Skip to main content
Log in

Splitting animal trajectories into fine-scale behaviorally consistent movement units: breaking points relate to external stimuli in a foraging seabird

  • Methods
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animal movements are widely studied in ecology, and the analysis of tracking data usually gains from splitting the time-series into different parts before interpreting movement strategies. The recent increase in data accuracy and resolution allows for the study of fine-scale movements where each behavioral change is recorded. We propose a simple method to identify the elementary units of movement in a trajectory, resulting in breaks in the track corresponding to the animals' decisions to change its movement. We quantify the movement between successive steps with a vector of speed and direction and represent a movement path in a trigonometric circle space in order to visualize behavioral changes instead of spatial changes. In this space, the distance between successive points informs about their similarity in both speed and direction. We quantify the temporal changes in these distances with a cumulative sum and use a line simplification algorithm to identify breaks in the slope that correspond to breaks in the consistency of successive distance values. We test the algorithm on simulated trajectories and show that the expected number of segments is accurately identified. Moreover, we relate the resulting segmentation from recorded trajectories to events observed using animal-borne video footage and show that the presence of stimuli in the surroundings of the animal is associated with a higher frequency of changes in movement. As an applied example, we propose a descriptive analysis of the segments and show that segments of particular characteristics are not distributed equally along the trajectory, highlighting larger-scale behavioral strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams N, Navarro R (2005) Foraging of a coastal seabird: flight patterns and movements of breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis. Afr J Mar Sci 27:239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barraquand F, Benhamou S (2008) Animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts. Ecology 89:3336–3348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartumeus F, da Luz MGE, Viswanathan GM, Catalan J (2005) Animal search strategies: a quantitative random-walk analysis. Ecology 86:3078–3087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bascompte J, Vilà C (1997) Fractals and search paths in mammals. Landscape Ecol 12:213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou S (1992) Efficiency of area-concentrated searching behaviour in a continuous patchy environment. J Theor Biol 159:67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou S (2004) How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal's path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension? J Theor Biol 229:209–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchin M, Driemel A, van Kreveld M, Sacristan V (2011) Segmenting trajectories: a framework and algorithms using spatiotemporal criteria. J Spat Inf Sci 0:33–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C, Dray S, Royer-Carenzi M (2009) The concept of animals' trajectories from a data analysis perspective. Ecol Inform 4:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camphuysen CJ, Webb A (1999) Multi-species feeding associations in North Sea seabirds: jointly exploiting a patchy environment. Ardea 87:177–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev 51:661–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codling EA, Plank MJ, Benhamou S (2008) Random walk models in biology. J R Soc Interface 5:813–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dean B, Freeman R, Kirk H, Leonard K, Phillips RA, Perrins CM, Guilford T (2013) Behavioural mapping of a pelagic seabird: combining multiple sensors and a hidden Markov model reveals the distribution of at-sea behaviour. J R Soc Interface. doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0570

  • Dodge S, Laube P, Weibel R (2012) Movement similarity assessment using symbolic representation of trajectories. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26:1563–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas DH, Peucker TK (1973) Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature. Cartogr Int J Geogr Inf GeoVis 10:112–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd M, Joy R (2010) Estimating behavioral parameters in animal movement models using a state-augmented particle filter. Ecology 92:568–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauchald P, Tveraa T (2003) Using first-passage time in the analysis of area-restricted search and habitat selection. Ecology 84:282–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz H, Said S, Weimerskirch H (2003) Scale-dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long-range foraging seabird. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1143–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fronhofer EA, Hovestadt T, Poethke H-J (2012) From random walks to informed movement. Oikos :001–010

  • Garthe S, Montevecchi WA, Davoren GK (2007) Flight destinations and foraging behaviour of northern gannets (Sula bassana) preying on a small forage fish in a low-Arctic ecosystem. Deep-Sea Res Pt II 54:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaucherel C (2011) Wavelet analysis to detect regime shifts in animal movement. Comput Ecol Softw 1:69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz WM, Saltz D (2008) A framework for generating and analyzing movement paths on ecological landscapes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19066–19071

    Google Scholar 

  • Grémillet D, DellOmo G, Ryan PG, Peters G, RopertCoudert Y, Weeks SJ (2004) Offshore diplomacy, or how seabirds mitigate intra-specific competition: a case study based on GPS tracking of Cape gannets from neighbouring colonies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268:265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V, Railsback SF (2005) Individual-based modeling and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford T, Roberts S, Biro D, Rezek I (2004) Positional entropy during pigeon homing II: navigational interpretation of Bayesian latent state models. J Theor Biol 227:25–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurarie E, Andrews RD, Laidre KL (2009) A novel method for identifying behavioural changes in animal movement data. Ecol Lett 12:395–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer KC, Humphreys EM, Magalhães MC, Garthe S, Hennicke J, Peters G, Grémillet D, Skov H, Wanless S (2009) Fine-scale foraging behaviour of a medium-ranging marine predator. J Anim Ecol 78:880–889

