Elsevier

Agricultural Systems

Volume 143, March 2016, Pages 205-216
Agricultural Systems

Perceiving to learn or learning to perceive? Understanding farmers' perceptions and adaptation to climate uncertainties

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.01.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Farmers perceive more weather variability rather than to climate change.

  • Different perceptions are due to different climate impacts on farming system.

  • Farmers' adaptation emerges from perceiving processes.

  • Adaptive capacity is driven by social capital, institutional setting and technology.

  • “Learning to perceive” is essential for enhance farmers' adaptation to climate change.

Abstract

Perception not only shapes knowledge but knowledge also shapes perception. Humans adapt to the natural world through a process of learning in which they interpret their sensory impressions in order to give meaning to their environment and act accordingly. In this research, we examined how farmers' decision making is shaped in the context of changing climate. Using empirical data (face-to-face semi-structured interviews and questionnaires) on four Mediterranean farming systems from a case study located in Oristano (Sardinia, Italy) we sought to understand farmers' perception of climate change and their behaviors in adjustment of farming practices. We found different perceptions among farmer groups were mainly associated with the different socio-cultural and institutional settings and perceived relationships between climate factors and impacts on each farming systems. The research findings on different perceptions among farmer groups can help to understand farmers' current choices and attitudes of adaptation for supporting the development of appropriate adaptation strategies. In addition, the knowledge of socio-cultural and economic factors that lead to biases in climate perceptions can help to integrate climate communication into adaptation research for making sense of climate impacts and responses at farm level.

Introduction

Climate change (CC) is raising significant issues for European agricultural development strategies. European agriculture will face serious challenges in the coming decades, such as competition for water resources (Koutroulis et al., 2013), combating invasive exotic plant species, pests and microbes (Bardsley and Edwards-Jones, 2007), rising costs due to environmental protection policies, and uncertainty in the effectiveness of current policies as CC adaptation strategies (Olesen and Bindi, 2002).

Farming activities are strongly shaped by local climate conditions, since impacts of changes in climate and bio-physical factors are perceived by farmers through their daily interaction with environment. The emerging reality of CC potentially increases the level of farmers' concern about the sustainable agricultural practices needed for mitigating greenhouse gases emissions as well as for adapting to the impacts of CC (Fleming and Vanclay, 2010). However, farmers' decisions about managing their farming activities in the framework of sustainability are plagued with uncertainty. They need to undertake continuous adjustments to their practices to adapt to an uncertain future, and uncertainty can lead farmers to perceive their farming activities as unpredictable, hence likely constraining their income (Dono et al., 2013), willingness and/or capacity to respond (Islam et al., 2013).

Farmers' decisions are traditionally made based on the aim of maximizing the profit of farming activities taking into account the market, subsidies, grants and restrictions. In the context of changing climate, farmers face difficulties in making decisions for their farming activities simply because CC is an uncertain and wicked issue that is difficult to foresee (Abildtrup et al., 2006, Audsley et al., 2006). Farmers perceive their environment and make decisions accordingly and this can result in mal-adaptations due to biased perception, cognition and lack of information (Etkin and Ho, 2007, Mubaya et al., 2012). Farmers may feel uncertain about addressing investments for their activities. Unpredictability may push farmers to adopt/not adopt agricultural practices, introduce/not introduce new changes in technologies, and maintain the same farming practices over time and space or abandon farming activities.

Farmers' adaptation to CC occurs within a socio-ecological context, and their perception determines the acceptability of adaptation measures posed by policy domains (Tam and McDaniels, 2013). Understanding farmers' perceptions of CC helps to understand their behaviors about adjustments they made/will make in their farming practices in order to respond to CC consequences (Tambo and Abdoulaye, 2013). Such understanding can help researchers to better orientate the agronomic research on adaptation at farm level's and policy makers to develop adaptation policies (Habiba et al., 2012).

In this research, we analyzed how farmers' decision making is shaped by their perceptions of climate change. Using empirical data from a local case study on the four most representative farming systems (i.e., intensive dairy cattle farming, extensive sheep farming, rice farming and horticulture) in the province of Oristano (Sardinia, Italy), we sought to answer the following questions: (1) What are farmers' perceptions of CC? (2) Are there any differences of perceptions of CC among different farmer groups? (3) How does farmers' perception influence their farming decisions and their willingness and capacity to adapt to climate uncertainties?

Section snippets

Theoretical framework: perceiving the environment and adaptation to climate change

Human systems are adapting and will have to adapt to climate change. Developing active adaptive responses to CC implies perceiving, learning and acting adaptively. Human beings explore and observe the world around them and act according to what they see (Slegers, 2008). To understand farmers' adaptation to climate change, it is important to understand farmers' perceptions of CC. Perceived CC has been identified as the main motivator for adaptation (Frank et al., 2011, Tompkins et al., 2010).

Case study

The study area is located in the province of Oristano in Sardinia, Italy (Fig. 2). The province consists of 88 municipalities within a total area of 3040 km2 and a total population of about 168,500. Oristano is located in the center of the Campidano plain and along the west coast of Sardinia. The province includes 62 km2 of wetlands (lagoons), 29 km2 of lakes and 104 km of river length.

The province of Oristano is characterized by typical Mediterranean climate, i.e. rainfall is concentrated in

Research methods

The research was articulated into the following three steps.

Step 1: Analysis of long-term changes in some climate indicators (rainfall and temperature) in order to evaluate the asymmetries between observed climate data and farmers' perceptions of their exposure to climate variability. Climate data were obtained from the Santa Lucia Meteorological Station (Oristano, Italy) and correspond to a 53-years time span (1959–2012). The case study area climate variability has been analyzed following the

Analysis of long-term changes in climate

Between 1870 and 1980 the rainfall of Sardinia had a marked inter-annual variability, but it did not show any evident long-term trend. In the last four decades of the 20th century, however, the rainfall showed a significant long-term reduction (ARPAS, 2013). The decrease in rainfall was observed also at the Santa Lucia station from 1963 to 2001 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 4 shows the average annual numbers of rainy days from 1959 to 2012. Three periods can be recognized: (i) the first span is from 1959 to

Learning climate changes by personal sensory impressions

In terms of climate conditions, human emotions at the perceptual layer may be classified only into two opposite categories: pleasant and unpleasant (Wang, 2005). Many farmers in this study saw themselves in a symbiotic relationship with nature and climate and most interviewees expressed strongly their experience with hotter weather from their personal feelings. The high level of agreement among surveyed farmers with the long-term observations in terms of the temperature increasing pattern (Fig.

Conclusion

Lack of consensus on climate impacts as well as scientifically biased top-down approach could constrain climate change adaptation at local level. The development of adaptation strategies at farm level requires holistic scientific research approaches that transcends disciplines, embraces uncertainties, and incorporates local farmers' perceptions and knowledge. This study provided an insight of farmers' perception of CC resulting in their adaptive action to cope with climate uncertainties.

The

Acknowledgment

This study was financially supported by the Agroscenari project (D.M. 8608/7303/2008 - www.agroscenari.it ) and by the FACCE JPI knowledge hub "MACSUR" (D.M. 2660/7303/2012 - www.macsur.eu) funded by the Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies. The authors thank the Farmers’ Unions Confagricoltura, Coldiretti, CIA of Oristano Province and all farmers involved in the interviews and questionnaires; Marco Peterle and Gianni Sardo, respectively Director and President of the

References (76)

  • E. Frank et al.

    Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, Mexico

    Glob. Environ. Chang.

    (2011)
  • S. Gandure et al.

    Farmers' perceptions of adaptation to climate change and water stress in a South African rural community

    Environ. Dev.

    (2013)
  • A.A. Granderson

    Making sense of climate change risks and responses at the community level: a cultural-political lens

    Clim. Risk Manag.

    (2014)
  • T. Grothmann et al.

    Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change

    Glob. Environ. Chang.

    (2005)
  • U. Habiba et al.

    Farmer's perception and adaptation practices to cope with drought: perspectives from Northwestern Bangladesh

    Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduction

    (2012)
  • M.M. Islam et al.

    An investigation into climate change scepticism among farmers

    J. Environ. Psychol.

    (2013)
  • S.E. Kalafatis et al.

    Increasing information usability for climate adaptation: the role of knowledge networks and communities of practice

    Glob. Environ. Chang.

    (2015)
  • P.J. Kellman et al.

    Chapter Four - Perceptual Learning, Cognition, and Expertise

  • T. Kiriscioglu et al.

    Urban and rural perceptions of ecological risks to water environments in southern and eastern Nevada

    J. Environ. Psychol.

    (2013)
  • A.G. Koutroulis et al.

    Impact of climate change on water resources status: a case study for Crete Island, Greece

    J. Hydrol.

    (2013)
  • R.P. Lejano et al.

    Climate and narrative: environmental knowledge in everyday life

    Environ. Sci. Pol.

    (2013)
  • N.A. Marshall et al.

    Climate change awareness is associated with enhanced adaptive capacity

    Agric. Syst.

    (2013)
  • J. Milgroom et al.

    Courting the rain: rethinking seasonality and adaptation to recurrent drought in semi-arid southern Africa

    Agric. Syst.

    (2013)
  • C.P. Mubaya et al.

    Climate variability and change or multiple stressors? Farmer perceptions regarding threats to livelihoods in Zimbabwe and Zambia

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2012)
  • R. Nelson

    The vulnerability of Australian rural communities to climate variability and change: part II—integrating impacts with adaptive capacity

    Environ. Sci. Pol.

    (2010)
  • J.E. Olesen et al.

    Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2002)
  • C.M. Raymond et al.

    Factors affecting rural landholders' adaptation to climate change: insights from formal institutions and communities of practice

    Glob. Environ. Chang.

    (2013)
  • P. Reidsma et al.

    Adaptation to climate change and climate variability in European agriculture: the importance of farm level responses

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2010)
  • M.F.W. Slegers

    “If only it would rain”: farmers' perceptions of rainfall and drought in semi-arid central Tanzania

    J. Arid Environ.

    (2008)
  • J. Tam et al.

    Understanding individual risk perceptions and preferences for climate change adaptations in biological conservation

    Environ. Sci. Pol.

    (2013)
  • E.L. Tompkins et al.

    Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapting society

    Glob. Environ. Chang.

    (2010)
  • R.N. Yegbemey et al.

    Farmers' decisions to adapt to climate change under various property rights: a case study of maize farming in northern Benin (West Africa)

    Land Use Policy

    (2013)
  • Gibson's theory of perceptual learning

  • I. Ajzen

    Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior

    J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • ARPAS

    Analisi agrometeorologica e climatologica della Sardegna — Analisi delle condizioni meteorologiche e conseguenze sul territorio regionale nel periodo ottobre 2011–settembre 2012

    (2013)
  • S. Asayama

    Catastrophism toward ‘opening up’ or ‘closing down’? Going beyond the apocalyptic future and geoengineering

    Curr. Sociol.

    (2015)
  • H. Aschmann

    Distribution and peculiarity of Mediterranean ecosystems

  • C. Bryant et al.

    Adaptation in Canadian agriculture to climatic variability and change

    Clim. Chang.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text