Comparison of infrared spectroscopy and laser granulometry as alternative methods to estimate soil aggregate stability in Mediterranean badlands
Introduction
Soil aggregation is a key process in soil structuration, influencing a wide range of soil properties, such as water holding capacity, water availability to plant roots and organic carbon sequestration (Bronick and Lal, 2005, Zhao et al., 2007). The stability of soil aggregates, referring to their resistance to breakdown under disruptive forces, is also a good indicator of soil resistance to erosion (Barthès and Roose, 2002). Surface erosion by water is important in Mediterranean regions (García-Ruiz et al., 2013), exhibiting frequent intense rainfall events (Borga et al., 2014) and the occurrence of badland areas. Badlands refer to patches of the landscape characterized by a dense network of ephemeral ravines incising soft erodible rocks with poorly cohesive soils and minimal vegetation (Gallart et al., 2013). In such context, soil aggregate stability offers a possibility to assess soil erodibility without running expensive and time-consuming field runoff experiments (Le Bissonnais, 1996).
Several methods have been developed to measure soil aggregate stability (Chepil, 1952, Kemper and Rosenau, 1986, Le Bissonnais, 1996, Amezketa, 1999). To allow comparison between studies, a standardized protocol, composed by three disruptive tests accounting for slaking, mechanical breakdown and physico-chemical dispersion was recently proposed (ISO/FDIS, 10930, 2012), from the work of Le Bissonnais (1996) and Le Bissonnais and Arrouays (1997). However this standardized method remains time-consuming. Labor-intensive steps of this method mainly relate to the numerous manual steps, including wetting and several sieving steps (Rawlins et al., 2013). In soils containing more than 10% of coarse soil particles, such as gravels or marly platelets, an additional step of manual removal of stones further increases the labor investment (Erktan et al., 2016). This actually limits the deployment of this method to a high number of field sites, while there is a growing interest in quantifying the variation of aggregate stability and related soil properties both in time (Abiven et al., 2009, Algayer et al., 2014) and space (Rawlins et al., 2015).
To reduce time investment in soil aggregate stability measurements, two main alternative strategies have been explored: the use of (i) laser granulometry (e.g. Bieganowski and Witkowska, 2010) and (ii) visible, near and mid infrared spectroscopies (e.g. Chang et al., 2001, Madari et al., 2006, Gomez et al., 2013).
Laser granulometry (LG) offers the possibility to run quick, easy and reproducible measurements of soil effective particle size distribution (PSD) of a soil sample in circulating water (Arriaga et al., 2006, Ryzak and Bieganowski, 2011, Sochan et al., 2012). Several alternative methods for time-effective soil aggregate stability measurements were developed using this technique (Beuselinck et al., 1999, Bieganowski and Witkowska, 2010, Schomakers et al., 2011, Grangeon et al., 2012, Grangeon et al., 2014). The most recent developments of the LG-based technique for rapid and reproducible soil aggregate stability assessment were conducted by Rawlins et al., 2013, Rawlins et al., 2015. Running continuous PSD measurements, they tracked mean weight diameter (MWD) variations of soil aggregate samples (1–2 mm), progressively disintegrating in circulating water due to hydrodynamic forces and sonication. Soil aggregate stability was assessed by the difference in the continuous size distribution of water stable aggregates and the disaggregated material. The main advantages of the LG-based technique for soil aggregate assessment rely on (i) accounting for a wide range of soil fractions, (ii) tracking soil disintegration by continuous measurements, (iii) limiting the bias related to the operator, and (iv) being less labor-intensive.
