Skip to main content
Log in

Inter-individual and age differences in exploration, neophobia and problem-solving ability in a Neotropical raptor (Milvago chimango)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animal innovations have far-reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. The occurrence and persistence of an innovation require several processes, including exploration, social and asocial learning, and low neophobia. In addition, the identity of the innovator may determine how these new behaviours are socially transmitted. Taking into account inter-individual and age differences, we investigated three correlates of animal innovation: object exploration, neophobia level and novel problem-solving ability in an opportunistic generalist raptor, the Chimango Caracara (Milvago chimango). Eighteen individuals (7 adults and 11 juveniles) were caught during the non-breeding period and housed in individual cages in outdoor aviaries. Each bird was given three tests: exploration, neophobia and problem-solving. Individuals differed in their response to novel situations both within and between age groups. Most of the juveniles were more explorative and had a lower neophobic response to a strange object than adult birds, but both age groups were able to solve a novel problem when given a food reward. In juveniles, neophobia level and problem-solving performance were inversely related; however, we found no relationship between these behaviours in adults. Exploration did not correlate with neophobia or problem-solving ability for either age group. This research is one of the few studies exploring the inter-individual and age differences in behavioural innovation and their correlates in a bird of prey. The explorative tendency, low neophobia and ability to innovate showed by M. chimango may be advantageous for this generalist and opportunistic raptor and might be some of the factors underlying its ecological success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aprile G, Bertonatti C (1996) Manual sobre rehabilitación de fauna. Bol.Téc. FVSA (Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger SR, Donnay TJ, Walton R (1994) Experimental analysis of diet specialization in the snail kite: the role of behaviorial conservatism. Oecologia 100:54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi LM, Bó MS, Favero M (2005) Dieta del chimango (Milvago chimango) durante el periodo reproductivo en el sudeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Ornitol Neotrop 16:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondi LM, Bó MS, Vassallo AI (2008) Experimental assessment of problem solving in Milvago chimango (Aves: Falconiformes). J Ethol 26:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom PH (1987) Capturing and handling raptors. In: Giron Pendleton BA, Millsap BA, Cline KW, Bird DMV (eds) Raptor management techniques manual. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, pp 99–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Boogert NJ, Reader SM, Laland KN (2006) The relation between social rank, neophobia and individual learning in starlings. Anim Behav 72:1229–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boogert NJ, Reader SM, Hoppitt W, Laland KN (2008) The origin and spread o innovation in starlings. Anim Behav 75:1509–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard J, Goodyer W, Lefebvre L (2007) Social learning and innovation are positively correlated in pigeons (Columba livia). Anim Cogn. doi 10.1007/s10071-006-0064-1

  • Cabezas VM, Schlatter RP (1987) Hábitos y comportamiento alimentario de Milvago chimango Vieillot, 1816 (Aves, Falconidae). An Mus Hist Nat Valp 18:131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, van Oers K, van Noordwijk AJ (2002) Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. Anim Behav 64:929–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drent PJ, van Oers K, van Noordwijk AJ (2003) Realised heritability of personalities in the great tit (Parus major). Proc R Soc Lond B 270:45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeverría AI, Vassallo AI (2008) Novelty responses in a bird assemblage inhabiting an urban area. Ethology 114:616–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeverria AI, Vassallo AI, Isacch JP (2006) Experimental analysis of novelty responses in a bird assemblage inhabiting a suburban marsh. Can J Zool 84:974–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson-Lees J, Christie DA (2001) Raptors of the world. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidler AE, van Oers K, Drent PJ, Kuhn S, Mueller JC, Kempenaers B (2007) Drd4 gene polymorphisms are associated with personality variation in a passerine bird. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 274:1685–1691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraga RM, Salvador SA (1986) Biología reproductiva del chimango (Polyborus chimango). El Hornero 12:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajdon GK (2007) Knowing psychological disposition might help to find innovation. Behav Brain Sci 30:409–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajdon GK, Fijn N, Huber L (2006) Limited spread of innovation in a wild parrot, the Kea (Nestor notabilis). Anim Cogn 9:173–181. doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0018-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R (1983) The role of neophobia in determining the degree of foraging specialization in some migrant warblers. Am Nat 122:444–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R (1984) Differences in feeding neophobia in the tropical migrant wood warblers Dendroica castanea and D. pensylvanica. J Comp Psychol 98:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R (2003) The role of neophobia and neophilia in the development of innovative behaviour of birds. In: Reader SM, Laland KN (eds) Animal Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 175–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R, Mettke-Hofmann C (2001) Ecological aspects of neophobia and neophilia in birds. Curr Ornithol 16:119–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1995) Neophilia and exploration in juvenile common ravens, Corvus corax. Anim Behav 50:695–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber L, Gajdon GK (2006) Technical intelligence in animals: the Kea model. Anim Cogn 9:295–305. doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0033-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katzir G (1982a) Relationship between social structure and response to novelty in captive jackdaws. Corvus monedula L., I. Response to novel space. Behaviour 81:231–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzir G (1982b) Relationship between social structure and response to novelty in captive jackdaws. Corvus monedula L., II. Response to novel palatable food. Behaviour 81:183–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal RL, Coe RL, Laland KN (2005) Age differences in neophilia, exploration, and innovation in family groups of Callitrichid monkeys. Am J Primatol 66:167–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kummer H, Goodall J (1985) Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 308:203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Reader SM (1999a) Foraging innovation in the guppy. Anim Behav 57:331–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Reader SM (1999b) Foraging innovation is inversely related to competitive ability in male but not in female guppies. Behav Ecol 10:270–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Bolhuis J (2003) Positive and negative correlates of feeding innovation in birds. In: Reader SM, Laland KN (eds) Animal innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 39–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Whittle P, Lascaris E, Finkelstein A (1997) Feeding innovation and forebrain size in birds. Anim Behav 53:549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Gaxiola A, Dawson S, Timmermans S, Rozsa L, Kabai P (1998) Feeding innovations and forebrain size in Australasian birds. Behaviour 135:1077–1097

