Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic vulnerability factors for impact-based flash flood prediction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social vulnerability explains the sociological and human-dependent circumstances that translate a natural event into a deadly disaster. But, what are the space–time characteristics of vulnerability (i.e., dynamic vulnerability) that influence how people are impacted by a specific natural hazard? This paper performs a critical analysis of previous flood-related human impact and vulnerability studies to better understand and summarize the human-related factors that determine the impacts from flash flood events. The paper is motivated by the hypothesis that the intersection of the spatiotemporal context of the hazard with the distribution of people and their characteristics across space and time reveals different paths of vulnerability and defines the most probable space of an exposed area in terms of deadly impacts. Based on this idea, a conceptual model for assessing vulnerability to flash flooding is developed and presented herein. The most important advance of the current research in comparison with previous efforts in vulnerability assessment is the introduction of the concept of the spatial and temporal variability of vulnerability. This means that the proposed conceptual model does not consider vulnerability as a static synopsis that can be described by a single map, but as an ever-evolving process derived from the interaction of social and physical dynamics. The dynamic perspective of vulnerability is key for the identification of pertinent vulnerability variables to be used for flash flood vulnerability assessment and dynamic mapping, and prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Meteorological Society (2000) Policy statement: prediction and mitigation of flash floods. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81:1338–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MG, Burt TP (eds) (1990) Subsurface runoff. In: Process studies in hillslope hydrology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 365–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley ST, Ashley WS (2008) Flood fatalities in the United States. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:805–818. doi:10.1175/2007JAMC1611.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azar D, Rain D (2007) Identifying population vulnerability to hydrological hazards in San Juan, Puerto Rico. GeoJournal 69(1):23–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards-towards disaster-resilient societies. UNU Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blöschl G, Sivapalan M (1995) Scale issues in hydrological modelling: a review. Hydrol Process 9:251–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohle HG (2001) Vulnerability and criticality: perspectives from social geography. IHDP Update 2:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1978) The environment as hazard. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Calianno M, Ruin I, Gourley JJ (2013) Supplementing flash flood reports with impact classifications. J Hydrol 477:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarasa Belmonte AM, Lopez-Garcia MJ, Soriano-Garcia J (2010) Mapping temporally-variable exposure to flooding in small Mediterranean basins using land-use indicators. Appl Geogr 31(1):136–145

  • Chakraborty J, Montz BE, Tobin GA (2005) Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Nat Hazards Rev 6(1):23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark GE, Moser S, Ratick S, Dow K, Meyer WB, Emani S, Jin W, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Schwarz HE (1998) Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: the case of Revere, MA., USA. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 3(1):59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates L (1999) Flood fatalities in Australia, 1788–1996. Aust Geogr 30:391–408. doi:10.1080/00049189993657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creutin JD, Borga M, Lutoff C, Scolobig A, Ruin I, Créton-Cazanave L (2009) Catchment dynamics and social response during flash floods: the potential of radar rainfall monitoring for warning procedures. Meteorol Appl 16(1):115–125. doi:10.1002/met.128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann As Am Geogr 90:713–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(1):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Webb JJ, Morath D (2009) Social vulnerability to climate variability hazards: a review of the literature. Final Report to Oxfam America, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208

  • Dawson RJ, Peppe R, Wang M (2011) An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management. Nat Hazards 59(1):167–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diakakis M, Deligiannakis G (2013) Vehicle-related flood fatalities in Greece. Environ Hazards. doi:10.1080/17477891.2013.832651

    Google Scholar 

  • Doocy S, Daniels A, Murray S, Kirsch TD (2013) The human impact of floods: a historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Curr. doi:10.1371/currents.dis.f4deb457904936b07c09daa98ee8171a

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek TE (2000) The social factors that constrain human responses to flood warnings. In: Parker DJ (ed) Floods, vol 1. Routledge, London, pp 361–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Duclos P, Vidonne P, Beuf P, Perray P, Stoebner A (1991) Flash flood disaster—Nimes, France, 1988. Eur J Epidemol 7(4):365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enarson E (2007) Chapter 13: identifying and addressing social vulnerabilities. In: Waugh WL, Tierney K (eds) Emergency management: principles and practices for local government, 2nd edn. ICMA Press, Washington DC, pp 257–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Administration (FEMA) (2010) Are you ready? an in-depth guide to citizen preparedness. Available online at http://www.fema.gov/areyouready/preface.shtm

