Skip to main content
Log in

Copying results and copying actions in the process of social learning: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is currently much debate about the nature of social learning in chimpanzees. The main question is whether they can copy others’ actions, as opposed to reproducing the environmental effects of these actions using their own preexisting behavioral strategies. In the current study, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens) were shown different demonstrations of how to open a tube—in both cases by a conspecific. In different experimental conditions, demonstrations consisted of (1) action only (the actions necessary to open the tube without actually opening it); (2) end state only (the open tube, without showing any actions); (3) both of these components (in a full demonstration); or (4) neither of these components (in a baseline condition). In the first three conditions subjects saw one of two different ways that the tube could open (break in middle; caps off ends). Subjects’ behavior in each condition was assessed for how often they opened the tube, how often they opened it in the same location as the demonstrator, and how often they copied the demonstrator’s actions or style of opening the tube. Whereas chimpanzees reproduced mainly the environmental results of the demonstrations (emulation), human children often reproduced the demonstrator’s actions (imitation). Because the procedure used was similar in many ways to the procedure that Meltzoff (Dev Psych 31:1, 1995) used to study the understanding of others’ unfulfilled intentions, the implications of these findings with regard to chimpanzees’ understanding of others’ intentions are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that this condition may have also offered some indirect information about results in the form of information about which actions do not produce the desired results.

References

  • Bellagamba F, Tomasello M (1999) Re-enacting intended acts: comparing 12- and 18-month-olds. Infant Behav Dev 22:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugnyar T, Huber L (1997) Push or pull: an experimental study on imitation in marmosets. Anim Behav 54:817–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Carpenter M (2002) Three sources of information in social learning. In: Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv C (eds) Imitation in animals and artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 211–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Carpenter M (2003) On imitation in apes and children. Infanc Aprendiz 26:325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Tomasello M (1994) The social learning of tool use by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Hum Evol 9:297–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Tomasello M (1995) The use of social information in the problem-solving of orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 109:308–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter M, Call J (2002) The chemistry of social learning. Dev Sci 5:23–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter M, Akhtar N, Tomasello M (1998) Fourteen through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behav Dev 21:315–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Custance D, Whiten A, Fredman T (1999) Social learning of an artificial fruit task in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 113:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson RP, Lee A (1999) Imitation and identification in autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40:649–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horner V, Whiten A (2004) Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Anim Cogn (in press)

  • Horowitz AC (2003) Do humans ape? Or do apes human? Imitation and intention in humans (Homo sapiens) and other animals. J Comp Psychol 117:325–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SC, Booth A, O’Hearn K (2001) Inferring the goals of a nonhuman agent. Cogn Dev 16:637–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff AN (1995) Understanding the intentions of others: re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Dev Psychol 31:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Myowa-Yamakoshi M, Matsuzawa T (1999) Factors influencing imitation of manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 113:128–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myowa-Yamakoshi M, Matsuzawa T (2000) Imitation of intentional manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 114:381–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagell K, Olguin R, Tomasello M (1993) Processes of social learning in the tool use of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 107:174–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoinksi TS, Wrate JL, Ure N, Whiten A (2001) Imitative learning by captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) in a simulated food-processing task. J Comp Psychol 115:272–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoinski TS, Whiten A (2003) Social learning by orangutans (Pongo abelii and Pongo pygmaeus) in a simulated food-processing task. J Comp Psychol 117:272–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton JJ (1998) Learning from others’ mistakes: a paradox revisited. Anim Behav 55:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (1996) Do apes ape? In: Heyes CM, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic Press, New York, pp 319–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M, Davis-Dasilva M, Camak L, Bard K (1987) Observational learning of tool-use by young chimpanzees. Hum Evol 2:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Visalberghi E, Fragaszy DM (1990) Do monkeys ape? In: Parker ST, Gibson KR (eds) “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 247–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Want SC, Harris PL (2001) Learning from other people’s mistakes: causal understanding in learning to use a tool. Child Dev 72:431–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten A, Custance DM, Gómez JC, Teixidor P, Bard KA (1996) Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 110:3–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This investigation was supported in part by a grant RR-00165 from the National Center for Research Resources to the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center. The Yerkes Center is fully accredited by the American Association of Laboratory Animal Care. We thank three anonymous referees for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josep Call.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Call, J., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. Copying results and copying actions in the process of social learning: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). Anim Cogn 8, 151–163 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004-0237-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004-0237-8

Keywords

Navigation