Skip to main content
Log in

Intrinsic joint kinematic planning. I: Reassessing the Listing’s law constraint in the control of three-dimensional arm movements

Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tested the validity of the assumption that intrinsic kinematic constraints, such as Listing’s law, can account for the geometric features of three-dimensional arm movements. In principle, if the arm joints follow a Listing’s constraint, the hand paths may be predicted. Four individuals performed ‘extended arm’, ‘radial’, ‘frontal plane’, and ‘random mixed’ movements to visual targets to test Listing’s law assumption. Three-dimensional rotation vectors of the upper arm and forearm were calculated from three-dimensional marker data. Data fitting techniques were used to test Donders’ and Listing’s laws. The coefficient values obtained from fitting rotation vectors to the surfaces described by a second-order equation were analyzed. The results showed that the coefficients that represent curvature and twist of the surfaces were often not significantly different from zero, particularly not during randomly mixed and extended arm movements. These coefficients for forearm rotations were larger compared to those for the upper arm segment rotations. The mean thickness of the rotation surfaces ranged between ≈1.7° and 4.7° for the rotation vectors of the upper arm segment and ≈2.6° and 7.5° for those of the forearm. During frontal plane movements, forearm rotations showed large twist scores while upper arm segment rotations showed large curvatures, although the thickness of the surfaces remained low. The curvatures, but not the thicknesses of the surfaces, were larger for large versus small amplitude radial movements. In conclusion, when examining the surfaces obtained for the different movement types, the rotation vectors may lie within manifolds that are anywhere between curved or twisted manifolds. However, a two-dimensional thick surface may roughly represent a global arm constraint. Our findings suggest that Listing’s law is implemented for some types of arm movement, such as pointing to targets with the extended arm and during radial reaching movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Admiraal MA, Medendorp WP, Gielen CCAM (2001) Three-dimensional head and upper arm orientations during kinematically redundant movements and at rest. Exp Brain Res 142:181–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceylan M, Henriques DYP, Tweed DB, Crawford JD (2000) Task-dependent constraints in motor control: pinhole goggles make the head move like an eye. J Neurosci 20:2719–2730

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JD, Vilis T (1995) How do motor systems deal with the problems of controlling three-dimensional rotations? J Mot Behav 27:89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSouza JFX, Nicolle DA, Vilis T (1997) Task-dependent changes in the shape and thickness of Listing’s plane. Vision Res 37:2271–2282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donders FC (1847) Beitrag zur Lehre von den Bewegungen des menschlichen Auges. Holländ Beitr Anat Physiol Wiss 1:104–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielen CCAM, Vrijenhoek EJ, Flash T, Neggers SFW (1997) Arm position constraints during pointing and reaching in 3D. J Neurophysiol 78:1179–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn B, Vilis T (1992) Violations of Listing’s law after large eye and head gaze shifts. J Neurophysiol 68:309–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haslwanter T (1995) Mathematics of 3-dimensional eye rotations. Vision Res 35:1727–1739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hepp K (1990) On Listing’s law. Commun Math Phys 132:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44:67–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hore J, Watts S, Vilis T (1992) Constraints on arm position when pointing in three dimensions: Donders’ law and the Fick-gimbal strategy. J Neurophysiol 68:374–383

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marotta JJ, Medendorp WP, Crawford JD (2003) Kinematic rules for upper and lower arm contributions to grasp orientation. J Neurophysiol 90:3816–3827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medendorp WP, Van Gisbergen JAM, Horstink MWIM, Gielen CCAM (1999) Donders’ law in Torticollis. J Neurophysiol 82:2833–2838

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medendorp WP, Crawford JD, Henriques DYP, Van Gisbergen JAM, Gielen CCAM (2000) Kinematic strategies for upper arm–forearm coordination in three dimensions. J Neurophysiol 84:2302–2816

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller LE, Theeuwen M, Gielen CCAM (1992) The control of arm pointing movements in three dimensions. Exp Brain Res 90:415–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S, Turvey MT (2004) A rotation invariant in 3-D reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:163–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Opstal J (1993) Representation of eye position in three dimensions. In: Berthoz A (ed) Multi-sensory control of movement. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 27–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Buneo CA, Herrmann U, Flanders M (1995) Moving effortlessly on three dimensions: does Donders’ law apply to arm movements? J Neurosci 15:6271–6280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straumann D, Haslwanter T, Hepp-Reymond MC, Hepp K (1991) Listing’s law for the eye, head and arm movements and their synergistic control. Exp Brain Res 86:209–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwen M, Miller LE, Gielen CCAM (1993) Are the orientations of the head and arm related during pointing movements? J Mot Behav 25:242–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tweed D (1999) Three-dimensional model of the human eye–head saccadic system. J Neurophysiol 77:654–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweed D, Vilis T (1987) Implications of rotational kinematics for the oculomotor systems in three dimensions. J Neurophysiol 58:832–849

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tweed D, Vilis T (1990) Geometric relations of eye position and velocity vectors during saccades. Vision Res 30:111–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer G (1957) Kinematics of the eye. J Optic Soc Am 47:967–974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr. L. Zuk from the University of Tel Aviv and the support of Mrs. E. Nuri. The research was supported in part by the Israeli Ministry of Science and by the Moross Vision and Robotics Laboratory, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel. Tamar Flash is an incumbent of the Dr. Hymie Moross Professorial Chair.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. G. Liebermann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liebermann, D.G., Biess, A., Friedman, J. et al. Intrinsic joint kinematic planning. I: Reassessing the Listing’s law constraint in the control of three-dimensional arm movements. Exp Brain Res 171, 139–154 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0265-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0265-x

Keywords

Navigation