Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple landmarks, the encoding of environmental geometry and the spatial logics of a dual brain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of place learning experiments was carried out in young chicks (Gallus gallus) in order to investigate how the geometry of a landmark array and that of a walled enclosure compete when disoriented animals could rely on both of them to re-orient towards the centre of the enclosure. A square-shaped array (four wooden sticks) was placed in the middle of a square-shaped enclosure, the two structures being concentric. Chicks were trained to ground-scratch to search for food hidden in the centre of the enclosure (and the array). To check for effects of array degradation, one, two, three or all landmarks were removed during test trials. Chicks concentrated their searching activity in the central area of the enclosure, but their accuracy was inversely contingent on the number of landmarks removed; moreover, the landmarks still present within the enclosure appeared to influence the shape of the searching patterns. The reduction in the number of landmarks affected the searching strategy of chicks, suggesting that they had focussed mainly on local cues when landmarks were present within the enclosure. When all the landmarks were removed, chicks searched over a larger area, suggesting an absolute encoding of distances from the local cues and less reliance on the relationships provided by the geometry of the enclosure. Under conditions of monocular vision, chicks tended to rely on different strategies to localize the centre on the basis of the eye (and thus the hemisphere) in use, the left hemisphere attending to details of the environment and the right hemisphere attending to the global shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew RJ (1991) The nature of behavioural lateralization in the chick. In: Andrew RJ (ed) Neural and behavioural plasticity: the use of the chick as a model. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 536–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou S, Poucet B (1998) Landmark use by navigating rats (Rattus norvegicus): contrasting geometric and featural information. J Comp Psychol 112:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett ATD (1993) Spatial memory in a food-storing corvid: I. Near tall landmarks are primarily used. J Comp Physiol A 173:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition 23:149–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K (2005) Reflections on geometry and navigation. Connect Sci 17:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Newcombe NS (2005) Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychon Bull Rev 12:1–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS, Cartwright BA, Smith BA (1986) Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils. J Comp Physiol A 158:835–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng C, Rogers LJ (1998a) Organisation of the tectorotundal and SP/IPS-rotundal projections in the chick. J Comp Neurol 394:171–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Della Chiesa A, Speranza M, Tommasi L, Vallortigara G (2006) Spatial cognition based on geometry and landmarks in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Behav Brain Res, in press

  • Deng C, Rogers LJ (1998b) Bilaterally projecting neurons in the two visual pathways of chicks. Brain Res 794:281–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear AJ, Kamil AC (2004) Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) and the effects of goal-landmark distance on overshadowing. J Comp Psychol 118:258–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil AC, Cheng K (2001) Way-finding and landmarks: the multiple-bearings hypothesis. J Exp Biol 204:103–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil AC, Jones JE (1997) Clark's nutcrackers learn geometric relationships among landmarks. Nature 390:276–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil AC, Jones JE (2000) Geometric rule learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process 26:439–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil AC, Goodyear AJ, Cheng K (2001) The use of landmarks by Clark's nutcrackers: first tests of a new model. J Navigat 54:429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JE, Antoniadis E, Shettleworth SJ, Kamil AC (2002) A comparative study of geometric rule learning by nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), pigeons (Columba livia), and jackdaws (Corvus monedula). J Comp Psychol 116:350–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers LJ (1995) The development of brain and behaviour in the chicken. CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovrano VA, Vallortigara G (2006) Dissecting the geometric module: a sense-linkage for metric and landmark information in animals’ spatial reorientation. Psych Sci 17:616--621

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2002) Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cogn 85:B51–B59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2003) Modularity as a fish views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process 29:199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2005) Animals’ use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space. Cogn 97:121–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2006) How fish do geometry in large and small spaces. Anim Cogn, DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0029-4

  • Spetch ML, Cheng K, MacDonald SE, Linkenhoker BA, Kelly DM, Doerkson SR (1997) Use of landmark configuration in pigeons and humans: II. Generality across search tasks. J Comp Psychol 111:114–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spetch ML, Rust TB, Kamil AC, Jones JE (2003) Searching by rules: pigeons’ (Columba livia) landmark-based search according to constant bearing or constant distance. J Comp Psychol 117:123–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi L, Gagliardo A, Andrew RJ, Vallortigara G (2003) Separate processing mechanisms for encoding geometric and landmark information in the avian hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 17:1695–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi L, Vallortigara G (2000) Searching for the center: spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process 26:477–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi L, Vallortigara (2001) Encoding of geometric and landmark information in the left and right hemispheres of the Avian brain. Behav Neurosci 115:602–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi L, Vallortigara (2004) Hemispheric processing of landmark and geometric information in male and female domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Behav Brain Res 155:85–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi L, Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M (1997) Young chickens learn to localize the centre of a spatial environment. J Comp Physiol A 180:567–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara G (2000) Comparative neuropsychology of the dual brain: a stroll through left and right animals’ perceptual worlds. Brain Lang 73:189–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara G (2004) Visual cognition and representation in birds and primates. In: Rogers LJ, Kaplan G (eds) Vertebrate comparative cognition: are primates superior to non-primates? Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp 57–94

  • Vallortigara G (2006) The cognitive chicken: visual and spatial cognition in a non-mammalian brain. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 41–58

  • Vallortigara G, Sovrano VA (2002) Conjoining information from different modules: a comparative perspective. Behav Brain Sci 25:701–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara G, Feruglio M, Sovrano VA (2005) Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. Dev Sci 8:393–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M, Pasti G (1990) Geometric modules in animal's spatial representation: a test with chicks. J Comp Psychol 104:248–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara G, Pagni P, Sovrano VA (2004) Separate geometric and non-geometric modules for spatial reorientation: evidence from a lopsided animal brain. J Cogn Neurosci 16:390–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Huber L (2006) Animal logics: decisions in the absence of human language. Anim Cogn, DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0043-6

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Tommasi.

Additional information

This contribution is part of the special issue “Animal Logics” (Watanabe and Huber 2006).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiesa, A., Pecchia, T., Tommasi, L. et al. Multiple landmarks, the encoding of environmental geometry and the spatial logics of a dual brain. Anim Cogn 9, 281–293 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0050-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0050-7

Keywords

Navigation