  • Fekete A (2009) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekete A (2010) Assessment of social vulnerability to river flooding. Graduate research series, vol 4, UNU-EHS. Bonn

  • Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein P, Read S, Combs B (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9:127–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FitzGerald G, Du W, Jamal A, Clark M, Hou X (2010) Flood fatalities in contemporary Australia (1997–2008). Emerg Med Australas 22:180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLOODSITE (2005) Task 10: risk to life, LITERATURE REVIEW AND BACKROUND. FLOODSite Report

  • Fothergill A (1998) The neglect of gender in disaster work: an overview of the literature. In: Enarson E, Morrow BH (eds) The gendered terrain of disaster: through women’s eyes. Praeger Publishers, Westport, pp 11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • French J, Ing R, Von Allmen S, Wood R (1983) Mortality from flash floods: a review of National Weather Service reports, 1969–81. Pub Health Rep 98:584–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin GC (2003) Box 1. A systemic synthesis of the relations between vulnerability, hazard, exposure and impact, aimed at policy identification. In: Economic Commission for Latin American and the Caribbean (ECLAC) handbook for estimating the socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters, ECLAC, LC/MEX/G.S., Mexico, DF, pp 2–5

  • Gamow G (1970) My world line: an informal autobiography. Viking Press, New York

  • Gladwin H, Peacock WG (1997) Warning and evacuation: a night for hard houses. In: Peacock WG, Morrow BH, Gladwin H (eds) Hurricane andrew: ethnicity, gender, and the sociology of disasters. International Hurricane Center, Laboratory for Social and Behavioral Research, Miami, FL, pp 52–74

  • Golden L (2001) Flexible work schedules: Which workers get them? Am Behav Sci 44:1157–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruntfest E (1977) What people did during the Big Thompson flood. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Boulder, Colorado, Working Paper No. 32

  • Hägerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Pap Reg Sci Assoc 24(1): 6–21. doi:10.1007/BF01936872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haki Z, Akyuerek Z, Duezguen S (2004) Assessment of social vulnerability using geographic information systems: Pendik, Istanbul case study. In: 7th AGILE conference on geographic information science (Heraklion, Greece, 2004), Middle East Technical University of Ankara, Turkey, pp S413–S423

  • Hanifan LJ (1916) The rural school community center. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 67:130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman SN (2003) Loss of life caused by floods: an overview of mortality statistics for worldwide floods. Delft Cluster report DC1-233-6

  • Jonkman SN (2005) Global perspectives on loss of human life caused by floods. Nat Hazards 34(2):151–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman SN, Kelman I (2005) An analysis of causes and circumstances of flood disaster deaths. Disasters 29(1):75–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman SN, van Gelder PHAJM, Vrijling JK (2002) Loss of life models for sea and river floods. In: Wu et al (eds) Proceedings of flood defence, vol 1. Science Press, New York Ltd., pp 196–206

  • Kienberger S, Blaschke T, Zaidi RZ (2013) A framework for spatio-temporal scales and concepts from different disciplines: the ‘Vulnerability Cube’. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0513-x

    Google Scholar 

  • King D, MacGregor C (2000) Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards. Aust J Emerg Manag 15(3):52–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Perry RW (1991) Understanding evacuation behaviour: an editorial introduction. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 9(2):133–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Perry RW (2004) Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumbroso DM, Tagg A (2011) Evacuation and loss of life modelling to enhance emergency response. Int. Symp. Urban Flood Risk Manag

  • Maples LZ, Tiefenbacher JP (2009) Landscape, development, technology and drivers: the geography of drownings associated with automobiles in Texas floods, 1950–2004. Appl Geogr 29:224–234. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire LC, Ford ES, Okoro CA (2007) Natural disasters and older U.S. adults with disabilities: implications for evacuation. Disasters 31(1):49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz B, Kreibich H, Lall U (2013) Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:53–64. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-53-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mileti D (1995) Factors related to flood warning response. In: Proceedings, United States-Italy research workshop on the hydrometeorology, impacts, and management of extreme floods, Perugia, Italy, National Science Foundation/Italian National Research Council, 4.6. Available online at http://www.engr.colostate.edu/;jsalas/us-italy/papers/46mileti.pdf

