Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral cues that great apes use to forage for hidden food

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conducted three studies to examine whether the four great ape species (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) are able to use behavioral experimenter-given cues in an object-choice task. In the subsequent experimental conditions subjects were presented with two eggs, one of which contained food and the other did not. In Study 1 the experimenter examined both eggs by smelling or shaking them, but only made a failed attempt to open (via biting) the egg containing food. In a control condition, the experimenter examined and attempted to open both eggs, but in reverse order to control for stimulus enhancement. The apes significantly preferred the egg that was first examined and then bitten, but had no preference in a baseline condition in which there were no cues. In Study 2, we investigated whether the apes could extend this ability to cues not observed in apes so far (i.e., attempting to pull apart the egg), as well as whether they made this discrimination based on the function of the action the experimenter performed. Subjects significantly preferred eggs presented with this novel cue, but did not prefer eggs presented with a novel but functionally irrelevant action. In Study 3, apes did not interpret human actions as cues to food-location when they already knew that the eggs were empty. Thus, great apes were able to use a variety of experimenter-given cues associated with foraging actions to locate hidden food and thereby were partially sensitive to the general purpose underlying these actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Anderson JR, Montant M, Schmitt D (1996) Rhesus monkeys fail to use gaze direction as an experimenter-given cue in an object-choice task. Behav Process 37:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR, Sallaberry P, Barbier H (1995) Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 49:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon R (1995) A model of physical reasoning in infancy. In: Rovee-Collier C, Lipsitt LP (eds) Adv infancy res, vol 9. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp 305–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth J, Reaux JE, Povinelli DJ (2005) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) use of gaze cues in object-choice tasks: different methods yield different results. Anim Cogn 8:84–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behne T, Carpenter M, Tomasello M (2005) One-year-olds comprehend the communicative intentions behind gestures in a hiding game. Dev Sci 8:492–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog—causal ape. J Comp Psychol 120:38–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnit J (2004) Nonenculturated orangutans’ (Pongo pygmaeus) use of experimenter-given manual and facial cues in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 118:309–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call J (2004) Inferences about the location of food in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus/). J Comp Psychol 118:232–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call J (2006) Descartes’ two errors: reasoning and reflection from a comparative perspective. In: Hurley S, Nudds M (eds) Rational animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 219–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Call J (2006) Apes know that hidden objects can affect the orientation of other objects. Cognition. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.08.004

  • Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M (2000) Cues that chimpanzees do and do not use to find hidden objects. Anim Cogn 3:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Hare BA, Tomasello M (1998) Chimpanzee gaze following in an object-choice task. Anim Cogn 1:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Hare B, Carpenter M, Tomasello M (2004) ‘Unwilling’ versus ‘unable’: chimpanzees’ understanding of human intentional action. Dev Sci 7:488–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Tomasello M (1994) The social learning of tool use by orangutans (P.p.). Hum Evol 9:297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1636–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare BA, Tomasello M (2004) Chimpanzees are more skillful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Anim Behav 68:571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue Y, Inoue E, Itakura S (2004) Use of experimenter-given directional cues by a young white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar). Jpn Psychol Res 46:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itakura S, Agnetta B, Hare B, Tomasello M (1999) Chimpanzee use of human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Dev Sci 2:448–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itakura S, Anderson JR (1996) Learning to use experimenter-given cues during an object-choice task by a capuchin monkey. Cah Psychol Cogn 15:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Itakura S, Tanaka M (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 112:119–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King BJ (1994) The information continuum: social information transfer in monkeys, apes, and hominids. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff AN (1995) Understanding the intentions of others: re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Dev Psychol 31:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi A, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peignot P, Anderson J (1999) Use of experimenter-given manual and facial cues by gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 113:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli DJ, Bierschwale DT, Cech CG (1999) Comprehension of seeing as a referential act in young children, but not juvenile chimpanzees. Br J Dev Psychol 17:37–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premack D, Premack AJ (1983) The mind of an ape. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijksen HD (1978) A field study on Sumatran orang utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii Lesson 1827): ecology, behaviour and conservation. H.Veenman and Zonen, Wageningen

  • Santos LR, Hauser MD, Spelke ES (2001) Recognition and categorization of biologically significant objects by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): the domain of food. Cognition 82:127–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (1999) Emulation learning and cultural learning. Behav Brain Sci 21:703–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M, Call J, Gluckman A (1997) Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. Child Dev 68:1067–1080

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vick S, Anderson JR (2000) Learning and limits of use of eye gaze by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 114(2):200–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vick SJ, Anderson JR (2003) Use of human visual attention cues by olive baboons (Papio anubis) in a competitive task. J Comp Psychol 117:209–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead JM (1986) Development of feeding selectivity in mantled howling monkeys, Alouatta palliata. In: Else JG, Lee PC (eds) Primate ontogeny, cognition and social behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 105–117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. The experiments comply with the current German laws.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Buttelmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buttelmann, D., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Behavioral cues that great apes use to forage for hidden food. Anim Cogn 11, 117–128 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0095-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0095-2

Keywords

Navigation