Abstract
This chapter introduces competition as a heuristic concept to analyse how specific land use practices establish themselves against possible alternatives. We briefly outline the global importance of land use practices as the material and symbolic basis for people’s livelihoods, particularly the provision of food security and well-being. We chart the development over time from research on land cover towards research on drivers of land use practices as part of an integrated land systems science. The increasingly spatially, temporally and functionally distributed nature of these drivers poses multiple challenges to research on land use practices. We propose the notion of ‘competition’ to respond to some of these challenges and to better understand how alternative land use practices are negotiated. We conceive of competition as a relational concept. Competition asks about agents in relation to each other, about the mode or the logic in which these relations are produced and about the material environments, practices and societal institutions through which they are mediated. While this has centrally to do with markets and prices, we deliberately open the concept to embrace more than economic perspectives. As such competition complements a broadening of analytical attention from the ‘who’, ‘what’ and ‘when’ to include prominently the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of particular land use practices and the question to whom this matters and ought to matter. We suggest that competition is an analytically productive concept, because it does not commit the analyst to a particular epistemological stance. It addresses reflexivity and feed-back, emergence and downward causation, history and response rates—concepts that all carry very different conceptual and analytical connotations in different disciplines. We propose to make these differences productive by putting them alongside each other through the notion of competition. Last not least, the heuristic lens of competition affords the combination of empirical and normative aspects, thus addressing land use practices in material, social and ethical terms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balée, W. L. (2013). Advances in historical ecology. New York City: Columbia University Press.
Barad, K. (1999). Agential Realism. Feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader. New York: Routledge.
Barry, A., & Born, G. (2013). Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences, New York: Routledge.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2, 359–377.
Breckenridge, C. A., Chakrabarty, D., Bhabha, H., & Pollock, S. (2000). Cosmospolitanisms. Public Culture, 12.
Cain, M. L. (2008). Ecology. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
Callon, M. (2012). Framing finance: the boundaries of markets and modern capitalism. Contemporary Sociology-a Journal of Reviews, 41, 665–666.
Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., Van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M., & Mcnie, E. (2011). Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Cumming, G. S., & Cumming, D. H. M., & Redman, C. L. (2006). Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecology and Society, 11.
Durkheim, E., & Lukes, S. (1982). Rules of sociological method, New York: Free Press.
Eakin, H., Defries, R., Kerr, S., Lambin, E. F., Liu, J., Marcotullio, P. J., et al. (2014). Significance of telecoupling for exploration of land use change. In S. Kc & A. Reenberg (Eds.), Rethinking global land use in an urban era. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (Eds.). (2007). Socioecological transitions and global change. Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Friis, C., Nielsen, J. Ø., Otero, I., Haberl, H., Niewöhner, J., & Hostert, P. (2015). From teleconnection to telecoupling: taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science. Journal of Land Use Science, 1–23.
Garrett, R. D., Lambin, E. F., & Naylor, R. L. (2013). Land institutions and supply chain configurations as determinants of soybean planted area and yields in Brazil. Land Use Policy, 31, 385–396.
Grove, R. H. (1995). Green imperialism: colonial expansion, tropical Island Edens and the origins of environmentalism, pp. 1600–1860.
Gutman, G. (2004). Land change science: observing, monitoring and understanding trajectories of change on the earth’s surface. Springer Science & Business Media.
Haberl, H. (2015). Competition for land: a sociometabolic perspective. Ecological Economics, 119, 424–431.
Hacking, I. (2006). Kinds of people: moving targets. London: British Academy Lecture.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hostert, P., Griffiths, P., Linden, S. V. D., & Pflugmacher, D. (2015). Time series analyses in a new era of optical satellite data. In: Kuenzer, C. (Ed.), Remote sensing time series. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hughes, J. (2000). Ecology and historical materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingold, T. (2004). Beyond biology and culture. The meaning of evolution in a relational world. Social Anthropology, 12, 209–221.
Kastner, T., Rivas, M. J. I., Koch, W., & Nonhebel, S. (2012). Global changes in diets and the consequences for land requirements for food. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 6868–6872.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (2009). The synthetic situation: interactionism for a global world. Symbolic Interaction, 32, 61–87.
Knorr-Cetina, K., & Bruegger, U. (2002). Global microstructures: the virtual societies of financial markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 905–950.
