Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The sources of two components of variance: an example of multifinger cyclic force production tasks at different frequencies

Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a multifinger cyclic force production task, the finger force variance measured across trials can be decomposed into two components, one that affects the combined force output (“bad variance”) and one that does not (“good variance”). Previous studies have found similar time patterns of “bad variance” and force rate leading to an approximately linear relationship between them. Based on this finding and a recently developed model of multifinger force production, we expected the “bad variance” during cyclic force production to increase monotonically with the rate of force change, both within a cycle and across trials at different frequencies. Alternatively, “bad variance” could show a dependence on task frequency, not on actual force derivative values. Healthy subjects were required to produce cyclic force patterns to prescribed targets by pressing on unidimensional force sensors, at a frequency set by a metronome. The task was performed with only the index finger, and with all four fingers. In the task with all four fingers, the “good variance” increased approximately linearly with an increase in the force magnitude. The “bad variance” showed within-a-cycle modulation similar to that of the force rate. However, an increase in the frequency did not lead to an increase in the “bad variance” that could be expected based on the natural relationships between action frequency and the rate of force change modulation. The results have been interpreted in the framework of an earlier model of multifinger force production where “bad variance” is a result of variance of the timing parameter. The unexpected lack of modulation of the “bad variance” with frequency suggests a drop in variance of the timing parameter with increased frequency. This mechanism may serve to maintain a constant acceptable level of variance under different conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Danion F, Schöner G, Latash ML, Li S, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) A mode hypothesis for finger interaction during multi-finger force-production tasks. Biol Cybern 88:91–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SR, Latash ML (2006) Feed-forward control of a redundant motor system. Biol Cybern 95:271–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SR, Shim JK, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2005) Motor variability within a multi-effector system: experimental and analytical studies of multi-finger production of quick force pulses. Exp Brain Res 163:75–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorniak SL, Duarte M, Latash ML (2008) Do synergies improve accuracy? A study of speed accuracy trade-offs during finger force production. Motor Control 12:151–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N, Sternad D (2007) On rhythmic and discrete movements: reflections, definitions and implications for motor control. Exp Brain Res 181:13–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ivry RB, Hazeltine RE (1995) Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:3–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivry RB, Richardson T (2002) Temporal control and coordination: the multiple timer model. Brain Cogn 48:117–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schöner G (2001) Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multi-finger force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 141:153–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schöner G (2002a) Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 146:412–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2002b) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2007) Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Motor Control 11:275–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Li ZM, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (1998) Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem. Exp Brain Res 119:276–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM, Carlton LG (1988) Force variability in isometric responses. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:37–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaal S, Sternad D, Osu R, Kawato M (2004) Rhythmic arm movement is not discrete. Nat Neurosci 7:1136–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Schöner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126:289–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Danion F, Latash ML, Schöner G (2002) Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability. Biol Cybern 86:29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapkova EYu, Shapkova AL, Goodman SR, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2008) Do synergies decrease force variability? A study of single-finger and multi-finger force production. Exp Brain Res 188:411–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shim JK, Lay B, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2004) Age-related changes in finger coordination in static prehension tasks. J Appl Physiol 97:213–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sternad D, Dean WJ (2003) Rhythmic and discrete elements in multi-joint coordination. Brain Res 989:152–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Russell DM, Sternad D (2003) Task-effector asymmetries in a rhythmic continuation task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:616–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky VM, Li ZM, Latash ML (1998) Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: finger interaction and neural network modeling. Biol Cybern 79:139–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky VM, Li ZM, Latash ML (2000) Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production. Exp Brain Res 131:187–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was in part supported by NIH grants AG-018751, NS-035032, and AR-048563.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark L. Latash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, J., SKM, V., Zatsiorsky, V.M. et al. The sources of two components of variance: an example of multifinger cyclic force production tasks at different frequencies. Exp Brain Res 196, 263–277 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1846-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1846-x

Keywords

Navigation