Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian methods for predicting LAI and soil water content

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

LAI of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and soil water content of the topsoil (200 mm) and of the subsoil (500 mm) were considered as state variables of a dynamic soil-crop system. This system was assumed to progress according to a Bayesian probabilistic state space model, in which real values of LAI and soil water content were daily introduced in order to correct the model trajectory and reach better future evolution. The chosen crop model was mini STICS which can reduce the computing and execution times while ensuring the robustness of data processing and estimation. To predict simultaneously state variables and model parameters in this non-linear environment, three techniques were used: extended Kalman filtering (EKF), particle filtering (PF), and variational filtering (VF). The significantly improved performance of the VF method when compared to EKF and PF is demonstrated. The variational filter has a low computational complexity and the convergence speed of states and parameters estimation can be adjusted independently. Detailed case studies demonstrated that the root mean square error of the three estimated states (LAI and soil water content of two soil layers) was smaller and that the convergence of all considered parameters was ensured when using VF. Assimilating measurements in a crop model allows accurate prediction of LAI and soil water content at a local scale. As these biophysical properties are key parameters in the crop-plant system characterization, the system has the potential to be used in precision farming to aid farmers and decision makers in developing strategies for site-specific management of inputs, such as fertilizers and water irrigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behera, S., & Panda, R. (2009). Integrated management of irrigation water and fertilizers for wheat crop using field experiments and simulation modeling. Agricultural Water Management, 96(11), 1532–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellochi, G., Rivington, M., Donatelli, M., & Matthews, K. (2009). Validation of biophysical models: Issues and methodologies. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breda, N. (2003). Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: A review of methods, instruments and current controversies. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54(392), 2403–2417.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brisson, N., Gara, C., Justes, E., Roche, R., Mary, B., Ripoche, D., et al. (2003). An overview of the crop model STICS. European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvet, J. (2000). Investigating soil and atmospheric plant water stress using physiological and micrometeorological data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 103(3), 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobriyal, P., Qureshi, A., Badola, R., & Hussain, A. (2012). A review of the methods available for estimating soil moisture and its implications for water resource management. Journal of Hydrology, 458–459, 110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucet, A., & Tadic, V. (2003). Parameter estimation in general state-space models using particle methods. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 55(2), 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebbers, R., Ehlert, D., & Adamek, R. (2011). Rapid mapping of the leaf area index in agricultural crops. Agronomy Journal, 103(5), 1532–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautala, M., & Hakojarvi, M. (2011). An analytical C3-crop growth model for precision farming. Precision Agriculture, 12, 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonckheere, I., Fleck, S., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B., Coppin, P., Weiss, M., et al. (2004). Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination. Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 121, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotecha, J., & Djuric, P. (2003). Gaussian particle filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51(10), 2592–2601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leemans, V., Dumont, B., Destain, M.-F., Vancutsem, F., & Bodson, B. (2012). A method for plant leaf area measurement by using stereo vision. In F. Juste (Ed.) Proceedings of CIGR-AgEng 2012 International Conference on Agricultural Engineering, July 8–12, Valencia (Spain), Paper C-2315.

  • Lunt, I., Hubbard, S., & Rubin, Y. (2005). Soil water content content estimation using ground-penetrating radar reflection data. Journal of Hydrology, 307, 254–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D. J. C. (2003). Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makowski, D., Jeuffroy, M., & Guérif, M. (2004). Bayesian methods for updating crop-model predictions, applications for predicting biomass and grain protein content. In M. van Boekel, A. Stein, & A. van Bruggen (Eds.), Bayesian Statistics and Quality Modelling in the Agro-Food Production Chain (Wageningen UR Frontis Series) (pp. 57–68). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri, M., Snoussi, M., & Richard, C. (2009). A nonlinear estimation for target tracking in wireless sensor networks using quantized variational filtering. In IEEE, Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Signals, Circuits and Systems, E-ISBN: 978-1-4244-4398-7, pp. 1–4.

  • Palosuoa, T., Kersebaumb, K., Angulo, C., Hlavinka, P., Moriondo, M., Olesen, J., et al. (2011). Simulation of winter wheat yield and its variability in different climates of Europe: A comparison of eight crop growth models. European Journal of Agronomy, 35, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, T., Gitelson, A., Wardlow, B., Arkebauer, T., Verma, S., Suyker, A., et al. (2012). Application of day and night digital photographs for estimating maize biophysical characteristics. Precision Agriculture, 13, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacheder, M., Koeniger, F., & Schuhmann, R. (2009). New dielectric sensors and sensing techniques for soil and snow moisture measurements. Sensors, 9(4), 2951–2967.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sudha, N., Valarmathi, M., Babu, M., & Susan, A. (2011). Energy efficient data transmission in automatic irrigation system using wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 78(2), 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M., & Wallach, D. (2004). Comparison of parameter estimation methods for crop models. Agronomie, 24(6–7), 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Merwe, R., & Wan, E. A. (2001). The square-root unscented Kalman filter for state and parameter-estimation. In IEEE (Eds), ICASSP, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 6, pp. 3461–3464.

  • Van Wijk, M., & Williams, M. (2005). Optical instruments for measuring leaf area index in low vegetation: Application in arctic ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 15(4), 1462–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermaak, J., Lawrence, N., & Perez, P. (2003). Variational inference for visual tracking, In IEEE (Ed.) Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–773). Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference.

  • Weiss, A., & Wilhem, W. (2006). The circuitous path to the comparison of simulated values from crop models with field observations. Journal of Agricultural Science, 144, 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Z., Liang, S. Wang, J., & Wu, X. (2009). Use of an ensemble Kalman filter for real-time inversion of leaf area index from modis time series data. In IEEE (Ed.), Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2009 IEEE International, IGARSS 2009, Vol. 4, pp. 4–73.

  • Zhang, R., Guo, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., & Wang, Q. (2011). A calibration method of detecting soil water content based on the information-sharing in wireless sensor network. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 76(2), 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-France Destain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mansouri, M., Dumont, B., Leemans, V. et al. Bayesian methods for predicting LAI and soil water content. Precision Agric 15, 184–201 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-013-9332-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-013-9332-7

Keywords

Navigation