Kosec, K., Haider, H. S., Spielman, D. J., & Zaidi, F. (2015). The effects of political competition on rural land: evidence from Pakistan. IFPRI Discussion Paper, 1441, http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/129182.
Krausmann, F., Haberl, H., Schulz, N. B., Erb, K.-H., Darge, E., & Gaube, V. (2003). Land-use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria—Part I: driving forces of land-use change: 1950–1995. Land Use Policy, 20, 1–20.
Krueger, T., Maynard, C., Carr, G., Bruns, A., Mueller, E.N. & Lane, S. (2016). A transdisciplinary account of water research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 3, 369–389. doi:10.1002/wat2.1132.
Lambin, E., & Geist, H. (2007). Causes of land-use and land-cover change. Retrieved from http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/150964.
Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3465–3472.
Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., et al. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11, 261–269.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (2009). Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3, 239–256.
Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor network theory and after, Oxford [England]; Malden, MA, Blackwell/Sociological Review.
Ledford, H. (2015). How to solve the world’s biggest problems. Nature, 525, 308.
Liu, J., Hall, V., Moran, E., Nagendra, H., Swaffield, S.R., & Ii, B. L. T. (2014). Applications of the telecoupling framework to land-change science. In: S. Kc, & A. Reenberg (Eds.), Rethinking global land use in an urban era. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Manson, S. M. (2008). Does scale exist? An epistemological scale continuum for complex human-environment systems. Geoforum, 39, 776–788.
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 416–432.
Martinez-Alier, J. (2002). The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Meyfroidt, P., Lambin, E. F., Erb, K. H., & Hertel, T. W. (2013). Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 438–444.
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
Nielsen, J. Ø., D’haen, S., & Reenberg, A. (2012). Adaptation to climate change as a development project: a case study from Northern Burkina Faso. Climate and Development, 4, 16–25.
O’brien, K. (2010). Responding to environmental change: A new age for human geography? Progress in Human Geography.
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ouma, S., Boeckler, M., & Lindner, P. (2013). Extending the margins of marketization: Frontier regions and the making of agro-export markets in northern Ghana. Geoforum, 48, 225–235.
Palsson, G., Szerszynski, B., Sörlin, S., Marks, J., Avril, B., Crumley, C., et al. (2013). Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science and Policy, 28, 3–13.
Park, R. E. (1915). The city: suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the city environment. American Journal of Sociology, 20, 577–612.
Rabinow, P. (2004). Anthropos today. Reflections on modern equipment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.
Sahlins, M. D., & America, V. O. (1964). Culture and environment: the study of cultural ecology, Voice of America, U.S. Information Agency.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Seto, K. C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C. G., Fragkias, M., Haase, D., Langanke, T., et al. (2012). Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 109, 7687–7692.
Smith, P., Gregory, P. J., Van Vuuren, D., Obersteiner, M., Havlík, P., Rounsevell, M., et al. (2010). Competition for land. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2941–2957.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects—amateurs and professionals in Berkeleys-Museum-of-Vertebrate-Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., De Vries, W., De Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347.
Turner, B. L., Lambin, E. F., & Reenberg, A. (2007). The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 20666–20671.
United Nations (2015). World Population Prospects. The 2015 Revision. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Verburg, P. H., Crossman, N., Ellis, E. C., Heinimann, A., Hostert, P., Mertz, O., Nagendra, H., Sikor, T., Erb, K. -H., Golubiewski, N., Grau, R., Grove, M., Konaté, S., Meyfroidt, P., Parker, D. C., Chowdhury, R. R., Shibata, H., Thomson, A., & Zhen, L., Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system: a global land project perspective. Anthropocene (in press).
Verburg, P. H., Mertz, O., Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H., & Wu, W. (2013). Land system change and food security: towards multi-scale land system solutions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 494–502.
WBGU (2011). Welt im Wandel. Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation, Berlin, Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderung.
Wetzel, D. J. (2013). Soziologie des Wettbewerbs. Eine kultur- und wirtschaftssoziologische Analyse der Marktgesellschaft, Jena, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Young, O. R., Lambin, E. F., Alcock, F., Haberl, H., Karlsson, S. I., Mcconnell, W. J., et al. (2006). A portfolio approach to analyzing complex human-environment interactions: institutions and land change. Ecology and Society, 11, 15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niewöhner, J. et al. (2016). Land Use Competition: Ecological, Economic and Social Perspectives. In: Niewöhner, J., et al. Land Use Competition. Human-Environment Interactions, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33628-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33628-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33626-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33628-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)