Spatial variability of surface properties and estimation of surface fluxes of a savannah

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00061-0Get rights and content

Abstract

During the HAPEX-Sahel experiment in 1992, a data set including atmospheric forcing, soil temperature at several depths, surface fluxes and surface soil moisture from 0 to 15 cm was collected on a degraded fallow savannah over a period of 18 days. The SiSPAT SVAT model was calibrated using this data set to provide a realistic reference set of parameters. The sensitivity of surface fluxes to the specification of surface properties based on this reference set of parameters was quantified focusing on runoff, evapotranspiration and soil moisture at the field scale. Runoff and latent heat flux, predominantly bare soil evaporation, were found to be the most sensitive processes in relation to soil parameters. For transpiration, even with such a sparse vegetation, leaf area index was the most sensitive factor. A stochastic approach was used to analyze the sensitivity of surface fluxes to the spatial variability of surface parameters. For a variation of ±50% of the parameters, no significant bias was obtained between the mean of the stochastic simulations and the 1-D simulation performed with the median values of the parameters. The analysis indicates that the variations of the components of the water budget are linearly related. For larger variations of the parameters, the bias is significant; therefore, simple aggregation rules fail to capture the nonlinearities induced by water transfer into the soil. When diurnal cycles are considered, the standard deviation of bare soil evaporation and surface soil moisture was found to be maximum for the intermediate wetting range. For this period, it would be valuable to parameterize the spatial variability of surface properties into larger scale models. Finally, the SiSPAT model, which solves equations derived from the Richards equation [Richards, L.A., 1931. Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. J. Phys. 1, pp. 318–333.]. for soil water distribution is shown to be very sensitive to the specification of soil parameters. This result would hold for similar models, showing that the Richards equation should be used with caution within large-scale models if a robust estimation of the long- term water budget is to be obtained.

References (56)

  • J.P. Vandervaere et al.

    Estimating hydraulic conductivity of crusted soils using disc infiltrometers and minitensiometers

    J. Hydrol.

    (1997)
  • M. Vauclin et al.

    Hydraulic conductivity measurements of the spatial variability of a loamy soil

    Soil Technol.

    (1994)
  • R. Avissar

    Conceptual aspects of a statistical-dynamical approach to represent landscape subgrid-scale heterogeneities in atmospheric models

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1992)
  • R. Avissar

    Observations of leaf stomatal conductance at the canopy scale: an atmospheric modeling perspective

    Bound. Layer Meteorol.

    (1993)
  • R. Avissar

    Scaling of the land-atmosphere interactions: an atmospheric modelling perspective

  • A. Bégué et al.

    Modélisation de la conductance stomatique de converts végétaux sahéliens-Site Central Ouest, Hapex-Sahel, 1992

  • K.R. Bell et al.

    Analysis of surface moisture variations within large field sites

    Water Resour. Res.

    (1980)
  • I. Brand
  • I. Brand et al.

    A stochastic approach to studying the influence of the spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties on surface fluxes, temperature and humidity

    J. Hydrol.

    (1995)
  • I. Braud et al.

    A Simple Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Transfer model (SiSPAT): development and field verification

    J. Hydrol.

    (1995)
  • R.H. Brooks et al.

    Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media

  • N.T. Burdine

    Relative permeability calculation from size distributions data

    Trans. AIME

    (1953)
  • A.C. Dantas-Antonino

    Modélisation des transferts de masse et de chaleur dans le système sol-plante-atmosphère. Influence de la variabilité spatiale des caractéristiques hydrodynamiques du sol

  • J.W. Deardorff

    Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture with inclusion of a layer of vegetation

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1978)
  • D.A. De Vries

    Thermal properties of soils

  • D.A. De Vries

    Heat transfer in soils

  • D. Entekhabi et al.

    Land surface hydrology parameterization for atmospheric general circulation models including subgrid scale spatial variability

    J. Clim.

    (1989)
  • J.S. Famiglietti et al.

    Evapotranspiration and runoff from large land areas: land surface hydrology for atmospheric General Circulations Models

  • Cited by (24)

    • Assessing the ability of mechanistic volatilization models to simulate soil surface conditions. A study with the Volt'Air model

      2011, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      SiSPAT describes in detail the physics of soil surface heat and water transfers: it particularly solves the coupled heat and water transfer equations and describes the water vapor transfers. It has also shown its ability to simulate water transfers under a wide range of soil water contents, including very dry ones (Boulet et al., 1997, 1999; Braud, 1998). This comparison was performed on a reference scenario built from a dataset obtained in a specific field experiment.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text