/IVP2002403

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oikawa, P. Y., and Lerdau, M. T. (2013). Catabolism of volatile organic compounds influences plant survival. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 695–703. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.08.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Onofre-Lemus, J., Hernández-Lucas, I., Girard, L., and Caballero-Mellado, J. (2009). ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate) deaminase activity, a widespread trait in Burkholderia species, and its growth-promoting effect on tomato plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 6581–6590. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01240-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palaniyandi, S. A., Damodharan, K., Yang, S. H., and Suh, J. W. (2014). Streptomyces sp. strain PGPA39 alleviates salt stress and promotes growth of ’Micro Tom’ tomato plants. J. Appl. Microbiol. 117, 766–773. doi: 10.1111/jam.12563

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Penrose, D. M., and Glick, B. R. (2003). Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Physiol. Plant. 118, 10–15. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00086.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Persello-Cartieaux, F., Nussaume, L., and Robaglia, C. (2003). Tales from the underground: molecular plant-rhizobacteria interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 189–199. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00956.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piechulla, B., and Schnitzler, J.-P. (2016). Circumvent CO2 effects in volatile-based microbe-plant interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 541–542. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pinedo, I., Ledger, T., Greve, M., and Poupin, M. J. (2015). Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN induces long-term metabolic and transcriptional changes involved in Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 6:466. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00466

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Porra, R., Thompson, W., and Kriedmann, P. (1989). Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophyll a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochem. Biophys Acta 975, 384–394.

Google Scholar

Poupin, M. J., Timmermann, T., Vega, A., Zuniga, A., and Gonzalez, B. (2013). Effects of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN throughout the life cycle of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 8:e69435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramadoss, D., Lakkineni, V. K., Bose, P., Ali, S., and Annapurna, K. (2013). Mitigation of salt stress in wheat seedlings by halotolerant bacteria isolated from saline habitats. Springer Plus 2, 1–7. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roy, S. J., Negra, S., and Tester, M. (2014). Salt resistant crop plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 26, 115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.12.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryu, C. M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C. H., Reddy, M. S., Wei, H. X., Paré, P. W., et al. (2003). Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 4927–4932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0730845100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sadeghi, A., Karimi, E., Dahaji, P. A., Javid, M. G., Dalvand, Y., and Askari, H. (2012). Plant growth promoting activity of an auxin and siderophore producing isolate of Streptomyces under saline soil conditions. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28, 1503–1509. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0952-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sahoo, R. K., Ansari, M. W., Pradhan, M., Dangar, T. K., Mohanty, S., and Tuteja, N. (2014). A novel Azotobacter vinellandii (SRIAz3) functions in salinity stress tolerance in rice. Plant Signal. Behav. 9, e29377. doi: 10.4161/psb.29377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sandhya, V., Ali, S. Z., Grover, M., Reddy, G., and Venkateswarlu, B. (2009). Alleviation of drought stress effects in sunflower seedlings by the exopolysaccharides producing Pseudomonas putida strain GAP-P45. Biol. Fert. Soils 46, 17–26. doi: 10.1007/s00374-009-0401-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saravanakumar, D., and Samiyappan, R. (2007). ACC deaminase from Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated saline resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogea) plants. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102, 1283–1292. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03179.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schulz, S., and Dickschat, J. S. (2007). Bacterial volatiles: the smell of small organisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 24, 814–842. doi: 10.1039/b507392h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sessitsch, A., Coenye, T., Sturz, A. V., Vandamme, P., Ait Barka, E., Salles, J. F., et al. (2005). Burkholderia phytofirmans sp. nov., a novel plant-associated bacterium with plant-beneficial properties. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55, 1187–1192. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63149-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, V., and Nowak, J. (1998). Enhancement of Verticillium wilt resistance in tomato transplants by in vitro co-culture of seedlings with a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium (Pseudomonas sp. strain PsJN). Can. J. Microbiol. 44, 528–536. doi: 10.1139/w98-017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, H., Quintero, F. J., Pardo, J. M., and Zhu, J. K. (2002). The putative plasma membrane Na(+)/H(+) antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na(+) transport in plants. Plant Cell 14, 465–477. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shilev, S., Sancho, E. D., and Benlloch-González, M. (2010). Rhizospheric bacteria alleviate salt-produced stress in sunflower. J. Environ. Manage. 95(Suppl.), S37–S41. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shrivastava, P., and Kumar, R. (2015). Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 22, 123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, R. P., Jha, P., and Jha, P. N. (2015). The plant-growth-promoting bacterium Klebsiella sp. SBP-8 confers induced systemic tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under salt stress. J Plant Physiol 184, 57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spaepen, S., Bossuyt, S., Engelen, K., Marchal, K., and Vanderleyden, J. (2014). Phenotypical and molecular responses of Arabidopsis thaliana roots as a result of inoculation with the auxin-producing bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. New Phytol. 201, 850–861. doi: 10.1111/nph.12590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spaepen, S., Vanderleyden, J., and Remans, R. (2007). Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 31, 425–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00072.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, F., Jacquard, C., Villaume, S., Michel, J., Rabenoelina, F., Clément, C., et al. (2015). Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN reduces impact of freezing temperatures on photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 6:810. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00810