Visible, near and mid infrared (Vis, NIR and MIR) spectroscopies have proved to be effective alternative methods to conventional laboratory analyses for assessing several soil properties (Viscarra Rossel et al., 2006), especially biochemical characteristics (O’Rourke and Holden, 2012, Cécillon et al., 2012, Yang et al., 2012). By contrast, studies investigating the prediction of soil structural characteristics are still scant and contradictory (Cécillon et al., 2009, Askari et al., 2015). Nevertheless, recent studies found promising, but still relatively inaccurate results for the prediction of soil aggregate stability using infrared spectroscopy (Madari et al., 2006, Cañasveras et al., 2010, Gomez et al., 2013). Soil aggregate stability is influenced by several soil components, such as soil carbon concentration, calcium carbonates, clays and iron oxydes, which are all well predicted by infrared spectroscopy (Malley et al., 2004, O’Rourke and Holden, 2012, Gomez et al., 2013) and may explain the high potential of this technique to predict soil aggregate stability accurately.
Despite increasing effort in the parallel development of LG and infrared spectroscopy as time and cost-effective methods for determining soil aggregate stability, no study attempted to compare directly these two methods.
The objective of this study was to assess and compare the efficiency of LG and soil infrared spectroscopy (NIR/MIR) as alternative methods to assess soil macro-aggregate stability in Mediterranean badland soils. It was hypothesized that (i) NIR and MIR spectra are suitable for prediction of soil macro-aggregate stability due to their ability to detect key drivers of soil aggregate stabilization, such as soil organic carbon (SOC), clays and carbonates, and that (ii) the disintegration of the [< 1 mm] soil aggregates under stirring and sonication within the LG is correlated to the disintegration of the [3–5 mm] aggregates after rapid immersion in water, constituting the standardized method of soil macro-aggregate stability measurement.
Section snippets
Study site and soil sampling
The soils used in this study originate from Mediterranean badlands in the Southern French Alps, near Digne-les-Bains at the Draix-Bléone Environmental Research Observatory (http://oredraixbleone.irstea.fr/; 44°08′N, 6°20′E). The site is characterized by a Mountainous and Mediterranean climate (Vallauri, 1997), with an annual mean air temperature of 10.3 °C and an annual mean precipitation of 900 mm (Mathys, 2006). Precipitation regime is heterogeneous, with most rainfall concentrating in May and
Results and discussion
Overall, the 75 soil samples collected covered the entire range of soil stability classes, as defined by the international norm ISO/FDIS 10930 (2012), with (a) very unstable class for 8 samples, (b) unstable class for 14 samples, (c) moderately stable class for 15 samples, (d) stable class for 13 samples and (e) very stable class for 15 samples (Table 1; Erktan et al., 2016).
Conclusions
Among the five datasets used for prediction, NIR-DR and MIR-ATR spectral data offered the best prediction model for soil aggregate stability values (RPD = 2.61 and 2.74; R2 = 0.85 and 0.87; misclassification rates = 22% and 28%), and also the best prediction of soil aggregate stability classes. LG-data also provided a satisfying prediction model (RPD = 2.12; R2 = 0.80), but error prediction still needs to be reduced for a routine use. The combination of IR and LG data did not yield satisfying predictive
Acknowledgments
We thank Electricité de France (EDF), Agence de l'eau Rhône, Méditerranée et Corse, Région Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur and European Union (FEDER program “L'Europe s'engage en PACA avec le Fonds Européen de Développement Régional”) for the financial support. We also thank Astrid Morel, Fabien Candy, Sophie Labonne and Thomas Goître for their help in the fieldwork and/or in the laboratory. Finally, this study was made possible by a research grant provided by the University of Grenoble Alpes.
References (56)
- et al.
The effects of organic inputs over time on soil aggregate stability – a literature analysis
Soil Biol. Biochem.
(2009) - et al.
Evaluation of soil structural quality using VIS–NIR spectra
Soil Tillage Res.
(2015) - et al.
Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to runoff and erosion; validation at several levels
Catena
(2002) - et al.
Critical review of chemometric indicators commonly used for assessing the quality of the prediction of soil attributes by NIR spectroscopy
Trends Anal. Chem.
(2010) Improved parametric time warping for proteomics
Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst.
