Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Xpert Norovirus and RidaGene Norovirus assays for the detection of noroviruses in clinical fecal specimens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usability and performance of the Xpert Norovirus and RidaGene Norovirus assays for the detection of noroviruses in fecal specimens. Of the 186 stool specimens, 53 (28.5%) were considered true-positive for norovirus (NoV). Of the true-positive specimens, Xpert detected 53 and RidaGene detected 52. The respective sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 94.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 91.0–98.5%] for the Xpert assay, and 98.1% (95% CI, 94.4–100%) and 97.0% (95% CI, 94.1–99.9%) for the RidaGene assay. Positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs) were 88.3% and 100% for the Xpert assay, and 92.9% and 99.2% for the RidaGene assay, respectively. Based on this study, it can be concluded that there were no significant differences (p-value > 0.5) between the results of the Xpert and RidaGene Norovirus assays. We found that both assays are useful for the detection of noroviruses in clinical stool samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruins MJ, Wolfhagen MJ, Schirm J, Ruijs GJ (2010) Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for the detection of norovirus in stool samples. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29(6):741–743. doi:10.1007/s10096-010-0911-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schaub SA, Oshiro RK (2000) Public health concerns about caliciviruses as waterborne contaminants. J Infect Dis 181(Suppl 2):S374–S380. doi:10.1086/315580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Teunis PF, Moe CL, Liu P, Miller SE, Lindesmith L, Baric RS, Le Pendu J, Calderon RL (2008) Norwalk virus: how infectious is it? J Med Virol 80(8):1468–1476. doi:10.1002/jmv.21237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter MJ (2005) Enterically infecting viruses: pathogenicity, transmission and significance for food and waterborne infection. J Appl Microbiol 98:1354–1380. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02635.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Iturriza-Gómara M, Lopman B (2014) Norovirus in healthcare settings. Curr Opin Infect Dis 27(5):437–443. doi:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000094

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartsch SM, Lopman BA, Ozawa S, Hall AJ, Lee BY (2016) Global economic burden of norovirus gastroenteritis. PLoS One 11(4):e0151219. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151219

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rockx B, de Wit M, Vennema H, Vinjé J, de Bruin E, van Duynhoven Y, Koopmans M (2002) Natural history of human calicivirus infection: a prospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 35(3):246–253. doi:10.1086/341408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lopman BA, Reacher MH, Vipond IB, Sarangi J, Brown DW (2004) Clinical manifestation of norovirus gastroenteritis in health care settings. Clin Infect Dis 39(3):318–324. doi:10.1086/421948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Duizer E, Bijkerk P, Rockx B, De Groot A, Twisk F, Koopmans M (2004) Inactivation of caliciviruses. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(8):4538–4543. doi:10.1128/AEM.70.8.4538-4543.2004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel MM, Hall AJ, Vinjé J, Parashar UD (2009) Noroviruses: a comprehensive review. J Clin Virol 44(1):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2008.10.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robilotti E, Deresinski S, Pinsky BA (2015) Norovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev 28(1):134–164. doi:10.1128/CMR.00075-14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirby A, Gurgel RQ, Dove W, Vieira SCF, Cunliffe NA, Cuevas LE (2010) An evaluation of the RIDASCREEN and IDEIA enzyme immunoassays and the RIDAQUICK immunochromatographic test for the detection of norovirus in faecal specimens. J Clin Virol 49(4):254–257. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2010.08.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Richards GP, Watson MA, Meade GK, Hovan GL, Kingsley DH (2012) Resilience of norovirus GII.4 to freezing and thawing: implications for virus infectivity. Food Environ Virol 4(4):192–197. doi:10.1007/s12560-012-9089-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez MD, Langley LC, Buchan BW, Faron ML, Maier M, Templeton K, Walker K, Popowitch EB, Miller MB, Rao A, Liebert UG, Ledeboer NA, Vinjé J, Burnham CAD (2016) Multicenter evaluation of the Xpert Norovirus assay for detection of norovirus genogroups I and II in fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol 54(1):142–147. doi:10.1128/JCM.02361-15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rovida F, Premoli M, Campanini G, Sarasini A, Baldanti F (2016) Evaluation of Xpert® Norovirus assay performance in comparison with real-time RT-PCR in hospitalized adult patients with acute gastroenteritis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 85(4):426–427. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunbar NL, Bruggink LD, Marshall JA (2014) Evaluation of the RIDAGENE real-time PCR assay for the detection of GI and GII norovirus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 79(3):317–321. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.03.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vinjé J (2015) Advances in laboratory methods for detection and typing of norovirus. J Clin Microbiol 53(2):373–381. doi:10.1128/JCM.01535-14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ambert-Balay K, Pothier P (2013) Evaluation of 4 immunochromatographic tests for rapid detection of norovirus in faecal samples. J Clin Virol 56(3):194–198. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2012.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work at Seinäjoki Central Hospital was part of the TUKE 5050 project and funded by TUKE (Research and Development Project of The Hospital District of South Ostrobothnia).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Aho-Laukkanen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aho-Laukkanen, E., Hirvonen, J.J. & Saha, K. Comparison of Xpert Norovirus and RidaGene Norovirus assays for the detection of noroviruses in clinical fecal specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36, 1019–1022 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2884-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2884-5

Keywords

Navigation