Skip to main content
Log in

Worldwide freshwater fish homogenization is driven by a few widespread non-native species

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction of non-native species have changed the composition of freshwater fish assemblages throughout the world and hence the dissimilarity between them, either toward homogenization (i.e. decrease in dissimilarity) or differentiation (i.e. increase in dissimilarity). However, there is still no assessment of individual contributions of non-native species to this overall trend at the global scale. Here, we disentangle individual non-native species effect from the global effect of the whole introduced species pool at the biogeographic realm scale and test which determinant can explain the effect of non-native species on changes in assemblage dissimilarity. Our results show that the contribution of introduced species on changes in dissimilarity is highly variable and all directions of changes are observed through the introduction process, i.e. either toward homogenization, differentiation or no change. Overall, only a few widespread species contribute to the worldwide homogenization pattern, whereas most of introduced species slightly contribute to the global change in dissimilarity. The effect of species on change in dissimilarity was influenced by the introduction pressure but also by whether introduced species were translocated (i.e. introduced to other basins within their biogeographic realm) or exotic (i.e. introduced from other biogeographic realms). Homogenization is strongly determined by the species translocated within a realm and only by few widespread exotic species whereas the majority of exotics contribute to a differentiation effect. Nevertheless, under future intensified human pressure, the exotic species spread across realms is predicted to increase and their differentiation effect might turn towards homogenization, and might trigger the global homogenization trend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcaraz C, Vila-Gispert A, García-Berthou E (2005) Profiling invasive fish species: the importance of phylogeny and human use. Divers Distrib 11:289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH (1991) Ecological and genetic impacts of introduced and translocated freshwater fishes in Australia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres R, Clunie P (2010) Toward a national emergency response system for freshwater fish incursion. Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon EK (2004) About the oldest domesticates among fishes. J Fish Biol 65:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A, Orme CDL (2012) betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol Evol 3:808–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet S, Grenouillet G, Beauchard O et al (2010) Non-native species disrupt the worldwide patterns of freshwater fish body size: implications for Bergmann’s rule. Ecol Lett 13:421–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Britton JR, Gozlan RE (2013) Geo-politics and freshwater fish introductions: how the Cold War shaped Europe’s fish allodiversity. Glob Environ Change 23:1566–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton JR, Gozlan RE, Copp GH (2011) Managing non-native fish in the environment. Fish Fish 12:256–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosse S, Beauchard O, Blanchet S et al (2013) Fish-SPRICH: a database of freshwater fish species richness throughout the World. Hydrobiologia 700:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B et al (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte MW, Hamilton MA, Murray BR (2009) Phylogenetic relatedness and plant invader success across two spatial scales. Divers Distrib 15:481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassey P, Lockwood J (2007) The varying role of population abundance in structuring indices of biotic homogenization. J Biogeogr 35:884–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavero M (2011) Assessing the risk of freshwater fish introductions into the Iberian Peninsula. Freshw Biol 56:2145–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavero M, García-Berthou E (2006) Homogenization dynamics and introduction routes of invasive freshwater fish in the Iberian Peninsula. Ecol Appl 16:2313–2324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RD (1977) Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics 19:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello C, McAusland C, Solow A, Springborn M (2005) International trade and the risk of biological invasions. Santa Barbara, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford SS, Muir AM (2008) Global introductions of salmon and trout in the genus Oncorhynchus: 1870–2007. Rev Fish Biol Fish 18:313–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France KE, Duffy JE (2006) Diversity and dispersal interactively affect predictability of ecosystem function. Nature 441:1139–1143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi F, Acquistapace P (2007) Invasive crayfish in Europe: the impact of Procambarus clarkii on the littoral community of a Mediterranean lake. Freshw Biol 52:1249–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gozlan RE, Britton JR, Cowx I, Copp GH (2010) Current knowledge on non-native freshwater fish introductions. J Fish Biol 76:751–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ et al (2009) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall

