Abstract
Animals can indirectly gather meaningful information about other individuals by eavesdropping on their third-party interactions. In particular, eavesdropping can be used to indirectly attribute a negative or positive valence to an individual and to adjust one’s future behavior towards that individual. Few studies have focused on this ability in nonhuman animals, especially in nonprimate species. Here, we investigated this ability for the first time in domestic horses (Equus caballus) by projecting videos of positive and negative interactions between an unknown human experimenter (a “positive” experimenter or a “negative” experimenter) and an actor horse. The horses reacted emotionally while watching the videos, expressing behavioral (facial expressions and contact-seeking behavior) and physiological (heart rate) cues of positive emotions while watching the positive video and of negative emotions while watching the negative video. This result shows that the horses perceived the content of the videos and suggests an emotional contagion between the actor horse and the subjects. After the videos were projected, the horses took a choice test, facing the positive and negative experimenters in real life. The horses successfully used the interactions seen in the videos to discriminate between the experimenters. They touched the negative experimenter significantly more, which seems counterintuitive but can be interpreted as an appeasement attempt, based on the existing literature. This result suggests that horses can indirectly attribute a valence to a human experimenter by eavesdropping on a previous third-party interaction with a conspecific.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdai J, Miklósi Á (2016) The origin of social evaluation, social eavesdropping, reputation formation, image scoring or what you will. Front Psychol 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01772
Anderson JR, Kuroshima H, Takimoto A, Fujita K (2013) Third-party social evaluation of humans by monkeys. Nat Commun 4:1561–1565. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2495
Aquiloni L, Gherardi F (2010) Crayfish females eavesdrop on fighting males and use smell and sight to recognize the identity of the winner. Anim Behav 79:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.024
Arnold GW, Grassia A (1982) Ethogram of agonistic behaviour for thoroughbred horses. Appl Anim Ethol 8:5–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(82)90129-8
Boissy A, Terlouw C, Le Neindre P (1998) Presence of cues from stressed conspecifics increases reactivity to aversive events in cattle: evidence for the existence of alarm substances in urine. Physiol Behav 63:489–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(97)00466-6
Bonnie KE, Earley RL (2007) Expanding the scope for social information use. Anim Behav 74:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.009
Briefer EF (2018) Vocal contagion of emotions in non-human animals. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 285:20172783. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2783
Briefer EF, Mandel R, Maigrot AL et al (2017) Perception of emotional valence in horse whinnies. Front Zool 14:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-017-0193-1
Bshary R, Grutter AS (2006) Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature 441:975–978. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04755
Cheney DL (2011) Extent and limits of cooperation in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:10902–10909. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100291108
Chijiiwa H, Kuroshima H, Hori Y et al (2015) Dogs avoid people who behave negatively to their owner: third-party affective evaluation. Anim Behav 106:123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.05.018
Christensen JW, Malmkvist J, Nielsen BL, Keeling LJ (2008) Effects of a calm companion on fear reactions in naïve test horses. Equine Vet J 40:46–50. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516408X245171
Cozzi A, Sighieri C, Gazzano A et al (2010) Post-conflict friendly reunion in a permanent group of horses (Equus caballus). Behav Process 85:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.007
Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D et al (2014) Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration. PLoS ONE 9:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092281
Dalla Costa E, Bracci D, Dai F et al (2017) Do different emotional states affect the horse grimace scale score? A pilot study. J Equine Vet Sci 54:114–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2017.03.221
de Waal FBM (2007) Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annu Rev Psychol 59:279–300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625
de Waal FBM (2012) The antiquity of empathy. Science 336:874–876. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220999
do HeitorMar Oom FM, Vicente L (2006) Social relationships in a herd of Sorraia horses. Part II. Factors affecting affiliative relationships and sexual behaviours. Behav Process 73:231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.005
Duranton C, Bedossa T, Gaunet F (2016) When facing an unfamiliar person, pet dogs present social referencing based on their owners’ direction of movement alone. Anim Behav 113:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.004
Earley RL, Dugatkin LA (2002) Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:943–952. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.1973
