Patterns and multi-scale drivers of phytoplankton species richness in temperate peri-urban lakes
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Spatial biogeographic patterns are increasingly studied in order to provide a better understanding of the ecology of living organisms (e.g. Marquet et al., 2004, Azeria et al., 2009) and to identify the processes involved in the maintenance or decline of biodiversity (Bellwood and Hughes, 2001). Evidence on the occurrence of biogeographic patterns in aquatic microorganisms has only recently been provided (Foissner, 2006, Martiny et al., 2006, Green and Bohannan, 2006) and the deterministic or random nature of the underlying processes of microbial biodiversity is still under close scrutiny. However, understanding how the environment acts on biodiversity patterns in microorganisms is critical for mitigating the impact of environmental changes and ensuring the continuity of ecosystems services (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). This is particularly true for phytoplankton communities, where shifts in communities’ composition (e.g. leading to species poor communities dominated by harmful cyanobacteria) may have profound effects on aquatic ecosystem functioning and on the quality of aquatic resources.
Various processes have been suggested to impact microorganisms’ richness patterns across scales, including latitudinal temperature gradients at large spatial scale (Fuhrman et al., 2008), species-area relationships (e.g. Horner-Devine et al., 2004, Smith et al., 2005, Bell et al., 2005), temporal (i.e. stability; Ptacnik et al., 2008b) and spatial (e.g. water column stratification; Streibel et al., 2010) ecosystem heterogeneity and the size of the regional pool of potential colonizers (Ptacnik et al., 2010). Among the various processes linking diversity to ecosystem functioning, the relationship between diversity and productivity (Currie, 1991) has been actively debated in the last decades (Strong, 2010). In essence, productivity corresponds to the ratio of production over biomass and characterizes the efficiency of a biological compartment to use surrounding resources. However, most empirical studies use standing biomass as a surrogate measure of productivity (e.g. Groner and Novoplansky, 2003, Filstrup et al., 2014, Vallina et al., 2014). Current knowledge suggests that the shape of productivity–diversity relationships in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is either positive or hump-shaped (e.g. Dodson et al., 2000, Mittelbach et al., 2001, Chase and Leibold, 2002, Gillman and Wright, 2006, Smith, 2007, Filstrup et al., 2014, Vallina et al., 2014). A number of hypotheses have arisen in the literature to explain how productivity might drive diversity (Palmer, 1994), including the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (Connell, 1978), the species-energy theory (Wright, 1983), the resources-supply ratios hypothesis (Tilman, 1985) or the keystone-predation hypothesis (Leibold, 1996). Alternatively, it was also suggested that diversity might drive productivity (Loreau et al., 2002, Duffy, 2009). These two views on the relationship between diversity and productivity are currently seen as complementary rather than mutually exclusive (Cardinale et al., 2009a, Cardinale et al., 2009b).
In most aquatic ecosystems, productivity (and standing phytoplankton biomass) is at least partly controlled by resource availability (Vallina et al., 2014). The occurrence of a productivity–diversity relationship in phytoplankton advocates a deterministic control of resource availability on local species richness (SR) and is supported by recent findings (Cardinale et al., 2009a, Cardinale et al., 2009b). However, to date, most ecological studies on phytoplankton diversity patterns have traditionally focused on understanding among sites variations in SR using explanatory variables quantified at relatively fine scales (e.g. in-lake nutrient concentration). While these studies have provided valuable approaches to test functional hypotheses regarding the drivers of phytoplankton species richness, (i) the hydrogeomorphic (e.g. hydrological connectivity) and anthropogenic features (e.g. land use) occur at multiple scales (Levin, 1992, Turner et al., 2001) and (ii) their interactions with meteorological factors have been seldom studied.