  • Hulme P, Roy D, Cunha T, Larsson T (2009) A pan-European inventory of alien species: rationale, implementation and implications for managing biological invasions. In: Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, pp 1–14

  • Jaccard P (1901) Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura. Bull la Société Vaudoise des Sci Nat 37:547–579

    Google Scholar 

  • La Sorte FA, McKinney ML (2007) Compositional changes over space and time along an occurrence–abundance continuum: anthropogenic homogenization of the North American avifauna. J Biogeogr 34:2159–2167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauzeral C, Leprieur F, Beauchard O et al (2011) Identifying climatic niche shifts using coarse-grained occurrence data: a test with non-native freshwater fish. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:407–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Blanchet S et al (2008a) Fish invasions in the world’s river systems: when natural processes are blurred by human activities. PLoS Biol 6:e28

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Hugueny B et al (2008b) Null model of biotic homogenization: a test with the European freshwater fish fauna. Divers Distrib 14:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévêque C, Oberdorff T, Paugy D, Stiassny MLJ, Tedesco PA (2008) Global diversity of fish (Pisces) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:545–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintermans M (2004) Human-assisted dispersal of alien freshwater fish in Australia. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 38:481–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney M, Lockwood J (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AM, Petts GE (1994) Glacial rivers: physical habitat and ecology. Freshw Biol 32:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden J (2006) Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography. J Biogeogr 33:2027–2039

  • Olden J, Poff N (2004) Ecological processes driving biotic homogenization: testing a mechanistic model using fish faunas. Ecology 85:1867–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Poff NL, McKinney ML (2006) Forecasting faunal and floral homogenization associated with human population geography in North America. Biol Conserv 127:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Kennard M, Pusey B (2008) Species invasions and the changing biogeography of Australian freshwater fishes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Lockwood J, Parr C (2011) Biological invasions and the homogenization of faunas and floras. In: Conservation biogeography. Wiley, pp 224–243

  • Pyke GH (2008) Plague minnow or mosquito fish? A review of the biology and impacts of introduced Gambusia species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahel F (2000) Homogenization of fish faunas across the United States. Science 288:854–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel F (2007) Biogeographic barriers, connectivity and homogenization of freshwater faunas: it’s a small world after all. Freshw Biol 52:696–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax DF, Gaines SD (2003) Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends Ecol Evol 18:561–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BW, Irwin RE (2004) Linking economic activities to the distribution of exotic plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17725–17730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint A, Beauchard O, Oberdorff T et al (2014) Historical assemblage distinctiveness and the introduction of widespread non-native species explain worldwide changes in freshwater fish taxonomic dissimilarity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:574–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villéger S, Brosse S (2012) Measuring changes in taxonomic dissimilarity following species introductions and extirpations. Ecol Indic 18:552–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villéger S, Blanchet S, Beauchard O et al (2011) Homogenization patterns of the world’s freshwater fish faunas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:18003–18008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Villéger S, Blanchet S, Beauchard O et al (2015) From current distinctiveness to future homogenization of the world’s freshwater fish faunas. Divers Distrib 21:223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welcomme RL (1988) International introductions of inland aquatic species. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Fisheries Technical Paper 294. Rome, Italy, pp 1–318

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the EU BioFresh Project (7th Framework European Program. Contract No. 226874). AT thanks the French National Centre of Scientific Research for financial support. EDB is part of the “Laboratoire d’Excellence” (LABEX) entitled TULIP (ANR-10-LABX-41) and CEBA (ANR-10-LABX-25-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurèle Toussaint.

Additional information

Sébastien Brosse and Sébastien Villéger: Co-senior authorship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toussaint, A., Beauchard, O., Oberdorff, T. et al. Worldwide freshwater fish homogenization is driven by a few widespread non-native species. Biol Invasions 18, 1295–1304 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1067-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1067-8

Keywords

Navigation