Regular ArticleReflections on self-recognition in primates
References (0)
Cited by (140)
Mechanisms of copying, social learning, and imitation in animals
2022, Learning and MotivationCitation Excerpt :When one organism matches or copies the behavior of another, because of the widespread finding of matching behavior across species it has attracted the attention of ethologists, behavior ecologists, anthropologists, and psychologists (Heyes, 1994; Heyes, & Galef Jr., 1996; Huber et al., 2009; Hoppitt & Laland, 2008; Galef & Giraldeau, 2001; Leadbeater & Chittka, 2009; Piaget, 1962; Schuster, Wohl, Griebsch, & Klostermeier, 2006; Shettleworth, 1998; Whiten & Ham, 1992; Whiten, Horner, & de Waal, 2005; Wilkinson, Kuenstner, Mueller, & Huber, 2014).
The signature-testing approach to mapping biological and artificial intelligences
2022, Trends in Cognitive SciencesAn evolutionary view of self-awareness
2022, Behavioural ProcessesCitation Excerpt :Methodological issues have been raised in relation to the test. For example, the MSR test sometimes yields inconsistent results in humans of different ages, depending on the context (Kartner et al., 2012), and has thus been criticized for not being a universal (Broesch et al., 2011) and reliable method to assess self-awareness (Heyes, 1994, 1995; Rochat and Zahavi, 2011). In addition, many animals, e.g. aquatic species, cannot reach the mark because they do not have the necessary ability to do so, making the evidence harder to interpret.
Cephalopods: Ambassadors for rethinking cognition
2021, Biochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsAzure-winged magpies fail to understand the principle of mirror imaging
2020, Behavioural ProcessesCitation Excerpt :The mirror self-recognition (MSR) paradigm has emerged as a standard method for evaluating self-awareness in many species since the pioneering work by Gallup (Gallup, 1970), although numerous researchers have debated whether animals that show MSR possess human-like self-awareness (Heyes, 1994, 1995; Bard et al., 2006).
Fronto-temporoparietal connectivity and self-awareness in 18-month-olds: A resting state fNIRS study
2019, Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :In the current study, we addressed this challenge by asking whether a functional network of brain regions –the so-called default mode network which is commonly thought to be involved in psychological or cognitive self-related processing in adults – is associated with MSR in infancy. Specifically, we hypothesized that if the MSR task reflects self-related processing (Bischof-Köhler, 2012; Howe et al., 1993) and not merely recognition of the physical self (Heyes, 1994), or a matching of seen and felt movements (Mitchell, 1993a,b), then resting-state activity in regions comprising the DMN – thought to reflect self-related processing in adults - might be expected to be higher in those toddlers who do recognize themselves in the mirror, compared with those who do not show evidence of mirror self-recognition. Our findings support this hypothesis and suggest that fronto-temporoparietal connectivity is associated with self-recognition in infancy, suggesting that this measure might be considered as a possible neural marker for the development of the sense of self in early development.