Patterns and multi-scale drivers of phytoplankton species richness in temperate peri-urban lakes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.179Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We studied phytoplankton communities in 50 peri-urban lakes.

  • We assessed the impact of multi-scale drivers of phytoplankton richness.

  • Local- and catchment-scale predictive models performed similarly.

  • Seasonal temperature variation and resource availability strongly modulate species richness.

  • This approach may be used for the management and conservation of aquatic ecosystems.

Abstract

Local species richness (SR) is a key characteristic affecting ecosystem functioning. Yet, the mechanisms regulating phytoplankton diversity in freshwater ecosystems are not fully understood, especially in peri-urban environments where anthropogenic pressures strongly impact the quality of aquatic ecosystems. To address this issue, we sampled the phytoplankton communities of 50 lakes in the Paris area (France) characterized by a large gradient of physico-chemical and catchment-scale characteristics. We used large phytoplankton datasets to describe phytoplankton diversity patterns and applied a machine-learning algorithm to test the degree to which species richness patterns are potentially controlled by environmental factors. Selected environmental factors were studied at two scales: the lake-scale (e.g. nutrients concentrations, water temperature, lake depth) and the catchment-scale (e.g. catchment, landscape and climate variables). Then, we used a variance partitioning approach to evaluate the interaction between lake-scale and catchment-scale variables in explaining local species richness. Finally, we analysed the residuals of predictive models to identify potential vectors of improvement of phytoplankton species richness predictive models.

Lake-scale and catchment-scale drivers provided similar predictive accuracy of local species richness (R2 = 0.458 and 0.424, respectively). Both models suggested that seasonal temperature variations and nutrient supply strongly modulate local species richness. Integrating lake- and catchment-scale predictors in a single predictive model did not provide increased predictive accuracy; therefore suggesting that the catchment-scale model probably explains observed species richness variations through the impact of catchment-scale variables on in-lake water quality characteristics.

Models based on catchment characteristics, which include simple and easy to obtain variables, provide a meaningful way of predicting phytoplankton species richness in temperate lakes. This approach may prove useful and cost-effective for the management and conservation of aquatic ecosystems.

Introduction

Spatial biogeographic patterns are increasingly studied in order to provide a better understanding of the ecology of living organisms (e.g. Marquet et al., 2004, Azeria et al., 2009) and to identify the processes involved in the maintenance or decline of biodiversity (Bellwood and Hughes, 2001). Evidence on the occurrence of biogeographic patterns in aquatic microorganisms has only recently been provided (Foissner, 2006, Martiny et al., 2006, Green and Bohannan, 2006) and the deterministic or random nature of the underlying processes of microbial biodiversity is still under close scrutiny. However, understanding how the environment acts on biodiversity patterns in microorganisms is critical for mitigating the impact of environmental changes and ensuring the continuity of ecosystems services (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). This is particularly true for phytoplankton communities, where shifts in communities’ composition (e.g. leading to species poor communities dominated by harmful cyanobacteria) may have profound effects on aquatic ecosystem functioning and on the quality of aquatic resources.

Various processes have been suggested to impact microorganisms’ richness patterns across scales, including latitudinal temperature gradients at large spatial scale (Fuhrman et al., 2008), species-area relationships (e.g. Horner-Devine et al., 2004, Smith et al., 2005, Bell et al., 2005), temporal (i.e. stability; Ptacnik et al., 2008b) and spatial (e.g. water column stratification; Streibel et al., 2010) ecosystem heterogeneity and the size of the regional pool of potential colonizers (Ptacnik et al., 2010). Among the various processes linking diversity to ecosystem functioning, the relationship between diversity and productivity (Currie, 1991) has been actively debated in the last decades (Strong, 2010). In essence, productivity corresponds to the ratio of production over biomass and characterizes the efficiency of a biological compartment to use surrounding resources. However, most empirical studies use standing biomass as a surrogate measure of productivity (e.g. Groner and Novoplansky, 2003, Filstrup et al., 2014, Vallina et al., 2014). Current knowledge suggests that the shape of productivity–diversity relationships in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is either positive or hump-shaped (e.g. Dodson et al., 2000, Mittelbach et al., 2001, Chase and Leibold, 2002, Gillman and Wright, 2006, Smith, 2007, Filstrup et al., 2014, Vallina et al., 2014). A number of hypotheses have arisen in the literature to explain how productivity might drive diversity (Palmer, 1994), including the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (Connell, 1978), the species-energy theory (Wright, 1983), the resources-supply ratios hypothesis (Tilman, 1985) or the keystone-predation hypothesis (Leibold, 1996). Alternatively, it was also suggested that diversity might drive productivity (Loreau et al., 2002, Duffy, 2009). These two views on the relationship between diversity and productivity are currently seen as complementary rather than mutually exclusive (Cardinale et al., 2009a, Cardinale et al., 2009b).