  • Montz BE, Gruntfest E (2002) Flash flood mitigation: recommendations for research and applications. Environ Hazards 4:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller A, Reiter J, Weiland U (2011) Assessment of urban vulnerability towards floods using an indicator-based approach—a case study for Santiago de Chile. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:2107–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest S, Tapsell S, Penning-Orwsell E, Viavattene C, Wilson T (2009) Task 10: building models to estimate loss of life for flood events. Produced for FLOODsite, Report number: T10-08-10

  • Ruin I (2007) Conduite à contre-courant. Les pratiques de mobilité dans le Gard: facteur de vulnérabilité aux crues rapides. Thèse de doctorat en géographie, Université Joseph Fourier

  • Ruin I (2010) Conduite à contre-courant et crues rapides, le conflit du quotidien et de l’exceptionnel. Ann Géogr 674:419–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruin I, Lutoff C (2004) Vulnérabilité face aux crues rapidés et mobilites des populations en temps de crise. La Houille Blanche 6:114–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruin I, Gaillard JC, Lutoff C (2007) How to get there? Assessing motorists’ flash flood risk perception on daily itineraries. Environ Hazards 7(8):235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruin I, Creutin JD, Anquetin S, Lutoff C (2008) Human exposure to flash floods–relation between flood parameters and human vulnerability during a storm of September 2002 in Southern France. J Hydrol 361(1):199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruin I, Creutin JD, Anquetin S, Gruntfest E, Lutoff C (2009) Human vulnerability to flash floods: addressing physical exposure. In: Samuels P, Huntington S, Allsop W, Harrop J (eds) Flood risk management: research and practice. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 1005–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruin I, Lutoff C, Boudevillain B, Creutin JD, Anquetin S, Bertran Rojo M, Boissier L, Bonnifait L, Borga M, Colbeau-Justin L, Creton-Cazanave L, Delrieu G, Douvinet J, Gaume E, Gruntfest E, Naulin JP, Payrastre O, Vannier O (2014) Social and hydrological responses to extreme precipitations: an interdisciplinary strategy for postflood investigation. Weather Clim Soc 6(1):135–153. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00009.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan T, Hanes S (2010) NWS Ft. Worth research studies: North Texas flash flood characteristics. NWS Dallas/Ft. Worth WFO

  • Sharif HO, Hossain M, Jackson T, Bin-Shafique S (2012) Person-place-time analysis of motor vehicle fatalities caused by flash floods in Texas. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 3(4):311–323. doi:10.1080/19475705.2011.615343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. Risk, society and policy series. Earthscan Publications, London

  • Smith B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Špitalar M, Gourley JJ, Lutoff C, Kirstetter P, Brilly M, Carr N (2014) Analysis of flash flood parameters and human impacts in the US from 2006 to 2012. J Hydrol 519:863–870. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staes C, Orengo JC, Malilay J, Rullan J, Noji E (1994) Deaths due to flash floods in Puerto Rico, January 1992. Implications for prevention. Int J Epidemiol 23:968–975. doi:10.1093/ije/23.5.968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapsell SM, Penning-Rowsell EC, Tunstall SM, Wilson TL (2002) Vulnerability to flooding: health and social dimensions. Philos Trans R Soc 360(1796):1511–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin GA, Montz BE (1997) Natural hazards: explanation and integration. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BLI, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR) (2004) Living with risk. A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. UN Publications, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinet F, Lumbroso D, Defossez S, Boissier L (2011) A comparative analysis of the loss of life during two recent floods in France: the sea surge caused by the storm Xynthia and the flash flood in Var. Nat Hazards 61(3):1179–1201. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9975-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmi OV, Morss RE (2012) Integrated analysis of societal vulnerability in an extreme precipitation event: a Fort Collins case study. Environ Sci Policy. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Davis I, Cannon T (2003) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Li H (2006) Chapter1: concepts of scale and scaling. In: Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (eds) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology: methods and applications. Springer, Dordrect, pp 3–15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S-Y, Yarnal BM, Fisher A (2002) Vulnerability of coastal communities to sea-level rise: a case study of Cape May County, New Jersey, USA. Clim Res 22:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by a Grant from Labex OSUG@2020 (Investissements d’avenir—ANR10 LABX56, FRANCE). Additional funding for this research was provided by NOAA to the Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies at the University of Oklahoma under contract NA14OAR4830100. The authors wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their contributing and highly constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Ruin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Terti, G., Ruin, I., Anquetin, S. et al. Dynamic vulnerability factors for impact-based flash flood prediction. Nat Hazards 79, 1481–1497 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1910-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1910-8

Keywords

Navigation