Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence for counting in insects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here we investigate the counting ability in honeybees by training them to receive a food reward after they have passed a specific number of landmarks. The distance to the food reward is varied frequently and randomly, whilst keeping the number of intervening landmarks constant. Thus, the bees cannot identify the food reward in terms of its distance from the hive. We find that bees can count up to four objects, when they are encountered sequentially during flight. Furthermore, bees trained in this way are able count novel objects, which they have never previously encountered, thus demonstrating that they are capable of object-independent counting. A further experiment reveals that the counting ability that the bees display in our experiments is primarily sequential in nature. It appears that bees can navigate to food sources by maintaining a running count of prominent landmarks that are passed en route, provided this number does not exceed four.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrillo C, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2007) Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 10:63–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Geiger K (1995) Can honeybees count landmarks? Anim Behav 49:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Kunze J, Geiger K (1995) The influence of landmarks on distance estimation of honeybees. Anim Behav 50:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis H, Pérusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behav Brain Sci 11:561–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S (1999) The number sense: how the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser M (2000) Wild minds: what animals really think. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Esch H, Burns JE (1996) Distance estimation by foraging honeybees. J Exp Biol 199:155–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Metherell BG, Nelson TR, Lanfear SAJ, Synes WS (2006) Not everything that counts can be counted: ants use multiple metrics for a single nest trait. Proc R Soc B 273:165–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 317–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Gelman R (2000) Non-verbal numerical cognition: from the reals to integers. Trends Cogn Sci 7:307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Black CA, Weinbaum SA (2000) How 17-year cicadas keep track of time. Ecol Lett 3:253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killian A, Yaman S, Von Fersen L, Güntürkün O (2003) A bottlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity. Learn Behav 31:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (2006) Grey parrot numerical competence: a review. Anim Cogn 9:377–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts WA, Roberts S, Kit AB (2002) Pigeons presented with sequences of of light flashes use behavior to count but not to time. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 28:137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugani R, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2007) Rudimental numerical competence in 5-day-old domestic chicks (Gallus gallus): identification of ordinal position. J Exp Psychol 33:21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Si A, Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW (2003) honeybee navigation: properties of the visually driven ‘odometer’. J Exp Biol 206:1265–1273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M (1988) Spatial acuity of honeybee vision and its spectral properties. J Comp Physiol A 162:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Altwein M, Tautz J (2000) Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the ‘odometer’. Science 287:851–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Bidwell NJ (1997) Visually mediated odometry in honeybees. J Exp Biol 200:2513–2522

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinerus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian. Anim Cogn 6:105–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vladusich T, Hemmi J, Srinivasan MV, Zeil J (2005) Interactions of visual odometry and landmark guidance during food search in honeybees. J Exp Biol 208:4123–4135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West RE, Young RJ (2002) Do domestic dogs show any evidence of being able to count? Anim Cogn 5:183–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese H (2003) Numbers, language and the human mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Hong Zhu for assistance. Financial support was provided by the Royal Physiographic Society, the Swedish Research council (623-2004-2903) and the ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science (CE0561903).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Dacke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dacke, M., Srinivasan, M.V. Evidence for counting in insects. Anim Cogn 11, 683–689 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0159-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0159-y

Keywords

Navigation