Elsevier

Atmospheric Environment

Volume 47, February 2012, Pages 413-420
Atmospheric Environment

Summer/winter variability of the surfactants in aerosols from Grenoble, France

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.040Get rights and content

Abstract

Many atmospheric aerosols seem to contain strong organic surfactants likely to enhance their cloud-forming properties. Yet, few techniques allow for the identification and characterization of these compounds. Recently, we introduced a double extraction method to isolate the surfactant fraction of atmospheric aerosol samples, and evidenced their very low surface tension (≤30 mN m−1). In this work, this analytical procedure was further optimized. In addition to an optimized extraction and a reduction of the analytical time, the improved method led to a high reproducibility in the surface tension curves obtained (shapes and minimal values), illustrated by the low uncertainties on the values, ±10% or less.

The improved method was applied to PM10 aerosols from the urban area of Grenoble, France collected from June 2009 to January 2010. Significant variability was observed between the samples. The minimum surface tension obtained from the summer samples was systematically lower (30 mN m−1) than that of the winter samples (35–45 mN m−1). Sharp transitions in the curves together with the very low surface tensions suggested that the dominating surfactants in the summer samples were biosurfactants, which would be consistent with the high biogenic activity in that season. One group of samples from the winter also displayed sharp transitions, which, together with the slightly higher surface tension, suggested the presence of weaker, possibly man-made, surfactants. A second group of curves from the winter did not display any clear transition but were similar to those of macromolecular surfactants such as polysaccharides or humic substances from wood burning. These surfactants are thus likely to originate from wood burning, the dominating source for aerosols in Grenoble in winter. These observations thus confirm the presence of surfactants from combustion processes in urban aerosols reported by other groups and illustrates the ability of our method to distinguish between different types of surfactants in atmospheric samples.

Graphical abstract

Highlights

► A method to extract the surfactant fraction of atmospheric aerosols was optimized. ► Aerosols from the urban area of Grenoble, France, contain some strong surfactants. ► The surfactant fraction display significant differences between the summer and the winter. ► In summer, the surfactant fraction seems to be controlled by biosurfactants. ► In winter, macromolecular surfactants from combustion seem to have a significant influence.

Introduction

While the thermodynamics of cloud formation is generally well understood, the properties of the aerosol particles responsible for their activation into cloud droplets, or “Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) properties”, are still not completely understood, leading to large uncertainties in the climate budget (Foster et al., 2007). Over 20 years ago, correlations between the surface tension of fog water and its Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM) content provided the first evidences that organic compounds can lower the surface tension, σ, of aerosol particles (Capel et al., 1990). Similar effects were later reported for organic acids and suggested to affect cloud formation at climate scale (Facchini et al., 1999). Establishing a direct link between the presence of surfactants and the CCN properties of aerosol particles is not easy because most techniques to study atmospheric CCN can not measure the surface tension of the particles. However, such a link is suggested by atmospheric observations such as the recent measurements of CCN numbers in the Atlantic Ocean (Good et al., 2010) and Central Germany (Irwin et al., 2010), which were systematically underpredicted by models unless a surface tension of less than 50 mN m−1 was assumed for the aerosol particles. Thus, knowing the surface tension of atmospheric particles or, alternatively, identifying the surfactants and determining their concentrations in aerosol particles appears to be important to predict CCN properties accurately. So far, the only way to perform such measurements is with aerosol filter samples, which are extracted, and the surface tension of the extracts measured with a tensiometer. The first studies using these methods reported surface tensions between 52 mN m−1 (Mircea et al., 2005) and 60 mN m−1 (Capel et al., 1990, Facchini et al., 1999, Facchini et al., 2000, Hitzenberger et al., 2002, Decesari et al., 2005, Mircea et al., 2005). The small amounts of material on the filters made these methods challenging. An additional drawback was that the extraction, usually in water, was not specific to surfactants, leading to mixtures where the contribution of the surfactants was underestimated.