(2010)- et al.
Hydrogeomorphic response to extreme rainfall in headwater systems: flash floods and debris flows
J. Hydrol.
(2014) - et al.
Soil structure and management: a review
Geoderma
(2005) - et al.
Estimation of soil aggregate stability indices in Mediterranean soils by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy
Geoderma
(2010) - et al.
Spectral fingerprinting of soil organic matter composition
Org. Geochem.
(2012) - et al.
Thirty years of studies on badlands, from physical to vegetated approaches. A succinct review
Catena
(2013)
Erosion in Mediterranean landscapes: changes and future challenges
Geomorphology
Laboratory Vis–NIR spectroscopy as an alternative method for estimating the soil aggregate stability indexes of Mediterranean soils
Geoderma
Mid- and near-infrared spectroscopic assessment of soil compositional parameters and structural indices in two Ferralsols
Geoderma
Characterisation of alteration profiles using dynamic penetrometry with variable energy. application to weathered black marls, Draix (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France)
C. R. Géosci.
Erosion quantification in the small marly experimental catchments of Draix (Alpes de Haute Provence, France). Calibration of the ETC rainfall–runoff–erosion model
Catena
Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science
Visible, near-infrared, mid-infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties
Geoderma
Soil properties, crop productivity and irrigation effects on five croplands of Inner Mongolia
Soil Tillage Res.
Short-term dynamics of soil aggregate stability in the field
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
Soil aggregate stability: a review
J. Sustain. Agric.
A fast method for determining soil particle size distribution using a laser instrument
Soil Sci.
hyperSpec: a package to handle hyperspectral data sets in R, R package version 0.98-20150304
Assessment of micro-aggregation using laser diffractometry
Earth Surf. Process. Landf.
Determination of soil aggregate disintegration dynamics using laser diffraction
Clay Miner.
Assessment and monitoring of soil quality using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS)
Eur. J. Soil Sci.
Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy–principal components regression analyses of soil properties
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
Improved rotary sieve for measuring state and stability of dry soil
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
Cited by (15)
Low mobility of CuO and TiO<inf>2</inf> nanoparticles in agricultural soils of contrasting texture and organic matter content
2021, Science of the Total EnvironmentData fusion of visible near-infrared and mid-infrared spectroscopy for rapid estimation of soil aggregate stability indices
2021, Computers and Electronics in AgricultureCitation Excerpt :In respect of the current study as well as that of Shi et al. (2020), a rather strong control of OC on aggregate stability index was observed (0.75 and 0.84 respectively at p > 0.01) with correspondingly good vis-NIR prediction accuracies. MIR model for FW in the present study is considered better than those reported in the literature [i.e. Cañasveras et al. (2010) (R2 = 0.59 and SEV of 0.4 mm for cross-validation) and Erktan et al. (2016) (R2 of 0.45, RMSE of 0.62 mm for cross validation]. The results for the data fusion as well as that of SW for vis-NIR and MIR could not be put into context with other studies as no such studies exist in published literature.
Hyperspectral response and quantitative estimation on soil aggregate characters
2021, CatenaCitation Excerpt :According to previous publications, the relatively good prediction on MWD, MA, MIA and OMA were achieved with Rv2 value of 0.72 (MWD), 0.62 (MA), 0.65 (MIA), 0.43 (OMA) (n = 83) (Cañasveras et al., 2010; Shi et al., 2020), Rv2 = 0.56 (MWD) (n = 113) (Cañasveras et al., 2010; Gomez et al., 2013). Some other studies also indicated the R2 of validation models for MWD, MA, MIA, and OMA were entirely lower than 0.59 (n = 150) (Erktan et al., 2016; Henaka Arachchi et al., 2016; Le Bissonnais, 1996; Yang et al., 2017). The predictive models in our study (n = 199) outperformed above results, and the number and variability of soil samples were probably the main factors to affect model accuracy.