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Juretic N, Nicolakakis N, Timmermans S (2001) Is the link between forebrain size and feeding innovations caused by confounding variables? A study of Australian and North America birds. Anim Cogn 4:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettke-Hofmann C, Winkler H, Leisler B (2002) The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots. Ethology 108:249–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettke-Hofmann C, Ebert C, Schmidt T, Steiger S, Stieb S (2005a) Personality traits in resident and migratory warbler species. Behaviour 142:1357–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettke-Hofmann C, Wink M, Winkler H, Leisler B (2005b) Exploration of environmental changes relates to lifestyle. Behav Ecol 16:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettke-Hofmann C, Rowe KC, Hayden TJ, Canoine V (2006) Effects of experience and object complexity on exploration in garden warblers (Sylia Borin). J Zoo 286:405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison JL, Phillips LM (2000) Nesting habitat and success of the chimango caracara in southern Chile. Wilson Bull 112:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negro JJ, Bustamante J, Milward J, Bird D (1996) Captive fledging American kestrel prefers to play with objects resembling natural prey. Anim Behav 52:707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1979) Population ecology of raptors. T & D Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolakakis N, Lefebvre L (2000) Forebrain size and innovation rate in European birds: feeding, nesting and confounding variables. Behaviour 137:1415–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolakakis N, Sol D, Lefebvre L (2003) Behavioural flexibility predicts species richness in birds, but not extinction risk. Anim Behav 65:445–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overington SE, Cauchard L, Morand-Ferron J, Lefebvre L (2009) Innovation in groups: does the proximity of others facilitate or inhibit performance? Behaviour 146:1543–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer K, Fritz J, Kotrschal K (2002) Hormonal correlates of being an innovative graylag goose, Anser anser. Anim Behav 63:687–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey G, Bastian ML, van Schaik C (2007) Animal innovation defined and operationalized. Behav Brain Sci 30:393–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader SM (2003) Innovation and social learning: individual variation and brain evolution. Anim Biol 53:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader SM, Laland KN (2001) Primate innovation: sex, age and social rank differences. Int J Primatol 22:787–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader SM, Laland KN (2003) Animal innovation: an introduction. In: Reader SM, Laland KN (eds) Animal innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell PA (1973) Relationship between exploratory behaviour and fear: a review. Br J Psychology 64:417–433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaden G (1993) Exploration and neophobia in captive Barn Owls (Tyto alba guttata). Egretta 36:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL (1995) Searching today for tomorrow’s mates. Anim Behav 50:759–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D (2003) Behavioural innovation: a neglected issue in the ecological and evolutionary literature? In: Reader SM, Laland KN (eds) Animal innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oers K, Drent PJ, de Goede P, van Noordwijk AJ (2004) Realized heritability and repeatability of risk-taking behaviour in relation to avian personalities. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 271:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster SJ, Lefebvre L (2001) Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform–passeriform assemblage in Barbados. Anim Behav 62:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White CM, Olsen PD, Cliff LF (1994) New World vultures to Guineafowl. In: Del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Sargalat J (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world 2. Lynx Editions, Barcelona, pp 216–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyles JS, Kunkel JG, Wilson AC (1983) Birds, behavior and anatomical evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 80:4394–4397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our sincere gratitude to Laura Mauco, German Garcia and Ramiro Rodriguez for helping in capturing and managing the raptors and to Natalia Fleitas for taking care of the birds in the zoo. We are grateful to Susana Rosso and Jorge Sanchez for their permission to capture birds in their properties. Juan Pablo Issach and four anonymous reviewers made helpful suggestions on the manuscript. We appreciate the improvements in English usage made by C. Riehl through the Association of Field Ornithologists’ program of editorial assistance and by Liliana Bordoni, Nicolas Lois and Christina Stagnaro. This work was conducted with funds provided by the Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Conicet and PICT 12507. The authors adhered to guidelines for the use of animals in research and to the legal requirements of our country. We had permission to capture and manipulate Milvago chimango: Nº 96 Exp. 22228-100, Dirección Contralor y Uso de Recursos Naturales y Pesqueros, Ministerio de Asuntos Agrarios de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Marina Biondi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biondi, L.M., Bó, M.S. & Vassallo, A.I. Inter-individual and age differences in exploration, neophobia and problem-solving ability in a Neotropical raptor (Milvago chimango). Anim Cogn 13, 701–710 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0319-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0319-8

Keywords

Navigation