In this study, we examined species richness patterns of phytoplankton communities across 50 freshwater water bodies located in the Paris area (within a 200 km radius), a region characterized by strong gradients in anthropogenic pressure and by different degree of hydrological connectivity of water bodies (Catherine et al., 2008, Catherine et al., 2010). We assessed the role of lake-scale and catchment-scale variables in explaining variations of species richness in space and time. Finally, we analysed the residuals of predictive models in order to identify vectors of improvement of predictive models of phytoplankton richness in temperate lakes.
Section snippets
Study area and sample collection
The Paris area (Fig. 1) is situated in north-central France and constitutes the most densely populated French region and is home to 11.9 million people (19% of the national population; IAURIF, 2014). The region includes many large industrial towns and residential suburbs. However, agricultural and forested areas still cover over 50% and 23% of the region, respectively (IAURIF, 2014), leading to contrasted local environmental contexts. The Paris area includes around 248 lakes and ponds covering
Local and regional species richness patterns
Higher regional species richness (γ-diversity) values were found in summer (γAug06 = 340; γAug11 = 383) compared to winter (γFeb07 = 244) (Table 2). Higher mean local SR values in summer than in winter were also observed (mean SR = 38, 35 and 19 for the Aug06, Aug11 and Feb07 sampling campaign, respectively). In term of phytoplankton community composition, the region is characterized by high temporal variability, with only 76 species (out of 676) shared among the three sampling campaigns and about half
Phytoplankton diversity in the Paris area
Local species richness (SR) exhibited major among-lakes variations whatever the sampling campaign considered (Table 2). In addition, we found strong seasonal variations in both regional and mean local species richness (Table 2). The observed regional phytoplankton richness in the Paris area (γ = 676 species, n = 50 lakes) is at the upper range of reported values (Nabout et al., 2007, de Nogueira et al., 2010, Angeler and Drakare, 2013, de Barros et al., 2013). In a previous study (Maloufi et al.,
Conclusions
Based on the analysis of phytoplankton species richness in a set of 50 peri-urban lakes, that seasonal temperature variations and resource availability were found to strongly modulate local phytoplankton species richness. Combining the two predictive models (based either on local-scale or catchment-scale variables) did not increase predictive accuracy; therefore suggesting that the catchment-scale model probably explains observed species richness variations through the impact of catchment-scale
Autorship
SM, AC, CB and MT designed the study; SM and AC contributed data; SM, AC and DM contributed to data analysis; SM and AC wrote the manuscript; all authors contributed to editing the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge funding from the French National Research Agency (ANR, www.agence-nationale-recherche.fr) through the CYANOTOX (ANR-007-SEST-05) and PULSE (ANR-10-CEPL-0010) projects. This work was also supported by the CNRS through a PhD grant awarded to S. Maloufi (PED grant for students originating from developing countries). We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the earlier draft of the manuscript.
References (81)
- et al.
All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices
Ecol. Model.
(2002) - et al.
Design and application of a stratified sampling strategy to study the regional distribution of cyanobacteria (Ile-de-France, France)
Water Res.
(2008) - et al.
On the use of the FluoroProbe®, a phytoplankton quantification method based on fluorescence excitation spectra for large-scale surveys of lakes and reservoirs
Water Res.
(2012) - et al.
Spatial scaling of microbial biodiversity
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2006) - et al.
Nutrient exports and land use in Australian catchments
J. Environ. Manag.
(1996) - et al.
Tracing alpha, beta, and gamma diversity responses to environmental change in boreal lakes
Oecologia
(2013) - et al.
Using null model analysis of species co-occurrences to deconstruct biodiversity patterns and select indicator species
Divers. Distrib.
(2009) - et al.
The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services
Nature
(2005) - et al.
Regional-scale assembly rules and biodiversity of coral reefs
Science
(2001) Analysis of a random forests model
J. Mach. Learn. Res.
(2012)
Predicting marine phytoplankton maximum growth rates from temperature: improving on the Eppley curve using quantile regression
Limnol. Oceanogr.
Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple spatial scales
Ecology
Numerical Ecology With R
Random forests
Mach. Learn.
Hydrogeomorphic features mediate the effects of land use/cover on reservoir productivity and food webs
Limnol. Oceanogr.
Diversity in the influence of temperature on the growth rates of freshwater algae, and its ecological relevance: temperature and growth rates of planktonic algae
Freshw. Biol.
Does productivity drive diversity or vice versa? A test of the multivariate productivity–diversity hypothesis in streams
Ecology
Separating the influence of resource “availability” from resource “imbalance” on productivity–diversity relationships
Ecol. Lett.
Cost effective prediction of the eutrophication status of lakes and reservoirs
Freshw. Biol.
Projecting the impact of regional land-use change and water management policies on lake water quality: an application to periurban lakes and reservoirs
PLoS ONE
Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship
Nature
Climate, energy and diversity
Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.
Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs
Science
Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness
Am. Nat.
Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness
Ecol. Lett.
Phytoplankton diversity in the middle Rio Doce lake system of southeastern Brazil
Acta Bot. Bras.
Determinants of beta diversity: the relative importance of environmental and spatial processes in structuring phytoplankton communities in an Amazonian floodplain
Acta Limnol. Brasiliensia
The relationship in lake communities between primary productivity and species richness
Ecology
Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems
Front. Ecol. Environ.
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater: Centennial Edition
Diversity and succession of the phytoplankton in a small lake over a two-year period
Hydrobiologia
Water Quality — Guidance Standard on the Enumeration of Phytoplankton Using Inverted Microscope (Utermöhl Technique)
rfUtilities: Random forests model selection and performance evaluation
Cyanobacteria dominance influences resource use efficiency and community turnover in phytoplankton and zooplankton communities
Ecol. Lett.
Biogeography and dispersal of micro-organisms: a review emphasizing protists
Acta Protozool.
The influence of land use on lake nutrients varies with watershed transport capacity
Ecosystems
A latitudinal diversity gradient in planktonic marine bacteria
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
The influence of productivity on the species richness of plants: a critical assessment
Ecology
Reconsidering diversity–productivity relationships: directness of productivity estimates matters
Ecol. Lett.
A taxa–area relationship for bacteria
Nature
Cited by (23)
Data-driven models for predicting community changes in freshwater ecosystems: A review
2023, Ecological InformaticsNovel insights in seasonal dynamics and co-existence patterns of phytoplankton and micro-eukaryotes in drinking water reservoir, Northwest China: DNA data and ecological model
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :However, previous investigations found the negative correlations between nutrients and phytoplankton diversity when the water nutrient loads were high (Nwankwegu et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2017). This inconsistency could be attributed the low average TP concentration (0.023 mg/L) in Jinpen Reservoir (Fig. S1), as low phosphorus conditions were found to correlate with high phytoplankton species richness in freshwater bodies (Barçante et al., 2020; Catherine et al., 2016). Furthermore, positive effects of nutrients on micro-eukaryotes were also demonstrated in the previous studies (Hou et al., 2020; Huang and Huang, 2019).
Integrated modeling framework to evaluate the impacts of multi-source water replenishment on lacustrine phytoplankton communities
2022, Journal of HydrologyCitation Excerpt :The final results were determined by majority votes (for classification) or averages (for regression) of all the trees in the RF. This method is unaffected by excessive parameterization in nature and has been widely used as a meaningful method for predicting phytoplankton species richness in temperate lakes (Catherine et al., 2016; Mallinis et al., 2020; Wu and Liang, 2018). There are two ways to evaluate the ranking of the most important predictive variables in RF models: increment in the mean of squared residuals (MSR) and node purity (Béjaoui et al., 2018).
Disentangling of the ecotoxicological signal using “omics” analyses, a lesson from the survey of the impact of cyanobacterial proliferations on fishes
2020, Science of the Total Environment
- 1
These authors contributed equally to this work.