In most aquatic ecosystems, productivity (and standing phytoplankton biomass) is at least partly controlled by resource availability (Vallina et al., 2014). The occurrence of a productivity–diversity relationship in phytoplankton advocates a deterministic control of resource availability on local species richness (SR) and is supported by recent findings (Cardinale et al., 2009a, Cardinale et al., 2009b). However, to date, most ecological studies on phytoplankton diversity patterns have traditionally focused on understanding among sites variations in SR using explanatory variables quantified at relatively fine scales (e.g. in-lake nutrient concentration). While these studies have provided valuable approaches to test functional hypotheses regarding the drivers of phytoplankton species richness, (i) the hydrogeomorphic (e.g. hydrological connectivity) and anthropogenic features (e.g. land use) occur at multiple scales (Levin, 1992, Turner et al., 2001) and (ii) their interactions with meteorological factors have been seldom studied.

In this study, we examined species richness patterns of phytoplankton communities across 50 freshwater water bodies located in the Paris area (within a 200 km radius), a region characterized by strong gradients in anthropogenic pressure and by different degree of hydrological connectivity of water bodies (Catherine et al., 2008, Catherine et al., 2010). We assessed the role of lake-scale and catchment-scale variables in explaining variations of species richness in space and time. Finally, we analysed the residuals of predictive models in order to identify vectors of improvement of predictive models of phytoplankton richness in temperate lakes.

Section snippets

Study area and sample collection

The Paris area (Fig. 1) is situated in north-central France and constitutes the most densely populated French region and is home to 11.9 million people (19% of the national population; IAURIF, 2014). The region includes many large industrial towns and residential suburbs. However, agricultural and forested areas still cover over 50% and 23% of the region, respectively (IAURIF, 2014), leading to contrasted local environmental contexts. The Paris area includes around 248 lakes and ponds covering

Local and regional species richness patterns

Higher regional species richness (γ-diversity) values were found in summer (γAug06 = 340; γAug11 = 383) compared to winter (γFeb07 = 244) (Table 2). Higher mean local SR values in summer than in winter were also observed (mean SR = 38, 35 and 19 for the Aug06, Aug11 and Feb07 sampling campaign, respectively). In term of phytoplankton community composition, the region is characterized by high temporal variability, with only 76 species (out of 676) shared among the three sampling campaigns and about half

Phytoplankton diversity in the Paris area

Local species richness (SR) exhibited major among-lakes variations whatever the sampling campaign considered (Table 2). In addition, we found strong seasonal variations in both regional and mean local species richness (Table 2). The observed regional phytoplankton richness in the Paris area (γ = 676 species, n = 50 lakes) is at the upper range of reported values (Nabout et al., 2007, de Nogueira et al., 2010, Angeler and Drakare, 2013, de Barros et al., 2013). In a previous study (Maloufi et al.,

Conclusions

Based on the analysis of phytoplankton species richness in a set of 50 peri-urban lakes, that seasonal temperature variations and resource availability were found to strongly modulate local phytoplankton species richness. Combining the two predictive models (based either on local-scale or catchment-scale variables) did not increase predictive accuracy; therefore suggesting that the catchment-scale model probably explains observed species richness variations through the impact of catchment-scale

Autorship

SM, AC, CB and MT designed the study; SM and AC contributed data; SM, AC and DM contributed to data analysis; SM and AC wrote the manuscript; all authors contributed to editing the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge funding from the French National Research Agency (ANR, www.agence-nationale-recherche.fr) through the CYANOTOX (ANR-007-SEST-05) and PULSE (ANR-10-CEPL-0010) projects. This work was also supported by the CNRS through a PhD grant awarded to S. Maloufi (PED grant for students originating from developing countries). We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the earlier draft of the manuscript.

References (81)

  • J.E. Bissinger et al.

    Predicting marine phytoplankton maximum growth rates from temperature: improving on the Eppley curve using quantile regression

    Limnol. Oceanogr.

    (2008)
  • D. Borcard et al.

    Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple spatial scales

    Ecology

    (2004)
  • D. Borcard et al.

    Numerical Ecology With R

    (2011)
  • L. Breiman

    Random forests

    Mach. Learn.

    (2001)
  • M.T. Bremigan et al.

    Hydrogeomorphic features mediate the effects of land use/cover on reservoir productivity and food webs

    Limnol. Oceanogr.