Numerous works tried to identify organic compounds able to lower the surface tension of atmospheric aerosols. In particular, since the work of Facchini et al. (1999) the CCN properties of numerous organic acids were studied in laboratory, such as 3-hydroxybutanoic acid, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, azelaic acid, cis-pinonic acid, oxalic, malonic, maleic, glutaric, citric, malic, succinic, adipic, fulvic, and phthalic acid (Li et al., 1998, Seidl, 2000, Hitzenberger et al., 2002, Tuckermann and Cammenga, 2004, Gaman et al., 2004, Kiss et al., 2005, Hyvarinen et al., 2006, Topping et al., 2007) as well as C8–C12 fatty acids (Prisle et al., 2008, Prisle et al., 2010). Other organic compounds found in aerosols were also investigated, such as levoglucosan (Rosenørn et al., 2006) and Humic-Like Substances (HULIS) (Kiss et al., 2005, Salma et al., 2006, Taraniuk et al., 2007). However, due to their modest surfactant effects or to their limited concentrations in aerosols, these compounds were all concluded to have negligible effects on the surface tension, and thus on the CCN properties, of atmospheric particles (McFiggans et al., 2006). In recent years, we identified a category of organic compounds able to lower the surface tension of solutions to about 30 mN m−1, and for concentrations 5 or 6 orders of magnitude lower than organic acids: “biosurfactants” produced by microorganisms (Ekström et al., 2010). The Köhler curves for these biosurfactants, obtained from surface tension and osmometry measurements, displayed Critical Supersaturation values lower than those for ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride, indicating their better CCN efficiencies (Ekström et al., 2010).

In addition to characterizing standard biosurfactants, Ekström et al. (2010) improved the technique for isolating the surfactant fraction of atmospheric samples by introducing a double extraction procedure. Not only this new method led to complete surface tension curves for atmospheric sample extracts, evidenced by a plateau at large concentration, but it also evidenced the very low surface tension of these extracts, around 30 mN m−1. This was true even for samples from regions such as the Amazonian forest, for which a surface tension of 50 mN m−1 had been previously reported (Mircea et al., 2005). This confirmed that single extraction methods provided only a partial picture of the surfactants in atmospheric aerosols. The very low surface tensions obtained with the double extraction method were attributed to biosurfactants, because they are the only surfactants able to reach such low values, even for trace concentrations (Gautam and Tyagi, 2006).

This new method needed however further characterization and optimization, and application to wider range of atmospheric samples. The objective of the present work was therefore to further optimize this method and apply it to a new type of aerosols: aerosols from an urban area. In a first part, this work presents the investigation of the optimal conditions for each step of the experimental procedure, using both standard surfactants and authentic aerosol samples. In a second part, the uncertainties on the surface tension obtained with the optimized method are estimated. In a third part, the application of this method to aerosol samples from Grenoble, France, is presented.

Section snippets

Standard surfactant solutions

The surfactants used as standards in our work were sodium dodecyl sulfate, rhamnolipid mixtures, and surfactin. Sodium dodecyl sulfate is the most widely used man-made surfactant and thus one of the best characterized. Its lowest surface tension in aqueous mixtures at 25 °C is 35 mN m−1 (Elworthy and Mysels, 1966, Fainerman et al., 2010) and its critical micelle concentration (CMC) 8 mM (Mysels, 1986). Rhamnolipids were also used because they are the first biosurfactants isolated from

Optimization of the extraction method

Several parameters of the procedure described in section 2.3 were studied in order to find the optimal conditions for this procedure. Step 1, the extraction of the filters in water, has been widely used by other groups for a number of applications, such as the determination of Total Organic Carbon, or Ion Chromatography analyses. These previous studies showed that a duration of 2 h for this step was more than sufficient (see for instance Decesari et al., 2006). This step was thus not further

Discussion and conclusion

As shown in Fig. 4a and b, the minimum surface tension obtained for all the samples was low (≤45 mN m−1), and significantly lower than those obtained with single-step extraction methods. While Ekström et al. (2010) had focused on aerosols from rural and remote areas, the present work evidences the presence of strong surfactants in urban aerosols. These results are very consistent with those of Latif and Brimblecombe (2004), which evidenced significant concentrations of surfactants in aerosols

Acknowledgements

Malin Hultberg, SLU, is gratefully acknowledged for providing the rhamnolipid samples; Sanna Ekström is gratefully acknowledged for useful discussions. Most of this project was funded by the Swedish Research council, VR, grant NT – 2006-5066 and FORMAS, grant 2009-228. The sampling at Grenoble “Les Fresnes” is maintained within a program directed by E. Léoz-Garziandia (INERIS; http://www.ineris.fr/), and is performed by the people from ASCOPARG (http://www.atmo-rhonealpes.org/). Both should be

References (48)

  • Y. Zouambia et al.

    Structural characterization and surface activity of hydrophobically functionalized extracted pectins

    Carbohydrate Polymers

    (2009)
  • A. Asa-Awuku et al.

    Investigation of molar volume and surfactant characteristics of water-soluble organic compounds in biomass burning aerosol

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

    (2008)
  • H.E. Ahern et al.