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak M, Casagrandi R, Nathan R, Revilla E, Spiegel O (2008) Trends and missing parts in the study of movement ecology. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19060–19065

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne JS, Garton EO, Krone SM, Lewis JS (2007) Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88:2354–2363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen ID, Myers RA, Flemming JM (2003) Meta-analysis of animal movement using state-space models. Ecology 84:3055–3063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P, Odell G (1987) Swarms of predators exhibit “preytaxis” if individual predators use area-restricted search. Am Nat 130:233–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranstauber B, Kays R, LaPoint SD, Wikelski M, Safi K (2012) A dynamic Brownian bridge movement model to estimate utilization distributions for heterogeneous animal movement. J Anim Ecol 81:738–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morales JM, Haydon DT, Frair J, Holsinger KE, Fryxell JM (2004) Extracting more out of relocation data: building movement models as mixtures of random walks. Ecology 85:2436–2445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naito Y (2004) New steps in bio-logging science. Mem Nat Inst Polar Res 58:50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Nams VO (1996) The VFractal: a new estimator for fractal dimension of animal movement paths. Landscape Ecol 11:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nams VO (2005) Using animal movement paths to measure response to spatial scale. Oecologia 143:179–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D, Smouse PE (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. PNAS 105:19052–19059

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newlands NK, Lutcavage ME, Pitcher TJ (2004) Analysis of foraging movements of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus): individuals switch between two modes of search behaviour. Popul Ecol 46:39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donoghue SH, Drapeau L, Peddemors VM (2010) Broad-scale distribution patterns of sardine and their predators in relation to remotely sensed environmental conditions during the KwaZulu-Natal sardine run. Afr J Mar Sci 32:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson TA, Thomas L, Wilcox C, Ovaskainen O, Matthiopoulos J (2008) State-space models of individual animal movement. Trends Ecol Evol 23:87–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pichegru L, Ryan PG, van der Lingen CD, Coetzee J, RopertCoudert Y, Grmillet D (2007) Foraging behaviour and energetics of Cape gannets Morus capensis feeding on live prey and fishery discards in the Benguela upwelling system. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 350:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polansky L, Wittemyer G, Cross PC, Tambling CJ, Getz WM (2010) From moonlight to movement and synchronized randomness: Fourier and wavelet analyses of animal location time series data. Ecology 91:1506–1518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postlethwaite CM, Brown P, Dennis TE (2013) A new multi-scale measure for analysing animal movement data. J Theor Biol 317:175–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S, Guilford T, Rezek I, Biro D (2004) Positional entropy during pigeon homing I: application of Bayesian latent state modelling. J Theor Biol 227:39–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ropert-Coudert Y, Wilson RP (2005) Trends and perspectives in animal-attached remote sensing. Front Ecol Environ 3:437–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamoun-Baranes J, van Loon EE, Purves RS, Speckmann B, Weiskopf D, Camphuysen CJ (2012) Analysis and visualization of animal movement. Biol Lett 8:6–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman ED, Veit RR, Nevitt G (2004) Nearest neighbors as foraging cues: information transfer in a patchy environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 277:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay Y, Bertrand S, Henry RW, Kappes MA, Costa DP, Shaffer SA (2009) Analytical approaches to investigating seabird–environment interactions: a review. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 391:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay Y, Roberts AJ, Costa DP (2007) Fractal landscape method: an alternative approach to measuring area-restricted searching behavior. J Exp Biol 210:935–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay Y, Shaffer SA, Fowler SL, Kuhn CE, McDonald BI, Weise MJ, Bost C-A, Weimerskirch H, Crocker DE, Goebel ME, Costa DP (2006) Interpolation of animal tracking data in a fluid environment. J Exp Biol 209:128–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker E, Bez N (2010) A pioneer validation of a state-space model of vessel trajectories (VMS) with observers' data. Ecol Model 221:2008–2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimerskirch H, Pinaud D, Pawlowski F, Bost C (2007) Does prey capture induce area-restricted search? A fine-scale study using GPS in a marine predator, the wandering albatross. Am Nat 170:734–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittemyer G, Polansky L, Douglas-Hamilton I, Getz WM (2008) Disentangling the effects of forage, social rank, and risk on movement autocorrelation of elephants using Fourier and wavelet analyses. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19108–19113

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank SANParks for access to Bird Island, as well as Pierre Pistorius and Ralf Mullers for support and help during the fieldwork. The wind data were collected and provided by the South African Weather Service. We thank Nicolas Bez, Gabriel Reygondeau, and Laurent Dubroca for constructive contributions during the initial phase of methodological implementation and the anonymous referees for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Ethical standards

We declare that all experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. Fieldwork, handling, and deployments were conducted following standard processes in seabird ecology (see “Materials and methods”, “Test of the method”, and “Collected data”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andréa Thiebault.

Additional information

Communicated by L. Z. Garamszegi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thiebault, A., Tremblay, Y. Splitting animal trajectories into fine-scale behaviorally consistent movement units: breaking points relate to external stimuli in a foraging seabird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67, 1013–1026 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1546-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1546-1

Keywords

Navigation