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suárez-Moreno, Z., Caballero-Mellado, J., Coutinho, B. G., Menzonça-Previato, L., James, E. K., and Ventturi, V. (2012). Common features of environmental and potentially beneficial plant-associated Burkholderia. Microb. Ecol. 63, 249–266. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9929-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sukweenadhi, J., Kim, Y. J., Choi, E. S., Koh, S. C., Lee, S. W., Kim, Y. J., et al. (2015). Paenibacillus yonginensis DCY84(T) induces changes in Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression against aluminum, drought, and salt stress. Microbiol. Res. 172, 7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y., Cheng, Z., and Glick, B. R. (2009). The presence of a 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase deletion mutation alters the physiology of the endophytic plant growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 296, 131–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01625.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sziderics, A. H., Rasche, F., Trognitz, F., Sessitsch, A., and Wilhelm, E. B. (2007). Bacterial endophytes contribute to abiotic stress adaptation in pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.). Can. J. Microbiol. 53, 1195–1202. doi: 10.1139/W07-082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Talbi, C., Argandoña, M., Salvador, M., Alché, J. D., Vargas, C., Bedmar, E. J., et al. (2013). Burkholderia phymatum improves salt tolerance of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Soil 367, 673–685. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1499-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tank, N., and Saraf, M. (2010). Salinity resistant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria ameliorates sodium chloride stress on tomato plants. J. Plant Interact. 5, 51–58. doi: 10.1080/17429140903125848

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tenorio-Salgado, S., Tinoco, R., Vazquez-Duhalt, R., Caballero-Mellado, J., and Perez-Rueda, E. (2013). Identification of volatile compounds produced by the bacterium Burkholderia tropica that inhibit the growth of fungal pathogens. Bioengineered 4, 236–243. doi: 10.4161/bioe.23808

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tester, M., and Davenport, R. (2003). Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann. Bot. 91, 503–527. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg058

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tewari, S., and Arora, N. K. (2014). Multifunctional exopolysaccharides from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PF23 involved in plant growth stimulation, biocontrol and stress amelioration in sunflower under saline conditions. Curr. Microbiol. 69, 484–494. doi: 10.1007/s00284-014-0612-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiwari, S., Singh, P., Tiwari, R., Meena, K. K., Yandigeri, M., Singh, D. P., et al. (2011). Salt-tolerant rhizobacteria-mediated induced tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and chemical diversity in rhizosphere enhance plant growth. Biol. Fertil. Soils 47, 907–916. doi: 10.1007/s00374-011-0598-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trdá, L., Fernandez, O., Boutrot, F., Héloir, M. C., Kelloniemi, J., Daire, X., et al. (2014). The grapevine flagellin receptor VvFLS2 differentially recognizes flagellin-derived epitopes from the endophytic growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans and plant pathogenic bacteria. New Phytol. 201, 1371–1384. doi: 10.1111/nph.12592

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trognitz, F., Scherwinski, K., Fekete, A., Schmidt, S., Eberl, L., et al. (2008). “Interaction between potato and the endophyte Burkholderia phytofirmans,” in Proceedings of the Tagung der Vereinigung der Pflanzenzüchter und Saatgutkaufl eute Österreichs, Austria, 63–66. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vacheron, J., Desbrosses, G., Bouffaud, M. L., Touraine, B., Moënne-Loccoz, Y., Muller, D., et al. (2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front. Plant Sci. 4:356. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vaishnav, A., Kumari, S., Jain, S., Varma, A., and Choudhary, D. K. (2015). Putative bacterial volatile-mediated growth in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) and expression of induced proteins under salt stress. J. Appl. Microbiol. 119, 539–551. doi: 10.1111/jam.12866

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vaishnav, A., Kumari, S., Jain, S., Varma, A., Tuteja, N., and Choudhary, D. K. (2016). PGPR-mediated expression of salt tolerance gene in soybean through volatiles under sodium nitroprusside. J. Basic Microbiol. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201600188 [Epub ahead of print]

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, B., Seiler, J. R., and Mei, C. (2016). A microbial endophyte enhanced growth of switchgrass under two drought cycles improving leaf level physiology and leaf development. Environ. Exp. Bot. 122, 100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.09.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, K., Conn, K., and Lazarovits, G. (2006). Involvement of quinolinate phosphoribosyl transferase in promotion of potato growth by a Burkholderia strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 760–768. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.760-768.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weisskopf, L., and Bailly, A. (2013). “Plant growth modulation by bacterial volatiles–a focus on Burkholderia species,” in Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere, Vol. 2, ed. F. d Bruijn (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons).

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Wu, Z., Yue, H., Lu, J., and Li, C. (2012). Characterization of rhizobacterial strain Rs-2 with ACC deaminase activity and its performance in promoting cotton growth under salinity stress. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28, 2383–2393. doi: 10.1007/s11274-012-1047-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, H., Pasternak, J. J., and Glick, B. R. (1996). Isolation and characterization of mutants of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida CR12-2 that overproduce indoleacetic acid. Curr. Microbiol. 32, 67–71. doi: 10.1007/s002849900012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, J., Kloepper, J. W., and Ryu, C. M. (2009). Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, S. F., and Hoffman, N. E. (1984). Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35, 155–189. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.001103

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Kim, M. S., Sun, Y., Dowd, S. E., Shi, H., and Pare, P. W. (2008). Soil bacteria confer plant salt tolerance by tissue-specific regulation of the sodium transporter HKT1. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 21, 731–744. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-6-0737

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J. L., and Shi, H. (2013). Physiological and molecular mechanisms of plant salt tolerance. Photosynth. Res. 115, 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s11120-013-9813-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Y. Y., Yue, H. T., and Li, C. (2008). Physiochemical characters and ability to promote cotton germination of bacteria strains Rs-5 and Rs-198 under salt stress. Scientia Agric Sin 41, 1326–1332.

Google Scholar

Zúñiga, A., Poupin, M. J., Donoso, R., Ledger, T., Guiliani, N., Gutierrez, R. A., et al. (2013). Quorum sensing and indole-3-acetic acid degradation play a role in colonization and plant growth promotion of Arabidopsis thaliana by Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 26, 546–553. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-12-0241-R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar