Elsevier

Applied Animal Ethology

Volume 8, Issue 6, August 1982, Pages 507-525
Applied Animal Ethology

On the effects of domestication on canine social development and behavior

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(82)90215-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Social development and behavior are compared for 4 Eastern timber wolves (C. lupus lycaon) and 4 Alaskan Malamutes (C. familiaris). The two groups were born a year apart, but all were fostered at approximately 10 days of age on the same lactating female wolf, reared jointly by the authors and the foster mother, housed in the same facility, and subjected to the same regimen of maintenance and social contact with adult members of the animal colony. It is suggested that many of the observed group differences can be attributed to selection in domestic dogs for prolongation of juvenile behavior and morphological characteristics. Discussion then focuses on the evolution and ontogeny of ritualized aggression in wolves and the effects of domestication on agonistic behavior in domestic dogs. It is suggested that the disintegration of ritualized aggression in dogs is, in part, a consequence of neotenization. Also implicated in the breakdown of this behavioral system is human provision of food, which relaxes (1) the behavioral consequences of injuries sustained in fighting and (2) the selective advantage enjoyed by group-hunting species who have evolved social systems of population regulation.

References (37)

  • H. Frank et al.

    Comparison of problem-solving performance in sixweek-old wolves and dogs

    Anim. Behav.

    (1982)
  • American Kennel Club

    The Complete Dog Book

    (1968)
  • A.C. Bakarich

    Comparative development in wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris)

  • I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt

    Ethology, The Biology of Behavior

    (1975)
  • M.W. Fox

    Canine Behavior

    (1965)
  • M.W. Fox

    The anatomy of aggression and its ritualization in canidae: A developmental and comparative study

    Behavior

    (1969)
  • M.W. Fox

    Behaviour of Wolves, Dogs, and Related Canids

    (1971)
  • M.W. Fox

    Socioecological implications of individual differences in wolf litters: A developmental and evolutionary perspective

    Behavior

    (1972)
  • M.W. Fox

    Social dynamics of three captive wolf packs

    Behavior

    (1973)
  • H. Frank

    Evolution of canine information processing under conditions of natural and artificial selection

    Z. Tierpsychol.

    (1980)
  • H. Frank et al.

    Comparison of forced training performance in sevenweek-old wolves and dogs

    (1982)
  • M.G. Frank et al.

    Food reinforcement vs. social reinforcement in timber wolf pups

    (1982)
  • J.L. Gould

    Do honeybees know what they are doing?

    Nat. Hist.

    (1975)
  • S.J. Gould

    Mickey Mouse meets Konrad Lorenz

    Nat. Hist.

    (1979)
    S.J. Gould

    Mickey Mouse meets Konrad Lorenz

    Nat. Hist.

    (1979)
    S.J. Gould

    Mickey Mouse meets Konrad Lorenz

    Nat. Hist.

    (1979)
    S.J. Gould

    Mickey Mouse meets Konrad Lorenz

    Nat. Hist.

    (1979)
  • W. Kohler

    The Mentality of Apes

    (1927)
  • P. Leyhausen

    On the function of the relative hierarchy of moods (as exemplified by the phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of prey-catching in carnivores)

    Z. Tierpsychol.

    (1965)
  • R. Lockwood

    Dominance in wolves: Useful construct or bad habit

  • K.Z. Lorenz

    On Aggression

    (1966)
  • Cited by (84)

    • Comparing wolves and dogs: current status and implications for human ‘self-domestication’

      2022, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, as reviewed in the preceding text, there is no general decrease in aggression in dogs compared with wolves. While dogs are potentially less aggressive toward conspecific outgroup members (although systematic studies still need to confirm this), their ingroup social dynamics, particularly around food, have changed in less obvious ways: dominant dogs are less tolerant than are dominant wolves, and subordinate dogs (but not subordinate wolves) avoid potential conflicts where possible [69–73]. A similar pattern emerges when interacting with humans, where dogs appear to be more easily inhibited and more likely to comply with their demands compared with wolves (Box 4) [42,74,106,107].

    • Behavioral genetics and animal science

      2022, Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals, Third Edition
    • Dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) behavioral adaptations to a human-dominated niche: A review and novel hypothesis

      2021, Advances in the Study of Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Frank (1980) argued that the wolf niche favors group hunting and thus cognitive adaptations including foresight, mental representation and an understanding of means-end relationships. Since dogs have been relieved of the selection pressures for hunting live prey in their symbiosis with humans, Frank argued they lost these forms of cognition in place of tractability in the human partnership (Frank & Frank, 1982). From these considerations the Franks derived a number of testable hypotheses.

    • Chimpanzees, but not bonobos, attend more to infant than adult conspecifics

      2019, Animal Behaviour
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, because human infants are altricial and require extensive care from both related and unrelated adults (even more so than bonobos and chimpanzees), humans might have acquired especially strong affiliative responses to infants with strong baby schema, which might be generalized to heterospecific infants with the same baby schema. If the preference of humans for heterospecific infants has an evolutionary origin, such preferences might have promoted the domestication of heterospecific species, such as dogs and cats, because domestication tends to promote the evolution of infant-like features in animals (e.g. Frank & Frank, 1982). The preference of humans for heterospecific infants is not limited to domesticated species, however.

    • Distributed cognition criteria: Defined, operationalized, and applied to human-dog systems

      2019, Behavioural Processes
      Citation Excerpt :

      In domesticated dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), such positive selection pressures have resulted in their preference for human companionship over and above even the companionship of their fellow dog (Hare and Woods, 2013). This is unlike their wolf (Canis lupus) relatives who, even when raised by humans, often prefer the company of other wolves (Hare and Woods, 2013; Frank and Frank, 1982). Through their convergent evolution with humans, dogs have become more adept at responding to human communicative cues in cooperative contexts than other species (Piotti and Kaminski, 2016; Naderi et al., 2001).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text