Edgar JL, Lowe JC, Paul ES, Nicol CJ (2011) Avian maternal response to chick distress. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:3129–3134. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2701
Fagot J (2000) Picture perception in animals. Psychology Press, London
Feinman S, Lewis M (1983) Social referencing at ten months: a second-order effect on infants’ responses to strangers. Child Dev 54:878–887
Freidin E, Putrino N, D’Orazio M, Bentosela M (2013) Dogs’ eavesdropping from people’s reactions in third party interactions. PLoS ONE 8:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079198
Friard O, Gamba M (2016) BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12584
Gleerup KB, Forkman B, Lindegaard C, Andersen PH (2015) An equine pain face. Vet Anaesth Analg 42:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12212
Goumon S, Špinka M (2016) Emotional contagion of distress in young pigs is potentiated by previous exposure to the same stressor. Anim Cogn 19:501–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0950-5
Hatfield E, Cacioppo JT, Rapson RL (1993) Emotional contagion. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2:96–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953
Henry S, Hemery D, Richard MA, Hausberger M (2005) Human-mare relationships and behaviour of foals toward humans. Appl Anim Behav Sci 93:341–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.01.008
Höjesjö J, Andersson P, Engman A, Johnsson JI (2007) Rapid bystander assessment of intrinsic fighting ability: behavioural and heart rate responses in rainbow trout. Anim Behav 74:1743–1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.013
Kavaliers M, Matta R, Choleris E (2017) Mate-choice copying, social information processing, and the roles of oxytocin. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 72:232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.003
Kawai N, Yasue M, Banno T, Ichinohe N (2014) Marmoset monkeys evaluate third-party reciprocity. Biol Lett 10:20140058. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0058
Keeling LJ, Jonare L, Lanneborn L (2009) Investigating horse-human interactions: the effect of a nervous human. Vet J 181:70–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.013
Kimura R (1998) Mutual grooming and preferred associate relationships in a band of free-ranging horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 59:265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00129-9
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Krueger K, Farmer K, Heinze J (2014) The effects of age, rank and neophobia on social learning in horses. Anim Cogn 17:645–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0696-x
Krupenye C, Hare B (2018) Bonobos prefer individuals that hinder others over those that help. Curr Biol 28:280–286.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.061
Lai WS, Yu WC, Liu CY et al (2014) A new method for studying social eavesdropping using male golden hamsters. Physiol Behav 128:202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.029
Lampe JF, Andre J (2012) Cross-modal recognition of human individuals in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 15:623–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0490-1
Lansade L, Nowak R, Lainé AL et al (2018) Facial expression and oxytocin as possible markers of positive emotions in horses. Sci Rep 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32993-z
Malavasi R, Huber L (2016) Evidence of heterospecific referential communication from domestic horses (Equus caballus) to humans. Anim Cogn 19:899–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-0987-0
Marshall-Pescini S, Passalacqua C, Ferrario A et al (2011) Social eavesdropping in the domestic dog. Anim Behav 81:1177–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.029
McGreevy PD, Oddie C, Burton FL, McLean AN (2009) The horse-human dyad: can we align horse training and handling activities with the equid social ethogram? Vet J 181:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.005
McGregor PK (1993) Signalling in territorial systems: a context for individual identification, ranging and eavesdropping. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci 340:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1993.0063
Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM, Boag PT (2002) Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. Science 296:873. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.296.5569.873
Murray L, De Rosnay M, Pearson J et al (2008) Intergenerational transmission of social anxiety: the role of social referencing processes in infancy. Child Dev 79:1049–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01175.x
Nakamura K, Takimoto-Inose A, Hasegawa T (2018) Cross-modal perception of human emotion in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Sci Rep 8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26892-6
Nitzschner M, Melis AP, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2012) Dogs (Canis familiaris) evaluate humans on the basis of direct experiences only. PLoS ONE 7:e46880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046880
Ophir AG, Galef BG (2004) Sexual experience can affect use of public information in mate choice. Anim Behav 68:1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.12.023
Peake TM, Terry AMR, McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T (2001) Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 268:1183–1187. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1648
Proops L, McComb K (2010) Attributing attention: the use of human-given cues by domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 13:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0257-5