    Fluorescent pseudomonads isolated from Hebridean cloud and rainwater produce biosurfactants but do not cause ice nucleation

    Biogeosciences

    (2007)
  • C. Baduel et al.

    Seasonal variations of concentrations and optical properties of water soluble HULIS collected in urban environments

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

    (2010)
  • A.A. Bodour et al.

    Distribution of biosurfactant-producing bacteria in undisturbed and contaminated arid Southwestern soils

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology

    (2003)
  • P.D. Capel et al.

    Carbon speciation and surface tension of fog

    Environmental Science and Technology

    (1990)
  • D.G. Cooper et al.

    Enhanced production of Surfactin from Bacillus subtilis by continuous product removal and metal cation additions

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology

    (1981)
  • S. Decesari et al.

    Characterization of the organic composition of aerosols from Rondônia, Brazil, during the LBA-SMOCC 2002 experiment and its representation through model compounds

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

    (2006)
  • J.D. Desai et al.

    Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial Potential

    Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews

    (1997)
  • S. Ekström et al.

    A possible role of ground-based microorganisms on cloud formation in the atmosphere

    Biogeosciences

    (2010)
  • M.C. Facchini et al.

    Cloud albedo enhancement by surface-active organic solutes in growing droplets

    Nature

    (1999)
  • O. Favez et al.

    Inter-comparison of source apportionment models for the estimation of wood burning aerosols during wintertime in an Alpine city (Grenoble, France)

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

    (2010)
  • P. Foster et al.

    Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing

  • A.I. Gaman et al.

    Binary homogeneous nucleation in water–succinic acid and water–glutaric acid systems

    Journal of Chemical Physics

    (2004)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Contributions of traffic emissions and new particle formation to the ultrafine particle size distribution in the megacity of Beijing

      2021, Atmospheric Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Newly formed aerosols become climatically important when they reach a size at which they scatter light efficiently, thereby having a direct cooling effect on the climate (Gordon et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017; Nieminen et al., 2018). Some studies indicate that high-temperature conditions promote particle growth and are negatively correlated with relative humidity (RH) (Yu et al., 2017; Stolzenburg et al., 2018; Tiszenkel et al., 2019), while others suggest that coagulation sinks or surface tension could govern the occurrence of NPF (Baduel et al., 2012; Platis et al., 2016; Cai et al., 2017). Therefore, the evolution of preexisting particle concentrations is the main factor that influences the occurrence of NPF events.

    • A preliminary study on pollution characteristics of surfactant substances in fine particles in the Beibu Gulf Region of China

      2021, Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)
      Citation Excerpt :

      The concentration of surfactant substances in PM2.5 is very low, generally less than 1% (Latif and Brimblecombe, 2004; Wahid et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2016), however, simulation results show that surfactant substances can affect the surface properties of PM2.5 (Smoydzin and Von Glasow, 2007; Zelenyuk et al., 2007). For example, Baduel et al. (2012) studied the surface tension of aerosol samples in summer and winter and found that different types of surfactant substances on aerosol surfaces can lead to a change of surface tension during different seasons. Facchini et al. (2000) analyzed the surface tension of aerosols or cloud drops of neutral organic compounds, monocarboxylic acids, dicarboxylic acids, or polycarboxylic acids.

    • The effects of surfactants on the heterogeneous uptake of sulfur dioxide on hematite

      2019, Atmospheric Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Surface active species or surfactants, known as amphiphilic molecules, are important contributors to the total organics found in atmospheric aerosols (Ahmed et al., 2016; Baduel et al., 2012; Feng et al., 2006; Gérard et al., 2016; Gill et al., 1983; Ho et al., 2001; Jaafar et al., 2018; Jimenez et al., 2009; Latif and Brimblecombe, 2004).

    • Monsoonal variations in atmospheric surfactants at different coastal areas of the Malaysian Peninsula

      2016, Marine Pollution Bulletin
      Citation Excerpt :

      This fundamentally impacts climate change through the formation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) (Moore et al., 2011; Westervelt et al., 2012). A seasonal effect is also found to contribute to the quantity of surfactants in the atmosphere, including those in coastal areas (Baduel et al., 2012; Mustaffa et al., 2014; Wahid et al., 2013). The movement of wind over the ocean usually brings a sea breeze containing surfactants to the coastal area (Alsalahi et al., 2014; Nicolotti et al., 2005; Olkowska et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Now at Institut de Recherches sur la Catalyse et l’Environnement de Lyon, CNRS UMR5256 & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, F-69626 Villeurbanne, France.

    View full text