    (2008)
  • C. Butterwick et al.

    Diversity in the influence of temperature on the growth rates of freshwater algae, and its ecological relevance: temperature and growth rates of planktonic algae

    Freshw. Biol.

    (2005)
  • B.J. Cardinale et al.

    Does productivity drive diversity or vice versa? A test of the multivariate productivity–diversity hypothesis in streams

    Ecology

    (2009)
  • B.J. Cardinale et al.

    Separating the influence of resource “availability” from resource “imbalance” on productivity–diversity relationships

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2009)
  • A. Catherine et al.

    Cost effective prediction of the eutrophication status of lakes and reservoirs

    Freshw. Biol.

    (2010)
  • A. Catherine et al.

    Projecting the impact of regional land-use change and water management policies on lake water quality: an application to periurban lakes and reservoirs

    PLoS ONE

    (2013)
  • J.M. Chase et al.

    Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship

    Nature

    (2002)
  • A. Clarke et al.

    Climate, energy and diversity

    Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.

    (2006)
  • J.H. Connell

    Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs

    Science

    (1978)
  • D.J. Currie

    Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness

    Am. Nat.

    (1991)
  • D.J. Currie et al.

    Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2004)
  • C.F.A. de Barros et al.

    Phytoplankton diversity in the middle Rio Doce lake system of southeastern Brazil

    Acta Bot. Bras.

    (2013)
  • I.S. de Nogueira et al.

    Determinants of beta diversity: the relative importance of environmental and spatial processes in structuring phytoplankton communities in an Amazonian floodplain

    Acta Limnol. Brasiliensia

    (2010)
  • S.I. Dodson et al.

    The relationship in lake communities between primary productivity and species richness

    Ecology

    (2000)
  • J.E. Duffy

    Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems

    Front. Ecol. Environ.

    (2009)
  • A.D. Eaton et al.

    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater: Centennial Edition

    (2005)
  • P. Eloranta

    Diversity and succession of the phytoplankton in a small lake over a two-year period

    Hydrobiologia

    (1993)
  • EN 15204:2006

    Water Quality — Guidance Standard on the Enumeration of Phytoplankton Using Inverted Microscope (Utermöhl Technique)

    (2006)
  • J.S. Evans et al.

    rfUtilities: Random forests model selection and performance evaluation

    (2015)
  • C.T. Filstrup et al.

    Cyanobacteria dominance influences resource use efficiency and community turnover in phytoplankton and zooplankton communities

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2014)
  • W. Foissner

    Biogeography and dispersal of micro-organisms: a review emphasizing protists

    Acta Protozool.

    (2006)
  • J.M. Fraterrigo et al.

    The influence of land use on lake nutrients varies with watershed transport capacity

    Ecosystems

    (2008)
  • J.A. Fuhrman et al.

    A latitudinal diversity gradient in planktonic marine bacteria

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2008)
  • L.N. Gillman et al.

    The influence of productivity on the species richness of plants: a critical assessment

    Ecology

    (2006)
  • E. Groner et al.

    Reconsidering diversity–productivity relationships: directness of productivity estimates matters

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2003)
  • M.C. Horner-Devine et al.

    A taxa–area relationship for bacteria

    Nature

    (2004)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Novel insights in seasonal dynamics and co-existence patterns of phytoplankton and micro-eukaryotes in drinking water reservoir, Northwest China: DNA data and ecological model

      2023, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, previous investigations found the negative correlations between nutrients and phytoplankton diversity when the water nutrient loads were high (Nwankwegu et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2017). This inconsistency could be attributed the low average TP concentration (0.023 mg/L) in Jinpen Reservoir (Fig. S1), as low phosphorus conditions were found to correlate with high phytoplankton species richness in freshwater bodies (Barçante et al., 2020; Catherine et al., 2016). Furthermore, positive effects of nutrients on micro-eukaryotes were also demonstrated in the previous studies (Hou et al., 2020; Huang and Huang, 2019).

    • Integrated modeling framework to evaluate the impacts of multi-source water replenishment on lacustrine phytoplankton communities

      2022, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The final results were determined by majority votes (for classification) or averages (for regression) of all the trees in the RF. This method is unaffected by excessive parameterization in nature and has been widely used as a meaningful method for predicting phytoplankton species richness in temperate lakes (Catherine et al., 2016; Mallinis et al., 2020; Wu and Liang, 2018). There are two ways to evaluate the ranking of the most important predictive variables in RF models: increment in the mean of squared residuals (MSR) and node purity (Béjaoui et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text