Proops L, McComb K (2012) Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus) extends to familiar humans. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:3131–3138. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0626
Proops L, McComb K, Reby D (2009) Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:947–951. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809127105
Proops L, Rayner J, Taylor AM, McComb K (2013) The responses of young domestic horses to human-given cues. PLoS ONE 8:26–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067000
Proops L, Grounds K, Smith AV, McComb K (2018) Animals remember previous facial expressions that specific humans have exhibited. Curr Biol 28:1428–1432.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.035
R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Reimert I, Bolhuis JE, Kemp B, Rodenburg TB (2014) Emotions on the loose: emotional contagion and the role of oxytocin in pigs. Anim Cogn 18:517–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0820-6
Ringhofer M, Yamamoto S (2016) Domestic horses send signals to humans when they face with an unsolvable task. Anim Cogn 20:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1074-x
Ringhofer M, Inoue S, Mendonça RS et al (2017) Comparison of the social systems of primates and feral horses: data from a newly established horse research site on Serra D’Arga, northern Portugal. Primates 58:479–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-017-0614-y
Rørvang MV, Christensen JW (2018) Attenuation of fear through social transmission in groups of same and differently aged horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 209:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.10.003
Rørvang MV, Ahrendt LP, Christensen JW (2015) A trained demonstrator has a calming effect on naïve horses when crossing a novel surface. Appl Anim Behav Sci 171:117–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.008
Rueden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC et al (2017) Image J2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform 18:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z
Russell YI, Call J, Dunbar RIM (2008) Image scoring in great apes. Behav Process 78:108–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2007.10.009
Sankey C, Richard-Yris MA, Henry S et al (2010) Reinforcement as a mediator of the perception of humans by horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 13:753–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0326-9
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Schuetz A, Farmer K, Krueger K (2017) Social learning across species: horses (Equus caballus) learn from humans by observation. Anim Cogn 20:567–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1060-8
Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K et al (2016) Functionally relevant responses to human facial expressions of emotion in the domestic horse (Equus caballus). Biol Lett 12:20150907. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0549
Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K et al (2018) Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations. Sci Rep 8:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30777-z
Špinka M (2012) Social dimension of emotions and its implication for animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 138:170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.005
Stone SM (2009) Human facial discrimination in horses: can they tell us apart? Anim Cogn 13:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0244-x
Subiaul F, Vonk J, Okamoto-Barth S, Barth J (2008) Do chimpanzees learn reputation by observation? Evidence from direct and indirect experience with generous and selfish strangers. Anim Cogn 11:611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0151-6
Trösch M, Cuzol F, Parias C et al (2019a) Horses categorize human emotions cross-modally based on facial expression and non-verbal vocalizations. Animals 9:862–872. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110862
Trösch M, Ringhofer M, Yamamoto S et al (2019b) Horses prefer to solicit a person who previously observed a food-hiding process to access this food: a possible indication of attentional state attribution. Behav Processes 166:103906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103906
Valone TJ (2007) From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0439-6
Wathan J, Proops L, Grounds K, McComb K (2016) Horses discriminate between facial expressions of conspecifics. Sci Rep 6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38322
Yonezawa T, Sato K, Uchida M et al (2017) Presence of contagious yawning in sheep. Anim Sci J 88:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12681
Acknowledgements
We thank Fabrice Reigner and his team for allowing us to use the animals and facilities and for their assistance in taking care of the horses.We also thank Marie-Claire Blache for her help in video editing. Our research was financially supported by the IFCE (Institut Français du Cheval et de l’Equitation).
Funding
This study was funded by IFCE (Institut Français du Cheval et de l’Equitation; grant: Cognition-équitation).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trösch, M., Pellon, S., Cuzol, F. et al. Horses feel emotions when they watch positive and negative horse–human interactions in a video and transpose what they saw to real life. Anim Cogn 23, 643–653 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01369-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01369-0