Abstract
A survey on attitudes toward large carnivores was conducted in a representative sample of the Norwegian population (n = 3134). People were asked about the acceptability of carnivores living in remote wilderness, close to where people live, killing livestock, killing pets, or threatening humans. Large differences in acceptability appeared across the five situations. Wolves and bears were less acceptable than lynx and wolverines when observed close to where people live. Negative associations were found between acceptability and lack of personal control, economic loss, and respondents' age. Acceptability was higher among males than among females, and higher among urban than among rural residents. The results showed that general measures of attitudes alone toward large carnivores were of limited value in wildlife management. The situational and social specificity of these attitudes should be given more attention.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen I. and Fishbein F. 1977. Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 84: 888–918.
Bjerke T. and Kaltenborn B.P. 1999. The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 415–421.
Bjerke T. and Kaltenborn B.P. 2000. Holdninger til ulv. En undersøkelse i Hedmark, Østfold, Oslo og Akershus. [Attitudes toward wolves. A survey in Hedmark, Østfold, Oslo and Akershus.] NINA Oppdragsmelding 671: 1–34 (in Norwegian with English abstract).
Bjerke T., Reitan O. and Kellert S.R. 1998. Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway. Society and Natural Resources 11: 169–178.
Bjerke T., Vittersø J. and Kaltenborn B.P. 2000. Locus of control and attitudes toward large carnivores. Psychological Reports 86: 37–46.
Bjerke T., Kaltenborn B.P. and Thrane C. 2001. Sociodemographic correlates of fear-related attitudes toward the wolf (Canis lupus lupus). Fauna Norvegica 21: 35–33.
Bjerke T., Skogen K. and Kaltenborn B.P. 2002. Nordmenns holdninger til store rovpattedyr. Resultater fra en spørreskjemaundersøkelse. [Attitudes toward large carnivores in Norway. Results from a national survey.] NINA Oppdragsmelding 768: 1–42 (in Norwegian with English abstract).
Bright A.D. and Manfredo M.J. 1996. A conceptual model of attitudes toward natural resource issues. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1: 1–21.
Directorate of Nature Management 2003. Web page (May 25): http://www.environment.no/templates/ themepage.aspx?id=2251
Fishbein M. and Ajzen I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
Jambu M. 1991. Exploratory and Multivariate Data Analysis. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
Kaltenborn B.P. and Bjerke T. 2002. The relationship of general life values to attitudes toward large carnivores. Human Ecology Review 9: 55–61.
Karlsson J., Bjärvall A. and Lundvall A. 1999. Svenskarnas installning till varg. [Attitudes toward wolves in Sweden.] Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kellert S.R. 1986. The public and the timber wolf in Minnesota. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 51: 193–200.
Kellert S.R. 1991. Public views of wolf restoration in Michigan. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 6: 152–161.
Kellert S.R., Black M., Rush C.R. and Bath A.J. 1996. Human culture and large carnivore conservation in North America. Conservation Biology 10: 977–990.
Levine G. 1991. A Guide to SPSS for Analysis of Variance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Linnell J.D.C. and Bjerke T. 2002. Frykten for ulven. En tverrfaglig utredning. [English summary - Fear of wolves. An interdisciplinary study.] NINA Oppdragsmelding 722: 1–110.
Lumiaro R. 1998. Suomalaisten suhtautuminen suteen [English summary - Attitude of Finns towards the wolf]. Suomen Riista 44: 43–55.
Norusis M.J. 1994. SPSS Advanced Statistics 6.1. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois.
Pate J., Manfredo M.J., Bright A.D. and Tischbein G. 1996. Coloradans' attitudes toward reintroducing the gray wolf into Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24: 421–428.
Rosenlund L. 2000. Social Structures and Change: Applying Pierre Bourdieu's Approach and Analytic Framework. Working Papers from Stavanger University College 85/2000. Stavanger University College, Stavanger, Norway.
Skogen K. and Haaland K. 2001. En ulvehistorie fra Østfold: samarbeid og konflikter mellom forvaltning, forskning og lokalbefolkning. [Collaborative efforts in wolf management in Østfold, Norway.] NINA Fagrapport 52: 1–51 (in Norwegian with English abstract).
Swenson J.E., Sandegren F., Heim M., Brunberg S., Sørensen O.J., Søderberg A. 1996. Er den skandinaviske bjørnen farlig? [Is the Scandinavian brown bear dangerous?] NINA Oppdragsmelding 404: 1–26 (in Norwegian with English abstract).
Vittersø J., Bjerke T. and Kaltenborn B.P. 1999. Attitudes toward large carnivores among sheep farmers experiencing different degrees of depredation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 4: 20–35.
Williams C.K., Ericsson G. and Heberlein T.A. 2002. A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972-2000). Wildlife Society Bulletin 30: 575–584.
Wilson M.A. 1997. The wolf in Yellowstone: science, symbol, or politics? Deconstructing the conflict between environmentalism and wise use. Society and Natural Resources 10: 453–468.
Zinn H.C., Manfredo M.J., Vaske J.J. and Wittmann K. 1998. Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions. Society and Natural Resources 11: 649–662.
Zinn H.C., Manfredo M.J. and Vaske J.J. 2000. Social psychological bases for stakeholder acceptance capacity. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5: 20–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kleiven, J., Bjerke, T. & Kaltenborn, B.P. Factors influencing the social acceptability of large carnivore behaviours. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 1647–1658 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000029328.81255.38
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000029328.81255.38