Skip to main content
Log in

Global and local spatial landmarks: their role during foraging by Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Locating food and refuge is essential for an animal's survival. However, little is known how mammals navigate under natural conditions and cope with given environmental constraints. In a series of six experiments, I investigated landmark-based navigation in free-ranging Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Squirrels were trained individually to find a baited platform within an array of nine identical platforms and artificial landmarks set up on their territories. After animals learned the location of the food platform in the array, the position of the latter with respect to local artificial, local natural, and global landmarks was manipulated, and the animal's ability to find the food platform was tested. When only positions of local artificial landmarks were changed, squirrels located food with high accuracy. When the location of the array relative to global landmarks was altered, food-finding accuracy decreased but remained significant. In the absence of known global landmarks, the presence of a familiar route and natural local landmarks resulted in significant but not highly accurate performance. Squirrels likely relied on multiple types of cues when orienting towards a food platform. Local landmarks were used only as a secondary mechanism of navigation, and were not attended to when a familiar route and known global landmarks were present. This study provided insights into landmark use by a wild mammal in a natural situation, and it demonstrated that an array of platforms can be employed to investigate landmark-based navigation under such conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alyan S, Jander R (1994) Short-range homing in the house mouse, (Mus musculus) stages in the learning of directions. Anim Behav 48:285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balda RP, Kamil AC, Grim K (1986) Revisits to emptied cache sites by clark nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). Anim Behav 34:1289–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett ATD (1993) Spatial memory in a food storing corvid.1. near tall landmarks are primarily used. J Comp Physiol A-Sens Neural Behav Physiol 173:193–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Biegler R, Morris RGM (1996) Landmark stability: further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning. Q J Exp Psychol Sect B-Comp Physiol Psychol 49:307–345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bingman VP (1998) Spatial representation and homing pigeon navigation. In: Healy S (ed) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck DR (1994) Memory for spatial and local cues a comparison of a storing and a nonstoring species. Anim Learn Behav 22:119–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K (1989) The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 15:366–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Spetch ML (1998) Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. In: Healy S (ed) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Geiger K (1995) Can honey-bees count landmarks. Anim Behav 49:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS, Cartwright BA, Smith BA (1986) Landmark learning and visuospatial memories in gerbils. J Comp Physiol A-Sens Neural Behav Physiol 158:835–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Detling JK (1990) Grassland patch dynamics and herbivore grazing preference following urine deposition. Ecology 71:180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devenport JA, Devenport LD (1994) Spatial navigation in natural habitats by ground-dwelling sciurids. Anim Behav 47:727–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Boag DA (1982) Territoriality in adult female Columbian ground squirrels. Can J Zool 60:1060–1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiset S, Dore FY (1996) Spatial encoding in domestic cats (Felis catus). J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 22:420–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fiset S, Gagnon S, Beaulieu C (2000) Spatial encoding of hidden objects in dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 114:315–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin SJC (1993) How and why sex differences evolve, with spatial ability as a paradigm example. In: Haug M, Whalen RE, Aron C, Olsen KL (ed) The development of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 111–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy SD, Hurly TA (1998) Rufous hummingbirds' (Selasphorus rufus) memory for flowers: patterns or actual spatial locations? J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 24:396–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J, Hurly TA, Healy SD (2001) Rufous hummingbirds' memory for flower location. Anim Behav 61:981–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs LF, Schenk F (2003) Unpacking the cognitive map: the parallel map theory of hippocampal function. Psychol Rev 110:285–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs LF, Shiflett MW (1999) Spatial orientation on a vertical maze in free-ranging fox squirrels (Sciurus niger). J Comp Psychol 113:116–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard B, McNaughton BL (1990) Spatial representation in the rat: conceptual, behavioral, and neurophysiological perspectives. In: Kesner RP, Olton DS (eds) Neurobiology of comparative cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NJ, pp 363–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R, Brandt R, Gumbert A, Komischke B, Kunze J (2000) Two spatial memories for honeybee navigation. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 267:961–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murie JO, Harris MA (1988) Social interactions and dominance relationships between female and male Columbian ground-squirrels. Can J Zool-Rev Can Zool 66:1414–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus P, Pelletier N (2001) Mortality in relation to season, age, sex, and reproduction in Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Can J Zool-Rev Can Zool 79:465–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki K, Kobayashi T (2000) Numerical competence in rats (Rattus norvegicus): Davis and Bradford (1986) extended. J Comp Psychol 114:73–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki S, Augerinos G, Black AH (1980) Stimulus-control of spatial-behavior on the 8–arm maze in rats. Learn Motiv 11:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55:189–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallraff HG (2001) Navigation by homing pigeons: updated perspective. Ethol Ecol Evol 13:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CL, Meck WH (1993) Organizational effects of gonadal hormones induce qualitative differences in visuospatial navigation. In: Haug M,Whalen RE, Aron C, Olsen KL (eds) The development of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Dorothy L. Cheney for her support, helpful discussions of the experiments, and valuable comments on the manuscript. I am thankful to Arthur E. Dunham for his support of the project. I would like to thank Sara J. Shettleworth, Brett M. Gibson, Marcia L. Spetch, Alan C. Kamil, anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the earlier versions of the manuscript, Ken Cheng for helpful discussion of the experiments, and Peter S. Petraitis for suggestions on statistical analysis. Many thanks are due to F. Stephen Dobson for teaching me how to work with the animals, allowing to perform experiments at his study site, logistical support on the field, and comments on the manuscript. I extend my thanks to Morgan King for helping with the platform construction. This research adheres to the legal requirements of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development organization, and the Life and Environmental Sciences Animal Care Committee of the University of Calgary, Canada. This research was partially supported by a National Science Foundation grant to F.S. Dobson (#DEB-0089473)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna N. Vlasak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vlasak, A.N. Global and local spatial landmarks: their role during foraging by Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Anim Cogn 9, 71–80 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-005-0006-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-005-0006-3

Keywords

Navigation