Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Is light pollution getting better or worse?

Nature Astronomy volume 2, pages 267–269 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

Awareness of light pollution is spreading, but with changing lighting technologies, emissions are shifting to wavelengths our current measuring devices cannot assess well. Community involvement is essential to evaluate changes in sky brightness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison of naked-eye limiting magnitude observations from Globe at Night in 2015 to sky brightness predictions from Falchi et al.12.
Fig. 2: Estimation of the NELM using the Loss of the Night app by a project participant from Portugal.

References

  1. Falchi, F. et al. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600377 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kolláth, Z., Dömény, A., Kolláth, K. & Nagy, B. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 181, 46–51 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinzey, B. et al. An Investigation of LED Street Lighting’s Impact on Sky Glow (US Department of Energy, 2017); http://go.nature.com/2nTa8O3

  4. Tsao, J. Y., Saunders, H. D., Creighton, J. R., Coltrin, M. E. & Simmons, J. A. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 354001 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kyba, C. C. M. et al. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701528 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Riegel, K. W. Science 179, 1285–1291 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers, P. New streetlights to be installed across Chicago. NBC Chicago (28 March 2017); http://go.nature.com/2DCGk0Y

  8. Sánchez de Miguel, A. et al. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 467, 2966–2979 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schaefer, B. E. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 102, 212 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, S. D. et al. Remote Sens. 5, 6717–6766 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Narendran, N., Freyssinier, J. P. & Zhu, Y. Light. Res. Tech. 48, 789–809 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Falchi, F. et al. Supplement to: The New World Atlas of Artificial Night Sky Brightness (GFZ Data Services, 2016); https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.1.4.2016.001

  13. Kyba, C. C. M. et al. Sci. Rep. 3, 1835 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges funding from the European Unionʼs Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 689443 via project GEOEssential.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GFZ, German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany

    Christopher C. M. Kyba

Authors
  1. Christopher C. M. Kyba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher C. M. Kyba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kyba, C.C.M. Is light pollution getting better or worse?. Nat Astron 2, 267–269 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0402-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0402-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing