Skip to main content
Log in

Chimpanzees’ constructional praxis (Pan paniscus, P. troglodytes)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated chimpanzees’ spontaneous spatial constructions with objects and especially their ability to repeat inter-object spatial relations, which is basic to understanding spatial relations at a higher level than perception or recognition. Subjects were six chimpanzees—four chimpanzees and two bonobos—aged 6–21 years, all raised in a human environment from an early age. Only minor species differences, but considerable individual differences were found. The effect of different object samples was assessed through a comparison with a previous study. A common overall chimpanzee pattern was also found. Chimpanzees repeated different types of inter-object spatial relations such as insertion (I), or vertical (V), or next-to (H) relations. However chimpanzees repeated I or V relations with more advanced procedures than when repeating H relations. Moreover, chimpanzees never repeated combined HV relations. Compared with children, chimpanzees showed a specific difficulty in repeating H relations. Repeating H relations is crucial for representing and understanding multiple reciprocal spatial relations between detached elements and for coordinating independent positions in space. Therefore, the chimpanzees’ difficulty indicates a fundamental difference in constructive space in comparison to humans. The findings are discussed in relation to issues of spatial cognition and tool use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayley N (1969) Bayley scales of infant development. Psychological Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett ATD (1996) Do animals have cognitive maps? J Exp Biol 19:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman GE (1982) A search for the origins of equivalence concepts through a microanalysis of block play. In: Forman GE (ed) Action and thought. Academic Press, New York, pp 97–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesell A, Amatruda CS (1947) Developmental diagnosis. Paul B Huber, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Guanella FM (1934) Block building activities of young children. Arch Psychol 174:5–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch ES (ed) (1996) The block book. The National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC), Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CM (2001) Distributed primate cognition: a review. Anim Cogn 4:167–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller H, Greenfield PM (2000) History and future of development in cross-cultural psychology. J Cross-Cultural Psychol 31:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritchevsky M (1988) The elementary spatial functions of the brain. In: Stiles-Davis J, Kritchevsky M, Bellugi U (eds) Spatial cognition: brain bases and development. LEA, Hillsdale, pp 111–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer J (1980) The origins of logic: six to twelve months. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer J (1986) The origins of logic: one to two years. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockman JJ, Ashmead DH (1983) Asynchronies in the development of manual behavior. Adv Infancy Res II:113–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel EW (1973) Chimpanzee spatial memory organization. Science 182:943–945

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1952) The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Potì P (1996) Spatial aspects of spontaneous object grouping in young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Int J Primatol 17:101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Potì P (1997) Logical structures of young chimpanzees’ object grouping. Int J Primatol 18:33–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potì P, Langer J (2001) Spontaneous spatial constructions by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus). Dev Sci 4:474–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potì P, Spinozzi G (1994) Early sensorimotor development in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Physiol 108(1):93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Potì P, Langer J, Savage-Rumbaugh ST, Brakke KE (1999) Spontaneous logicomathematical constructions by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes, P. paniscus). Anim Cogn 2:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli DJ (2000) Folk physics for apes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 189

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh DM (ed) (1977) Language learning by a chimpanzee: the Lana project. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Sevcik RA (1994) Biobehavioral roots of language. In: Wrangham RW, McGrew WC, Heltne PG (eds) Chimpanzee cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 319–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh ES (1986) Ape language: from conditioned response to symbol. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Lewin R (1994) Kanzi, the ape at the brink of the human mind. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Brakke Ke, Hutchins SS (1992) Linguistic development: contrast between coreared Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus. In: Nishida T, McGrew WC, Markler P, Pickford M, de Waal FBM (eds) Topics in primatology, human origins. Tokyo University Press, Tokyo, pp 51–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair H, Stambak M, Lezine I, Rayna S, Verba M (1989) Infants and objects: the creativity of cognitive development. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinozzi G (1993) The development of spontaneous classificatory behavior in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 107:193–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spinozzi G, Natale F, Langer J, Brakke K (1999) Spontaneous class composing behavior by bonobo (Pan paniscus) and common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 2:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles-Davis J (1988) Developmental change in young children’s spatial grouping activity. Dev Psychol 24:522–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman S (1982) Transitions in early representational intelligence: changes over time in children’s production of simple block structures. In: Forman GE (ed) Action and thought. Academic Press, New York, pp 65–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman S (1983) Children’s early thought: developments in classification. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vauclair J, Bard KA (1983) Development of manipulation with objects in ape and human infants. J Human Evol 12:631–645

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vereeken P (1961) Spatial development. Constructive praxia from birth to the age of seven. J.B. Wolters, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Visalberghi E, Tomasello M (1998) Primate causal understanding in the physical and psychological domains. Behav Processes 42:189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotskij LS (1962) Thought and language. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR/FIRB). I wish to thank Kim Bard and an anonymous reviewer for their comments and suggestions that helped greatly improve an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrizia Potì.

About this article

Cite this article

Potì, P. Chimpanzees’ constructional praxis (Pan paniscus, P. troglodytes). Primates 46, 103–113 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-004-0111-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-004-0111-y

Keywords

Navigation